Commune · 08302

AntucoAntuco

Compare Antuco with another place
Census population
4,373
313th of 346
Population density
2.2/km²
307th of 346
Average years of schooling
9.3 yrs
170th of 346
Foreign-born share
1.1%
278th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Sought care when ill1st of 332 · Chile 92.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Women among foreign-born14th of 345 · Chile 51.7%57.4%
Sales per firm327th of 342 · Chile 21,706 UF1,174 UF
Of those continuing, women316th of 331 · Chile 49.7%38.7%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF26.9 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF26.9 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 153 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
67.0%
105th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
10.3%
277th of 335
Came from another region
19.9%
88th of 335
Net internal migration
-2,617
-60.3 per 100 residents
Antucothis commune · 6,834another region865 peopleelsewhere in the region448 peopleabroad120 peopleanother region2,111 peopleelsewhere in the region1,819 peopleAntucothis commune · 4,337
Antucothis commune · 6,834another region865 peopleelsewhere in th…448 peopleabroad120 peopleanother region2,111 peopleelsewhere in th…1,819 peopleAntucothis commune · 4,337

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Education1Education2Public administration2Public administration4Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▲13Construction4Construction▼18Transport5Transport▲35Agriculture and fishing6Agriculture and fishing▼16Water and waste7Water and waste▼17Accommodation and food8Accommodation and food▼19Other services9Other services
2005202411Education22Public administration43Retail and wholesale▲134Construction▼185Transport▲356Agriculture and fishing▼167Water and waste▼178Accommodation and food▼199Other services

The ten branches that employ most of Antuco

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

0200400600800projection →6912029 · central2005201520242029
0200400600800projection →6912029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.1% a year observed · 2.8% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

0200 k400 k600 kprojection →439 k2029 · central2005201520242029
0200 k400 k600 kprojection →439 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval9.0% a year observed · 1.6% projected

What Antuco is specialised in

2024 · SII

PuroChile does not compute this for Antuco. A specialisation is a share of this place's formal employment divided by the country's share, and with 601 formal workers here that division is a statement about a handful of people: one worker would move it further than a whole industry moves it in Santiago. The floor is 1,000 workers, and it is a floor rather than a caveat because a spectacular number nobody should read is worse than no number.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
68,763
hectares in holdings
73.0%
of them under a named use
78.6%
of the crop land is irrigated
149
holdings with land here
Woodland 47%Not farmed 27%Pasture 25%Native woodland45%Scrub, barren groundand buildings27%Pasture25%
Woodland 47%Not farmed 27%Pasture 25%Native woodland45%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings27%Pasture25%
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
AntucoChile% of each territory's own population · 4,373 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
4,373
421,38018,480,432313th of 346
Average age
42.3 yrs
38.7 yrs38.1 yrs27th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
131.3
81.879.026th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
2.2/km²
28.0/km²24.7/km²307th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
1,722
152,2156,596,527314th of 346
Dwellings
2,672
186,0887,642,716314th of 346
People per household
2.54
2.772.80294th of 345
Women
51.4%
51.6%51.5%102nd of 346
Men per 100 women
94.5
93.894.3245th of 346
Under 15
15.1%
18.4%17.7%317th of 346
65 and over
19.8%
15.1%14.0%32nd of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
53.8
50.346.589th of 346
One-person households
26.6%
20.9%21.8%55th of 345
Households with children
27.0%
34.5%33.2%311th of 345
Indigenous peoples
6.4%
7.4%11.4%209th of 346
Female-headed households
47.1%
47.5%49.9%206th of 345
Land area
1,955 km²
15,039 km²748,041 km²74th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Antuco30%Arrived since 202070%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Antuco30%Arrived since 2…70%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
1.1%
2.0%8.7%278th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
67.0%
68.5%50.5%105th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
10.3%
14.8%23.9%277th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
19.9%
15.0%17.2%88th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
47
8,4311,608,650312th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
38.7 yrs
32.6 yrs33.5 yrs32nd of 345
Women among foreign-born
57.4%
50.8%51.7%14th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
83.0%
80.0%83.1%90th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
29.8%
39.6%34.4%259th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
1.4%
2.4%10.6%275th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.9 yrs
13.2 yrs12.9 yrs246th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-2,617
-50,9470214th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-60.3
-11.90.0305th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Antuco20%Higher38%Secondary34%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Antuco20%38%Secondary34%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.3 yrs
9.5 yrs10.4 yrs170th of 346
Reached higher education
19.9%
23.2%31.1%190th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
96.6%
99.5%98.6%300th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
57.4%
54.9%55.6%123rd of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
101.9%
101.2%99.8%155th of 346
Literacy rate
96.5%
95.7%97.8%170th of 346
Reached secondary education
38.3%
37.6%36.7%129th of 346
Primary education only
34.3%
30.0%24.1%132nd of 346
Never attended school
3.66%
4.16%3.01%165th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.4 yrs
11.0 yrs12.1 yrs197th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.6 yrs
11.1 yrs12.1 yrs207th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.50%
4.31%2.18%175th of 345
Households lacking schooling
20.3%
24.9%15.1%198th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
54
5,665217,565287th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
0.0%
36.2%33.9%301st of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
8.7%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
61.3%
55.1%67.2%180th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
25.8%
26.2%19.7%81st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
12.9%
18.7%13.1%203rd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
16.1%
9.3%13.0%144th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
38.7%
47.1%49.7%316th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

54left secondary school in 2024
31enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
57.4%continued immediately
61%of those, to a university
16%of those, outside their region

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesNatural sciencesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesNatural sciencesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinary
AntucoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country. The list of individual programmes is withheld here: fewer than 30 of this territory's leavers continued, and a ranking built on that few names people.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

02040602006201520245431
02040602006201520245431
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Antuco's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Antuco against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Antuco94%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Antuco94%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
14.9%
12.9%10.6%53rd of 346
Public health insurance
94.0%
95.0%82.6%130th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
47.8
86.982.5274th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
49
99100294th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
652
54,1671,950,388304th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
62.4 yrs
57.7 yrs56.4 yrs23rd of 346
Disability among 65+
54.1%
44.7%43.0%21st of 346
Difficulty walking
8.16%
6.22%4.92%22nd of 346
Difficulty seeing
6.40%
6.04%4.58%95th of 346
Difficulty hearing
3.38%
2.82%2.16%57th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
3.36%
3.10%2.70%68th of 346
Private health insurance
3.2%
2.8%13.2%165th of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
0.71%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
100.0%
96.5%92.1%1st of 332
Households lacking health access
1.5%
7.6%6.0%294th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
209
36,6081,523,716299th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
6
89336,698304th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.87%
2.44%2.41%160th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
8.1 days
6.6 days6.1 days50th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
13.7
21.219.9265th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
53
104100275th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
11
1,73889,723300th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.3%
4.7%5.9%197th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
25.2
41.248.6275th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
43
81100284th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 33%Heart and lungs 24%Injuries, bones and skin 15%Tumours, blood and metabol… 11%Mind, nerves and senses 8.1%Pregnancy,… 4.8%Infect… 3.8%Digestive system17%Genitourinary system17%Circulatorysystem13%Respiratorysystem11%Injuries and poisoning12%Muscu…1.4%Skin1.0%Cancers andtumours7.2%Endocri…andmetabol…2.9%Nervoussystem4.3%Mental andbehavioural2.4%EyePregnancyandchildbirth4.3%Ill-definedsymptoms2.9%Infectious and…
Digestive and urinary tr… 33%Heart and lungs 24%Injuries, b… 15%Tumou… 11%Mind, nerves … 8.1%Pre… 4.8%Digestivesystem17%Genitourin…system17%Circulatory system13%Respiratory system11%Injuries andpoisoning12%SkinCancersandtumours7.2%Endocrineand…NervoussystemMent…andbeha…Pregnan…andchildbi…Ill-de…sympto…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
23.1%
20.9%17.3%122nd of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
26.9 UF
23.2 UF32.0 UF73rd of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
91.6%
99.6%78.9%235th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
79.1
74.685.6166th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
41.3%
46.6%54.4%314th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
12.0%
11.0%8.6%29th of 345
Self-employed
43.1%
30.7%33.8%55th of 345
Extreme poverty
7.8%
8.0%6.9%169th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
16.9%
16.6%17.7%182nd of 335
Unemployment rate
15.3%
9.6%8.8%27th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 465,039
CLP 539,944CLP 783,124258th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.417
0.4540.488217th of 321
Registered firms
346
31,4251,582,390313th of 346
Annual sales
406,056 UF
209,215,971 UF34,347,683,688 UF321st of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
601
135,7519,699,164320th of 346
Sales per firm
1,174 UF
6,658 UF21,706 UF327th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.2
2.73.9307th of 346
Women among employees
54.2%
36.7%40.6%19th of 345
Independent contractors
258
36,4543,958,269330th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
30.0%
21.2%29.0%127th of 346

Employment by industry

Industry and construction 26%State and social services 23%Trade and logistics 20%Natural resources 19%Other … 6.2%Advanc… 5.0%Construction15%Manufacturi…6.7%Electricityand gas3.3%Publicadministra…8.3%Education8.1%Health7.0%Retail andwholesale12%Accommodati…and food5.2%Transport3.1%Mining10%Agriculture andfishing8.5%Domestic work4.2%Other…Artsand…Admin…servi…2.5%Profes…servic…1.7%
Industry and construc… 26%State and social s… 23%Trade and logi… 20%Natural resou… 19%Oth… 6.2%Adv… 5.0%Construction15%Manufact…6.7%Electr…and gas3.3%Publicadminist…8.3%Education8.1%HealthRetail andwholesale12%Accommodat…and food5.2%Trans…3.1%Mining10%Agriculture andfishing8.5%DomesticworkOther…Admi…serv…Prof…serv…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 65%Managers and professi… 22%Elementary occupations 13%Craft and trades22%Service and sales21%Plant and machineoperators11%Skilledagricultu…5.5%Clericalsupport5.0%Professionals11%Technicians8.3%Manage…2.8%Elementaryoccupations13%
Skilled occupations 65%Managers and professionals 22%Elementary o… 13%Craft andtrades22%Service andsales21%Plant andmachineoperators11%Skilledagricu…5.5%Cleri…suppo…5.0%Professiona…11%Technici…8.3%Elementaryoccupations13%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Antuco99%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Antuco99%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
4.2%
4.9%5.7%289th of 345
Internet access
84.8%
88.0%93.2%254th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.7
3.72.3182nd of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.9
2.81.6149th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
1,701
150,3556,408,172314th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.12%
0.24%0.57%327th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.94%
1.01%1.13%213th of 345
Public water network
82.4%
79.3%92.3%188th of 345
Electricity access
99.4%
99.4%99.6%167th of 345
Detached houses
99.2%
95.5%78.7%93rd of 345
Apartments
0.0%
3.8%19.9%281st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.25%0.23%298th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
35.0%
16.7%11.9%48th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
69
6,860491,904325th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.0%
4.5%7.5%282nd of 345
Renting households
11.6%
16.9%26.2%256th of 345
Owner-occupiers
74.0%
69.7%61.1%58th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
90.2%
72.5%24.4%54th of 345
Commute by public transport
41.7%
29.1%42.1%48th of 345
Walks to work
20.5%
13.2%10.2%102nd of 345
Households with a computer
40.7%
45.4%54.9%201st of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.0
1.51.1124th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
91.9%
93.0%97.0%210th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
99.9%99.9%285th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
77.9%
75.2%89.4%152nd of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.5%
95.5%98.1%238th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
99.5%99.7%276th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
62.0
12.55.931st of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
51.4%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
68.5%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
87.2%96.2%306th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.4
1.00.6112th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.2%
97.4%99.0%191st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.4%
100.0%99.9%298th of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
74.6%
80.1%91.6%186th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
92.0%
98.4%98.5%261st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.4%
99.5%99.8%276th of 345

How people commute

Public transport 42%On foot or by bicycle 26%Private vehicle 26%Public transport42%Walking21%Bicycle5.4%Car25%Other6.4%
Public transport 42%On foot or by… 26%Private vehicle 26%Public transport42%Walking21%Bicycle5.4%Car25%Other6.4%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 74%Rented 12%Provided rent-… 10%Other 4.3%Owned outright73%Rented, withcontract6.7%Rented, nocontract4.9%Provided byfamily7.6%Pro…byemp…Other arrangement
Owned 74%Rented 12%Provided rent… 10%Owned outright73%Rented, withcontract6.7%Rented,nocontract4.9%Provided byfamily7.6%Pro…byemp…Otherarran…4.3%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 91%Firewood90%Gas3.5%Paraffin1.6%Electri…2.4%No…
Wood and biomass 91%Firewood90%ParaffinElectricityNo…
ElectricityNo heatinghover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
82.2%
of the registered voted in the first round
82.1%
voted in the runoff
4,665
registered voters on the roll
7.6%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman33.1%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist66.9%58.3%
AntucoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez26.3%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman20.2%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio0.9%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen15.1%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist29.1%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.3%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.6%1.3%
AntucoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile27.6%30.6%
KCambio por Chile26.2%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido22.2%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente13.9%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas1.8%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista3.6%2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde4.8%0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
AntucoChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Antuco across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading