Commune · 07408

Yerbas BuenasYerbas Buenas

Compare Yerbas Buenas with another place
Census population
20,035
170th of 346
Population density
77.2/km²
103rd of 346
Average years of schooling
8.4 yrs
316th of 346
Foreign-born share
0.7%
313th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 98.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 90.0%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF22.3 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF22.3 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 267 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
57.2%
203rd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
31.4%
55th of 335
Came from another region
11.0%
275th of 335
Net internal migration
+5,092
+25.6 per 100 residents
Yerbas Buenasthis commune · 14,692elsewhere in the region6,236 peopleanother region2,184 peopleabroad68 peopleelsewhere in the region2,555 peopleanother region773 peopleYerbas Buenasthis commune · 19,852
Yerbas Buenasthis commune · 14,692elsewhere in th…6,236 peopleanother region2,184 peopleabroad68 peopleelsewhere in th…2,555 peopleanother region773 peopleYerbas Buenasthis commune · 19,852

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing4Construction2Construction▲27Manufacturing3Manufacturing▲42Retail and wholesale4Retail and wholesale▼23Transport5Transport▼28Accommodation and food6Accommodation and food▲25Water and waste7Water and waste▼29Real estate8Real estate▲16Other services9Other services▼3
2005202411Agriculture and fishing42Construction▲273Manufacturing▲424Retail and wholesale▼235Transport▼286Accommodation and food▲257Water and waste▼298Real estate▲169Other services▼3

The ten branches that employ most of Yerbas Buenas

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

02 k4 k6 kprojection →5 k2029 · central2005201520242029
02 k4 k6 kprojection →5 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval4.8% a year observed · 5.2% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

02.0 M4.0 M6.0 Mprojection →3.8 M2029 · central2005201520242029
02.0 M4.0 M6.0 Mprojection →3.8 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.9% a year observed · 2.9% projected

What Yerbas Buenas is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Yerbas Buenas employs more people in 41 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

41
activities it is specialised in
3,515
formal workers
245/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de la administración …Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Elaboración de otros productos al…Construcción de edificios para us…Terminación y acabado de edificiosOtras instalaciones para obras de…Venta al por mayor de productos q…Cría de aves de corral para la pr…Asesoría y gestión en la compra o…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de la administración …Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Elaboración de otros productos al…Transporte de carga por carreteraHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Yerbas Buenas

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cultivo de maízCultivo de plantas no perennes7576.5×
Actividades de residenciales para estudiantes y trabajadoresOtras actividades de alojamiento5046.6×
Cultivo de plantas vivas incluida la producción en viveros (excepto viveros forestales)Propagación de plantas9231.3×
Servicios prestados de forma independiente por otros profesionales de la saludOtras actividades de atención de la salud humana3021.7×
Elaboración de otros productos alimenticios n.c.p.Elaboración de otros productos alimenticios29714.6×
Cultivo de otros frutos y nueces de árboles y arbustosCultivo de plantas perennes3513.4×
Venta al por mayor de productos químicosOtras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada2810.6×
Fabricación de otros productos químicos n.c.p.Fabricación de otros productos químicos2710.3×
Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de huesoCultivo de plantas perennes5509.3×
Cultivo de trigoCultivo de plantas no perennes418.2×
Venta al por menor de gas licuado en bombonas (cilindros) en comercios especializadosVenta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados126.4×
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción de carne o como ganado reproductorGanadería225.8×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
12,936
hectares in holdings
89.3%
of them under a named use
99.7%
of the crop land is irrigated
821
holdings with land here
Annual crops 34%Orchards and vineyards 26%Not farmed 19%Pasture 18%Woodland 4.1%Cereals22%Fodder crops5.4%Pulses andtubers4.1%Indus…cropsSeedcropsVeget…0.6%Fruit trees22%Vines4.0%Scrub, barren groundand buildings11%Untilled land8.0%Pasture18%Forest plantations3.6%
Annual crops 34%Orchards and vin… 26%Not farmed 19%Pasture 18%Cereals22%Fodder crops5.4%PulsesandtubersIndus…Seed…Veg…Fruit trees22%VinesScrub,barrenground and…11%Untilledland8.0%Pasture18%For…pla…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
Yerbas BuenasChile% of each territory's own population · 20,035 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
20,035
307,82618,480,432170th of 346
Average age
39.3 yrs
39.4 yrs38.1 yrs169th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
85.7
88.979.0196th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
77.2/km²
30.6/km²24.7/km²103rd of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
7,095
112,4046,596,527179th of 346
Dwellings
8,088
135,5247,642,716189th of 346
People per household
2.82
2.742.80114th of 345
Women
50.1%
51.6%51.5%272nd of 346
Men per 100 women
99.8
94.094.375th of 346
Under 15
18.2%
18.3%17.7%138th of 346
65 and over
15.6%
16.2%14.0%179th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
51.2
52.646.5168th of 346
One-person households
18.9%
20.9%21.8%286th of 345
Households with children
34.9%
33.7%33.2%102nd of 345
Indigenous peoples
3.7%
3.8%11.4%311th of 346
Female-headed households
39.2%
47.3%49.9%329th of 345
Land area
259 km²
10,068 km²748,041 km²260th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Yerbas Buenas42%Arrived since 202058%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Yerbas Buenas42%Arrived since 202058%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
0.7%
1.7%8.7%313th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
57.2%
68.1%50.5%203rd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
31.4%
16.2%23.9%55th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
11.0%
13.8%17.2%275th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
149
5,3371,608,650260th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
32.4 yrs
33.7 yrs33.5 yrs227th of 345
Women among foreign-born
53.0%
49.8%51.7%97th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
84.6%
81.3%83.1%43rd of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
41.6%
38.8%34.4%126th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
1.0%
2.2%10.6%308th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.2 yrs
12.4 yrs12.9 yrs191st of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
5,092
-50,720067th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
25.6
-16.00.053rd of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Yerbas Buenas14%Higher35%Secondary42%Primary only4.7%4.6%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Yerbas Buenas35%Secondary42%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
8.4 yrs
9.1 yrs10.4 yrs316th of 346
Reached higher education
13.7%
19.7%31.1%320th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
98.4%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
50.5%
49.3%55.6%230th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
105.4%
103.9%99.8%33rd of 346
Literacy rate
93.5%
95.3%97.8%317th of 346
Reached secondary education
35.0%
36.4%36.7%258th of 346
Primary education only
42.0%
34.9%24.1%23rd of 346
Never attended school
4.67%
3.81%3.01%66th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.3 yrs
10.3 yrs12.1 yrs320th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
9.8 yrs
10.7 yrs12.1 yrs307th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
6.43%
4.68%2.18%32nd of 345
Households lacking schooling
30.0%
27.1%15.1%85th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
91
3,750217,565247th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
63.7%
44.1%33.9%49th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
23.1%
4.4%3.1%47th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
28.3%
56.9%67.2%327th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
8.7%
8.6%19.7%291st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
63.0%
34.5%13.1%2nd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
4.3%
21.2%13.0%244th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
47.8%
52.3%49.7%251st of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

91left secondary school in 2024
46enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
50.5%continued immediately
28%of those, to a university
4%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%Tecnico AgricolaTecnico en Cosmetologia y Estetica IntegralTecnico en Redes ElectricasTecnico en Automatizacion y Control Industrial
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%Tecnico AgricolaTecnico en Cosmetologia y Estetica IntegralTecnico en Redes ElectricasTecnico en Automatizacion y Control Industrial
Yerbas BuenasChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryAgriculture and veterinaryServicesEducationHealth and welfareBusiness and lawInformation technologySocial sciencesNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryAgriculture and veterinaryServicesEducationHealth and welfareBusiness and lawInformation technologySocial sciencesNatural sciences
Yerbas BuenasChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0501001502006201520249146
0501001502006201520249146
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Yerbas Buenas's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Yerbas Buenas against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Yerbas Buenas91%Fonasa4.6%Chile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Yerbas Buenas91%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
13.7%
13.6%10.6%98th of 346
Public health insurance
90.9%
92.0%82.6%197th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
57.2
76.682.5232nd of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
74
117100230th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
2,738
41,8951,950,388164th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
57.9 yrs
57.7 yrs56.4 yrs178th of 346
Disability among 65+
44.8%
45.2%43.0%197th of 346
Difficulty walking
6.76%
6.74%4.92%103rd of 346
Difficulty seeing
6.42%
6.31%4.58%94th of 346
Difficulty hearing
3.03%
2.79%2.16%91st of 346
Difficulty concentrating
3.29%
3.23%2.70%80th of 346
Private health insurance
0.1%
1.9%13.2%310th of 335
No health coverage
4.45%
3.18%1.98%31st of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
97.5%
96.9%92.1%73rd of 332
Households lacking health access
12.0%
6.8%6.0%26th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
1,146
23,5811,523,716190th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
32
79936,698202nd of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.79%
3.39%2.41%168th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.3 days
6.0 days6.1 days197th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
16.0
26.019.9227th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
68
90100225th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
58
1,37989,723208th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.1%
5.8%5.9%217th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
28.9
44.848.6259th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
55
84100256th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 23%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 22%Heart and lungs 21%Injuries, bones… 17%Tumours, blood … 10%Digestive system15%Genitour…system7.9%Pregnancy and childbirth21%Circulatory system12%Respiratorysystem8.8%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculoskeletal4.3%Cancers andtumours7.2%Endo…andmeta…Bloo…Infectiou…Ill-de…sympto…NervoussystemMental…
Digestive and urinary… 23%Pregnancy, birth an… 22%Heart and lun… 21%Injuries,… 17%Tumours, … 10%Digestivesystem15%Genito…system7.9%Pregnancy andchildbirth21%Circulatorysystem12%Respiratorysystem8.8%Injuriesandpoisoning12%Musculoskel…4.3%Cancersandtumours7.2%End…andmet…Blo…Infect…and…Ill-…symp…NervoussystemMentaland…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Sitios reservados34%Órganos digestivos29%Mama17%Genitales femeninos10%Piel y melanoma8.6%
Sitios reservados34%Órganosdigestivos29%Mama17%Genitalesfemeninos10%Piel ymelanoma8.6%
Sitios reservadosÓrganos digestivosMamaGenitales femeninosPiel y melanomahover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
23.0%
29.7%17.3%123rd of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
22.3 UF
19.2 UF32.0 UF185th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
111.9%
109.0%78.9%75th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
75.8
89.685.6181st of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
44.4%
46.7%54.4%277th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
11.6%
10.7%8.6%42nd of 345
Self-employed
31.1%
35.3%33.8%261st of 345
Extreme poverty
9.4%
12.5%6.9%124th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
15.0%
14.9%17.7%220th of 335
Unemployment rate
5.5%
9.0%8.8%286th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 412,870
CLP 466,464CLP 783,124307th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.359
0.4420.488309th of 321
Registered firms
1,518
27,5711,582,390180th of 346
Annual sales
3,296,419 UF
83,517,785 UF34,347,683,688 UF237th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
3,515
92,1109,699,164220th of 346
Sales per firm
2,172 UF
3,029 UF21,706 UF258th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.4
1.83.9287th of 346
Women among employees
44.6%
42.3%40.6%104th of 345
Independent contractors
1,108
22,1653,958,269222nd of 346
Contractors as share of workers
24.0%
19.4%29.0%227th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 40%Trade and logistics 18%Industry and con… 17%State and social services 16%Other se… 4.3%Advanced… 3.9%Agriculture andfishing38%Retail andwholesale11%Transport5.2%Accomm…andfood2.4%Construction8.0%Manufacturi…6.8%Elec…andgasWaterandwasteEducation7.5%Health4.8%Publicadministration4.0%Domesticwork2.8%Otherserv…Admini…servic…1.8%Profe…servi…Infor…
Natural resources 40%Trade and… 18%Industry and c… 17%State and soc… 16%Agriculture and fishing38%Retail andwholesale11%Transport5.2%Acc…andfoodConstru…8.0%Manufact…6.8%Elec…Wat…Education7.5%Health4.8%Pub…adm…Domes…work2.8%Adm…ser…Prof…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 54%Elementary occupations 30%Managers and professionals 16%Service andsales13%Craft and trades13%Skilledagricultural12%Plant and machineoperators11%Clerical supportElementary occupations30%Technicians8.0%Professiona…6.6%
Skilled occupations 54%Elementary occupations 30%Managers an… 16%Service and sales13%Craft and trades13%Skilledagricultur…12%Plant andmachineoperators11%Elementary occupations30%Technicians8.0%Profession…6.6%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Yerbas Buenas100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Yerbas Buenas100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
6.5%
5.7%5.7%60th of 345
Internet access
86.9%
87.3%93.2%213th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
6.2
4.62.379th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.9
3.31.6146th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
6,998
111,0606,408,172179th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.37%
0.32%0.57%125th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.86%
0.96%1.13%238th of 345
Public water network
91.9%
88.5%92.3%112th of 345
Electricity access
99.1%
99.6%99.6%225th of 345
Detached houses
99.5%
98.3%78.7%34th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
1.2%19.9%247th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.20%
0.14%0.23%140th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
9.3%
13.8%11.9%252nd of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
334
5,214491,904188th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.7%
4.6%7.5%221st of 345
Renting households
8.1%
13.6%26.2%326th of 345
Owner-occupiers
75.6%
73.0%61.1%36th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
82.0%
64.9%24.4%106th of 345
Commute by public transport
20.3%
23.0%42.1%238th of 345
Walks to work
8.2%
11.3%10.2%285th of 345
Households with a computer
35.1%
41.6%54.9%275th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.1
1.61.1117th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.0%
95.3%97.0%143rd of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
37.1%
67.4%89.4%303rd of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
93.3%98.1%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.8%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
6.0
6.55.9202nd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
38.8%
56.1%80.3%164th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
86.3%90.0%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.0%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.4
1.10.6103rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
98.5%99.0%1st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
63.3%
74.5%91.6%242nd of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
96.7%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 50%On foot or by bicycle 22%Public transport 20%Car46%Bicycle14%Walking8.2%Public transport20%Other8.0%
Private vehicle 50%On foot or by bi… 22%Public transpo… 20%Car46%Bicycle14%Walking8.2%Publictransport20%Other8.0%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 76%Provided ren… 12%Rented 8.1%Other 4.6%Owned outright75%Provided byfamily9.7%Rented,nocontract4.6%Rente…withcontr…3.4%Other arrangement4.6%
Owned 76%Provided rent-free 12%Rented 8.1%Owned outright75%Provided by family9.7%Rented,nocontractRented,withcontra…3.4%Otherarrang…4.6%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 83%Fossil fuels 11%Electricity 3.0%No heating 2.9%Firewood82%Gas7.4%Paraffin3.3%Electricity3.0%No heating2.9%
Wood and biomass 83%Fossil fuels 11%Firewood82%GasParaffinElectri…Noheati…
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
93.2%
of the registered voted in the first round
93.1%
voted in the runoff
17,183
registered voters on the roll
6.2%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman26.0%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist74.0%58.3%
Yerbas BuenasChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez27.0%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman16.2%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.4%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist33.7%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet6.5%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.5%1.3%
Yerbas BuenasChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile26.0%30.6%
KCambio por Chile30.1%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido23.2%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente13.3%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas7.4%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
Yerbas BuenasChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile14.5%
KCambio por Chile35.5%
JChile Grande y Unido14.3%
IPartido de la Gente12.4%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas17.3%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular2.3%
Independents outside a pact3.8%
Yerbas Buenasshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Yerbas Buenas across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading