Commune · 07109

San ClementeSan Clemente

Compare San Clemente with another place
Census population
47,380
96th of 346
Population density
10.5/km²
258th of 346
Average years of schooling
8.7 yrs
281st of 346
Foreign-born share
1.9%
217th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Self-employed321st of 345 · Chile 33.8%26.3%
Contractors as share of workers316th of 346 · Chile 29.0%17.1%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF19.0 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF19.0 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 547 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
70.8%
69th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
13.4%
240th of 335
Came from another region
15.0%
171st of 335
Net internal migration
-3,189
-6.7 per 100 residents
San Clementethis commune · 50,689another region7,169 peopleelsewhere in the region6,406 peopleabroad440 peopleelsewhere in the region12,163 peopleanother region4,601 peopleSan Clementethis commune · 47,940
San Clementethis commune · 50,689another region7,169 peopleelsewhere in th…6,406 peopleabroad440 peopleelsewhere in th…12,163 peopleanother region4,601 peopleSan Clementethis commune · 47,940

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing2Retail and wholesale2Retail and wholesale4Construction3Construction▲111Administrative services4Administrative services▲75Manufacturing5Manufacturing6Transport6Transport12Education7Education▲57Water and waste8Water and waste▼110Accommodation and food9Accommodation and food▲114Arts and entertainment10Arts and entertainment▲49Professional services11Professional services▼23Other services12Other services▼98Mining13Mining▼5
2005202411Agriculture and fishing22Retail and wholesale43Construction▲1114Administrative services▲755Manufacturing66Transport127Education▲578Water and waste▼1109Accommodation and food▲11410Arts and entertainment▲4911Professional services▼2312Other services▼9813Mining▼5

The ten branches that employ most of San Clemente

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

05 k10 k15 k20 kprojection →17 k2029 · central2005201520242029
05 k10 k15 k20 kprojection →17 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.4% a year observed · 3.2% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

05.0 M10 M15 Mprojection →10 M2029 · central2005201520242029
05.0 M10 M15 Mprojection →10 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.8% a year observed · 2.0% projected

What San Clemente is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, San Clemente employs more people in 48 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

48
activities it is specialised in
14,490
formal workers
290/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.33.7Actividades de la administración …Venta al por mayor de huevos, lác…Cultivo de frutos oleaginosos (in…Cultivo de trigoActividades de organizaciones y ó…Venta al por menor de productos t…Fabricación de plásticos y caucho…Fabricación de otros tipos de maq…Terminación y acabado de edificiosHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.33.7Actividades de la administración …Venta al por mayor de huevos, lác…Cultivo de trigoFabricación de plásticos y caucho…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in San Clemente

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cultivo de otras plantas perennesCultivo de plantas perennes1,40136.4×
Cultivo de uva destinada a la producción de vinoCultivo de plantas perennes62133.2×
Venta al por menor mediante máquinas expendedorasVenta al por menor no realizada en comercios, puestos de venta o mercados1619.3×
Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales (explotación mixta)Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales55116.4×
Actividades de organizaciones y órganos extraterritorialesActividades de organizaciones y órganos extraterritoriales1915.6×
Gestión de otras instalaciones deportivas n.c.p.Actividades deportivas8111.2×
Elaboración de vinosElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas26410.9×
Actividades de apoyo a la agriculturaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha4,0809.2×
ApiculturaGanadería129.1×
Servicios de forestación a cambio de una retribución o por contrataServicios de apoyo a la silvicultura1047.3×
Cultivo de maízCultivo de plantas no perennes286.9×
Conservador de bienes raícesActividades jurídicas216.1×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
90,753
hectares in holdings
90.8%
of them under a named use
98.8%
of the crop land is irrigated
2,125
holdings with land here
Woodland 54%Not farmed 16%Annual crops 11%Pasture 10%Orchards and vine… 8.9%Native woodland41%Forestplantations13%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings9.2%Untilled land6.4%Cereals3.0%Seedcrops2.8%Foddercrops2.7%Pulsesand…Veg…Pasture10%Fruit trees6.4%Vines2.5%
Woodland 54%Not farmed 16%Annual crops 11%Pasture 10%Native woodland41%Forestplantatio…13%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings9.2%Untilled land6.4%Cerea…3.0%Seedcrops2.8%Fodd…cropsPul…Veg…Pasture10%Fruittrees6.4%Vines
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
San ClementeChile% of each territory's own population · 47,380 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
47,380
445,02118,480,43296th of 346
Average age
38.6 yrs
37.9 yrs38.1 yrs215th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
81.7
77.779.0219th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
10.5/km²
44.8/km²24.7/km²258th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
16,654
160,5066,596,52799th of 346
Dwellings
22,312
191,3267,642,71694th of 346
People per household
2.84
2.772.8098th of 345
Women
50.6%
51.5%51.5%222nd of 346
Men per 100 women
97.8
94.394.3125th of 346
Under 15
18.7%
18.3%17.7%103rd of 346
65 and over
15.3%
14.2%14.0%204th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
51.6
48.346.5150th of 346
One-person households
20.0%
21.5%21.8%247th of 345
Households with children
34.9%
33.8%33.2%109th of 345
Indigenous peoples
3.9%
3.7%11.4%307th of 346
Female-headed households
42.8%
47.9%49.9%301st of 345
Land area
4,502 km²
9,927 km²748,041 km²38th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

San Clemente44%Arrived since 202056%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
San Clemente44%Arrived since 202056%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
1.9%
4.8%8.7%217th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
70.8%
60.8%50.5%69th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
13.4%
19.5%23.9%240th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
15.0%
14.5%17.2%171st of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
912
21,5741,608,650130th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
33.0 yrs
32.5 yrs33.5 yrs193rd of 345
Women among foreign-born
49.9%
50.5%51.7%220th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
84.3%
80.6%83.1%50th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
44.3%
42.0%34.4%92nd of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
2.5%
5.8%10.6%211th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.4 yrs
13.3 yrs12.9 yrs297th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-3,189
-18,3810221st of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-6.7
-3.90.0180th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

San Clemente16%Higher37%Secondary37%Primary only5.0%5.1%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
San Clemente16%37%Secondary37%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
8.7 yrs
9.9 yrs10.4 yrs281st of 346
Reached higher education
16.0%
26.9%31.1%286th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.3%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
53.7%
52.5%55.6%178th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
105.1%
102.7%99.8%44th of 346
Literacy rate
94.6%
96.6%97.8%275th of 346
Reached secondary education
36.5%
36.4%36.7%196th of 346
Primary education only
37.4%
27.7%24.1%80th of 346
Never attended school
4.96%
3.58%3.01%43rd of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.8 yrs
11.4 yrs12.1 yrs277th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.3 yrs
11.8 yrs12.1 yrs251st of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
5.37%
3.38%2.18%68th of 345
Households lacking schooling
24.3%
18.5%15.1%153rd of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
218
5,338217,565167th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
42.2%
37.5%33.9%137th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
13.3%
4.3%3.1%73rd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
58.1%
69.4%67.2%209th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
13.7%
10.3%19.7%234th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
28.2%
20.3%13.1%53rd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
5.1%
10.8%13.0%236th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
47.9%
48.3%49.7%249th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

218left secondary school in 2024
117enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
53.7%continued immediately
58%of those, to a university
5%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%PsicologiaTecnico AgricolaTecnico en EnfermeriaDerechoArquitecturaIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria ComercialTecnico en Mecanica Automotriz y AutotronicaTecnico en Mecanica y Electromovilidad AutomotrizAdministracion Gastronomica
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%PsicologiaTecnico AgricolaTecnico en EnfermeriaDerechoArquitecturaIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria ComercialTecnico en Mecanica Automotriz y AutotronicaTecnico en Mecanica y Electromovilidad AutomotrizAdministracion Gastronomica
San ClementeChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareEducationBusiness and lawAgriculture and veterinarySocial sciencesInformation technologyServicesArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareEducationBusiness and lawAgriculture and veterinarySocial sciencesInformation technologyServicesArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
San ClementeChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0100200300200620152024218117
0100200300200620152024218117
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort San Clemente's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold San Clemente against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

San Clemente96%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
San Clemente96%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
14.0%
12.0%10.6%86th of 346
Public health insurance
95.8%
90.9%82.6%74th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
58.5
72.482.5225th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
62
84100263rd of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
6,646
53,1941,950,38882nd of 346
Average age, people with a disability
57.3 yrs
56.5 yrs56.4 yrs204th of 346
Disability among 65+
44.2%
42.8%43.0%215th of 346
Difficulty walking
6.99%
5.70%4.92%81st of 346
Difficulty seeing
6.48%
5.53%4.58%85th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.73%
2.37%2.16%135th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
3.33%
2.86%2.70%74th of 346
Private health insurance
0.7%
5.0%13.2%291st of 335
No health coverage
0.98%
2.33%1.98%207th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
95.7%
90.9%92.1%123rd of 332
Households lacking health access
2.4%
3.9%6.0%268th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
2,772
32,2001,523,716110th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
63
74636,698131st of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.27%
2.32%2.41%243rd of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
7.4 days
5.9 days6.1 days79th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
13.3
16.819.9272nd of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
70
88100220th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
194
2,14389,723101st of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
7.0%
6.7%5.9%67th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
40.9
48.248.6156th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
79
98100155th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 24%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 20%Injuries, bones a… 20%Heart and lungs 17%Tumours, blood and metabo… 13%Mind,… 4.1%Digestive system16%Genitour…system7.6%Pregnancy andchildbirth19%Injuries andpoisoning14%Musculoskeletal4.8%SkinCirculatorysystem10.0%Respiratorysystem7.0%Cancers andtumours9.7%Endoc…andmetab…3.1%Nervoussystem2.7%Men…andbeh…Infect…and…Cont…
Digestive and urinary … 24%Pregnancy, birth … 20%Injuries, b… 20%Heart an… 17%Tumours, bl… 13%Min… 4.1%Digestivesystem16%Genito…system7.6%Pregnancy andchildbirth19%Injuries andpoisoning14%Musculoskele…4.8%Circulatorysystem10.0%Respiratorysystem7.0%Cancers andtumours9.7%Endocrine and…NervoussystemInf…and…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos27%Sangre y sistemalinfático17%Mama10%Genitalesmasculinos8.8%Genitalesfemeninos7.2%Víasurinarias6.7%Víasrespirator…6.2%Tiroides yendocrinas6.2%Sitios maldefinidos5.2%Sitiosreservados5.2%
Órganos digestivos27%Sangre ysistemalinfático17%Mama10%Genitalesmasculinos8.8%Genitalesfemeninos7.2%Víasurinarias6.7%Víasrespirat…6.2%Tiroidesyendocrin…6.2%Sitiosmaldefinidos5.2%Sitiosreservad…5.2%
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaGenitales masculinosGenitales femeninosVías urinariashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
22.9%
23.7%17.3%127th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
19.0 UF
24.9 UF32.0 UF304th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
110.8%
100.5%78.9%83rd of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
78.3
84.985.6168th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
46.2%
51.0%54.4%247th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
11.0%
9.1%8.6%60th of 345
Self-employed
26.3%
32.3%33.8%321st of 345
Extreme poverty
10.2%
10.5%6.9%97th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
11.4%
13.3%17.7%275th of 335
Unemployment rate
7.0%
8.4%8.8%244th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 446,226
CLP 538,802CLP 783,124277th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.432
0.4610.488173rd of 321
Registered firms
3,709
37,7891,582,39098th of 346
Annual sales
9,161,931 UF
236,637,990 UF34,347,683,688 UF143rd of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
14,490
169,0949,699,16496th of 346
Sales per firm
2,470 UF
6,262 UF21,706 UF245th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.9
2.83.9222nd of 346
Women among employees
38.1%
38.2%40.6%225th of 345
Independent contractors
2,991
53,0023,958,269125th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
17.1%
23.9%29.0%316th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 33%Industry and construction 20%Trade and logistics 19%State and social… 17%Other … 5.9%Advanc… 5.2%Agriculture and fishing29%Construction11%Manufacturing5.7%Electricityand gasWaterandwasteRetail andwholesale12%Transport3.8%Accommodati…and foodEducation8.1%Health4.9%Publicadminis…4.2%Domestic work3.7%OtherservicesArtsand…Administ…servicesProfessio…
Natural resources 33%Industry and … 20%Trade and logi… 19%State and so… 17%Othe… 5.9%Adva… 5.2%Agriculture andfishing29%Construction11%Manufactu…5.7%Elect…andgasWater…Retail andwholesale12%Transport3.8%Accomm…andfoodEducation8.1%Health4.9%Publicadmini…4.2%Domes…work3.7%Admi…serv…Profe…servi…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 54%Elementary occupations 27%Managers and professionals 19%Service and sales16%Craft andtrades15%Plant andmachineoperators9.8%Skilledagricultural8.2%Cleric…support4.1%Elementary occupations27%Technicians8.7%Professionals8.1%Managers
Skilled occupations 54%Elementary occupations 27%Managers and pr… 19%Service andsales16%Craft andtrades15%Plant and machineoperators9.8%Skilledagricultur…8.2%Cleri…suppo…4.1%Elementary occupations27%Technici…8.7%Profess…8.1%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

San Clemente100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
San Clemente100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
6.4%
5.1%5.7%65th of 345
Internet access
88.2%
91.1%93.2%188th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.8
2.52.3121st of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.9
2.21.6103rd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
16,376
157,3776,408,17299th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.36%
0.30%0.57%137th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.16%
0.67%1.13%162nd of 345
Public water network
90.6%
92.0%92.3%126th of 345
Electricity access
99.6%
99.7%99.6%118th of 345
Detached houses
99.4%
90.0%78.7%56th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
9.7%19.9%256th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.11%0.23%243rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
23.6%
14.3%11.9%97th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
911
8,220491,90493rd of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
5.5%
5.1%7.5%166th of 345
Renting households
10.6%
19.5%26.2%276th of 345
Owner-occupiers
73.0%
69.0%61.1%73rd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
68.6%
35.9%24.4%134th of 345
Commute by public transport
27.4%
27.0%42.1%146th of 345
Walks to work
10.9%
10.3%10.2%233rd of 345
Households with a computer
38.9%
51.0%54.9%238th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.6
1.11.1208th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.8%
97.5%97.0%122nd of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.7%
100.0%99.9%266th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
60.0%
86.6%89.4%239th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.9%
98.6%98.1%225th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
6.5
5.15.9196th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
58.5%
78.4%80.3%144th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
87.7%
88.9%90.0%154th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.3%
95.7%96.2%201st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.1
0.80.6158th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.2%
98.8%99.0%188th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.6%
100.0%99.9%292nd of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
69.3%
88.0%91.6%213th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
92.6%
98.0%98.5%256th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.0%
99.9%99.8%289th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 40%Public transport 27%On foot or by bicycle 20%Other means 13%Car38%Public transport27%Walking11%Bicycle9.1%Other13%
Private vehicle 40%Public transpo… 27%On foot or by bicycle 20%Other means 13%Car38%Publictransport27%Walking11%Bicycle9.1%Other13%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 73%Provided rent-f… 13%Rented 11%Other 3.7%Owned outright69%Provided byfamily9.9%Provided by employerRented,withcontract5.3%Rented,nocontract5.3%Other arrangement
Owned 73%Provided rent-free 13%Rented 11%Owned outright69%Provided byfamily9.9%Pro…byemp…Rented,withcontract5.3%Rented,nocontract5.3%Otherarran…3.7%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 71%Fossil fuels 19%Electricity 6.4%No h… 3.4%Firewood69%Gas12%Paraffin7.4%Electricity6.4%Noheating3.4%
Wood and biomass 71%Fossil fuels 19%Ele… 6.4%Firewood69%Gas12%Paraffin7.4%Electric…6.4%Noheat…
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
91.2%
of the registered voted in the first round
91.1%
voted in the runoff
40,456
registered voters on the roll
6.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman31.2%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist68.8%58.3%
San ClementeChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez25.7%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman19.3%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.4%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen12.5%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist32.4%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.6%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.8%1.3%
San ClementeChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile32.7%30.6%
KCambio por Chile27.6%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido20.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente13.4%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas5.7%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
San ClementeChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile23.3%
KCambio por Chile31.5%
JChile Grande y Unido11.0%
IPartido de la Gente10.9%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.9%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.5%
Independents outside a pact17.9%
San Clementeshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble San Clemente across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading