Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Leaves from a rural school1st of 331 · Chile 3.1%100.0%
Foreign-born share of working-age population7th of 346 · Chile 10.6%33.8%
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents324th of 330 · Chile 48.68.0
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents324th of 331 · Chile 19.93.2
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio324th of 331 · Chile 10017
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio323rd of 330 · Chile 10017
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.3 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.3 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 167 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
40.8%
285th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
12.6%
254th of 335
Came from another region
22.9%
54th of 335
Net internal migration
+731
+11.5 per 100 residents
Picathis commune · 4,097another region1,449 peopleelsewhere in the region795 peopleabroad1,504 peopleelsewhere in the region886 peopleanother region627 peoplePicathis commune · 6,332
Picathis commune · 4,097another region1,449 peopleelsewhere in th…795 peopleabroad1,504 peopleelsewhere in th…886 peopleanother region627 peoplePicathis commune · 6,332

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Public administration1Public administration4Transport2Transport▲26Accommodation and food3Accommodation and food▲33Retail and wholesale4Retail and wholesale▼12Agriculture and fishing5Agriculture and fishing▼35Manufacturing6Manufacturing▼17Professional services7Professional services
2005202411Public administration42Transport▲263Accommodation and food▲334Retail and wholesale▼125Agriculture and fishing▼356Manufacturing▼177Professional services

The ten branches that employ most of Pica

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

05001 k2 k2 kprojection →1 k2029 · central2005201520242029
05001 k2 k2 kprojection →1 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.9% a year observed · 0.7% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

0500 k1.0 M1.5 Mprojection →999 k2029 · central2005201520242029
0500 k1.0 M1.5 Mprojection →999 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval10.3% a year observed · 1.2% projected

What Pica is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Pica employs more people in 22 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

22
activities it is specialised in
1,427
formal workers
153/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.03.7Actividades de la administración …Otras actividades profesionales, …Actividades de programación infor…Cultivo de cítricosActividades de restaurantes y de …Terminación y acabado de edificiosVenta al por menor de artículos d…Cultivo de productos agrícolas en…Cultivo de trigoHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.03.7Actividades de la administración …Transporte de carga por carreteraActividades de programación infor…Actividades de restaurantes y de …How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Pica

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Destilación, rectificación y mezclas de bebidas alcohólicas; excepto piscoElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas328.1×
Producción de aguas minerales y otras aguas embotelladasElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas619.1×
Cultivo de cítricosCultivo de plantas perennes215.4×
Recogida de desechos no peligrososRecogida de desechos5510.8×
Cultivo de plantas con las que se preparan bebidas (incluye el cultivo de café, té y mate)Cultivo de plantas perennes18.6×
Actividades de hotelesActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas858.4×
Actividades de la administración pública en generalAdministración del estado y aplicación de la política económica y social de la comunidad7378.0×
Transporte de pasajeros en buses interurbanosOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre226.4×
Construcción de otras obras de ingeniería civilConstrucción de otras obras de ingeniería civil1425.8×
Transporte de carga por carreteraOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre1955.8×
Fabricación de artículos de hormigón, cemento y yesoFabricación de productos minerales no metálicos n.c.p.85.5×
Venta al por mayor de materiales de construcción, artículos de ferretería, gasfitería y calefacciónOtras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada254.7×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
164,896
hectares in holdings
24.7%
of them under a named use
92.8%
of the crop land is irrigated
320
holdings with land here
Not farmed 76%Pasture 24%Scrub, barren ground and buildings75%Pasture24%
Not farmed 76%Pasture 24%Scrub, barren ground and buildings75%Pasture24%
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
PicaChile% of each territory's own population · 6,272 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
6,272
28,13318,480,432293rd of 346
Average age
35.2 yrs
34.2 yrs38.1 yrs328th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
58.6
50.179.0314th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
0.7/km²
0.7/km²24.7/km²319th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
2,180
9,5616,596,527298th of 346
Dwellings
3,199
21,3087,642,716299th of 346
People per household
2.88
2.942.8080th of 345
Women
50.7%
49.2%51.5%206th of 346
Men per 100 women
97.3
103.194.3141st of 346
Under 15
23.8%
24.1%17.7%10th of 346
65 and over
14.0%
12.1%14.0%252nd of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
60.7
56.646.517th of 346
One-person households
24.2%
26.5%21.8%109th of 345
Households with children
40.8%
39.7%33.2%14th of 345
Indigenous peoples
60.7%
54.6%11.4%16th of 346
Female-headed households
49.0%
45.7%49.9%141st of 345
Land area
8,990 km²
39,460 km²748,041 km²20th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Pica36%Arrived since 202064%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Pica36%Arrived since 202064%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
26.9%
23.6%8.7%9th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
40.8%
36.4%50.5%285th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
12.6%
20.3%23.9%254th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
22.9%
24.9%17.2%54th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
1,686
6,6521,608,65099th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
30.7 yrs
30.4 yrs33.5 yrs301st of 345
Women among foreign-born
53.3%
52.8%51.7%86th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
78.2%
79.5%83.1%266th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
36.1%
37.2%34.4%190th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
33.8%
29.4%10.6%7th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
10.7 yrs
10.5 yrs12.9 yrs333rd of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
731
-4,1570132nd of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
11.5
-13.40.0104th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Pica19%Higher43%Secondary28%Primary only6.9%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Pica19%43%Secondary28%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.4 yrs
8.9 yrs10.4 yrs153rd of 346
Reached higher education
19.2%
16.0%31.1%209th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
95.3%
99.0%98.6%316th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
42.5%
47.7%55.6%304th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
99.1%
97.9%99.8%285th of 346
Literacy rate
98.4%
97.7%97.8%56th of 346
Reached secondary education
42.8%
42.7%36.7%30th of 346
Primary education only
28.0%
30.4%24.1%227th of 346
Never attended school
3.01%
4.26%3.01%245th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
11.6 yrs
11.1 yrs12.1 yrs89th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.5 yrs
10.8 yrs12.1 yrs113th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.57%
2.35%2.18%294th of 345
Households lacking schooling
6.5%
24.1%15.1%321st of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
120
369217,565221st of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
52.5%
75.1%33.9%82nd of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
100.0%
100.0%3.1%1st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
74.5%
67.6%67.2%57th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
7.8%
10.8%19.7%300th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
17.6%
21.6%13.1%142nd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
45.1%
27.3%13.0%55th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
52.9%
55.1%49.7%123rd of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

120left secondary school in 2024
51enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
42.5%continued immediately
75%of those, to a university
45%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%5.0%10.0%Agronomia
0.0%5.0%10.0%Agronomia
PicaChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryEducationAgriculture and veterinarySocial sciencesBusiness and lawHealth and welfareArts and humanitiesInformation technologyNatural sciencesServices
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryEducationAgriculture and veterinarySocial sciencesBusiness and lawHealth and welfareArts and humanitiesInformation technologyNatural sciencesServices
PicaChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

05010015020062015202412051
05010015020062015202412051
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Pica's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Pica against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Pica89%Fonasa8.5%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Pica89%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo cover% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.5%
10.1%10.6%289th of 346
Public health insurance
88.6%
82.6%82.6%235th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
16.9
28.282.5323rd of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
17
42100324th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
596
2,8431,950,388309th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
56.0 yrs
54.5 yrs56.4 yrs265th of 346
Disability among 65+
44.3%
41.8%43.0%210th of 346
Difficulty walking
4.07%
4.07%4.92%294th of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.58%
4.99%4.58%248th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.10%
2.28%2.16%262nd of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.17%
2.18%2.70%291st of 346
Private health insurance
8.5%
3.9%13.2%70th of 335
No health coverage
2.26%
3.70%1.98%115th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
92.6%
94.3%92.1%187th of 332
Households lacking health access
1.7%
1.3%6.0%284th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
106
7931,523,716315th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
2
2036,698316th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.89%
2.52%2.41%286th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
8.8 days
6.7 days6.1 days28th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
3.2
7.119.9324th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
21
36100322nd of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
5
3089,723318th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
4.7%
3.8%5.9%251st of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
8.0
10.748.6324th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
17
25100323rd of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Injuries, bones and skin 25%Digestive and urinary tract 19%Mind, nerves and senses 15%Heart and lungs 15%Infections and other reas… 12%Tumours, blood and metab… 9.4%Pregnancy, birth and new… 4.7%Injuries and poisoning20%Musculo…2.8%Skin1.9%Digestive system16%Genit…system2.8%Mental andbehavioural6.6%Nervous system4.7%Eye3.8%Respiratorysystem10%Circulat…system4.7%Contact withhealthservices7.5%Infectio…andparasitic2.8%Special-…codes1.9%Cancers andtumours5.7%Endocrineandmetabolic3.8%CongenitalmalformationsPreg…andchil…
Injuries, bones and skin 25%Digestive and ur… 19%Mind, nerves and senses 15%Heart and lungs 15%Infections and oth… 12%Tumours,… 9.4%Injuries andpoisoning20%Musc…SkinDigestivesystem16%Mentalandbehaviou…6.6%Nervoussystem4.7%Eye3.8%Respiratorysystem10%Circul…system4.7%Contactwith healthservicesInfecti…and…Special-…Cancersandtumours5.7%Endoc…andmetab…3.8%Conge…malfo…3.8%Pregnan…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
36.1%
22.5%17.3%21st of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
24.3 UF
21.3 UF32.0 UF121st of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
105.0%
101.3%78.9%126th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
89.0
74.585.6118th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
58.0%
55.6%54.4%53rd of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
5.4%
6.7%8.6%302nd of 345
Self-employed
48.4%
41.2%33.8%20th of 345
Extreme poverty
7.9%
5.4%6.9%167th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
14.5%
19.2%17.7%226th of 335
Unemployment rate
10.4%
6.9%8.8%113th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 598,919
CLP 512,057CLP 783,124115th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.403
0.3730.488245th of 321
Registered firms
558
2,0961,582,390283rd of 346
Annual sales
939,097 UF
18,898,101 UF34,347,683,688 UF299th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
1,427
7,0959,699,164278th of 346
Sales per firm
1,683 UF
9,016 UF21,706 UF293rd of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.9
2.33.9204th of 346
Women among employees
48.8%
40.5%40.6%50th of 345
Independent contractors
740
4,3423,958,269268th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
34.1%
38.0%29.0%84th of 346

Employment by industry

State and social services 27%Trade and logistics 26%Natural resources 22%Industry and const… 17%Adva… 5.2%Othe… 3.5%Education13%Publicadministration9.2%Health4.8%Retail andwholesale13%Accommodationand food8.4%Transport4.2%Agriculture andfishing12%Mining10%Construction11%Manufacturing4.6%Ele…and…Wate…Administra…services3.2%Profess…servicesDomesti…Other…
State and social ser… 27%Trade and logistics 26%Natural resources 22%Industry an… 17%Education13%Publicadministration9.2%Hea…Retail and wholesale13%Accommodationand food8.4%Trans…4.2%Agricultu…andfishing12%Mining10%Construction11%Manufacturing4.6%Admini…servic…Profe…servi…Domes…Other…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 62%Managers and professiona… 22%Elementary occupations 16%Service and sales22%Craft andtrades15%Plant andmachineoperators10%Skilledagricultural9.4%Clericalsupport5.2%Professionals11%Technicians7.9%Managers3.7%Elementary occupations16%
Skilled occupations 62%Managers and professionals 22%Elementary occu… 16%Service andsales22%Craft and trades15%Plant and machineoperators10%Skilledagricultu…9.4%Clericalsupport5.2%Professiona…11%Technicians7.9%ManagersElementaryoccupations16%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Pica99%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Pica99%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
11.2%
12.9%5.7%15th of 345
Internet access
91.4%
88.7%93.2%127th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.5
5.42.3242nd of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.6
9.91.6204th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
2,025
9,1526,408,172302nd of 346
Critically overcrowded
1.14%
2.11%0.57%20th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
2.62%
7.07%1.13%55th of 345
Public water network
70.0%
66.2%92.3%271st of 345
Electricity access
98.8%
97.5%99.6%265th of 345
Detached houses
98.6%
96.2%78.7%149th of 345
Apartments
0.2%
0.1%19.9%176th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.87%0.23%243rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
30.9%
55.0%11.9%58th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
330
1,588491,904192nd of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
15.1%
16.6%7.5%22nd of 345
Renting households
32.1%
23.8%26.2%23rd of 345
Owner-occupiers
47.1%
51.7%61.1%324th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
0.7%
1.2%24.4%307th of 345
Commute by public transport
24.9%
24.2%42.1%182nd of 345
Walks to work
29.4%
29.4%10.2%36th of 345
Households with a computer
39.9%
35.8%54.9%215th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.6
2.91.1205th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.5%
83.7%97.0%167th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.2%
95.6%99.9%315th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.8%
99.2%100.0%310th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.4%
78.7%89.4%87th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.3%
89.3%98.1%230th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.3%
95.3%99.7%277th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
46.9
25.55.945th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
40.6%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
44.5%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.2%
63.3%96.2%304th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.7
2.20.673rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
94.3%
88.4%99.0%275th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.8%
97.1%99.9%323rd of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.3%
99.7%100.0%325th of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
93.4%
68.4%91.6%97th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.8%
73.5%98.5%210th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.3%
94.2%99.8%277th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 37%On foot or by bicycle 33%Public transport 25%Car37%Walking29%Bic…Public transport25%Other5.1%
Private vehicle 37%On foot or by bicy… 33%Public transport 25%Car37%Walking29%Public transport25%Other5.1%
Public transportOther meanshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 47%Rented 32%Provided rent-free 18%Owned outright44%Rented, nocontract17%Rented, withcontract15%Provided by family13%Providedbyemployer5.3%
Owned 47%Rented 32%Provided rent-… 18%Owned outright44%Rented, nocontract17%Rented,withcontract15%Provided byfamily13%Provided by employer
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 85%Fossil fue… 11%Ele… 2.6%No heating85%Gas11%Electric…2.6%Fir…Oth…
No heating 85%Fossil fuels 11%No heating85%GasElect…2.6%
No heatingElectricityWood and biomassOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
84.1%
of the registered voted in the first round
82.8%
voted in the runoff
6,220
registered voters on the roll
7.3%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman36.4%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist63.6%58.3%
PicaChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez33.4%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman22.3%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen16.4%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist19.8%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet5.9%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.7%1.3%
PicaChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile49.7%30.6%
KCambio por Chile16.3%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido15.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente11.0%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas7.4%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
PicaChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile33.6%
KCambio por Chile35.8%
JChile Grande y Unido11.3%
IPartido de la Gente13.8%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.7%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista2.8%
Picashare of the valid vote

No sister communes

How this is computed

No commune in Chile resembles Pica closely enough: its best match sits further away than the best match of nine out of ten communes in the country. These four are the least unlike it, which is not the same thing as sisters.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading