Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Average age, foreign-born16th of 16 · Chile 33.5 yrs31.0 yrs
Unoccupied private dwellings1st of 16 · Chile 11.9%23.9%
Sought care when ill16th of 16 · Chile 92.1%87.3%
Continues to higher education1st of 16 · Chile 55.6%63.9%
Women15th of 16 · Chile 51.5%50.4%
Men per 100 women2nd of 16 · Chile 94.398.2
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF31.2 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF31.2 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 9,277 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
60.9%
7th of 16
Came from another commune of the same region
10.9%
12th of 16
Came from another region
20.5%
8th of 16
Net internal migration
-28,581
-8.9 per 100 residents
Atacama316,540 peopleCoquimbo22,064 peopleMetropolitana11,891 peopleAntofagasta9,525 peopleValparaíso6,257 peopleAraucanía3,279 peopleMaule2,191 peopleTarapacá2,057 peopleArica y Parinacota2,040 peopleBiobío2,036 peopleO'Higgins1,249 peopleLos Lagos1,221 peopleabroad24,722 peopleCoquimbo39,688 peopleMetropolitana20,218 peopleAntofagasta11,773 peopleValparaíso7,935 peopleTarapacá4,977 peopleArica y Parinacota2,605 peopleAtacama317,876 people
Atacama316,540 peopleCoquimbo22,064 peopleMetropolitana11,891 peopleAntofagasta9,525 peopleValparaíso6,257 peopleAraucanía3,279 peopleMaule2,191 peopleTarapacá2,057 peopleArica y Parinac…2,040 peopleBiobío2,036 peopleO'Higgins1,249 peopleLos Lagos1,221 peopleabroad24,722 peopleCoquimbo39,688 peopleMetropolitana20,218 peopleAntofagasta11,773 peopleValparaíso7,935 peopleTarapacá4,977 peopleArica y Parinac…2,605 peopleAtacama317,876 people
Loading
Loading

Chile lengthwise, north on the left. Atacama is left unshaded on both maps: it is the place the flows are measured against, not one of them. Darker is a larger flow, and the two maps are scaled separately, because arrivals and departures are different distributions and putting them on one scale would hide the smaller of the two.

Population by sub-territory

Province → Commune
Copiapó 67%Huasco 25%Chañaral 7.9%Copiapó56%Caldera6.3%TierraAmarilla4.0%Vallenar18%Huasco3.1%Freirina2.5%Alto delCarmenChañaral4.1%Diego de Almagro3.8%
Copiapó 67%Huasco 25%Chañ… 7.9%Copiapó56%Calde…6.3%TierraAmari…4.0%Vallenar18%Huasco3.1%Freir…2.5%AltodelCar…Chañaral4.1%Diego deAlmagro
hover a tile for its count; click a group to open it

Every tile is a census count and the areas add up exactly: this is the same sum that produces Atacama's own population figure, drawn instead of stated. One block per province, one tile per commune — click a tile to open its profile, or a block's band to lay it out alone.

Employment survey

ENE · INE · 2010–2026
Unemployment−0.4 pts on a year ago9.1%0510152012.8% · Jun–Aug 2020Employment rate+0.4 pts on a year ago60.1%455055606548.4% · Jun–Aug 2020Participation+0.3 pts on a year ago66.2%505560657055.5% · Jun–Aug 2020201020122014201620182020202220242026
Unemployment−0.4 pts on a year ago9.1%0510152012.8% · Jun–Aug 2020Employment rate+0.4 pts on a year ago60.1%455055606548.4% · Jun–Aug 2020Participation+0.3 pts on a year ago66.2%505560657055.5% · Jun–Aug 20202012201620202024

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Construction1Construction▲112Education2Education▲105Manufacturing3Manufacturing▲27Administrative services4Administrative services▲34Mining5Mining▼16Public administration6Public administration3Retail and wholesale7Retail and wholesale▼410Transport8Transport▲21Agriculture and fishing9Agriculture and fishing▼89Professional services10Professional services▼111Accommodation and food11Accommodation and food8Other services12Other services▼4
2005202421Construction▲1122Education▲1053Manufacturing▲274Administrative services▲345Mining▼166Public administration37Retail and wholesale▼4108Transport▲219Agriculture and fishing▼8910Professional services▼11111Accommodation and food812Other services▼4

The ten branches that employ most of Atacama

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

70 k80 k90 k100 k110 kprojection →96 k2029 · central2005201520242029
70 k80 k90 k100 k110 kprojection →96 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval0.8% a year observed · 0.9% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

80 M130 M180 M230 Mprojection →154 M2029 · central2005201520242029
80 M130 M180 M230 Mprojection →154 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.7% a year observed · -3.0% projected

What Atacama is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Atacama employs more people in 105 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

105
activities it is specialised in
92,155
formal workers
7/16
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Actividades de la administración …Empresas de servicios de ingenier…Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Alquiler de otros tipos de maquin…Extracción de oro y plataEnseñanza superior en universidad…Extracción de minerales de hierroCultivo de uva para mesaIndustrias básicas de hierro y ac…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Fabricación de equipo eléctrico d…Cultivo de porotosFabricación de motores, generador…Venta al por mayor de equipo, par…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Atacama

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Fabricación de productos primarios de metales preciosos y de otros metales no ferrosos n.c.p.Fabricación de productos primarios de metales preciosos y otros metales no ferrosos1,43247.0×
Extracción de oro y plataExtracción de minerales metalíferos no ferrosos, excepto cobre97842.5×
Extracción de minerales de hierroExtracción de minerales de hierro63823.5×
Fabricación de equipo eléctrico de iluminaciónFabricación de equipo eléctrico de iluminación10314.7×
Enseñanza preescolar públicaEnseñanza preescolar, primaria, secundaria científico humanista y técnico profesional5,53314.4×
Cultivo de porotosCultivo de plantas no perennes8714.0×
Cultivo de uva destinada a la producción de pisco y aguardienteCultivo de plantas perennes479.7×
Acabado de productos textilesHilatura, tejedura y acabado de productos textiles818.8×
Reparación de maquinaria metalúrgica, para la minería, extracción de petróleo y para la construcciónReparación de productos elaborados de metal, maquinaria y equipo1,5458.7×
Fabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructuralFabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructural, tanques, depósitos, recipientes de metal4,6307.8×
Industrias básicas de hierro y aceroIndustrias básicas de hierro y acero5027.5×
Extracción y procesamiento de cobreExtracción y procesamiento de cobre3,2357.0×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
4,463,454
hectares in holdings
5.7%
of them under a named use
99.7%
of the crop land is irrigated
1,938
holdings with land here
Not farmed 95%Scrub, barren ground and buildings94%Past…
Not farmed 95%Scrub, barren ground and buildings94%
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Foreign trade

Aduanas · January–July 2026

What export declarations name as produced in Atacama, month by month since January 2025, and what the customs offices seated in the region clear. They are different things: an import declares not where it is used, only where it is cleared.

US$ 7,385 M
exported, January–July 2026 · +60% vs January–July 2025
9.3%
of everything Chile exported
US$ 377 M
cleared in Chañaral · +37% vs January–July 2025
0.7%
of Chile's imports, cleared here

Month by month

05001,0001,500US$ MJan2025FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovs/dDecJan2026FebMarAprMayJunJuls/dAug
05001,0001,500US$ MJ2025FMAMJJASON·DJ2026FMAMJJ·A
Exports from AtacamaImports cleared in its officesshaded: the months the figures above are read over

What Atacama exports

Mineral products 55%Pearls, stones and precious metals 32%Base metals 10%Vegetable … 2.1%Copper ores and concentrates46%Iron oresandconcentrate…9.3%Gold (including gold plated withplatinum) unwrought or in semi-manuf…32%Copper;refined andcopper alloys…10%Grapes;fresh or…Locu…
Mineral products 55%Pearls, stones and precious meta… 32%Base me… 10%Copper ores and concentrates46%Ironoresand…9.3%Gold (including gold platedwith platinum) unwrought or insemi-manuf…32%Copper;refined andcopper…10%Grapes;…
Transport equipmentPlastics and rubberSpecial treatmentsFats and oilsHides and leatherhover a tile for its count; click a group to open it

What leaves, through which office, to where

ChapterCustoms officeDestination26 Ores, slag and ashUS$ 4,087 million · 55%71 Natural, cultured pearls;…US$ 2,372 million · 32%74 Copper and articles there…US$ 750 million · 10%08 Fruit and nuts, edible; p…US$ 131 million · 1.8%12 Oil seeds and oleaginous …US$ 21.5 million · 0.3%27 Mineral fuels, mineral oi…US$ 9.1 million · 0.1%Other chaptersUS$ 15.6 million · 0.2%ChañaralUS$ 3,384 million · 46%AntofagastaUS$ 1,078 million · 15%CoquimboUS$ 83.8 million · 1.1%MetropolitanaUS$ 2,372 million · 32%San AntonioUS$ 384 million · 5.2%Other officesUS$ 82.5 million · 1.1%JapanUS$ 1,312 million · 18%ChinaUS$ 2,376 million · 32%FinlandUS$ 184 million · 2.5%United StatesUS$ 474 million · 6.4%IndiaUS$ 1,008 million · 14%SwitzerlandUS$ 1,087 million · 15%CanadaUS$ 276 million · 3.7%OthersUS$ 667 million · 9.0%
ChapterCustoms officeDestination26 Ores, s…55%71 Natural…32%74 Copper …10%08 Fruit a…1.8%12 Oil see…0.3%27 Mineral…0.1%Other chap…0.2%Chaña…46%Antof…15%Coqui…1.1%Metro…32%San A…5.2%Other…1.1%Japan18%China32%Finland2.5%United Sta…6.4%India14%Switzerland15%Canada3.7%Others9.0%

Where its exports go

  1. ChinaUS$ 2,376 million32%
  2. JapanUS$ 1,312 million18%
  3. SwitzerlandUS$ 1,087 million15%
  4. IndiaUS$ 1,008 million14%
  5. United StatesUS$ 474 million6.4%
  6. CanadaUS$ 276 million3.7%
  7. FinlandUS$ 184 million2.5%
  8. BrazilUS$ 146 million2.0%
  9. SpainUS$ 138 million1.9%
  10. AustraliaUS$ 67.6 million0.9%
  11. TaiwanUS$ 41.2 million0.6%
  12. ItalyUS$ 36.8 million0.5%
  13. OthersUS$ 238 million3.2%

Where what is cleared here comes from

  1. United StatesUS$ 252 million67%
  2. ColombiaUS$ 79.7 million21%
  3. CanadaUS$ 14.8 million3.9%
  4. South KoreaUS$ 12.7 million3.4%
  5. PeruUS$ 10.2 million2.7%
  6. BulgariaUS$ 3.6 million1.0%
  7. BelgiumUS$ 2.6 million0.7%
  8. JapanUS$ 1.7 million0.5%
  9. SpainUS$ 104 thousand<0.1%
  10. ChinaUS$ 3 thousand<0.1%
  11. OthersUS$ 3 thousand<0.1%

Through which office

Customs officeRegion of its seatExports%Imports%
ChañaralAtacamaUS$ 3,384 million46%US$ 377 million100%
MetropolitanaMetropolitanaUS$ 2,372 million32%——
AntofagastaAntofagastaUS$ 1,078 million15%——
San AntonioValparaísoUS$ 384 million5.2%——
CoquimboCoquimboUS$ 83.8 million1.1%——
ValparaísoValparaísoUS$ 71.7 million1.0%——
TalcahuanoBiobíoUS$ 4.7 million0.1%——
Los AndesValparaísoUS$ 3.6 million<0.1%——
AricaArica y ParinacotaUS$ 1.4 million<0.1%——
IquiqueTarapacáUS$ 1.0 million<0.1%——
AraucaníaAraucaníaUS$ 76 thousand<0.1%——

Its ports and crossings

Port or crossingComunaLoaded (exports)%Unloaded (imports)%
CalderaCalderaUS$ 2,552 million74%US$ 223 million58%
Chañaral / BarquitoChañaralUS$ 516 million15%US$ 58.5 million15%
Huasco / GuacoldaHuascoUS$ 348 million10%US$ 100 million26%
San FranciscoCopiapóUS$ 14.0 million0.4%US$ 55 thousand<0.1%

What was loaded or unloaded at the region's ports, airports and crossings, wherever it came from: a port serves regions other than its own. Shares are of what crosses the region's ports. Every port →

What its offices clear most

  1. Petroleum oils and oils from bituminous minerals, not crude; preparations n.e.c…US$ 258 million69%
  2. Coal; briquettes, ovoids and similar solid fuels manufactured from coalUS$ 100 million27%
  3. Sulphuric acid; oleumUS$ 18.2 million4.8%
  4. Twine, cordage, ropes and cables, whether or not plaited or braided; whether or…US$ 6 thousand<0.1%

An export is assigned to the region its declaration names as the origin of the goods; an import to the office that clears it, and the office to the region of its seat. The office an export leaves through is not its region of origin: much of what one region produces leaves through another's office. Customs agents do not appear because the open databases leave them out. A change is shown only where the same months of the year before added up to at least US$ 1.0 million. All of Chile's foreign trade →

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
AtacamaChile% of each territory's own population · 299,180 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Census population
299,180
18,480,43213th of 16
Average age
36.8 yrs
38.1 yrs13th of 16
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
63.7
79.014th of 16
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
4.0/km²
24.7/km²14th of 16
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Households
103,057
6,596,52713th of 16
Dwellings
139,531
7,642,71613th of 16
People per household
2.90
2.804th of 16
Women
50.4%
51.5%15th of 16
Men per 100 women
98.2
94.32nd of 16
Under 15
19.8%
17.7%2nd of 16
65 and over
12.6%
14.0%14th of 16
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
47.8
46.59th of 16
One-person households
21.4%
21.8%10th of 16
Households with children
37.2%
33.2%4th of 16
Indigenous peoples
25.6%
11.4%5th of 16
Female-headed households
48.8%
49.9%11th of 16
Land area
75,705 km²
748,041 km²4th of 16

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Atacama42%Arrived since 202058%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Atacama42%Arrived since 202058%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Foreign-born share
8.4%
8.7%5th of 16
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
60.9%
50.5%7th of 16
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
10.9%
23.9%12th of 16
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
20.5%
17.2%8th of 16
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Foreign-born population
25,167
1,608,65011th of 16
Average age, foreign-born
31.0 yrs
33.5 yrs16th of 16
Women among foreign-born
52.5%
51.7%5th of 16
Foreign-born of working age
81.3%
83.1%10th of 16
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
41.8%
34.4%4th of 16
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
10.1%
10.6%5th of 16
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.8 yrs
12.9 yrs13th of 16
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-28,581
010th of 16
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-8.9
0.012th of 16

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Atacama26%Higher41%Secondary25%Primary only5.3%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Atacama26%Higher41%Secondary25%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.9 yrs
10.4 yrs9th of 16
Reached higher education
25.5%
31.1%11th of 16
School attendance, ages 6-17
98.1%
98.6%15th of 16
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
63.9%
55.6%1st of 16
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.3%
99.8%9th of 16
Literacy rate
98.2%
97.8%7th of 16
Reached secondary education
40.9%
36.7%3rd of 16
Primary education only
25.0%
24.1%10th of 16
Never attended school
3.21%
3.01%6th of 16
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
11.8 yrs
12.1 yrs9th of 16
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.8 yrs
12.1 yrs9th of 16
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.83%
2.18%10th of 16
Households lacking schooling
15.9%
15.1%9th of 16
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
4,119
217,56513th of 16
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
49.9%
33.9%2nd of 16
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
1.1%
3.1%13th of 16
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
66.3%
67.2%10th of 16
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
15.0%
19.7%11th of 16
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
18.7%
13.1%6th of 16
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
33.8%
13.0%3rd of 16
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
49.5%
49.7%12th of 16

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

4,119left secondary school in 2024
2,633enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
63.9%continued immediately
66%of those, to a university
34%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoIngenieria Civil IndustrialTecnico en EnfermeriaIngenieria Civil en MinasIngenieria ComercialKinesiologiaPsicologiaGeologiaTecnico Universitario en Automatizacion IndustrialTecnico Universitario en Mantencion Mecanica de Equipos Industriales
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoIngenieria Civil IndustrialTecnico en EnfermeriaIngenieria Civil en MinasIngenieria ComercialKinesiologiaPsicologiaGeologiaTecnico Universitario en Automatizacion IndustrialTecnico Universitario en Mantencion Mecanica de Equipos Industriales
AtacamaChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyNatural sciencesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyNatural sciencesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinary
AtacamaChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

02,0004,0006,0002006201520244,1192,633
02,0004,0006,0002006201520244,1192,633
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Atacama's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Atacama against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Atacama87%Fonasa9.0%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Atacama87%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.8%
10.6%12th of 16
Public health insurance
87.3%
82.6%11th of 16
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
71.3
82.513th of 15
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
106
1004th of 15
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
People with a disability
29,182
1,950,38813th of 16
Average age, people with a disability
54.5 yrs
56.4 yrs14th of 16
Disability among 65+
40.3%
43.0%14th of 16
Difficulty walking
4.21%
4.92%13th of 16
Difficulty seeing
4.56%
4.58%9th of 16
Difficulty hearing
1.95%
2.16%12th of 16
Difficulty concentrating
2.17%
2.70%14th of 16
Private health insurance
9.0%
13.2%4th of 16
No health coverage
2.19%
1.98%9th of 16
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
87.3%
92.1%16th of 16
Households lacking health access
4.8%
6.0%14th of 16
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
21,318
1,523,71613th of 15
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
580
36,69812th of 15
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.72%
2.41%5th of 15
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.5 days
6.1 days3rd of 15
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
19.4
19.97th of 15
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
88
10013th of 15
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
1,126
89,72313th of 16
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.3%
5.9%12th of 16
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
37.6
48.612th of 16
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
81
10012th of 16

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 25%Injuries, bones and skin 18%Pregnancy, birth… 17%Heart and lungs 17%Tumours, blood and… 12%Mind, nerves… 6.4%Infections a… 3.7%Digestive system16%Genitour…system8.6%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculos…4.3%SkinPregnancy andchildbirth15%Perinatal…Conge…malfo…Circulatorysystem9.5%Respiratory system7.3%Cancers andtumours7.6%Endocri…andmetabol…4.3%Mentalandbehaviou…Nervo…system1.9%EarInfect…and…Cont…with…Ill-…symp…
Digestive and urinary tr… 25%Injuries, bones… 18%Pregnancy… 17%Heart an… 17%Tumours, blood… 12%Mind… 6.4%Digestivesystem16%Genitou…system8.6%Injuriesandpoisoning12%Muscu…4.3%SkinPregnancyandchildbirth15%Perinatal…Con…mal…Circulatorysystem9.5%Respiratorysystem7.3%Cancersandtumours7.6%Endoc…andmetab…4.3%Mentalandbehavi…3.9%Ner…sys…Infec…Contac…Ill-…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos21%Sangre y sistemalinfático15%Mama13%Genitalesfemeninos9.5%Tiroides yendocrinas9.4%Vías urinarias9.3%Genitalesmasculinos6.6%Víasrespirat…5.1%Sitiosmaldefinid…3.6%Piel ymelano…2.0%Encéfa…ysistem…Tejid…bland…1.1%Bocayfari…Hue…
Órganos digestivos21%Sangre y sistemalinfático15%Mama13%Genitalesfemeninos9.5%Tiroides yendocrinas9.4%Víasurinarias9.3%Genital…masculi…6.6%Víasrespiratori…5.1%Sitios maldefinidosPiel ymelanomaEncéfalo …Tejidos…Boca y…
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaGenitales femeninosTiroides y endocrinasVías urinariashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
18.6%
17.3%9th of 16
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
31.2 UF
32.0 UF3rd of 16
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
80.1%
78.9%14th of 16
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
72.7
85.613th of 16
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
54.0%
54.4%7th of 16
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
9.0%
8.6%8th of 16
Self-employed
36.6%
33.8%3rd of 16
Extreme poverty
7.4%
6.9%8th of 16
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
20.2%
17.7%2nd of 16
Unemployment rate
9.0%
8.8%7th of 16
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 692,230
CLP 783,1245th of 16
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.427
0.48815th of 16
Registered firms
21,765
1,582,39013th of 16
Annual sales
179,091,754 UF
34,347,683,688 UF11th of 16
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
92,179
9,699,16413th of 16
Sales per firm
8,228 UF
21,706 UF7th of 16
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.7
3.99th of 16
Women among employees
34.0%
40.6%15th of 16
Independent contractors
31,297
3,958,26913th of 16
Contractors as share of workers
25.3%
29.0%11th of 16

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 27%Natural resources 23%State and social services 21%Industry and co… 16%Advanced s… 8.5%Other serv… 4.3%Retail andwholesale15%Transport6.6%Accommodationand food5.4%Mining19%Agric…andfishi…4.4%Education9.4%Health6.6%Publicadministration5.1%Construction7.6%Manufactur…5.4%Elect…andgas1.5%WaterandwasteAdministrativeservices4.4%Profess…services2.2%Otherservic…Dome…work
Trade and logistics 27%Natural resources 23%State and socia… 21%Industry … 16%Advan… 8.5%Other… 4.3%Retail andwholesale15%Transport6.6%Accommoda…and food5.4%Mining19%Agriculture and fishingEducation9.4%Health6.6%Public administrationConstruction7.6%Manufact…5.4%Ele…andgasWat…and…Administra…servicesProfes…servic…Otherservi…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 29%Elementary occupations 14%Service and sales19%Craft andtrades16%Plant and machineoperators14%Clericalsupport6.0%Skilled…Professionals14%Technicians11%Manage…3.9%Elementary occupations14%
Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 29%Elementar… 14%Service andsales19%Craft andtrades16%Plant andmachineoperators14%Clericalsupport6.0%Ski…agr…Professiona…14%Technicians11%ManagersElementaryoccupations14%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Atacama90%House8.8%FlatChile79%House20%Flat
Atacama90%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.7%
5.7%5th of 16
Internet access
93.3%
93.2%7th of 16
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.1
2.38th of 16
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.6
1.68th of 16
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
99,861
6,408,17213th of 16
Critically overcrowded
0.45%
0.57%6th of 16
Irrecoverable dwellings
2.55%
1.13%4th of 16
Public water network
87.1%
92.3%12th of 16
Electricity access
99.2%
99.6%14th of 16
Detached houses
90.0%
78.7%9th of 16
Apartments
8.8%
19.9%8th of 16
Precarious wall materials
0.60%
0.23%3rd of 16
Unoccupied private dwellings
23.9%
11.9%1st of 16
Quantitative housing deficit
8,613
491,90413th of 16
Housing deficit as share of households
8.4%
7.5%5th of 16
Renting households
19.4%
26.2%13th of 16
Owner-occupiers
64.9%
61.1%8th of 16
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
2.3%
24.4%13th of 16
Commute by public transport
32.7%
42.1%9th of 16
Walks to work
13.5%
10.2%5th of 16
Households with a computer
49.3%
54.9%10th of 16
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.5
1.16th of 16
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.2%
97.0%11th of 16
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.9%
99.9%15th of 16
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.6%
100.0%15th of 16
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
91.7%
89.4%6th of 16
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
95.0%
98.1%12th of 16
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.6%
99.7%15th of 16
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
7.6
5.98th of 16
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
80.5%
80.3%7th of 16
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
85.8%
90.0%9th of 16
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
89.1%
96.2%13th of 16
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.0
0.65th of 16
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.2%
99.0%15th of 16
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.2%
99.9%14th of 16
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.8%
100.0%13th of 16
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
92.0%
91.6%7th of 16
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
95.0%
98.5%14th of 16
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.7%
99.8%15th of 16

How people commute

Public transport 33%Private vehicle 33%Other means 19%On foot or by bicycle 16%Public transport33%Car32%Other19%Walking14%
Public transport 33%Private vehicle 33%Other means 19%On foot or by bic… 16%Public transport33%Car32%Other19%Walking14%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 65%Rented 19%Provided ren… 11%Owned outright55%Owned, still paying10.0%Rented, with contract13%Rented, no contract6.6%Provided byfamily8.2%Provided by…Otherarrang…4.8%
Owned 65%Rented 19%Provided … 11%Owned outright55%Owned,stillpaying10.0%Rented, withcontract13%Rented,nocontract6.6%Provided byfamily8.2%Otherarran…4.8%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 62%Fossil fuels 20%Electricity 15%No heating62%Gas19%Electricity15%Firew…2.3%CoalOther
No heating 62%Fossil fuels 20%Electricity 15%No heating62%Gas19%Electricity15%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
84.9%
of the registered voted in the first round
84.6%
voted in the runoff
248,271
registered voters on the roll
9.5%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman45.5%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist54.5%58.3%
AtacamaChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez32.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman26.4%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen13.2%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist18.8%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet6.3%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.0%1.3%
AtacamaChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile30.9%30.6%
KCambio por Chile16.4%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido14.0%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente14.8%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas18.5%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular5.3%0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
AtacamaChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile53.0%
KCambio por Chile15.6%
JChile Grande y Unido17.0%
IPartido de la Gente11.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista2.6%
Atacamashare of the valid vote

Territories within

3
ProvinceCensus populationForeign-born shareAverage years of schoolingIncome poverty
Copiapó199,48210.5%10.1 yrs18.5%
Chañaral23,7425.0%9.7 yrs18.8%
Huasco75,9563.9%9.6 yrs23.0%
Atacama299,1808.4%9.9 yrs18.6%