Region · 01

Región de TarapacáRegión de Tarapacá

Compare Tarapacá with another place
Census population
369,806
12th of 16
Population density
8.7/km²
12th of 16
Average years of schooling
10.1 yrs
8th of 16
Foreign-born share
23.0%
1st of 16

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
People per household1st of 16 · Chile 2.803.04
Average age16th of 16 · Chile 38.1 yrs34.0 yrs
Women16th of 16 · Chile 51.5%50.4%
Men per 100 women1st of 16 · Chile 94.398.3
Under 151st of 16 · Chile 17.7%21.8%
65 and over16th of 16 · Chile 14.0%9.6%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.8 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.8 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 9,718 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
42.2%
15th of 16
Came from another commune of the same region
12.0%
9th of 16
Came from another region
26.6%
2nd of 16
Net internal migration
+43,092
+10.6 per 100 residents
Tarapacá278,842 peopleMetropolitana26,927 peopleAntofagasta19,672 peopleCoquimbo11,468 peopleValparaíso10,776 peopleArica y Parinacota9,425 peopleBiobío8,290 peopleAtacama4,977 peopleAraucanía4,720 peopleMaule2,905 peopleLos Ríos2,340 peopleO'Higgins2,125 peopleÑuble1,995 peopleLos Lagos1,726 peopleabroad78,093 peopleMetropolitana22,007 peopleValparaíso9,317 peopleArica y Parinacota8,137 peopleAntofagasta7,835 peopleCoquimbo5,128 peopleBiobío3,294 peopleAtacama2,057 peopleTarapacá406,506 people
Tarapacá278,842 peopleMetropolitana26,927 peopleAntofagasta19,672 peopleCoquimbo11,468 peopleValparaíso10,776 peopleArica y Parinac…9,425 peopleBiobío8,290 peopleAtacama4,977 peopleAraucanía4,720 peopleMaule2,905 peopleLos Ríos2,340 peopleO'Higgins2,125 peopleÑuble1,995 peopleLos Lagos1,726 peopleabroad78,093 peopleMetropolitana22,007 peopleValparaíso9,317 peopleArica y Parinac…8,137 peopleAntofagasta7,835 peopleCoquimbo5,128 peopleBiobío3,294 peopleAtacama2,057 peopleTarapacá406,506 people
Loading
Loading

Chile lengthwise, north on the left. Tarapacá is left unshaded on both maps: it is the place the flows are measured against, not one of them. Darker is a larger flow, and the two maps are scaled separately, because arrivals and departures are different distributions and putting them on one scale would hide the smaller of the two.

Population by sub-territory

Province → Commune
Iquique 92%Del … 7.6%Iquique54%Alto Hospicio38%PozoAlmonte4.6%Pica1.7%Huara0.8%Cam…Col…
Iquique 92%Iquique54%Alto Hospicio38%Huara
hover a tile for its count; click a group to open it

Every tile is a census count and the areas add up exactly: this is the same sum that produces Tarapacá's own population figure, drawn instead of stated. One block per province, one tile per commune — click a tile to open its profile, or a block's band to lay it out alone.

Employment survey

ENE · INE · 2010–2026
Unemployment−0.8 pts on a year ago7.8%010203015.4% · Jun–Aug 2020Employment rate+1.6 pts on a year ago60.9%4050607043.6% · May–Jul 2020Participation+1.1 pts on a year ago66.0%4050607050.0% · Apr–Jun 2020201020122014201620182020202220242026
Unemployment−0.8 pts on a year ago7.8%010203015.4% · Jun–Aug 2020Employment rate+1.6 pts on a year ago60.9%4050607043.6% · May–Jul 2020Participation+1.1 pts on a year ago66.0%4050607050.0% · Apr–Jun 20202012201620202024

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Construction1Construction▲11Retail and wholesale2Retail and wholesale▼14Education3Education▲19Administrative services4Administrative services▲55Transport5Transport10Health6Health▲43Manufacturing7Manufacturing▼48Accommodation and food8Accommodation and food12Public administration9Public administration▲37Mining10Mining▼311Professional services11Professional services6Other services12Other services▼6
2005202421Construction▲112Retail and wholesale▼143Education▲194Administrative services▲555Transport106Health▲437Manufacturing▼488Accommodation and food129Public administration▲3710Mining▼31111Professional services612Other services▼6

The ten branches that employ most of Tarapacá

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

50 k70 k90 k110 k130 kprojection →117 k2029 · central2005201520242029
50 k70 k90 k110 k130 kprojection →117 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.6% a year observed · 0.9% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

0200 M400 M600 Mprojection →351 M2029 · central2005201520242029
0200 M400 M600 Mprojection →351 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval4.7% a year observed · 1.9% projected

What Tarapacá is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Tarapacá employs more people in 123 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

123
activities it is specialised in
111,988
formal workers
3/16
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.33.7Servicios de seguridad privada pr…Explotación de otras minas y cant…Actividades de hotelesFundaciones y corporaciones; asoc…Venta al por mayor de productos t…Extracción de minerales para la f…Venta al por mayor de artículos e…Venta al por mayor de bebidas alc…Venta al por mayor de otros tipos…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.33.7Extracción de minerales para la f…Venta al por menor de artículos d…Agencias de aduanasVenta al por mayor de artículos d…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Tarapacá

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Extracción de minerales para la fabricación de abonos y productos químicos n.c.p.Explotación de minas y canteras n.c.p.68947.6×
Servicios relacionados con la pesca marítimaPesca14414.2×
Alquiler de equipos de transporte sin operario, excepto vehículos automotoresAlquiler y arrendamiento de otros tipos de maquinaria, equipo y bienes tangibles35212.4×
Actividades de centros de salud municipalizados (servicios de salud pública)Actividades de médicos y odontólogos5,38511.1×
Explotación de otras minas y canteras n.c.p.Explotación de minas y canteras n.c.p.3,13710.2×
Tratamiento y revestimiento de metales, maquinadoFabricación de otros productos elaborados de metal; actividades de servicios de trabajo de metales4819.9×
Venta al por mayor de desechos metálicos (chatarra)Otras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada1929.4×
Fabricación de cuerdas, cordeles, bramantes y redesFabricación de otros productos textiles818.7×
Promoción y organización de competencias deportivasActividades deportivas647.5×
Fabricación de fibras de vidrioFabricación de vidrio y productos de vidrio427.2×
Servicios de transporte de trabajadoresOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre1,5666.6×
Actividades de residenciales para estudiantes y trabajadoresOtras actividades de alojamiento2236.5×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
2,363,446
hectares in holdings
9.5%
of them under a named use
83.2%
of the crop land is irrigated
1,116
holdings with land here
Not farmed 91%Scrub, barren ground and buildings90%Pasture7.7%Forestplant…1.0%
Not farmed 91%Scrub, barren ground and buildings90%PastureFore…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Foreign trade

Aduanas · January–July 2026

What export declarations name as produced in Tarapacá, month by month since January 2025, and what the customs offices seated in the region clear. They are different things: an import declares not where it is used, only where it is cleared.

US$ 4,524 M
exported, January–July 2026 · +44% vs January–July 2025
5.7%
of everything Chile exported
US$ 736 M
cleared in Iquique · −10% vs January–July 2025
1.4%
of Chile's imports, cleared here

Month by month

02505007501,000US$ MJan2025FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovs/dDecJan2026FebMarAprMayJunJuls/dAug
02505007501,000US$ MJ2025FMAMJJASON·DJ2026FMAMJJ·A
Exports from TarapacáImports cleared in its officesshaded: the months the figures above are read over

What Tarapacá exports

Mineral products 90%Chemicals 5.9%Base met… 2.0%Copper ores and concentrates86%Salt(incl…table…2.4%Molyb…oresand…2.1%Fluorine,chlorine,bromine and…4.8%Nitrites;nitratesFert…Coppe…refin…and…0.8%Fer…was…and…Flour…mealand…1.1%Fats…
Mineral products 90%Copper ores and concentrates86%Fluorine, chlorine, bromin…Flo…
Stone, ceramics and glassOther sectionsPulp and paperhover a tile for its count; click a group to open it

What leaves, through which office, to where

ChapterCustoms officeDestination26 Ores, slag and ashUS$ 3,969 million · 88%28 Inorganic chemicals; orga…US$ 252 million · 5.6%25 Salt; sulphur; earths, st…US$ 107 million · 2.4%74 Copper and articles there…US$ 54.1 million · 1.2%23 Food industries, residues…US$ 48.9 million · 1.1%72 Iron and steelUS$ 30.4 million · 0.7%Other chaptersUS$ 61.8 million · 1.4%CoquimboUS$ 42.6 million · 0.9%AntofagastaUS$ 863 million · 19%IquiqueUS$ 3,507 million · 78%ValparaísoUS$ 19.7 million · 0.4%San AntonioUS$ 79.6 million · 1.8%Other officesUS$ 12.2 million · 0.3%GermanyUS$ 265 million · 5.9%SpainUS$ 76.9 million · 1.7%South KoreaUS$ 481 million · 11%IndiaUS$ 355 million · 7.9%JapanUS$ 542 million · 12%ChinaUS$ 2,366 million · 52%United StatesUS$ 126 million · 2.8%OthersUS$ 311 million · 6.9%
ChapterCustoms officeDestination26 Ores, s…88%28 Inorgan…5.6%25 Salt; s…2.4%74 Copper …1.2%23 Food in…1.1%72 Iron an…0.7%Other chap…1.4%Coqui…0.9%Antof…19%Iquiq…78%Valpa…0.4%San A…1.8%Other…0.3%Germany5.9%Spain1.7%South Korea11%India7.9%Japan12%China52%United Sta…2.8%Others6.9%

Where its exports go

  1. ChinaUS$ 2,366 million52%
  2. JapanUS$ 542 million12%
  3. South KoreaUS$ 481 million11%
  4. IndiaUS$ 355 million7.9%
  5. GermanyUS$ 265 million5.9%
  6. United StatesUS$ 126 million2.8%
  7. SpainUS$ 76.9 million1.7%
  8. MexicoUS$ 72.3 million1.6%
  9. BulgariaUS$ 36.6 million0.8%
  10. MalaysiaUS$ 32.3 million0.7%
  11. BrazilUS$ 30.3 million0.7%
  12. NetherlandsUS$ 28.9 million0.6%
  13. OthersUS$ 111 million2.5%

Where what is cleared here comes from

  1. ChinaUS$ 334 million45%
  2. United StatesUS$ 155 million21%
  3. JapanUS$ 73.6 million10.0%
  4. GermanyUS$ 44.7 million6.1%
  5. South KoreaUS$ 26.5 million3.6%
  6. United KingdomUS$ 24.3 million3.3%
  7. PeruUS$ 11.5 million1.6%
  8. IndiaUS$ 10.9 million1.5%
  9. United Arab EmiratesUS$ 7.4 million1.0%
  10. ItalyUS$ 6.6 million0.9%
  11. OthersUS$ 41.7 million5.7%

Through which office

Customs officeRegion of its seatExports%Imports%
IquiqueTarapacáUS$ 3,507 million78%US$ 736 million100%
AntofagastaAntofagastaUS$ 863 million19%——
San AntonioValparaísoUS$ 79.6 million1.8%——
CoquimboCoquimboUS$ 42.6 million0.9%——
ValparaísoValparaísoUS$ 19.7 million0.4%——
AricaArica y ParinacotaUS$ 8.3 million0.2%——
MetropolitanaMetropolitanaUS$ 3.1 million0.1%——
Los AndesValparaísoUS$ 826 thousand<0.1%——

Its ports and crossings

Port or crossingComunaLoaded (exports)%Unloaded (imports)%
PatacheIquiqueUS$ 3,023 million81%——
IquiqueIquiqueUS$ 560 million15%US$ 733 million100%
PatillosIquiqueUS$ 83.2 million2.2%US$ 2 thousand<0.1%
ColchaneColchaneUS$ 49.5 million1.3%US$ 1.6 million0.2%
Zona Franca IquiqueIquique——US$ 735 thousand0.1%
Aeropuerto Diego AracenaIquiqueUS$ 84 thousand<0.1%US$ 34 thousand<0.1%

What was loaded or unloaded at the region's ports, airports and crossings, wherever it came from: a port serves regions other than its own. Shares are of what crosses the region's ports. Every port →

What its offices clear most

  1. Electric motors and generators (excluding generating sets)US$ 239 million32%
  2. Vehicles; for the transport of goodsUS$ 70.7 million9.6%
  3. Bulldozers, graders, levellers, scrapers, angledozers, mechanical shovels, exca…US$ 62.0 million8.4%
  4. New pneumatic tyres, of rubberUS$ 50.5 million6.9%
  5. Special purpose motor vehicles; not those for the transport of persons or goods…US$ 40.1 million5.4%
  6. Boards, panels, consoles, desks, cabinets, bases with apparatus of heading no.…US$ 35.7 million4.8%
  7. Petroleum oils and oils from bituminous minerals, not crude; preparations n.e.c…US$ 27.1 million3.7%
  8. Mercancías que lleguen al país para los organismos internacionales y sus agenci…US$ 20.4 million2.8%
  9. Perfumes and toilet watersUS$ 16.4 million2.2%
  10. Iron or steel; articles, n.e.c. in chapter 73US$ 13.5 million1.8%
  11. Derricks, cranes, including cable cranes, mobile lifting frames, straddle carri…US$ 12.1 million1.6%
  12. Motor cars and other motor vehicles; principally designed for the transport of…US$ 10.7 million1.5%
  13. Textiles; worn clothing and other worn articlesUS$ 10.5 million1.4%
  14. Fats and oils and their fractions of fish or marine mammals; whether or not ref…US$ 9.4 million1.3%
  15. Machinery for sorting, screening, separating, washing, crushing, grinding, mixi…US$ 8.3 million1.1%
  16. Other headingsUS$ 110 million15%

An export is assigned to the region its declaration names as the origin of the goods; an import to the office that clears it, and the office to the region of its seat. The office an export leaves through is not its region of origin: much of what one region produces leaves through another's office. Customs agents do not appear because the open databases leave them out. A change is shown only where the same months of the year before added up to at least US$ 1.0 million. All of Chile's foreign trade →

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
TarapacáChile% of each territory's own population · 369,806 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Census population
369,806
18,480,43212th of 16
Average age
34.0 yrs
38.1 yrs16th of 16
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
43.9
79.016th of 16
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
8.7/km²
24.7/km²12th of 16
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Households
121,511
6,596,52712th of 16
Dwellings
143,253
7,642,71612th of 16
People per household
3.04
2.801st of 16
Women
50.4%
51.5%16th of 16
Men per 100 women
98.3
94.31st of 16
Under 15
21.8%
17.7%1st of 16
65 and over
9.6%
14.0%16th of 16
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
45.6
46.512th of 16
One-person households
21.1%
21.8%13th of 16
Households with children
41.1%
33.2%1st of 16
Indigenous peoples
24.3%
11.4%6th of 16
Female-headed households
47.7%
49.9%15th of 16
Land area
42,323 km²
748,041 km²6th of 16

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Tarapacá36%Arrived since 202064%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Tarapacá36%Arrived since 202064%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Foreign-born share
23.0%
8.7%1st of 16
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
42.2%
50.5%15th of 16
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
12.0%
23.9%9th of 16
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
26.6%
17.2%2nd of 16
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Foreign-born population
84,935
1,608,6504th of 16
Average age, foreign-born
31.7 yrs
33.5 yrs15th of 16
Women among foreign-born
53.2%
51.7%3rd of 16
Foreign-born of working age
82.3%
83.1%5th of 16
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
36.2%
34.4%9th of 16
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
27.5%
10.6%1st of 16
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.4 yrs
12.9 yrs15th of 16
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
43,092
03rd of 16
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
10.6
0.01st of 16

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Tarapacá26%Higher42%Secondary23%Primary only6.1%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Tarapacá26%Higher42%Secondary23%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.1 yrs
10.4 yrs8th of 16
Reached higher education
26.1%
31.1%10th of 16
School attendance, ages 6-17
98.7%
98.6%11th of 16
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
54.0%
55.6%13th of 16
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
99.0%
99.8%14th of 16
Literacy rate
98.9%
97.8%2nd of 16
Reached secondary education
42.0%
36.7%1st of 16
Primary education only
22.7%
24.1%11th of 16
Never attended school
3.17%
3.01%8th of 16
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
12.3 yrs
12.1 yrs6th of 16
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
12.1 yrs
12.1 yrs6th of 16
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.08%
2.18%15th of 16
Households lacking schooling
15.6%
15.1%10th of 16
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
4,871
217,56512th of 16
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
50.9%
33.9%1st of 16
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
14.3%
3.1%1st of 16
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
63.7%
67.2%12th of 16
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
18.5%
19.7%7th of 16
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
17.9%
13.1%8th of 16
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
22.6%
13.0%8th of 16
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
49.5%
49.7%11th of 16

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

4,871left secondary school in 2024
2,628enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
54.0%continued immediately
64%of those, to a university
23%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoPsicologiaIngenieria Civil IndustrialEnfermeriaIngenieria ComercialIngenieria en InformaticaIngenieria Civil de MinasIngenieria en Maquinaria Pesada y Vehiculos AutomotricesKinesiologiaGastronomia
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%DerechoPsicologiaIngenieria Civil IndustrialEnfermeriaIngenieria ComercialIngenieria en InformaticaIngenieria Civil de MinasIngenieria en Maquinaria Pesada y Vehiculos AutomotricesKinesiologiaGastronomia
TarapacáChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationInformation technologySocial sciencesServicesArts and humanitiesNatural sciencesAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationInformation technologySocial sciencesServicesArts and humanitiesNatural sciencesAgriculture and veterinary
TarapacáChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

02,0004,0006,0002006201520244,8712,628
02,0004,0006,0002006201520244,8712,628
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Tarapacá's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Tarapacá against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Tarapacá85%Fonasa8.0%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Tarapacá85%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Disability prevalence
8.8%
10.6%15th of 16
Public health insurance
84.9%
82.6%13th of 16
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
78.0
82.511th of 15
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
91
10013th of 15
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
People with a disability
32,671
1,950,38812th of 16
Average age, people with a disability
50.7 yrs
56.4 yrs16th of 16
Disability among 65+
33.9%
43.0%16th of 16
Difficulty walking
3.66%
4.92%15th of 16
Difficulty seeing
4.03%
4.58%13th of 16
Difficulty hearing
1.60%
2.16%15th of 16
Difficulty concentrating
2.25%
2.70%13th of 16
Private health insurance
8.0%
13.2%8th of 16
No health coverage
3.55%
1.98%1st of 16
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
88.9%
92.1%14th of 16
Households lacking health access
6.5%
6.0%5th of 16
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
28,847
1,523,71612th of 15
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
477
36,69813th of 15
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.65%
2.41%14th of 15
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.2 days
6.1 days13th of 15
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
12.9
19.915th of 15
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
102
1008th of 15
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
1,083
89,72314th of 16
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
3.8%
5.9%15th of 16
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
29.3
48.615th of 16
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
73
10014th of 16

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 25%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 18%Injuries, bones a… 15%Heart and lungs 14%Tumours, b… 10%Infect… 9.0%Mind… 7.9%Digestive system16%Genitour…system8.9%Pregnancy and childbirth17%Injuries andpoisoning9.1%Musculoskelet…5.0%SkinCirculatorysystem7.4%Respiratorysystem6.7%Cancers andtumours5.8%Endocrine andmetabolic3.8%Contact withhealthservices5.8%Infecti…andparasit…Ill…sym…Mental andbehaviour…3.8%Eye2.3%Nervoussystem
Digestive and urinary tr… 25%Pregnancy, birt… 18%Injuries, bones and s… 15%Heart and lungs 14%Tumour… 10%Inf… 9.0%Mind, nerves and … 7.9%Digestivesystem16%Genitour…system8.9%Pregnancy andchildbirth17%Injuries andpoisoning9.1%Musculos…5.0%Circulatorysystem7.4%Respirato…system6.7%Cancers andtumours5.8%EndocrineandmetabolicContactwithhealth…5.8%Infect…andparasi…Mental andbehaviouralEye2.3%Nerv…syst…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos22%Mama15%Sangre y sistemalinfático13%Vías urinarias11%Genitalesfemeninos9.0%Tiroides yendocrinas8.5%Sitios maldefinidos5.8%Víasrespirato…5.2%Genitalesmasculin…4.2%Tejidosblandos1.7%Encéf…ysiste…Boca yfaringe1.2%Pielymela…
Órganos digestivos22%Mama15%Sangre ysistemalinfático13%Vías urinarias11%Genitalesfemeninos9.0%Tiroides yendocrinas8.5%Sitios maldefinidos5.8%VíasrespiratoriasGenitalesmasculinosTejidosblandosEncéfa…Boca yfaringePielymel…
Órganos digestivosMamaSangre y sistema linfáticoVías urinariasGenitales femeninosTiroides y endocrinashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
20.8%
17.3%6th of 16
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
24.8 UF
32.0 UF9th of 16
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
84.7%
78.9%13th of 16
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
71.2
85.615th of 16
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
57.7%
54.4%4th of 16
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
8.2%
8.6%11th of 16
Self-employed
38.3%
33.8%2nd of 16
Extreme poverty
9.0%
6.9%6th of 16
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
22.2%
17.7%1st of 16
Unemployment rate
7.5%
8.8%14th of 16
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 682,509
CLP 783,1246th of 16
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.429
0.48814th of 16
Registered firms
26,326
1,582,39012th of 16
Annual sales
320,488,008 UF
34,347,683,688 UF8th of 16
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
112,008
9,699,16411th of 16
Sales per firm
12,174 UF
21,706 UF4th of 16
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.8
3.98th of 16
Women among employees
38.1%
40.6%14th of 16
Independent contractors
41,914
3,958,26912th of 16
Contractors as share of workers
27.2%
29.0%8th of 16

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 36%State and social services 22%Industry and … 14%Natural resourc… 12%Advanced s… 9.6%Retail and wholesale21%Transport8.2%Accommoda…and food6.9%Education8.7%Health7.1%Publicadmini…6.6%Construction7.5%Manufacturi…5.0%Wat…andwas…Ele…and…Mining10%AdministrativeservicesProfe…servi…2.4%RealestateFin…andins…Inf…andcom…Otherservices3.4%Domes…work1.5%
Trade and logistics 36%State and soc… 22%Industry a… 14%Natural … 12%Advanced se… 9.6%Other servi… 5.9%Retail andwholesale21%Transport8.2%Accommoda…and food6.9%Education8.7%Health7.1%Publicadminis…6.6%Construction7.5%Manufactur…5.0%Mining10%Admin…servi…4.1%Profe…servi…2.4%Fina…Info…Other…Dom…work
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 56%Managers and professionals 29%Elementary occupations 15%Service and sales23%Craft andtrades14%Plant and machineoperators10%Clerical support6.8%Professionals14%Technicians11%ManagersElementary occupations15%
Skilled occupations 56%Managers and professionals 29%Elementary … 15%Service andsales23%Craft and trades14%Plant and machineoperators10%Cleri…suppo…6.8%Skilled…Professiona…14%Technicians11%ManagersElementaryoccupations15%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Tarapacá69%House25%Flat6.3%Chile79%House20%Flat
Tarapacá69%House25%FlatChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
10.4%
5.7%1st of 16
Internet access
95.4%
93.2%4th of 16
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.3
2.315th of 16
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.6
1.612th of 16
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
116,102
6,408,17212th of 16
Critically overcrowded
1.43%
0.57%1st of 16
Irrecoverable dwellings
4.53%
1.13%2nd of 16
Public water network
88.4%
92.3%10th of 16
Electricity access
99.3%
99.6%12th of 16
Detached houses
68.6%
78.7%15th of 16
Apartments
25.1%
19.9%2nd of 16
Precarious wall materials
0.72%
0.23%1st of 16
Unoccupied private dwellings
14.7%
11.9%8th of 16
Quantitative housing deficit
18,126
491,9048th of 16
Housing deficit as share of households
14.9%
7.5%2nd of 16
Renting households
35.2%
26.2%1st of 16
Owner-occupiers
47.7%
61.1%16th of 16
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
0.2%
24.4%16th of 16
Commute by public transport
40.0%
42.1%4th of 16
Walks to work
13.7%
10.2%4th of 16
Households with a computer
51.0%
54.9%8th of 16
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.8
1.115th of 16
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.2%
97.0%4th of 16
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.5%
99.9%11th of 16
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.9%
100.0%11th of 16
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.8%
89.4%1st of 16
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.9%
98.1%4th of 16
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.5%
99.7%9th of 16
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.1
5.914th of 16
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.1%
80.3%4th of 16
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
95.3%
90.0%4th of 16
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.8%
96.2%5th of 16
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.5
0.615th of 16
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.6%
99.0%8th of 16
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.6%
99.9%12th of 16
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%12th of 16
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.7%
91.6%3rd of 16
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.4%
98.5%9th of 16
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.0%
99.8%12th of 16

How people commute

Public transport 40%Private vehicle 36%On foot or by bicycle 15%Other mea… 8.7%Public transport40%Car36%Walking14%Other8.7%
Public transport 40%Private vehicle 36%On foot or by bicycle 15%Other means 8.7%Public transport40%Car36%Walking14%Other8.7%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 48%Rented 35%Provided rent-f… 9.4%Other 7.8%Owned outright37%Owned, still paying10%Rented, withcontract21%Rented, nocontract14%Provided byfamily7.1%Prov…byempl…Otherarrangement7.8%
Owned 48%Rented 35%Provided … 9.4%Other 7.8%Owned outright37%Owned,stillpaying10%Rented, withcontract21%Rented, nocontract14%Providedby family7.1%Otherarrangement7.8%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 75%Fossil fuels 17%Electricity 7.4%No heating75%Gas17%Electricity7.4%
No heating 75%Fossil fuels 17%Electri… 7.4%No heating75%Gas17%Electricity7.4%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
80.2%
of the registered voted in the first round
79.7%
voted in the runoff
266,119
registered voters on the roll
8.2%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman37.9%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist62.1%58.3%
TarapacáChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez31.1%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman22.0%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.1%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.6%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist22.6%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet6.9%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.1%1.3%
TarapacáChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile32.9%30.6%
KCambio por Chile21.6%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido23.8%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente13.5%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas8.2%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
TarapacáChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile32.1%
KCambio por Chile33.1%
JChile Grande y Unido14.0%
IPartido de la Gente15.1%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.6%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista3.0%
Tarapacáshare of the valid vote

Territories within

2
ProvinceCensus populationForeign-born shareAverage years of schoolingIncome poverty
Iquique341,67322.9%10.2 yrs21.0%
Del Tamarugal28,13323.6%8.9 yrs22.5%
Tarapacá369,80623.0%10.1 yrs20.8%