Commune · 03202

Diego de AlmagroDiego de Almagro

Compare Diego de Almagro with another place
Census population
11,397
243rd of 346
Population density
0.6/km²
321st of 346
Average years of schooling
9.9 yrs
94th of 346
Foreign-born share
6.4%
75th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation334th of 345 · Chile 100.0%97.1%
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents319th of 330 · Chile 48.612.3
Self-employed333rd of 345 · Chile 33.8%24.9%
Women's pay as share of men's330th of 342 · Chile 78.9%68.0%
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer317th of 330 · Chile 5.9%3.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF32.2 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF32.2 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 616 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
52.0%
239th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
15.6%
210th of 335
Came from another region
28.9%
29th of 335
Net internal migration
-10,047
-72.5 per 100 residents
Diego de Almagrothis commune · 23,405another region4,001 peopleelsewhere in the region2,157 peopleabroad496 peopleanother region11,137 peopleelsewhere in the region5,068 peopleDiego de Almagrothis commune · 13,854
Diego de Almagrothis commune · 23,405another region4,001 peopleelsewhere in th…2,157 peopleabroad496 peopleanother region11,137 peopleelsewhere in th…5,068 peopleDiego de Almagrothis commune · 13,854

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Construction1Construction7Professional services2Professional services▲55Accommodation and food3Accommodation and food▲23Administrative services4Administrative services▼14Education5Education▼12Retail and wholesale6Retail and wholesale▼411Transport7Transport▲46Arts and entertainment8Arts and entertainment▼210Manufacturing9Manufacturing▲18Mining10Mining▼214Water and waste11Water and waste▲39Other services12Other services▼312Information and communications13Information and communications▼1
2005202411Construction72Professional services▲553Accommodation and food▲234Administrative services▼145Education▼126Retail and wholesale▼4117Transport▲468Arts and entertainment▼2109Manufacturing▲1810Mining▼21411Water and waste▲3912Other services▼31213Information and communications▼1

The ten branches that employ most of Diego de Almagro

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

2 k3 k4 k5 k6 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
2 k3 k4 k5 k6 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval1.2% a year observed · 0.5% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

1.0 M3.0 M5.0 M7.0 Mprojection →4.8 M2029 · central2005201520242029
1.0 M3.0 M5.0 M7.0 Mprojection →4.8 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.2% a year observed · 1.6% projected

What Diego de Almagro is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Diego de Almagro employs more people in 40 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

40
activities it is specialised in
3,487
formal workers
119/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Empresas de servicios de ingenier…Actividades de la administración …Construcción de edificios para us…Terminación y acabado de edificiosActividades de restaurantes y de …Actividades de paisajismo, servic…Venta al por menor en comercios d…Otros tipos de enseñanza n.c.p.Lavado y limpieza, incluida la li…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Empresas de servicios de ingenier…Actividades de la administración …Terminación y acabado de edificiosCultivo de trigoHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Diego de Almagro

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Actividades de residenciales para estudiantes y trabajadoresOtras actividades de alojamiento5450.7×
Preparación del terrenoDemolición y preparación del terreno79136.7×
Actividades de otros clubes deportivos n.c.p.Actividades deportivas11735.2×
Venta al por mayor de desechos metálicos (chatarra)Otras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada1625.2×
Producción de aguas minerales y otras aguas embotelladasElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas1620.9×
Actividades de paisajismo, servicios de jardinería y servicios conexosActividades de paisajismo y servicios de mantenimiento conexos8411.4×
Otras actividades de transporte de pasajeros por vía terrestre n.c.p.Otras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre9810.1×
Servicios de transporte de trabajadoresOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre567.6×
Empresas de servicios de ingeniería y actividades conexas de consultoría técnicaActividades de arquitectura e ingeniería y actividades conexas de consultoría técnica3285.8×
Actividades de hotelesActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas1355.5×
Otras actividades de limpieza de edificios e instalaciones industriales n.c.p.Actividades de limpieza624.9×
Recuperación y reciclamiento de desperdicios y desechos metálicosRecuperación de materiales43.6×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
Diego de AlmagroChile% of each territory's own population · 11,397 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
11,397
23,74218,480,432243rd of 346
Average age
36.1 yrs
37.0 yrs38.1 yrs313th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
48.6
61.379.0326th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
0.6/km²
1.0/km²24.7/km²321st of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
4,157
8,5406,596,527240th of 346
Dwellings
6,808
14,0457,642,716213th of 346
People per household
2.74
2.782.80180th of 345
Women
50.2%
49.9%51.5%256th of 346
Men per 100 women
99.1
100.394.391st of 346
Under 15
21.2%
20.7%17.7%19th of 346
65 and over
10.3%
12.7%14.0%323rd of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
45.9
50.246.5291st of 346
One-person households
24.2%
24.4%21.8%107th of 345
Households with children
37.7%
36.6%33.2%43rd of 345
Indigenous peoples
15.3%
15.6%11.4%125th of 346
Female-headed households
44.7%
50.1%49.9%265th of 345
Land area
18,992 km²
24,765 km²748,041 km²7th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Diego de Almagro45%Arrived since 202055%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Diego de Almagro45%Arrived since 202055%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
6.4%
5.0%8.7%75th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
52.0%
55.3%50.5%239th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
15.6%
15.9%23.9%210th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
28.9%
25.8%17.2%29th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
735
1,1981,608,650142nd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
31.8 yrs
31.1 yrs33.5 yrs256th of 345
Women among foreign-born
55.8%
54.7%51.7%33rd of 345
Foreign-born of working age
80.4%
80.2%83.1%200th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
44.9%
47.7%34.4%87th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
7.6%
6.1%10.6%78th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.6 yrs
11.6 yrs12.9 yrs281st of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-10,047
-20,6830285th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-72.5
-77.00.0316th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Diego de Almagro23%Higher43%Secondary25%Primary only5.6%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Diego de Almagro23%43%Secondary25%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.9 yrs
9.7 yrs10.4 yrs94th of 346
Reached higher education
23.2%
21.7%31.1%134th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
100.0%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
64.0%
60.5%55.6%41st of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
99.2%
100.1%99.8%278th of 346
Literacy rate
98.6%
98.4%97.8%44th of 346
Reached secondary education
43.2%
43.2%36.7%24th of 346
Primary education only
25.3%
26.6%24.1%267th of 346
Never attended school
2.63%
2.66%3.01%302nd of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
11.9 yrs
11.5 yrs12.1 yrs71st of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.8 yrs
11.5 yrs12.1 yrs84th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.44%
1.61%2.18%303rd of 345
Households lacking schooling
14.0%
13.7%15.1%267th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
175
339217,565182nd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
38.3%
43.1%33.9%156th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
59.8%
56.1%67.2%196th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
15.2%
13.2%19.7%216th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
25.0%
30.7%13.1%73rd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
57.1%
43.9%13.0%39th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
43.8%
46.8%49.7%296th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

175left secondary school in 2024
112enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
64.0%continued immediately
60%of those, to a university
57%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria Civil en MetalurgiaDerechoKinesiologiaAdministracion de EmpresasTecnico en MineriaIngenieria Civil en MinasMedicina VeterinariaNutricion y DieteticaObstetricia y Puericultura
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria Civil en MetalurgiaDerechoKinesiologiaAdministracion de EmpresasTecnico en MineriaIngenieria Civil en MinasMedicina VeterinariaNutricion y DieteticaObstetricia y Puericultura
Diego de AlmagroChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesNatural sciences
Diego de AlmagroChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0100200300200620152024175112
0100200300200620152024175112
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Diego de Almagro's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Diego de Almagro against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Diego de Almagro87%Fonasa11%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Diego de Almagro87%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo cover% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
11.1%
10.6%10.6%219th of 346
Public health insurance
86.6%
90.4%82.6%263rd of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
41.0
54.182.5287th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
38
100100308th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
1,261
2,5081,950,388259th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
52.5 yrs
54.2 yrs56.4 yrs319th of 346
Disability among 65+
33.4%
37.6%43.0%331st of 346
Difficulty walking
4.41%
4.32%4.92%271st of 346
Difficulty seeing
5.91%
5.47%4.58%117th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.19%
2.11%2.16%241st of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.46%
2.14%2.70%254th of 346
Private health insurance
11.4%
7.5%13.2%50th of 335
No health coverage
1.40%
1.37%1.98%171st of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
92.6%
91.6%92.1%188th of 332
Households lacking health access
3.0%
5.3%6.0%248th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
467
1,2851,523,716264th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
7
4436,698295th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.50%
3.42%2.41%308th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.7 days
6.7 days6.1 days259th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
6.1
18.519.9315th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
52
67100276th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
14
6289,723298th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
3.0%
4.8%5.9%317th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
12.3
26.148.6319th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
28
55100311th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 25%Injuries, bones and skin 19%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 19%Heart and lungs 17%Tumours, blood and m… 8.6%Mind, nerves an… 7.1%Infecti… 4.9%Digestive system16%Genitourinarysystem9.2%Injuries andpoisoning11%Musculoskeletal6.2%SkinPregnancy and childbirth15%Perinatal conditions2.4%Congenitalmalformat…Circulatory system8.8%Respiratory system7.9%Endocrineandmetabolic4.3%Cancers andtumours3.9%Mental andbehavioural4.5%Nervo…system2.4%Ill-definedsymptomsContactwithhealth…1.3%Infec…andparas…
Digestive and urinary tr… 25%Injuries, bones… 19%Pregnancy,… 19%Heart an… 17%Tumours, bl… 8.6%Digestivesystem16%Genitour…system9.2%Injuriesandpoisoning11%Muscul…6.2%SkinPregnancyandchildbirth15%Perinatal…Cong…malf…Circulatorysystem8.8%Respiratorysystem7.9%Endocr…andmetabo…CancersandtumoursMentalandbehaviou…Nervous…Ill-d…sympt…Contac…Inf…and…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
12.7%
18.8%17.3%285th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
32.2 UF
31.8 UF32.0 UF25th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
68.0%
68.9%78.9%330th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
73.4
79.285.6201st of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
60.4%
57.5%54.4%37th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
7.7%
7.8%8.6%218th of 345
Self-employed
24.9%
28.7%33.8%333rd of 345
Extreme poverty
6.0%
6.2%6.9%227th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
13.7%
18.1%17.7%236th of 335
Unemployment rate
6.7%
9.2%8.8%253rd of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 697,449
CLP 611,928CLP 783,12455th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.391
0.4150.488274th of 321
Registered firms
837
1,8811,582,390251st of 346
Annual sales
4,478,218 UF
9,024,733 UF34,347,683,688 UF210th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
3,487
6,6069,699,164221st of 346
Sales per firm
5,350 UF
4,798 UF21,706 UF115th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.7
2.33.9105th of 346
Women among employees
30.3%
28.0%40.6%315th of 345
Independent contractors
1,075
2,2763,958,269226th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
23.6%
25.6%29.0%235th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 29%Trade and logistics 22%State and social services 20%Industry and … 15%Advanced s… 9.2%Other serv… 4.5%Mining29%Retail andwholesale10%Accommodation andfood7.1%Transport5.2%Education9.5%Publicadministration5.3%Health5.2%Construction7.7%Manufact…4.5%Waterandwaste1.8%Electr…and gasAdministrativeservices6.3%Profession…servicesOtherservicesArtsandent…
Natural resources 29%Trade and logist… 22%State and socia… 20%Industry … 15%Advanc… 9.2%Other … 4.5%Mining29%Retail andwholesale10%Accommoda…and food7.1%Transpo…5.2%Education9.5%Publicadminist…5.3%Health5.2%Construction7.7%Manufac…4.5%WaterandwasteElect…Administrati…services6.3%Profess…Otherservic…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 29%Elementary occupations 14%Service andsales19%Plant andmachineoperators17%Craft and trades15%Clericalsupport5.7%Technicians13%Professionals12%Manage…3.7%Elementary occupations14%
Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 29%Elementar… 14%Service andsales19%Plant andmachineoperators17%Craft andtrades15%Clerical support5.7%Technicians13%Professionals12%ManagersElementaryoccupations14%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Diego de Almagro96%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Diego de Almagro96%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.1%
5.2%5.7%189th of 345
Internet access
93.3%
91.8%93.2%92nd of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.6
3.52.3238th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.6
3.41.6207th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
4,089
8,3886,408,172240th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.59%
0.42%0.57%51st of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
3.30%
2.71%1.13%44th of 345
Public water network
86.2%
88.7%92.3%160th of 345
Electricity access
99.3%
99.2%99.6%187th of 345
Detached houses
95.9%
97.3%78.7%221st of 345
Apartments
2.0%
1.1%19.9%111th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.70%
0.55%0.23%23rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
36.1%
34.4%11.9%44th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
285
566491,904207th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
6.9%
6.6%7.5%88th of 345
Renting households
18.7%
16.6%26.2%119th of 345
Owner-occupiers
43.4%
55.7%61.1%326th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
3.5%
2.1%24.4%289th of 345
Commute by public transport
20.4%
26.7%42.1%235th of 345
Walks to work
26.9%
24.8%10.2%50th of 345
Households with a computer
50.9%
48.8%54.9%85th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.1
1.41.1263rd of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.4%
95.2%97.0%105th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.7%
97.5%99.9%306th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.9%
99.7%100.0%305th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.7%
90.5%89.4%79th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.8%
91.8%98.1%226th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.1%
97.4%99.7%303rd of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.5
29.75.9270th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.7%
45.4%80.3%64th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.8%
45.5%90.0%133rd of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.1%
50.0%96.2%217th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.1
2.00.637th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
94.7%
93.9%99.0%268th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
94.8%
95.2%99.9%330th of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.1%
98.4%100.0%334th of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
94.7%
90.5%91.6%91st of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
94.8%
91.8%98.5%239th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.1%
97.4%99.8%309th of 345

How people commute

On foot or by bicycle 31%Private vehicle 25%Other means 23%Public transport 20%Walking27%Bicy…Car25%Other23%Public transport20%
On foot or by bicycle 31%Private vehicle 25%Other means 23%Public transport 20%Walking27%Car25%Other23%Public transport20%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 43%Provided rent-free 33%Rented 19%Owned outright43%Provided by employer27%Provi…byfamily6.2%Rented, withcontract14%Rented,nocontract5.1%Otherarrang…5.0%
Owned 43%Provided rent-fr… 33%Rented 19%Owned outright43%Provided byemployer27%Provided by familyRented, with contract14%Rented,nocontractOtherarrangem…5.0%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 45%Electricity 28%Fossil fuels 22%Woo… 3.8%Oth… 1.1%No heating45%Electricity28%Gas21%Firewood3.5%Other
No heating 45%Electricity 28%Fossil fuels 22%No heating45%Electricity28%Gas21%Firew…3.5%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
73.6%
of the registered voted in the first round
72.4%
voted in the runoff
11,361
registered voters on the roll
10.5%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman53.3%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist46.7%58.3%
Diego de AlmagroChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez35.5%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman30.7%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen11.6%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist15.7%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet4.2%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.7%1.3%
Diego de AlmagroChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile23.7%30.6%
KCambio por Chile15.8%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido5.4%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente37.0%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas15.4%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular2.8%0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
Diego de AlmagroChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile52.0%
KCambio por Chile12.6%
JChile Grande y Unido14.4%
IPartido de la Gente17.5%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista3.5%
Diego de Almagroshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Diego de Almagro across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading