Province · 031

Provincia de CopiapóProvincia de Copiapó

Compare Copiapó with another place
Census population
199,482
27th of 56
Population density
6.1/km²
41st of 56
Average years of schooling
10.1 yrs
19th of 56
Foreign-born share
10.5%
10th of 56

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Continues to higher education1st of 56 · Chile 55.6%66.2%
School attendance, ages 6-1753rd of 54 · Chile 98.6%97.4%
Average age, foreign-born54th of 56 · Chile 33.5 yrs31.0 yrs
Leaves from technical-vocational school3rd of 56 · Chile 33.9%53.7%
Sought care when ill51st of 54 · Chile 92.1%85.8%
Average monthly pay4th of 54 · Chile 32.0 UF32.8 UF
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF32.8 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF32.8 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 5,998 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
59.2%
27th of 54
Came from another commune of the same region
10.7%
44th of 54
Came from another region
21.9%
16th of 54
Net internal migration
+10,327
+4.9 per 100 residents
Copiapóthis province · 182,929another region46,144 peopleelsewhere in the region12,082 peopleabroad17,291 peopleanother region41,518 peopleelsewhere in the region6,381 peopleCopiapóthis province · 210,547
Copiapóthis province · 182,929another region46,144 peopleelsewhere in th…12,082 peopleabroad17,291 peopleanother region41,518 peopleelsewhere in th…6,381 peopleCopiapóthis province · 210,547

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Construction1Construction▲14Manufacturing2Manufacturing▲212Education3Education▲96Mining4Mining▲29Administrative services5Administrative services▲45Public administration6Public administration▼13Retail and wholesale7Retail and wholesale▼41Agriculture and fishing8Agriculture and fishing▼710Professional services9Professional services▲111Transport10Transport▲18Accommodation and food11Accommodation and food▼313Health12Health▲17Other services14Other services▼7
2005202421Construction▲142Manufacturing▲2123Education▲964Mining▲295Administrative services▲456Public administration▼137Retail and wholesale▼418Agriculture and fishing▼7109Professional services▲11110Transport▲1811Accommodation and food▼31312Health▲1714Other services▼7

The ten branches that employ most of Copiapó

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

50 k60 k70 k80 kprojection →73 k2029 · central2005201520242029
50 k60 k70 k80 kprojection →73 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval0.8% a year observed · 1.3% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

60 M85 M110 M135 M160 Mprojection →135 M2029 · central2005201520242029
60 M85 M110 M135 M160 Mprojection →135 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.2% a year observed · -2.6% projected

What Copiapó is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Copiapó employs more people in 99 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

99
activities it is specialised in
68,712
formal workers
14/53
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Actividades de la administración …Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Enseñanza superior en universidad…Actividades de hotelesExtracción de oro y plataOtras actividades especializadas …Extracción de minerales de hierroCultivo de uva para mesaProducción de harina de pescadoHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Cultivo de uva para mesaFabricación de equipo eléctrico d…Cultivo de porotosExtracción de salHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Copiapó

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Fabricación de productos primarios de metales preciosos y de otros metales no ferrosos n.c.p.Fabricación de productos primarios de metales preciosos y otros metales no ferrosos1,43263.0×
Extracción de oro y plataExtracción de minerales metalíferos no ferrosos, excepto cobre90752.9×
Extracción de minerales de hierroExtracción de minerales de hierro63531.4×
Fabricación de equipo eléctrico de iluminaciónFabricación de equipo eléctrico de iluminación10319.7×
Enseñanza preescolar públicaEnseñanza preescolar, primaria, secundaria científico humanista y técnico profesional5,51519.3×
Acabado de productos textilesHilatura, tejedura y acabado de productos textiles8111.9×
Fabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructuralFabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructural, tanques, depósitos, recipientes de metal4,44010.0×
Extracción y procesamiento de cobreExtracción y procesamiento de cobre2,6437.7×
Cultivo de porotosCultivo de plantas no perennes326.9×
Actividades de descontaminación y otros servicios de gestión de desechosActividades de descontaminación y otros servicios de gestión de desechos1496.9×
Actividades de apoyo para la explotación de otras minas y canteras prestados por empresasActividades de apoyo para la explotación de otras minas y canteras2,1856.4×
Actividades de sindicatosActividades de sindicatos306.0×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
1,923,536
hectares in holdings
1.1%
of them under a named use
99.7%
of the crop land is irrigated
Not farmed 99%Scrub, barren ground and buildings99%
Not farmed 99%Scrub, barren ground and buildings99%
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
CopiapóChile% of each territory's own population · 199,482 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Census population
199,482
299,18018,480,43227th of 56
Average age
36.0 yrs
36.8 yrs38.1 yrs49th of 56
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
57.4
63.779.048th of 56
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
6.1/km²
4.0/km²24.7/km²41st of 56
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Households
67,763
103,0576,596,52729th of 56
Dwellings
87,151
139,5317,642,71625th of 56
People per household
2.94
2.902.808th of 56
Women
50.4%
50.4%51.5%43rd of 56
Men per 100 women
98.5
98.294.314th of 56
Under 15
19.9%
19.8%17.7%11th of 56
65 and over
11.4%
12.6%14.0%50th of 56
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
45.5
47.846.544th of 56
One-person households
20.5%
21.4%21.8%42nd of 56
Households with children
38.0%
37.2%33.2%9th of 56
Indigenous peoples
24.7%
25.6%11.4%20th of 56
Female-headed households
48.5%
48.8%49.9%33rd of 56
Land area
32,729 km²
75,705 km²748,041 km²8th of 56

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Copiapó41%Arrived since 202059%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Copiapó41%Arrived since 202059%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Foreign-born share
10.5%
8.4%8.7%10th of 56
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
59.2%
60.9%50.5%27th of 54
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
10.7%
10.9%23.9%44th of 54
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
21.9%
20.5%17.2%16th of 54
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Foreign-born population
21,003
25,1671,608,65015th of 56
Average age, foreign-born
31.0 yrs
31.0 yrs33.5 yrs54th of 56
Women among foreign-born
52.3%
52.5%51.7%16th of 56
Foreign-born of working age
81.7%
81.3%83.1%25th of 56
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
40.7%
41.8%34.4%21st of 56
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
12.5%
10.1%10.6%10th of 56
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.8 yrs
11.8 yrs12.9 yrs46th of 56
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
10,327
-28,581013th of 54
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
4.9
-8.90.017th of 54

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Copiapó28%Higher40%Secondary24%Primary only5.2%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Copiapó28%Higher40%Secondary24%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.1 yrs
9.9 yrs10.4 yrs19th of 56
Reached higher education
27.8%
25.5%31.1%18th of 56
School attendance, ages 6-17
97.4%
98.1%98.6%53rd of 54
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
66.2%
63.9%55.6%1st of 56
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.3%
100.3%99.8%36th of 56
Literacy rate
98.6%
98.2%97.8%12th of 56
Reached secondary education
39.8%
40.9%36.7%11th of 56
Primary education only
24.1%
25.0%24.1%43rd of 56
Never attended school
3.08%
3.21%3.01%32nd of 56
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
12.0 yrs
11.8 yrs12.1 yrs16th of 56
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
12.1 yrs
11.8 yrs12.1 yrs16th of 56
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.45%
1.83%2.18%44th of 56
Households lacking schooling
16.1%
15.9%15.1%35th of 54
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
2,719
4,119217,56525th of 56
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
53.7%
49.9%33.9%3rd of 56
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
1.1%3.1%41st of 56
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
65.0%
66.3%67.2%28th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
15.0%
15.0%19.7%36th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
20.0%
18.7%13.1%15th of 56
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
20.5%
33.8%13.0%32nd of 56
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
49.6%
49.5%49.7%39th of 56

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

2,719left secondary school in 2024
1,801enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
66.2%continued immediately
65%of those, to a university
21%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria Civil en MinasTecnico en EnfermeriaPsicologiaIngenieria ComercialKinesiologiaGeologiaIngenieria en Maquinaria Pesada y Vehiculos AutomotricesObstetricia y Puericultura
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria Civil en MinasTecnico en EnfermeriaPsicologiaIngenieria ComercialKinesiologiaGeologiaIngenieria en Maquinaria Pesada y Vehiculos AutomotricesObstetricia y Puericultura
CopiapóChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyNatural sciencesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyNatural sciencesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinary
CopiapóChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

01,0002,0003,0002006201520242,7191,801
01,0002,0003,0002006201520242,7191,801
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Copiapó's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Copiapó against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Copiapó86%Fonasa9.3%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Copiapó86%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.2%
9.8%10.6%48th of 56
Public health insurance
86.4%
87.3%82.6%40th of 54
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
73.2
71.382.532nd of 52
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
109
10610014th of 52
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
People with a disability
18,365
29,1821,950,38832nd of 56
Average age, people with a disability
53.1 yrs
54.5 yrs56.4 yrs48th of 56
Disability among 65+
38.0%
40.3%43.0%45th of 56
Difficulty walking
3.85%
4.21%4.92%48th of 56
Difficulty seeing
4.36%
4.56%4.58%40th of 56
Difficulty hearing
1.77%
1.95%2.16%49th of 56
Difficulty concentrating
2.08%
2.17%2.70%47th of 56
Private health insurance
9.3%
9.0%13.2%12th of 54
No health coverage
2.47%
2.19%1.98%19th of 54
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
85.8%
87.3%92.1%51st of 54
Households lacking health access
5.0%
4.8%6.0%40th of 54
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
14,602
21,3181,523,71628th of 52
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
363
58036,69826th of 52
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.49%
2.72%2.41%28th of 52
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.4 days
6.5 days6.1 days20th of 52
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
18.2
19.419.931st of 52
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
93
8810026th of 52
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
831
1,12689,72328th of 54
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.7%
5.3%5.9%23rd of 54
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
41.7
37.648.626th of 54
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
94
8110018th of 54

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 25%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 19%Injuries, bones an… 18%Heart and lun… 15%Tumours, blood and m… 14%Mind, ner… 5.9%Infection… 3.0%Digestivesystem17%Genitour…system8.7%Pregnancy andchildbirth15%Peri…cond…Cong…malf…Injuries andpoisoning13%Musculoskeletal4.4%SkinCirculatorysystem9.0%Respiratorysystem6.2%Cancers andtumours8.1%Endocrineandmetabolic4.9%Mentalandbehavi…3.1%Nervo…system2.2%EarConta…Inf…Ill…sym…
Digestive and urinary tr… 25%Pregnancy, birt… 19%Injuries, … 18%Heart and lungs 15%Tumours, blood and m… 14%Digestivesystem17%Genitou…system8.7%Pregnancy andchildbirth15%Injuries andpoisoning13%Musculoske…4.4%Circulatorysystem9.0%Respirat…system6.2%Cancers andtumours8.1%EndocrineandmetabolicMentalandbehav…3.1%Nervo…systemCon…withhea…Ill-d…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos19%Mama15%Sangre y sistemalinfático13%Genitales femeninos11%Tiroides yendocrinas9.9%Vías urinarias9.7%Genitalesmasculinos6.5%Víasrespirat…4.7%Sitiosmaldefini…3.7%Piel ymelanoma2.3%Encéfaloysistema…2.3%SitiosreservadosTej…bla…
Órganos digestivos19%Mama15%Sangre ysistemalinfático13%Genitalesfemeninos11%Tiroides yendocrinas9.9%Víasurinarias9.7%Genital…masculi…6.5%Víasrespirator…4.7%Sitios maldefinidosPiel ymelanomaEncéfalo ysistema…Sitiosreser…
Órganos digestivosMamaSangre y sistema linfáticoGenitales femeninosTiroides y endocrinasVías urinariashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
18.5%
18.6%17.3%30th of 54
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
32.8 UF
31.2 UF32.0 UF4th of 54
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
79.2%
80.1%78.9%47th of 54
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
69.9
72.785.647th of 56
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
54.5%
54.0%54.4%23rd of 56
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
9.0%
9.0%8.6%22nd of 56
Self-employed
37.1%
36.6%33.8%15th of 56
Extreme poverty
7.2%
7.4%6.9%30th of 54
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
19.8%
20.2%17.7%15th of 54
Unemployment rate
8.6%
9.0%8.8%31st of 54
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 677,498
CLP 692,230CLP 783,12415th of 54
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.429
0.4270.48845th of 53
Registered firms
13,951
21,7651,582,39029th of 56
Annual sales
153,558,734 UF
179,091,754 UF34,347,683,688 UF17th of 54
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
68,723
92,1799,699,16423rd of 56
Sales per firm
11,007 UF
8,228 UF21,706 UF12th of 54
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
3.2
2.73.99th of 56
Women among employees
33.5%
34.0%40.6%52nd of 56
Independent contractors
21,756
31,2973,958,26925th of 56
Contractors as share of workers
24.0%
25.3%29.0%39th of 56

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 28%Natural resources 23%State and social services 21%Industry and … 15%Advanced se… 9.0%Other servi… 4.5%Retail andwholesale16%Transport6.6%Accommodationand food5.3%Mining19%Agric…andfishi…3.9%Education9.2%Health6.6%PublicadministrationConstruction7.2%Manufactur…5.1%Elect…andgasWaterandwasteAdministrativeservices4.5%Profess…services2.4%Inf…andcom…Otherservic…Dom…work
Trade and logistics 28%Natural resources 23%State and socia… 21%Industry… 15%Advanc… 9.0%Other … 4.5%Retail andwholesale16%Transport6.6%Accommod…and food5.3%Mining19%Education9.2%Health6.6%Public administrationConstructi…7.2%Manufac…5.1%Ele…andgasWat…and…Administrat…servicesProfe…servi…Otherservic…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 55%Managers and professionals 31%Elementary occupations 13%Service and sales19%Craft andtrades15%Plant and machineoperators13%Clericalsupport6.3%Skilled…Professionals16%Technicians11%Managers4.3%Elementary occupations13%
Skilled occupations 55%Managers and professionals 31%Elementa… 13%Service andsales19%Craft andtrades15%Plant andmachineoperators13%Clericalsupport6.3%Professionals16%Technicians11%ManagersElementaryoccupations13%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Copiapó87%House12%FlatChile79%House20%Flat
Copiapó87%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.9%
5.7%5.7%14th of 56
Internet access
94.7%
93.3%93.2%12th of 56
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.5
3.12.339th of 56
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.9
2.61.637th of 56
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
65,462
99,8616,408,17229th of 56
Critically overcrowded
0.49%
0.45%0.57%12th of 56
Irrecoverable dwellings
2.21%
2.55%1.13%13th of 56
Public water network
87.9%
87.1%92.3%29th of 56
Electricity access
99.4%
99.2%99.6%28th of 56
Detached houses
87.0%
90.0%78.7%48th of 56
Apartments
12.0%
8.8%19.9%9th of 56
Precarious wall materials
0.57%
0.60%0.23%7th of 56
Unoccupied private dwellings
21.0%
23.9%11.9%17th of 56
Quantitative housing deficit
5,659
8,613491,90420th of 56
Housing deficit as share of households
8.4%
8.4%7.5%10th of 56
Renting households
21.8%
19.4%26.2%25th of 56
Owner-occupiers
64.8%
64.9%61.1%35th of 56
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
1.2%
2.3%24.4%51st of 56
Commute by public transport
32.3%
32.7%42.1%20th of 56
Walks to work
11.1%
13.5%10.2%37th of 56
Households with a computer
52.0%
49.3%54.9%20th of 56
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.4
1.51.134th of 56
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.2%
94.2%97.0%22nd of 56
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.5%
97.9%99.9%47th of 56
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.5%
99.6%100.0%49th of 56
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
95.3%
91.7%89.4%13th of 56
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.6%
95.0%98.1%32nd of 56
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.5%
97.6%99.7%41st of 56
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.6
7.65.948th of 56
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
90.6%
80.5%80.3%11th of 56
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.5%
85.8%90.0%16th of 56
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.5%
89.1%96.2%18th of 56
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.8
1.00.635th of 56
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.8%
96.2%99.0%33rd of 56
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.7%
99.2%99.9%41st of 56
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.9%
99.8%100.0%45th of 56
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
95.5%
92.0%91.6%17th of 56
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.8%
95.0%98.5%33rd of 56
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.7%
97.7%99.8%41st of 56

How people commute

Private vehicle 33%Public transport 32%Other means 21%On foot or by bicycle 14%Car32%Public transport32%Other21%Walking11%Bicy…
Private vehicle 33%Public transport 32%Other means 21%On foot or by … 14%Car32%Public transport32%Other21%Walking11%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 65%Rented 22%Provided re… 9.1%Owned outright53%Owned, still paying12%Rented, withcontract15%Rented, no contract6.8%Provided byfamily7.4%Otherarran…4.3%
Owned 65%Rented 22%Provi… 9.1%Owned outright53%Owned,stillpaying12%Rented, withcontract15%Rented,nocontract6.8%Providedby family7.4%Otherarra…
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 62%Fossil fuels 20%Electricity 16%No heating62%Gas19%Electricity16%
No heating 62%Fossil fuels 20%Electricity 16%No heating62%Gas19%Electricity16%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
85.6%
of the registered voted in the first round
85.4%
voted in the runoff
158,893
registered voters on the roll
9.0%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman44.5%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist55.5%58.3%
CopiapóChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez31.3%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman26.0%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen13.4%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist19.7%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet6.7%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.1%1.3%
CopiapóChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile22.8%30.6%
KCambio por Chile18.7%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido18.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente15.0%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas18.1%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular7.0%0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
CopiapóChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile51.8%
KCambio por Chile17.6%
JChile Grande y Unido16.2%
IPartido de la Gente11.8%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista2.6%
Copiapóshare of the valid vote

Territories within

3
CommuneCensus populationForeign-born shareAverage years of schoolingIncome poverty
Copiapó168,83111.4%10.2 yrs17.2%
Caldera18,8055.9%10.0 yrs22.9%
Tierra Amarilla11,8465.8%8.9 yrs28.5%
Copiapó199,48210.5%10.1 yrs18.5%