Commune · 01403
Colchane
Compare Colchane with another placeCensus population
790
334th of 346
Population density
0.2/km²
334th of 346
Average years of schooling
6.7 yrs
345th of 346
Foreign-born share
42.8%
2nd of 346
Where it stands out
Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.Average age, foreign-born345th of 345 · Chile 33.5 yrs26.2 yrs
Foreign-born share of working-age population1st of 346 · Chile 10.6%54.2%
Electricity access345th of 345 · Chile 99.6%83.4%
Internet access345th of 345 · Chile 93.2%56.5%
Unoccupied private dwellings1st of 345 · Chile 11.9%87.5%
Multidimensional poverty1st of 335 · Chile 17.7%56.4%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024
Average monthly pay
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.
Where the people here are from
Casen 2024 · 79 surveyedLives in the commune where they were born
68.4%
89th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
1.2%
333rd of 335
Came from another region
0.0%
335th of 335
Net internal migration
-4,070
-260.7 per 100 residents
Formal employment, 2005–2024
2005–2024 · Source SIIThe ten branches that employ most of Colchane
Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.
BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change
01Public administrationState and social services162+479%02ConstructionIndustry and construction22—03Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics5−38%04Administrative servicesAdvanced services3—05Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics2—06Other servicesOther services2—07ManufacturingIndustry and construction0—08TransportTrade and logistics0—What Colchane is specialised in
2024 · SIIPuroChile does not compute this for Colchane. A specialisation is a share of this place's formal employment divided by the country's share, and with 196 formal workers here that division is a statement about a handful of people: one worker would move it further than a whole industry moves it in Santiago. The floor is 1,000 workers, and it is a floor rather than a caveat because a spectacular number nobody should read is worse than no number.
The land and who works it
Agricultural census · INE · 2020/20215,013
hectares in holdings
38.0%
of them under a named use
22.4%
of the crop land is irrigated
82
holdings with land here
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.
Population and territory
See all →Population pyramid
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Census population | 790 | 28,133 | 18,480,432 | 334th of 346 | |
Average age | 35.0 yrs | 34.2 yrs | 38.1 yrs | 331st of 346 | |
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15. | 68.6 | 50.1 | 79.0 | 280th of 345 | |
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography. | 0.2/km² | 0.7/km² | 24.7/km² | 334th of 346 |
See the other 13 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Households | 247 | 9,561 | 6,596,527 | 336th of 346 | |
Dwellings | 2,112 | 21,308 | 7,642,716 | 320th of 346 | |
People per household | 3.20 | 2.94 | 2.80 | 6th of 345 | |
Women | 50.8% | 49.2% | 51.5% | 195th of 346 | |
Men per 100 women | 97.0 | 103.1 | 94.3 | 152nd of 346 | |
Under 15 | 24.6% | 24.1% | 17.7% | 5th of 346 | |
65 and over | 16.8% | 12.1% | 14.0% | 124th of 346 | |
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age. | 70.6 | 56.6 | 46.5 | 3rd of 346 | |
One-person households | 26.7% | 26.5% | 21.8% | 54th of 345 | |
Households with children | 33.6% | 39.7% | 33.2% | 157th of 345 | |
Indigenous peoples | 79.9% | 54.6% | 11.4% | 5th of 346 | |
Female-headed households | 39.7% | 45.7% | 49.9% | 326th of 345 | |
Land area | 4,011 km² | 39,460 km² | 748,041 km² | 44th of 346 |
Migration
See all →When the migrant population arrived
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign-born share | 42.8% | 23.6% | 8.7% | 2nd of 346 | |
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born. | 68.4% | 36.4% | 50.5% | 89th of 335 | |
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province. | 1.2% | 20.3% | 23.9% | 333rd of 335 | |
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region. | 0.0% | 24.9% | 17.2% | 335th of 335 |
See the other 9 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign-born population | 338 | 6,652 | 1,608,650 | 191st of 346 | |
Average age, foreign-born | 26.2 yrs | 30.4 yrs | 33.5 yrs | 345th of 345 | |
Women among foreign-born | 52.7% | 52.8% | 51.7% | 110th of 345 | |
Foreign-born of working age | 74.3% | 79.5% | 83.1% | 323rd of 345 | |
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later. | 60.1% | 37.2% | 34.4% | 8th of 345 | |
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna. | 54.2% | 29.4% | 10.6% | 1st of 346 | |
Average schooling, foreign-born | 9.5 yrs | 10.5 yrs | 12.9 yrs | 339th of 345 | |
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count. | -4,070 | -4,157 | 0 | 239th of 335 | |
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory. | -260.7 | -13.4 | 0.0 | 334th of 335 |
Education
See all →How far schooling went
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average years of schooling | 6.7 yrs | 8.9 yrs | 10.4 yrs | 345th of 346 | |
Reached higher education | 7.6% | 16.0% | 31.1% | 345th of 346 | |
School attendance, ages 6-17 | 100.0% | 99.0% | 98.6% | 1st of 333 | |
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes. | 38.1% | 47.7% | 55.6% | 319th of 331 |
See the other 17 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling. | 87.1% | 97.9% | 99.8% | 344th of 346 | |
Literacy rate | 87.8% | 97.7% | 97.8% | 344th of 346 | |
Reached secondary education | 29.7% | 42.7% | 36.7% | 330th of 346 | |
Primary education only | 45.2% | 30.4% | 24.1% | 9th of 346 | |
Never attended school | 10.93% | 4.26% | 3.01% | 3rd of 346 | |
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country. | 8.5 yrs | 11.1 yrs | 12.1 yrs | 343rd of 346 | |
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men. | 7.4 yrs | 10.8 yrs | 12.1 yrs | 345th of 346 | |
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write. | 12.08% | 2.35% | 2.18% | 3rd of 345 | |
Households lacking schooling | 68.5% | 24.1% | 15.1% | 1st of 335 | |
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart. | 21 | 369 | 217,565 | 319th of 331 | |
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks. | 100.0% | 75.1% | 33.9% | 1st of 331 | |
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates. | 100.0% | 100.0% | 3.1% | 1st of 331 | |
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 87.5% | 67.6% | 67.2% | 11th of 331 | |
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 0.0% | 10.8% | 19.7% | 323rd of 331 | |
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 12.5% | 21.6% | 13.1% | 208th of 331 | |
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives. | 12.5% | 27.3% | 13.0% | 164th of 331 | |
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue. | 75.0% | 55.1% | 49.7% | 3rd of 331 |
The class of 2024
Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school inApproximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.
21left secondary school in 2024
8enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
38.1%continued immediately
88%of those, to a university
13%of those, outside their region
By field of study
The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country. The list of individual programmes is withheld here: fewer than 30 of this territory's leavers continued, and a ranking built on that few names people.
Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year
Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Colchane's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.
Health
See all →The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.
The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.
The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Colchane against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.
In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.
Which health system
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disability prevalence | 12.2% | 10.1% | 10.6% | 173rd of 346 | |
Public health insurance | 94.2% | 82.6% | 82.6% | 123rd of 335 |
See the other 11 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People with a disability | 96 | 2,843 | 1,950,388 | 331st of 346 | |
Average age, people with a disability | 60.6 yrs | 54.5 yrs | 56.4 yrs | 74th of 346 | |
Disability among 65+ | 57.3% | 41.8% | 43.0% | 11th of 346 | |
Difficulty walking | 3.67% | 4.07% | 4.92% | 305th of 346 | |
Difficulty seeing | 6.08% | 4.99% | 4.58% | 110th of 346 | |
Difficulty hearing | 5.19% | 2.28% | 2.16% | 2nd of 346 | |
Difficulty concentrating | 5.06% | 2.18% | 2.70% | 4th of 346 | |
Private health insurance | 0.0% | 3.9% | 13.2% | 311th of 335 | |
No health coverage | 5.77% | 3.70% | 1.98% | 17th of 335 | |
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months. | 100.0% | 94.3% | 92.1% | 1st of 332 | |
Households lacking health access | 0.0% | 1.3% | 6.0% | 310th of 335 |
Economy and poverty
See all →| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line. | 22.9% | 22.5% | 17.3% | 130th of 335 | |
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked. | 30.2 UF | 21.3 UF | 32.0 UF | 36th of 342 | |
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job. | 100.4% | 101.3% | 78.9% | 166th of 342 | |
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity. | 53.2 | 74.5 | 85.6 | 313th of 346 |
See the other 15 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over. | 40.6% | 55.6% | 54.4% | 322nd of 345 | |
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently. | 6.9% | 6.7% | 8.6% | 257th of 345 | |
Self-employed | 50.4% | 41.2% | 33.8% | 16th of 345 | |
Extreme poverty | 19.2% | 5.4% | 6.9% | 15th of 335 | |
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks. | 56.4% | 19.2% | 17.7% | 1st of 335 | |
Unemployment rate | 11.2% | 6.9% | 8.8% | 87th of 335 | |
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income. | CLP 400,751 | CLP 512,057 | CLP 783,124 | 313th of 335 | |
Registered firms | 42 | 2,096 | 1,582,390 | 338th of 346 | |
Annual sales | 66,141 UF | 18,898,101 UF | 34,347,683,688 UF | 340th of 342 | |
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve. | 196 | 7,095 | 9,699,164 | 334th of 346 | |
Sales per firm | 1,575 UF | 9,016 UF | 21,706 UF | 304th of 342 | |
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions. | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 67th of 346 | |
Women among employees | 42.9% | 40.5% | 40.6% | 130th of 345 | |
Independent contractors | 228 | 4,342 | 3,958,269 | 333rd of 346 | |
Contractors as share of workers | 53.8% | 38.0% | 29.0% | 10th of 346 |
Employment by industry
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.
Employment by occupation
Elementary occupationshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.
Housing and services
See all →House or flat
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overcrowded dwellings | 23.2% | 12.9% | 5.7% | 2nd of 345 | |
Internet access | 56.5% | 88.7% | 93.2% | 345th of 345 | |
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 5.6 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 99th of 345 | |
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 8.2 | 9.9 | 1.6 | 41st of 345 |
See the other 35 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Province | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupied dwellings with residents | 241 | 9,152 | 6,408,172 | 336th of 346 | |
Critically overcrowded | 5.39% | 2.11% | 0.57% | 2nd of 345 | |
Irrecoverable dwellings | 15.77% | 7.07% | 1.13% | 6th of 345 | |
Public water network | 83.3% | 66.2% | 92.3% | 180th of 345 | |
Electricity access | 83.4% | 97.5% | 99.6% | 345th of 345 | |
Detached houses | 95.9% | 96.2% | 78.7% | 222nd of 345 | |
Apartments | 0.0% | 0.1% | 19.9% | 281st of 345 | |
Precarious wall materials | 0.00% | 0.87% | 0.23% | 324th of 345 | |
Unoccupied private dwellings | 87.5% | 55.0% | 11.9% | 1st of 345 | |
Quantitative housing deficit | 72 | 1,588 | 491,904 | 323rd of 345 | |
Housing deficit as share of households | 29.1% | 16.6% | 7.5% | 3rd of 345 | |
Renting households | 17.8% | 23.8% | 26.2% | 129th of 345 | |
Owner-occupiers | 51.8% | 51.7% | 61.1% | 309th of 345 | |
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south. | 6.1% | 1.2% | 24.4% | 279th of 345 | |
Commute by public transport | 15.3% | 24.2% | 42.1% | 299th of 345 | |
Walks to work | 25.0% | 29.4% | 10.2% | 61st of 345 | |
Households with a computer | 8.9% | 35.8% | 54.9% | 344th of 345 | |
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 4.2 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 21st of 345 | |
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 60.6% | 83.7% | 97.0% | 334th of 345 | |
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 98.9% | 95.6% | 99.9% | 291st of 345 | |
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 100.0% | 99.2% | 100.0% | 1st of 345 | |
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 56.7% | 78.7% | 89.4% | 254th of 345 | |
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 90.2% | 89.3% | 98.1% | 269th of 345 | |
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 100.0% | 95.3% | 99.7% | 1st of 345 | |
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 106.1 | 25.5 | 5.9 | 11th of 345 | |
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 0.0% | 40.6% | 80.3% | 194th of 345 | |
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 0.0% | 44.5% | 90.0% | 249th of 345 | |
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 0.0% | 63.3% | 96.2% | 306th of 345 | |
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 3.3 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 20th of 345 | |
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 76.5% | 88.4% | 99.0% | 330th of 345 | |
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 98.9% | 97.1% | 99.9% | 304th of 345 | |
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 100.0% | 99.7% | 100.0% | 1st of 345 | |
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 56.7% | 68.4% | 91.6% | 270th of 345 | |
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 72.5% | 73.5% | 98.5% | 319th of 345 | |
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 97.6% | 94.2% | 99.8% | 304th of 345 |
How people commute
Other meansPrivate vehiclePublic transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.
Housing tenure
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.
Home heating fuel
No heatingWood and biomassElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.
How it voted in 2025
TRICEL · qualified result60.2%
of the registered voted in the first round
54.1%
voted in the runoff
2,030
registered voters on the roll
2.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank
Presidential runoff · 14 December
Jeannette Jara Roman6.2%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist93.8%58.3%
Presidential, first round · 16 November
Franco Parisi Fernandez57.3%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman2.1%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio0.7%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen6.7%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist31.9%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.2%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet1.0%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.2%1.3%
Chamber of Deputies · 16 November
CUnidad por Chile38.5%30.6%
KCambio por Chile16.6%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido15.5%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente26.8%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.6%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
Senate · 16 November
CUnidad por Chile11.0%
KCambio por Chile43.2%
JChile Grande y Unido8.0%
IPartido de la Gente34.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.0%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista1.9%
No sister communes
How this is computedNo commune in Chile resembles Colchane closely enough: its best match sits further away than the best match of nine out of ten communes in the country. These four are the least unlike it, which is not the same thing as sisters.
Camiña1.20Tarapacá · 1,335 peopleAlike in Health; apart in Migration.Huara1.53Tarapacá · 2,858 peopleAlike in Health; apart in Education.Pica1.93Tarapacá · 6,272 peopleAlike in Population structure; apart in Education.La Higuera1.97Coquimbo · 4,335 peopleAlike in Economy; apart in Migration.
ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services
The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.
Inside the commune
Census districtsLoading