Commune · 07306

RomeralRomeral

Compare Romeral with another place
Census population
17,233
192nd of 346
Population density
10.7/km²
254th of 346
Average years of schooling
9.0 yrs
230th of 346
Foreign-born share
3.1%
159th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Contractors as share of workers345th of 346 · Chile 29.0%8.5%
Employees per firm12th of 346 · Chile 3.95.8
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute315th of 331 · Chile 19.7%5.5%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF19.1 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF19.1 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 234 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
63.0%
142nd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
20.6%
143rd of 335
Came from another region
12.2%
250th of 335
Net internal migration
+649
+3.8 per 100 residents
Romeralthis commune · 15,678elsewhere in the region3,512 peopleanother region2,076 peopleabroad710 peopleelsewhere in the region3,239 peopleanother region1,700 peopleRomeralthis commune · 17,037
Romeralthis commune · 15,678elsewhere in th…3,512 peopleanother region2,076 peopleabroad710 peopleelsewhere in th…3,239 peopleanother region1,700 peopleRomeralthis commune · 17,037

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing2Retail and wholesale2Retail and wholesale3Administrative services3Administrative services4Manufacturing4Manufacturing6Transport5Transport▲15Public administration6Public administration▼19Accommodation and food7Accommodation and food▲211Education8Education▲38Construction9Construction▼110Health10Health7Professional services11Professional services▼413Other services12Other services▲112Finance and insurance16Finance and insurance▼4
2005202411Agriculture and fishing22Retail and wholesale33Administrative services44Manufacturing65Transport▲156Public administration▼197Accommodation and food▲2118Education▲389Construction▼11010Health711Professional services▼41312Other services▲11216Finance and insurance▼4

The ten branches that employ most of Romeral

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

10 k20 k30 k40 k50 kprojection →38 k2029 · central2005201520242029
10 k20 k30 k40 k50 kprojection →38 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.3% a year observed · 2.0% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

010 M20 M30 M40 Mprojection →37 M2029 · central2005201520242029
010 M20 M30 M40 Mprojection →37 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval8.9% a year observed · -0.1% projected

What Romeral is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Romeral employs more people in 28 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

28
activities it is specialised in
34,365
formal workers
227/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.43.7Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Actividades de agencias de empleoActividades de envasado y empaque…Corretaje al por mayor de product…Venta al por mayor de productos d…Cultivo de trigoVenta al por mayor de maquinaria,…Venta al por mayor de maquinaria …Transmisiones de radioHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.43.7Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Venta al por mayor de frutas y ve…Actividades de agencias de empleoActividades de laboratorios clíni…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Romeral

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Venta al por mayor de frutas y verdurasVenta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco6,09146.1×
Elaboración y conservación de frutas, legumbres y hortalizasElaboración y conservación de frutas, legumbres y hortalizas1,12116.9×
Actividades de agencias de empleoActividades de agencias de empleo3,07316.2×
Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de huesoCultivo de plantas perennes8,66615.0×
Explotación de frigoríficos para almacenamiento y depósitoAlmacenamiento y depósito89114.7×
Cultivos forrajeros en praderas mejoradas o sembradas; cultivos suplementarios forrajerosCultivo de plantas no perennes15011.2×
Venta al por menor de flores, plantas, árboles, semillas y abonos en comercios especializadosVenta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados1118.7×
Venta al por menor de recuerdos, artesanías y artículos religiosos en comercios especializadosVenta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados378.0×
Actividades de apoyo a la agriculturaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha7,8387.5×
Actividades de envasado y empaquetadoActividades de servicios de apoyo a las empresas n.c.p.4286.5×
Cultivo de otras plantas perennesCultivo de plantas perennes5205.7×
Cría de cerdosGanadería735.5×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
86,391
hectares in holdings
41.9%
of them under a named use
99.9%
of the crop land is irrigated
514
holdings with land here
Not farmed 59%Woodland 23%Pasture 13%Orcha… 4.9%Scrub, barren ground and buildings58%Native woodland20%For…pla…Pasture13%Fruittrees4.5%
Not farmed 59%Woodland 23%Pasture 13%Scrub, barren ground and buildings58%Native woodland20%Pasture13%Fruittrees
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
RomeralChile% of each territory's own population · 17,233 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
17,233
309,33918,480,432192nd of 346
Average age
38.5 yrs
38.9 yrs38.1 yrs220th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
75.9
83.379.0246th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
10.7/km²
42.5/km²24.7/km²254th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
6,113
110,8956,596,527197th of 346
Dwellings
7,233
127,3777,642,716208th of 346
People per household
2.82
2.792.80118th of 345
Women
51.0%
51.2%51.5%170th of 346
Men per 100 women
96.2
95.494.3177th of 346
Under 15
18.4%
17.9%17.7%125th of 346
65 and over
14.0%
14.9%14.0%251st of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
47.8
48.846.5254th of 346
One-person households
19.3%
20.5%21.8%274th of 345
Households with children
35.0%
33.9%33.2%98th of 345
Indigenous peoples
7.5%
5.8%11.4%184th of 346
Female-headed households
47.3%
48.0%49.9%199th of 345
Land area
1,603 km²
7,286 km²748,041 km²89th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Romeral50%Arrived since 202050%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Romeral50%Arrived since 202050%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
3.1%
4.7%8.7%159th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
63.0%
65.2%50.5%142nd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
20.6%
15.1%23.9%143rd of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
12.2%
15.4%17.2%250th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
535
14,4531,608,650158th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
31.2 yrs
32.4 yrs33.5 yrs279th of 345
Women among foreign-born
47.1%
48.6%51.7%302nd of 345
Foreign-born of working age
79.6%
81.5%83.1%234th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
49.5%
41.3%34.4%48th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
3.7%
5.7%10.6%161st of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.8 yrs
12.7 yrs12.9 yrs255th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
649
-26,2030136th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
3.8
-8.10.0133rd of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Romeral20%Higher35%Secondary35%Primary only5.3%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Romeral20%35%Secondary35%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.0 yrs
9.5 yrs10.4 yrs230th of 346
Reached higher education
19.7%
23.0%31.1%197th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
98.8%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
60.3%
51.6%55.6%72nd of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
102.9%
102.4%99.8%114th of 346
Literacy rate
95.0%
96.0%97.8%256th of 346
Reached secondary education
35.3%
36.8%36.7%250th of 346
Primary education only
35.5%
31.3%24.1%113th of 346
Never attended school
4.27%
3.55%3.01%101st of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.3 yrs
10.9 yrs12.1 yrs212th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.6 yrs
11.1 yrs12.1 yrs207th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
5.01%
3.96%2.18%91st of 345
Households lacking schooling
33.9%
27.7%15.1%56th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
121
4,011217,565219th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
64.5%
44.8%33.9%46th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
4.6%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
63.0%
64.8%67.2%162nd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
5.5%
12.3%19.7%315th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
31.5%
23.0%13.1%38th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
11.0%
16.7%13.0%173rd of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
52.1%
49.9%49.7%141st of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

121left secondary school in 2024
73enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
60.3%continued immediately
63%of those, to a university
11%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Contador Publico y AuditorIngenieria Civil IndustrialAnalista ProgramadorGastronomiaObstetricia y PuericulturaPedagogia en Educacion FisicaTecnico en Mecanica y Electromovilidad AutomotrizTecnologia MedicaTerapia Ocupacional
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Contador Publico y AuditorIngenieria Civil IndustrialAnalista ProgramadorGastronomiaObstetricia y PuericulturaPedagogia en Educacion FisicaTecnico en Mecanica y Electromovilidad AutomotrizTecnologia MedicaTerapia Ocupacional
RomeralChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Health and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesEngineering and industryAgriculture and veterinaryInformation technologySocial sciencesNatural sciences
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Health and welfareBusiness and lawEducationServicesEngineering and industryAgriculture and veterinaryInformation technologySocial sciencesNatural sciences
RomeralChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

05010015020020062015202412173
05010015020020062015202412173
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Romeral's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Romeral against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Romeral95%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Romeral95%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
12.1%
11.9%10.6%178th of 346
Public health insurance
94.7%
91.7%82.6%107th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
52.3
71.182.5258th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
58
109100274th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
2,077
36,8481,950,388199th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
56.3 yrs
57.3 yrs56.4 yrs259th of 346
Disability among 65+
41.2%
44.4%43.0%285th of 346
Difficulty walking
5.88%
5.95%4.92%179th of 346
Difficulty seeing
5.47%
5.14%4.58%163rd of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.46%
2.36%2.16%189th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.49%
2.89%2.70%244th of 346
Private health insurance
2.7%
4.6%13.2%186th of 335
No health coverage
1.12%
2.17%1.98%197th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
88.2%
92.2%92.1%261st of 332
Households lacking health access
4.2%
3.6%6.0%211th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
902
22,0091,523,716212th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
20
69536,698236th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.22%
3.16%2.41%251st of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
7.2 days
6.8 days6.1 days94th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
11.6
22.519.9286th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
63
85100252nd of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
58
1,34889,723208th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
6.4%
6.1%5.9%106th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
33.7
43.648.6223rd of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
67
86100218th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 26%Heart and lungs 21%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 20%Injuries, bon… 16%Tumours, blood a… 13%Mind, nerv… 3.9%Digestive system16%Genitourin…system9.4%Circulatorysystem11%Respiratorysystem10%Pregnancy and childbirth18%Injuries andpoisoning11%Musculoske…3.1%Skin1.8%Cancers and tumours8.1%Endocrine andmetabolic4.7%Mentaland…Nervoussystem
Digestive and urinary t… 26%Heart and lungs 21%Pregnancy, b… 20%Injuries… 16%Tumours, b… 13%Mind, … 3.9%Digestivesystem16%Genitour…system9.4%Circulat…system11%Respirat…system10%Pregnancy andchildbirth18%Injuriesandpoisoning11%Musculo…3.1%SkinCancers andtumours8.1%Endocrine andmetabolicMenta…Nerv…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Sitios reservados38%Órganos digestivos29%Sangre y sistemalinfático21%Mama12%
Sitios reservados38%Órganosdigestivos29%Sangre y sistema linfático21%Mama12%
Sitios reservadosÓrganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamahover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
18.9%
19.4%17.3%195th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
19.1 UF
18.9 UF32.0 UF300th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
80.3%
94.5%78.9%304th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
122.6
101.185.638th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
54.7%
52.4%54.4%98th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
8.8%
8.9%8.6%167th of 345
Self-employed
29.9%
30.3%33.8%284th of 345
Extreme poverty
9.3%
7.4%6.9%126th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
9.1%
11.9%17.7%297th of 335
Unemployment rate
5.0%
8.1%8.8%293rd of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 506,667
CLP 528,684CLP 783,124197th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.374
0.4240.488301st of 321
Registered firms
2,112
31,2651,582,390140th of 346
Annual sales
36,949,086 UF
208,679,717 UF34,347,683,688 UF65th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
34,365
207,8679,699,16454th of 346
Sales per firm
17,495 UF
6,675 UF21,706 UF29th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
5.8
2.73.912th of 346
Women among employees
46.6%
40.5%40.6%82nd of 345
Independent contractors
3,174
35,7123,958,269117th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
8.5%
14.7%29.0%345th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 38%Trade and logistics 22%State and soci… 16%Industry and constructi… 14%Advanced ser… 5.1%Other servic… 4.9%Agriculture andfishing37%Retail and wholesale13%Transport6.0%Accomm…andfood2.6%Education7.2%Health4.7%Publicadmini…3.9%Manufacturi…7.8%Constructi…5.5%Water…Elect…Profes…servic…2.0%Admin…servi…1.7%Fina…DomesticworkOtherservic…
Natural resources 38%Trade and lo… 22%State and soc… 16%Industry and… 14%Adva… 5.1%Othe… 4.9%Agriculture and fishing37%Retail andwholesale13%Transport6.0%Acco…andfoodEducation7.2%HealthPub…adm…Manufacturing7.8%Construction5.5%Pro…ser…Adminis…Domes…workOth…ser…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 52%Elementary occupations 27%Managers and professionals 21%Service andsales14%Skilledagricultural11%Plant andmachineoperators11%Craft and trades11%Clerical support4.9%Elementary occupations27%Professiona…9.4%Technicians8.2%Managers
Skilled occupations 52%Elementary occupations 27%Managers and prof… 21%Service andsales14%Skilledagricultural11%Plant and machineoperators11%Craft andtrades11%ClericalsupportElementaryoccupations27%Professi…9.4%Technici…8.2%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Romeral98%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Romeral98%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
6.1%
5.6%5.7%84th of 345
Internet access
90.2%
90.8%93.2%149th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.3
2.92.3141st of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.1
2.81.6140th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
5,997
108,5276,408,172198th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.28%
0.33%0.57%230th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.93%
0.86%1.13%74th of 345
Public water network
91.4%
92.4%92.3%117th of 345
Electricity access
99.5%
99.6%99.6%140th of 345
Detached houses
98.3%
96.8%78.7%167th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
2.5%19.9%236th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.20%
0.14%0.23%140th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
12.9%
11.9%11.9%203rd of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
375
6,215491,904178th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
6.1%
5.6%7.5%123rd of 345
Renting households
11.4%
17.6%26.2%261st of 345
Owner-occupiers
70.9%
69.0%61.1%122nd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
64.3%
48.0%24.4%150th of 345
Commute by public transport
18.5%
23.3%42.1%265th of 345
Walks to work
12.0%
9.0%10.2%209th of 345
Households with a computer
45.4%
49.2%54.9%138th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.9
1.31.1150th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.1%
97.1%97.0%172nd of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.9%
100.0%99.9%253rd of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
73.7%
81.8%89.4%174th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.8%
98.5%98.1%236th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.8%
100.0%99.7%258th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
11.1
10.45.9168th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
5.3%
46.9%80.3%179th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
83.7%
79.3%90.0%167th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.6%
92.0%96.2%218th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.1
0.80.6170th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.7%
99.4%99.0%165th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.9%
100.0%99.9%274th of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
73.6%
81.0%91.6%192nd of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
93.8%
96.9%98.5%245th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.7%
100.0%99.8%264th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 51%On foot or by bicycle 21%Public transport 18%Othe… 9.0%Car48%Walking12%Bicycle9.3%Public transport18%Other8.9%
Private vehicle 51%On foot or by bi… 21%Public transp… 18%Car48%Walking12%Bicycle9.3%Publictransport18%Other8.9%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 71%Provided rent-fr… 16%Rented 11%Owned outright63%Owne…stillpayi…Provided byfamily10%Provided by employer5.6%Rented,nocontract6.1%Rented,withcontract5.3%
Owned 71%Provided rent-free 16%Rented 11%Owned outright63%Owne…stillpayi…Provided byfamily10%Providedbyemployer5.6%Rented,nocontract6.1%Rented,withcontra…5.3%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 68%Fossil fuels 18%Electricity 11%Firewood64%Gas12%Paraffin5.8%Electricity11%Noheating3.5%Other
Wood and biomass 68%Fossil fuels 18%Electricity 11%Firewood64%Gas12%Paraff…5.8%Electricity11%Noheat…
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
93.1%
of the registered voted in the first round
93.0%
voted in the runoff
15,066
registered voters on the roll
6.6%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman30.2%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist69.8%58.3%
RomeralChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez20.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman18.8%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.4%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.4%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist32.9%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet10.4%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.0%1.3%
RomeralChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile37.3%30.6%
KCambio por Chile26.7%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido17.7%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente12.2%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas6.2%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
RomeralChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile19.0%
KCambio por Chile33.5%
JChile Grande y Unido22.2%
IPartido de la Gente11.1%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas5.3%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.8%
Independents outside a pact7.2%
Romeralshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Romeral across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading