Región del Maule
Compare Maule with another placeWhere it stands out
Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.Average monthly pay
Where the people here are from
Casen 2024 · 14,597 surveyedChile lengthwise, north on the left. Maule is left unshaded on both maps: it is the place the flows are measured against, not one of them. Darker is a larger flow, and the two maps are scaled separately, because arrivals and departures are different distributions and putting them on one scale would hide the smaller of the two.
Population by sub-territory
Province → CommuneEvery tile is a census count and the areas add up exactly: this is the same sum that produces Maule's own population figure, drawn instead of stated. One block per province, one tile per commune — click a tile to open its profile, or a block's band to lay it out alone.
Employment survey
ENE · INE · 2010–2026Formal employment, 2005–2024
2005–2024 · Source SIIThe ten branches that employ most of Maule
Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.
Dependent workers, projected
Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.
Annual sales in UF, projected
UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.
What Maule is specialised in
2024 · SIIOf the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Maule employs more people in 92 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.
Most over-represented in Maule
Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.
| Activity | Division | Workers here | Times the national share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extracción de madera | Extracción de madera | 3,874 | 9.1× |
| Cultivo de porotos | Cultivo de plantas no perennes | 284 | 8.8× |
| Actividades de hospitales y clínicas públicas | Actividades de hospitales públicos y privados | 13,911 | 7.9× |
| Actividades de envasado y empaquetado | Actividades de servicios de apoyo a las empresas n.c.p. | 7,010 | 7.6× |
| Elaboración y conservación de frutas, legumbres y hortalizas | Elaboración y conservación de frutas, legumbres y hortalizas | 6,705 | 7.2× |
| Elaboración y conservación de carne y productos cárnicos | Elaboración y conservación de carne | 5,044 | 6.8× |
| Cultivo de uva destinada a la producción de vino | Cultivo de plantas perennes | 4,107 | 6.6× |
| Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de hueso | Cultivo de plantas perennes | 50,763 | 6.3× |
| Venta al por mayor de frutas y verduras | Venta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco | 10,409 | 5.7× |
| Actividades de apoyo a la agricultura | Actividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha | 81,395 | 5.6× |
| Cultivo de frutos oleaginosos (incluye el cultivo de aceitunas) | Cultivo de plantas perennes | 2,170 | 5.2× |
| Aserrado y acepilladura de madera | Aserrado y acepilladura de madera | 4,638 | 4.9× |
The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.
Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.
The land and who works it
Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021Foreign trade
Aduanas · January–July 2026What export declarations name as produced in Maule, month by month since January 2025, and what the customs offices seated in the region clear. They are different things: an import declares not where it is used, only where it is cleared.
Month by month
What Maule exports
What leaves, through which office, to where
Where its exports go
- ChinaUS$ 433 million22%
- United StatesUS$ 316 million16%
- BrazilUS$ 105 million5.3%
- MexicoUS$ 95.0 million4.8%
- ColombiaUS$ 87.6 million4.4%
- NetherlandsUS$ 72.9 million3.7%
- JapanUS$ 66.7 million3.4%
- PeruUS$ 62.1 million3.1%
- South KoreaUS$ 62.1 million3.1%
- CanadaUS$ 54.3 million2.7%
- GermanyUS$ 52.9 million2.7%
- United KingdomUS$ 52.4 million2.6%
- OthersUS$ 529 million27%
Through which office
| Customs office | Region of its seat | Exports | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| San Antonio | Valparaíso | US$ 911 million | 46% |
| Valparaíso | Valparaíso | US$ 685 million | 34% |
| Talcahuano | Biobío | US$ 188 million | 9.5% |
| Los Andes | Valparaíso | US$ 129 million | 6.5% |
| Metropolitana | Metropolitana | US$ 66.5 million | 3.3% |
| Arica | Arica y Parinacota | US$ 7.5 million | 0.4% |
| Araucanía | Araucanía | US$ 452 thousand | <0.1% |
| Osorno | Los Lagos | US$ 411 thousand | <0.1% |
| Coquimbo | Coquimbo | US$ 391 thousand | <0.1% |
| Puerto Montt | Los Lagos | US$ 120 thousand | <0.1% |
| Iquique | Tarapacá | US$ 46 thousand | <0.1% |
Its ports and crossings
| Port or crossing | Comuna | Loaded (exports) | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paso Pehuenche | San Clemente | US$ 3 thousand | 100% |
What was loaded or unloaded at the region's ports, airports and crossings, wherever it came from: a port serves regions other than its own. Shares are of what crosses the region's ports. Every port →
An export is assigned to the region its declaration names as the origin of the goods; an import to the office that clears it, and the office to the region of its seat. The office an export leaves through is not its region of origin: much of what one region produces leaves through another's office. Customs agents do not appear because the open databases leave them out. A change is shown only where the same months of the year before added up to at least US$ 1.0 million. All of Chile's foreign trade →
Population and territory
See all →Population pyramid
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Census population | 1,123,008 | 18,480,432 | 4th of 16 | |
Average age | 38.8 yrs | 38.1 yrs | 5th of 16 | |
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15. | 83.9 | 79.0 | 6th of 16 | |
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography. | 37.1/km² | 24.7/km² | 6th of 16 |
See the other 13 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Households | 406,964 | 6,596,527 | 4th of 16 | |
Dwellings | 486,650 | 7,642,716 | 4th of 16 | |
People per household | 2.76 | 2.80 | 9th of 16 | |
Women | 51.4% | 51.5% | 7th of 16 | |
Men per 100 women | 94.4 | 94.3 | 10th of 16 | |
Under 15 | 18.1% | 17.7% | 8th of 16 | |
65 and over | 15.2% | 14.0% | 4th of 16 | |
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age. | 50.1 | 46.5 | 4th of 16 | |
One-person households | 21.3% | 21.8% | 11th of 16 | |
Households with children | 33.6% | 33.2% | 7th of 16 | |
Indigenous peoples | 4.3% | 11.4% | 15th of 16 | |
Female-headed households | 47.8% | 49.9% | 14th of 16 | |
Land area | 30,302 km² | 748,041 km² | 9th of 16 |
Migration
See all →When the migrant population arrived
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign-born share | 3.8% | 8.7% | 12th of 16 | |
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born. | 64.1% | 50.5% | 2nd of 16 | |
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province. | 17.0% | 23.9% | 6th of 16 | |
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region. | 14.3% | 17.2% | 16th of 16 |
See the other 9 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign-born population | 42,349 | 1,608,650 | 8th of 16 | |
Average age, foreign-born | 32.6 yrs | 33.5 yrs | 10th of 16 | |
Women among foreign-born | 49.6% | 51.7% | 16th of 16 | |
Foreign-born of working age | 81.0% | 83.1% | 13th of 16 | |
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later. | 41.5% | 34.4% | 5th of 16 | |
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna. | 4.6% | 10.6% | 12th of 16 | |
Average schooling, foreign-born | 12.9 yrs | 12.9 yrs | 8th of 16 | |
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count. | -107,320 | 0 | 15th of 16 | |
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory. | -9.2 | 0.0 | 13th of 16 |
Education
See all →How far schooling went
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Average years of schooling | 9.5 yrs | 10.4 yrs | 16th of 16 | |
Reached higher education | 23.5% | 31.1% | 16th of 16 | |
School attendance, ages 6-17 | 99.0% | 98.6% | 8th of 16 | |
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes. | 51.6% | 55.6% | 14th of 16 |
See the other 17 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling. | 103.1% | 99.8% | 1st of 16 | |
Literacy rate | 96.0% | 97.8% | 15th of 16 | |
Reached secondary education | 36.4% | 36.7% | 11th of 16 | |
Primary education only | 31.1% | 24.1% | 2nd of 16 | |
Never attended school | 3.69% | 3.01% | 1st of 16 | |
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country. | 10.9 yrs | 12.1 yrs | 15th of 16 | |
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men. | 11.2 yrs | 12.1 yrs | 15th of 16 | |
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write. | 4.00% | 2.18% | 2nd of 16 | |
Households lacking schooling | 22.9% | 15.1% | 1st of 16 | |
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart. | 13,908 | 217,565 | 4th of 16 | |
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks. | 40.8% | 33.9% | 4th of 16 | |
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates. | 4.2% | 3.1% | 7th of 16 | |
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 63.8% | 67.2% | 11th of 16 | |
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 10.2% | 19.7% | 14th of 16 | |
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 26.0% | 13.1% | 1st of 16 | |
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives. | 16.1% | 13.0% | 11th of 16 | |
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue. | 50.4% | 49.7% | 6th of 16 |
The class of 2024
Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school inApproximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.
The ten programmes they enrolled in most
Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.
By field of study
The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.
Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024
Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Maule's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.
Health
See all →The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.
The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.
The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Maule against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.
In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.
Which health system
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Disability prevalence | 12.4% | 10.6% | 3rd of 16 | |
Public health insurance | 91.0% | 82.6% | 2nd of 16 | |
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby. | 74.6 | 82.5 | 12th of 15 | |
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. | 104 | 100 | 6th of 15 |
See the other 21 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
People with a disability | 139,705 | 1,950,388 | 4th of 16 | |
Average age, people with a disability | 57.4 yrs | 56.4 yrs | 5th of 16 | |
Disability among 65+ | 44.5% | 43.0% | 6th of 16 | |
Difficulty walking | 6.12% | 4.92% | 2nd of 16 | |
Difficulty seeing | 5.63% | 4.58% | 3rd of 16 | |
Difficulty hearing | 2.52% | 2.16% | 4th of 16 | |
Difficulty concentrating | 2.96% | 2.70% | 4th of 16 | |
Private health insurance | 4.3% | 13.2% | 16th of 16 | |
No health coverage | 2.48% | 1.98% | 5th of 16 | |
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months. | 94.0% | 92.1% | 5th of 16 | |
Households lacking health access | 5.2% | 6.0% | 12th of 16 | |
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times. | 83,819 | 1,523,716 | 4th of 15 | |
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register. | 2,462 | 36,698 | 4th of 15 | |
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death. | 2.94% | 2.41% | 2nd of 15 | |
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up. | 6.2 days | 6.1 days | 6th of 15 | |
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older. | 21.9 | 19.9 | 5th of 15 | |
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. | 89 | 100 | 12th of 15 | |
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people. | 5,186 | 89,723 | 5th of 16 | |
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour. | 6.2% | 5.9% | 5th of 16 | |
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is. | 46.2 | 48.6 | 9th of 16 | |
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places. | 90 | 100 | 10th of 16 |
What people are hospitalised for
By tumour site
Economy and poverty
See all →| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line. | 24.3% | 17.3% | 2nd of 16 | |
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked. | 21.6 UF | 32.0 UF | 14th of 16 | |
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job. | 100.8% | 78.9% | 4th of 16 | |
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity. | 90.8 | 85.6 | 5th of 16 |
See the other 16 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over. | 49.8% | 54.4% | 13th of 16 | |
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently. | 9.5% | 8.6% | 6th of 16 | |
Self-employed | 32.8% | 33.8% | 13th of 16 | |
Extreme poverty | 10.1% | 6.9% | 3rd of 16 | |
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks. | 13.7% | 17.7% | 14th of 16 | |
Unemployment rate | 8.2% | 8.8% | 12th of 16 | |
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income. | CLP 527,732 | CLP 783,124 | 16th of 16 | |
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide. | 0.442 | 0.488 | 12th of 16 | |
Registered firms | 102,020 | 1,582,390 | 4th of 16 | |
Annual sales | 538,303,187 UF | 34,347,683,688 UF | 7th of 16 | |
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve. | 479,362 | 9,699,164 | 4th of 16 | |
Sales per firm | 5,276 UF | 21,706 UF | 10th of 16 | |
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions. | 2.4 | 3.9 | 11th of 16 | |
Women among employees | 40.2% | 40.6% | 10th of 16 | |
Independent contractors | 114,349 | 3,958,269 | 6th of 16 | |
Contractors as share of workers | 19.3% | 29.0% | 15th of 16 |
Employment by industry
Employment by occupation
Housing and services
See all →House or flat
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Overcrowded dwellings | 5.4% | 5.7% | 6th of 16 | |
Internet access | 89.4% | 93.2% | 14th of 16 | |
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 3.3 | 2.3 | 7th of 16 | |
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 2.8 | 1.6 | 7th of 16 |
See the other 35 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupied dwellings with residents | 399,880 | 6,408,172 | 4th of 16 | |
Critically overcrowded | 0.31% | 0.57% | 11th of 16 | |
Irrecoverable dwellings | 0.86% | 1.13% | 14th of 16 | |
Public water network | 90.2% | 92.3% | 7th of 16 | |
Electricity access | 99.6% | 99.6% | 4th of 16 | |
Detached houses | 94.6% | 78.7% | 4th of 16 | |
Apartments | 4.9% | 19.9% | 12th of 16 | |
Precarious wall materials | 0.14% | 0.23% | 15th of 16 | |
Unoccupied private dwellings | 14.2% | 11.9% | 9th of 16 | |
Quantitative housing deficit | 20,814 | 491,904 | 5th of 16 | |
Housing deficit as share of households | 5.1% | 7.5% | 10th of 16 | |
Renting households | 17.1% | 26.2% | 15th of 16 | |
Owner-occupiers | 70.3% | 61.1% | 1st of 16 | |
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south. | 48.6% | 24.4% | 7th of 16 | |
Commute by public transport | 24.8% | 42.1% | 13th of 16 | |
Walks to work | 10.5% | 10.2% | 12th of 16 | |
Households with a computer | 47.1% | 54.9% | 14th of 16 | |
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 1.3 | 1.1 | 8th of 16 | |
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 96.5% | 97.0% | 7th of 16 | |
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 100.0% | 99.9% | 4th of 16 | |
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 100.0% | 100.0% | 7th of 16 | |
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 79.2% | 89.4% | 11th of 16 | |
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 96.7% | 98.1% | 8th of 16 | |
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 99.9% | 99.7% | 4th of 16 | |
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 7.3 | 5.9 | 9th of 16 | |
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 62.6% | 80.3% | 13th of 16 | |
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 84.2% | 90.0% | 10th of 16 | |
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 95.2% | 96.2% | 8th of 16 | |
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 0.9 | 0.6 | 8th of 16 | |
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 98.7% | 99.0% | 6th of 16 | |
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 100.0% | 99.9% | 7th of 16 | |
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10th of 16 | |
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 81.6% | 91.6% | 12th of 16 | |
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 97.0% | 98.5% | 11th of 16 | |
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 99.9% | 99.8% | 4th of 16 |