Commune · 03101

CopiapóCopiapó

Compare Copiapó with another place
Census population
168,831
29th of 346
Population density
9.5/km²
265th of 346
Average years of schooling
10.2 yrs
65th of 346
Foreign-born share
11.4%
36th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Continues to higher education18th of 331 · Chile 55.6%67.3%
Average monthly pay21st of 342 · Chile 32.0 UF33.5 UF
Came from another commune of the same region315th of 335 · Chile 23.9%7.6%
Average age322nd of 346 · Chile 38.1 yrs35.8 yrs
Ageing index320th of 345 · Chile 79.055.7
Annual sales27th of 342 · Chile 34,347,683,688 UF136,402,459 UF
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF33.5 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF33.5 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 5,021 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
61.7%
159th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
7.6%
315th of 335
Came from another region
21.6%
66th of 335
Net internal migration
-1,810
-1.0 per 100 residents
Copiapóthis commune · 161,843another region38,009 peopleelsewhere in the region13,391 peopleabroad16,043 peopleanother region39,433 peopleelsewhere in the region13,777 peopleCopiapóthis commune · 176,076
Copiapóthis commune · 161,843another region38,009 peopleelsewhere in th…13,391 peopleabroad16,043 peopleanother region39,433 peopleelsewhere in th…13,777 peopleCopiapóthis commune · 176,076

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
2005202411Education1Education▲102Construction2Construction6Mining3Mining▲34Manufacturing4Manufacturing10Administrative services5Administrative services▲55Public administration6Public administration▼18Professional services7Professional services▲13Retail and wholesale8Retail and wholesale▼51Agriculture and fishing9Agriculture and fishing▼812Transport10Transport▲29Accommodation and food11Accommodation and food▼213Health12Health▲17Other services14Other services▼7
20052024111Education▲1022Construction63Mining▲344Manufacturing105Administrative services▲556Public administration▼187Professional services▲138Retail and wholesale▼519Agriculture and fishing▼81210Transport▲2911Accommodation and food▼21312Health▲1714Other services▼7

The ten branches that employ most of Copiapó

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

40 k50 k60 k70 kprojection →64 k2029 · central2005201520242029
40 k50 k60 k70 kprojection →64 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval1.0% a year observed · 1.9% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

60 M80 M100 M120 M140 Mprojection →119 M2029 · central2005201520242029
60 M80 M100 M120 M140 Mprojection →119 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.0% a year observed · -2.7% projected

What Copiapó is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Copiapó employs more people in 94 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

94
activities it is specialised in
58,608
formal workers
54/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Enseñanza preescolar públicaActividades de la administración …Empresas de servicios de ingenier…Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Enseñanza superior en universidad…Extracción de oro y plataExtracción de minerales de hierroCultivo de uva para mesaFabricación de equipo eléctrico d…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Fabricación de productos primario…Cultivo de uva para mesaFabricación de equipo eléctrico d…Venta al por mayor de equipo, par…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Copiapó

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Fabricación de productos primarios de metales preciosos y de otros metales no ferrosos n.c.p.Fabricación de productos primarios de metales preciosos y otros metales no ferrosos1,43273.9×
Extracción de oro y plataExtracción de minerales metalíferos no ferrosos, excepto cobre90762.0×
Extracción de minerales de hierroExtracción de minerales de hierro63536.8×
Fabricación de equipo eléctrico de iluminaciónFabricación de equipo eléctrico de iluminación10323.1×
Enseñanza preescolar públicaEnseñanza preescolar, primaria, secundaria científico humanista y técnico profesional5,51522.6×
Acabado de productos textilesHilatura, tejedura y acabado de productos textiles8113.9×
Extracción y procesamiento de cobreExtracción y procesamiento de cobre2,4598.4×
Cultivo de porotosCultivo de plantas no perennes328.1×
Actividades de descontaminación y otros servicios de gestión de desechosActividades de descontaminación y otros servicios de gestión de desechos1347.3×
Actividades de sindicatosActividades de sindicatos307.0×
Actividades de clubes de futbol amateur y profesionalActividades deportivas886.7×
Reparación de maquinaria metalúrgica, para la minería, extracción de petróleo y para la construcciónReparación de productos elaborados de metal, maquinaria y equipo7456.6×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
CopiapóChile% of each territory's own population · 168,831 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
168,831
199,48218,480,43229th of 346
Average age
35.8 yrs
36.0 yrs38.1 yrs322nd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
55.7
57.479.0320th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
9.5/km²
6.1/km²24.7/km²265th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
56,984
67,7636,596,52732nd of 346
Dwellings
64,409
87,1517,642,71631st of 346
People per household
2.96
2.942.8048th of 345
Women
50.5%
50.4%51.5%230th of 346
Men per 100 women
97.9
98.594.3117th of 346
Under 15
19.9%
19.9%17.7%46th of 346
65 and over
11.1%
11.4%14.0%316th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
44.8
45.546.5306th of 346
One-person households
20.0%
20.5%21.8%247th of 345
Households with children
38.3%
38.0%33.2%36th of 345
Indigenous peoples
23.7%
24.7%11.4%98th of 346
Female-headed households
48.0%
48.5%49.9%174th of 345
Land area
17,789 km²
32,729 km²748,041 km²8th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Copiapó40%Arrived since 202060%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Copiapó40%Arrived since 202060%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
11.4%
10.5%8.7%36th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
61.7%
59.2%50.5%159th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
7.6%
10.7%23.9%315th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
21.6%
21.9%17.2%66th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
19,207
21,0031,608,65024th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
30.9 yrs
31.0 yrs33.5 yrs297th of 345
Women among foreign-born
52.1%
52.3%51.7%129th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
81.7%
81.7%83.1%146th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
40.4%
40.7%34.4%141st of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
13.5%
12.5%10.6%38th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.8 yrs
11.8 yrs12.9 yrs255th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-1,810
10,3270196th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-1.0
4.90.0157th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Copiapó29%Higher39%Secondary23%Primary only5.2%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Copiapó29%Higher39%Secondary23%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.2 yrs
10.1 yrs10.4 yrs65th of 346
Reached higher education
29.1%
27.8%31.1%70th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
97.0%
97.4%98.6%287th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
67.3%
66.2%55.6%18th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.0%
100.3%99.8%231st of 346
Literacy rate
98.7%
98.6%97.8%34th of 346
Reached secondary education
39.2%
39.8%36.7%94th of 346
Primary education only
23.4%
24.1%24.1%288th of 346
Never attended school
3.10%
3.08%3.01%235th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
12.2 yrs
12.0 yrs12.1 yrs58th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
12.2 yrs
12.1 yrs12.1 yrs56th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.34%
1.45%2.18%307th of 345
Households lacking schooling
15.1%
16.1%15.1%257th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
2,380
2,719217,56526th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
51.7%
53.7%33.9%86th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
65.6%
65.0%67.2%135th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
15.0%
15.0%19.7%222nd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
19.4%
20.0%13.1%132nd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
20.5%
20.5%13.0%125th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
49.5%
49.6%49.7%203rd of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

2,380left secondary school in 2024
1,601enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
67.3%continued immediately
66%of those, to a university
21%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria Civil en MinasTecnico en EnfermeriaIngenieria ComercialGeologiaPsicologiaKinesiologiaIngenieria en Maquinaria Pesada y Vehiculos AutomotricesObstetricia y Puericultura
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria Civil en MinasTecnico en EnfermeriaIngenieria ComercialGeologiaPsicologiaKinesiologiaIngenieria en Maquinaria Pesada y Vehiculos AutomotricesObstetricia y Puericultura
CopiapóChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyNatural sciencesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyNatural sciencesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinary
CopiapóChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

01,0002,0003,0002006201520242,3801,601
01,0002,0003,0002006201520242,3801,601
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Copiapó's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Copiapó against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Copiapó85%Fonasa10%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Copiapó85%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
8.8%
9.2%10.6%306th of 346
Public health insurance
85.3%
86.4%82.6%273rd of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
80.1
73.282.5103rd of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
119
10910066th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
14,855
18,3651,950,38837th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
53.0 yrs
53.1 yrs56.4 yrs314th of 346
Disability among 65+
38.1%
38.0%43.0%311th of 346
Difficulty walking
3.69%
3.85%4.92%303rd of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.10%
4.36%4.58%282nd of 346
Difficulty hearing
1.68%
1.77%2.16%311th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.02%
2.08%2.70%306th of 346
Private health insurance
10.4%
9.3%13.2%57th of 335
No health coverage
2.46%
2.47%1.98%100th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
86.1%
85.8%92.1%284th of 332
Households lacking health access
5.1%
5.0%6.0%175th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
13,525
14,6021,523,71633rd of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
330
36336,69828th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.44%
2.49%2.41%221st of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.4 days
6.4 days6.1 days191st of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
19.5
18.219.9167th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
102
9310076th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
779
83189,72336th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.8%
5.7%5.9%154th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
46.1
41.748.6103rd of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
106
9410059th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 26%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 19%Injuries, bones an… 18%Heart and lun… 15%Tumours, blood and m… 14%Mind, ner… 5.9%Infection… 3.1%Digestivesystem17%Genitour…system8.7%Pregnancy andchildbirth16%Peri…cond…Cong…malf…Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculoskeletal4.4%SkinCirculatorysystem8.7%Respiratorysystem6.2%Cancers andtumours8.2%Endocrineandmetabolic5.0%Mentalandbehavi…3.1%Nervo…system2.2%Conta…with…Inf…and…
Digestive and urinary tr… 26%Pregnancy, birt… 19%Injuries, … 18%Heart and lungs 15%Tumours, blood and me… 14%Digestivesystem17%Genitou…system8.7%Pregnancy andchildbirth16%Injuriesandpoisoning12%Musculoske…4.4%Circulatorysystem8.7%Respirat…system6.2%Cancers andtumours8.2%EndocrineandmetabolicMentalandbehavi…3.1%NervoussystemCon…withhea…Ill-d…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos19%Mama15%Sitios reservados12%Sangre y sistemalinfático12%Genitales femeninos11%Tiroides y endocrinas10%Vías urinarias9.8%Víasrespirat…4.6%Encéfalo ysistemanerviosoPiel ymelanoma2.1%
Órganos digestivos19%Mama15%Sitiosreservados12%Sangre ysistemalinfático12%Genitalesfemeninos11%Tiroides yendocrinas10%Víasurinarias9.8%VíasrespiratoriasEncéfa…ysistem…Piel ymelanoma
Órganos digestivosMamaSitios reservadosSangre y sistema linfáticoGenitales femeninosTiroides y endocrinashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
17.2%
18.5%17.3%235th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
33.5 UF
32.8 UF32.0 UF21st of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
77.5%
79.2%78.9%312th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
68.6
69.985.6230th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
55.1%
54.5%54.4%90th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
8.8%
9.0%8.6%164th of 345
Self-employed
36.3%
37.1%33.8%143rd of 345
Extreme poverty
6.2%
7.2%6.9%223rd of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
18.6%
19.8%17.7%155th of 335
Unemployment rate
8.2%
8.6%8.8%201st of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 697,421
CLP 677,498CLP 783,12456th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.427
0.4290.488189th of 321
Registered firms
11,589
13,9511,582,39034th of 346
Annual sales
136,402,459 UF
153,558,734 UF34,347,683,688 UF27th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
58,619
68,7239,699,16434th of 346
Sales per firm
11,770 UF
11,007 UF21,706 UF48th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
3.3
3.23.953rd of 346
Women among employees
35.2%
33.5%40.6%265th of 345
Independent contractors
17,204
21,7563,958,26940th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
22.7%
24.0%29.0%248th of 346

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 28%Natural resources 22%State and social services 21%Industry and … 15%Advanced se… 9.4%Other servi… 4.5%Retail andwholesale16%Transport6.5%Accommodationand food5.0%Mining20%Education9.4%Health7.1%Publicadmini…4.8%Construction7.4%Manufactur…5.0%Elect…andgas1.4%Waterand…Administrativeservices4.6%Profess…services2.4%Inf…andcom…Otherservic…Dome…work
Trade and logistics 28%Natural resources 22%State and socia… 21%Industry… 15%Advanc… 9.4%Other … 4.5%Retail andwholesale16%Transport6.5%Accommoda…and food5.0%Mining20%Education9.4%Health7.1%Public administrationConstructi…7.4%Manufac…5.0%Ele…andgasWat…and…Administrat…servicesProfes…servic…2.4%Otherservic…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 54%Managers and professionals 33%Elementary occupations 13%Service andsales19%Craft andtrades15%Plant and machineoperators13%Clericalsupport6.4%Professionals17%Technicians12%Managers4.5%Elementary occupations13%
Skilled occupations 54%Managers and professionals 33%Element… 13%Service andsales19%Craft andtrades15%Plant andmachineoperators13%Clericalsupport6.4%Professionals17%Technicians12%ManagersElementaryoccupations13%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Copiapó85%House14%FlatChile79%House20%Flat
Copiapó85%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.9%
5.9%5.7%97th of 345
Internet access
95.3%
94.7%93.2%45th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.0
2.52.3266th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.5
1.91.6263rd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
54,970
65,4626,408,17232nd of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.49%
0.49%0.57%67th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
2.09%
2.21%1.13%70th of 345
Public water network
89.3%
87.9%92.3%133rd of 345
Electricity access
99.5%
99.4%99.6%140th of 345
Detached houses
84.8%
87.0%78.7%294th of 345
Apartments
14.1%
12.0%19.9%51st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.50%
0.57%0.23%39th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
10.6%
21.0%11.9%230th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
4,805
5,659491,90434th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
8.4%
8.4%7.5%60th of 345
Renting households
23.0%
21.8%26.2%76th of 345
Owner-occupiers
64.3%
64.8%61.1%249th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
1.0%
1.2%24.4%303rd of 345
Commute by public transport
32.8%
32.3%42.1%93rd of 345
Walks to work
10.1%
11.1%10.2%244th of 345
Households with a computer
53.7%
52.0%54.9%68th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.3
1.41.1239th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.6%
96.2%97.0%126th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.5%
97.5%99.9%308th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.6%
99.5%100.0%315th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.5%
95.3%89.4%63rd of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.3%
96.6%98.1%182nd of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
98.5%99.7%272nd of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.7
2.65.9289th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.6%
90.6%80.3%52nd of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.5%
96.5%90.0%107th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.6%
98.5%96.2%175th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.6
0.80.6265th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.6%
96.8%99.0%202nd of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.9%
99.7%99.9%276th of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.9%
99.9%100.0%313th of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.6%
95.5%91.6%76th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.6%
96.8%98.5%194th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.6%
98.7%99.8%271st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 33%Public transport 33%Other means 21%On foot or by bicycle 13%Car32%Public transport33%Other21%Walking10%Bicy…
Private vehicle 33%Public transport 33%Other means 21%On foot or by… 13%Car32%Public transport33%Other21%Walking10%Bic…
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 64%Rented 23%Provided re… 8.5%Owned outright51%Owned, still paying14%Rented, withcontract16%Rented, no contract6.8%Provided byfamily7.2%Otherarrang…4.2%
Owned 64%Rented 23%Provided r… 8.5%Owned outright51%Owned,stillpaying14%Rented, withcontract16%Rented,nocontract6.8%Provided byfamily7.2%Other arrangement
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 61%Fossil fuels 20%Electricity 17%No heating61%Gas19%Electricity17%
No heating 61%Fossil fuels 20%Electricity 17%No heating61%Gas19%Electricity17%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
85.7%
of the registered voted in the first round
85.5%
voted in the runoff
129,887
registered voters on the roll
8.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman44.1%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist55.9%58.3%
CopiapóChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez30.5%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman25.9%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen13.5%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist20.2%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet6.9%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.2%1.3%
CopiapóChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile22.8%30.6%
KCambio por Chile19.4%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido18.3%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente14.9%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas17.1%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular7.4%0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
CopiapóChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile52.0%
KCambio por Chile18.3%
JChile Grande y Unido15.6%
IPartido de la Gente11.6%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista2.6%
Copiapóshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Copiapó across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading