Commune · 07106

PelarcoPelarco

Compare Pelarco with another place
Census population
9,229
265th of 346
Population density
27.9/km²
176th of 346
Average years of schooling
8.8 yrs
264th of 346
Foreign-born share
1.6%
235th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
Leaves from technical-vocational school1st of 331 · Chile 33.9%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.2 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.2 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 162 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
60.4%
175th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
27.7%
73rd of 335
Came from another region
11.9%
254th of 335
Net internal migration
-1,830
-19.5 per 100 residents
Pelarcothis commune · 11,191elsewhere in the region2,590 peopleanother region1,114 peopleelsewhere in the region5,143 peopleanother region391 peoplePelarcothis commune · 9,361
Pelarcothis commune · 11,191elsewhere in th…2,590 peopleanother region1,114 peopleelsewhere in th…5,143 peopleanother region391 peoplePelarcothis commune · 9,361

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Public administration1Public administration▲11Agriculture and fishing2Agriculture and fishing▼110Manufacturing3Manufacturing▲74Retail and wholesale4Retail and wholesale5Construction5Construction9Transport6Transport▲38Water and waste7Water and waste▲13Health8Health▼56Accommodation and food9Accommodation and food▼311Other services10Other services▲17Finance and insurance11Finance and insurance▼4
2005202421Public administration▲112Agriculture and fishing▼1103Manufacturing▲744Retail and wholesale55Construction96Transport▲387Water and waste▲138Health▼569Accommodation and food▼31110Other services▲1711Finance and insurance▼4

The ten branches that employ most of Pelarco

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

01 k2 k3 kprojection →2 k2029 · central2005201520242029
01 k2 k3 kprojection →2 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.7% a year observed · 5.0% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

01.0 M2.0 M3.0 Mprojection →2.1 M2029 · central2005201520242029
01.0 M2.0 M3.0 Mprojection →2.1 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.7% a year observed · 0.0% projected

What Pelarco is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Pelarco employs more people in 43 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

43
activities it is specialised in
1,684
formal workers
275/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de la administración …Actividades de atención en instit…Cultivo de trigoOtras instalaciones para obras de…Fabricación de otros productos el…Cultivos forrajeros en praderas m…Corretaje al por mayor de ganadoCría de caballos y otros equinosTerminación y acabado de edificiosHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de la administración …Cultivo de trigoFabricación de productos metálico…Fabricación de otros productos el…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Pelarco

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción de carne o como ganado reproductorGanadería15987.6×
Actividades combinadas de servicios administrativos de oficinaActividades administrativas y de apoyo de oficina3549.1×
Cultivo de frutos oleaginosos (incluye el cultivo de aceitunas)Cultivo de plantas perennes6040.7×
Cultivo de maízCultivo de plantas no perennes1429.8×
Evacuación y tratamiento de aguas servidasEvacuación de aguas residuales3128.7×
Aserrado y acepilladura de maderaAserrado y acepilladura de madera9026.9×
Fabricación de otros productos de madera, de artículos de corcho, paja y materiales trenzablesFabricación de productos de madera, corcho, paja y materiales trenzables1423.6×
Corretaje al por mayor de ganadoVenta al por mayor a cambio de una retribución o por contrata417.4×
Actividades de atención en instituciones para personas de edad y personas con discapacidad físicaActividades de atención en instituciones para personas de edad y personas con discapacidad2517.1×
Fabricación de artículos de hormigón, cemento y yesoFabricación de productos minerales no metálicos n.c.p.179.9×
Cultivo de trigoCultivo de plantas no perennes229.2×
Cría de caballos y otros equinosGanadería18.5×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
24,382
hectares in holdings
89.3%
of them under a named use
98.3%
of the crop land is irrigated
454
holdings with land here
Pasture 33%Woodland 29%Not farmed 15%Annual crops 13%Orchards and … 10%Pasture33%Forest plantations17%Native woodland12%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings11%Untilledland4.2%Seed crops4.6%Cereals3.0%Fodder crops2.8%Veget…1.6%Indust…cropsPulses…Fruit trees10%
Pasture 33%Woodland 29%Not farmed 15%Annual crops 13%Orchard… 10%Pasture33%Forest plantations17%Native woodland12%Scrub,barrenground and…11%Unti…landSeedcrops4.6%Cerea…3.0%FoddercropsVeg…Fruit trees10%
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
PelarcoChile% of each territory's own population · 9,229 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
9,229
445,02118,480,432265th of 346
Average age
40.3 yrs
37.9 yrs38.1 yrs109th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
97.3
77.779.0128th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
27.9/km²
44.8/km²24.7/km²176th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
3,247
160,5066,596,527273rd of 346
Dwellings
4,073
191,3267,642,716281st of 346
People per household
2.84
2.772.80100th of 345
Women
50.2%
51.5%51.5%255th of 346
Men per 100 women
99.0
94.394.392nd of 346
Under 15
17.9%
18.3%17.7%170th of 346
65 and over
17.4%
14.2%14.0%102nd of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
54.4
48.346.570th of 346
One-person households
18.1%
21.5%21.8%300th of 345
Households with children
33.8%
33.8%33.2%148th of 345
Indigenous peoples
3.5%
3.7%11.4%323rd of 346
Female-headed households
38.7%
47.9%49.9%335th of 345
Land area
331 km²
9,927 km²748,041 km²238th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Pelarco32%Arrived since 202068%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Pelarco32%Arrived since 202068%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
1.6%
4.8%8.7%235th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
60.4%
60.8%50.5%175th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
27.7%
19.5%23.9%73rd of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
11.9%
14.5%17.2%254th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
145
21,5741,608,650261st of 346
Average age, foreign-born
33.9 yrs
32.5 yrs33.5 yrs141st of 345
Women among foreign-born
54.5%
50.5%51.7%52nd of 345
Foreign-born of working age
83.4%
80.6%83.1%70th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
32.4%
42.0%34.4%233rd of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
2.0%
5.8%10.6%231st of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.2 yrs
13.3 yrs12.9 yrs191st of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-1,830
-18,3810197th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-19.5
-3.90.0225th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Pelarco16%Higher37%Secondary37%Primary only5.2%4.7%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Pelarco16%37%Secondary37%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
8.8 yrs
9.9 yrs10.4 yrs264th of 346
Reached higher education
16.4%
26.9%31.1%275th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.3%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
47.3%
52.5%55.6%276th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
107.2%
102.7%99.8%12th of 346
Literacy rate
93.6%
96.6%97.8%314th of 346
Reached secondary education
37.0%
36.4%36.7%175th of 346
Primary education only
36.7%
27.7%24.1%91st of 346
Never attended school
5.23%
3.58%3.01%35th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.7 yrs
11.4 yrs12.1 yrs287th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.4 yrs
11.8 yrs12.1 yrs237th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
6.32%
3.38%2.18%38th of 345
Households lacking schooling
31.5%
18.5%15.1%73rd of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
55
5,338217,565285th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
100.0%
37.5%33.9%1st of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
4.3%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
34.6%
69.4%67.2%325th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
11.5%
10.3%19.7%259th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
53.8%
20.3%13.1%3rd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
0.0%
10.8%13.0%315th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
46.2%
48.3%49.7%275th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

55left secondary school in 2024
26enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
47.3%continued immediately
35%of those, to a university
0%of those, outside their region

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%Engineering and industryBusiness and lawEducationHealth and welfare
0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%Engineering and industryBusiness and lawEducationHealth and welfare
PelarcoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country. The list of individual programmes is withheld here: fewer than 30 of this territory's leavers continued, and a ranking built on that few names people.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

02040602006201520245526
02040602006201520245526
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Pelarco's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Pelarco against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Pelarco99%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Pelarco99%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapre% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
15.2%
12.0%10.6%40th of 346
Public health insurance
98.2%
90.9%82.6%14th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
58.3
72.482.5226th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
45
84100299th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
1,403
53,1941,950,388245th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
59.9 yrs
56.5 yrs56.4 yrs101st of 346
Disability among 65+
48.4%
42.8%43.0%105th of 346
Difficulty walking
7.79%
5.70%4.92%32nd of 346
Difficulty seeing
7.37%
5.53%4.58%34th of 346
Difficulty hearing
3.46%
2.37%2.16%47th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
3.68%
2.86%2.70%28th of 346
Private health insurance
1.1%
5.0%13.2%271st of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
2.33%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
86.4%
90.9%92.1%281st of 332
Households lacking health access
16.2%
3.9%6.0%5th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
538
32,2001,523,716258th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
10
74636,698285th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.86%
2.32%2.41%289th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.7 days
5.9 days6.1 days261st of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
10.8
16.819.9294th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
67
88100232nd of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
35
2,14389,723252nd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
6.5%
6.7%5.9%103rd of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
37.9
48.248.6192nd of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
69
98100204th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Injuries, bones and skin 22%Digestive and urinary tract 22%Pregnancy, birth … 21%Heart and lungs 19%Tumours, blood and meta… 11%Mind, n… 4.3%Injuries andpoisoning16%Muscu…3.7%Skin1.7%Digestive system13%Genitouri…system8.2%Pregnancy andchildbirth20%Circulatorysystem11%Respiratorysystem7.8%Cancers and tumours9.1%Nervoussystem2.8%Men…andbeh…Con…
Injuries, bones and … 22%Digestive and urinar… 22%Pregnancy, bi… 21%Heart and … 19%Tumours… 11%Min… 4.3%Injuries andpoisoning16%Muscu…3.7%Skin1.7%Digestivesystem13%Genitou…system8.2%Pregnancy andchildbirth20%Circulatorysystem11%Respiratorysystem7.8%Cancers andtumours9.1%Nervoussystem2.8%
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Sitios reservados40%Órganosdigestivos23%Genitalesmasculinos23%Piel y melanoma14%
Sitios reservados40%Órganosdigestivos23%Genitales masculinos23%Piel y melanoma14%
Sitios reservadosÓrganos digestivosGenitales masculinosPiel y melanomahover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
12.5%
23.7%17.3%291st of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
24.2 UF
24.9 UF32.0 UF125th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
107.0%
100.5%78.9%110th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
92.4
84.985.696th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
48.7%
51.0%54.4%212th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
7.3%
9.1%8.6%239th of 345
Self-employed
44.0%
32.3%33.8%44th of 345
Extreme poverty
4.8%
10.5%6.9%264th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
12.5%
13.3%17.7%258th of 335
Unemployment rate
15.4%
8.4%8.8%25th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 467,927
CLP 538,802CLP 783,124249th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.430
0.4610.488180th of 321
Registered firms
853
37,7891,582,390249th of 346
Annual sales
2,136,820 UF
236,637,990 UF34,347,683,688 UF261st of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
1,684
169,0949,699,164263rd of 346
Sales per firm
2,505 UF
6,262 UF21,706 UF238th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.4
2.83.9281st of 346
Women among employees
41.1%
38.2%40.6%169th of 345
Independent contractors
807
53,0023,958,269261st of 346
Contractors as share of workers
32.4%
23.9%29.0%101st of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 34%State and social services 19%Industry and construction 18%Trade and logist… 18%Advanc… 5.5%Other … 5.4%Agriculture and fishing33%Education8.0%Publicadminist…5.3%Health5.3%Construction9.0%Manufacturing7.5%Water and…Electri…Retail andwholesale11%Transport4.0%Accomm…andfood2.7%Admini…servic…2.2%Pro…ser…Info…and…Fin…and…Domesticwork3.5%Other…
Natural resources 34%State and s… 19%Industry and … 18%Trade and log… 18%Adv… 5.5%Oth… 5.4%Agriculture and fishing33%Education8.0%Publicadmini…5.3%Health5.3%Construction9.0%Manufacturi…7.5%Retail andwholesale11%Transport4.0%Accom…andfoodAdmini…servic…Profess…Domes…work3.5%
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 56%Elementary occupations 25%Managers and professionals 18%Service andsales16%Craft and trades14%Skilledagricultural12%Plant and machineoperators11%Clerical supportElementary occupations25%Professiona…8.3%Technicians7.8%Managers
Skilled occupations 56%Elementary occupations 25%Managers and pr… 18%Service andsales16%Craft and trades14%Skilled agricultural12%Plant andmachineoperators11%ClericalsupportElementary occupations25%Professionals8.3%Technicians7.8%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Pelarco100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Pelarco100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.8%
5.1%5.7%112th of 345
Internet access
87.4%
91.1%93.2%204th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.5
2.52.3134th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.5
2.21.6123rd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
3,191
157,3776,408,172274th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.16%
0.30%0.57%318th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.38%
0.67%1.13%128th of 345
Public water network
81.6%
92.0%92.3%193rd of 345
Electricity access
99.4%
99.7%99.6%175th of 345
Detached houses
99.2%
90.0%78.7%89th of 345
Apartments
0.1%
9.7%19.9%202nd of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.30%
0.11%0.23%86th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
16.5%
14.3%11.9%146th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
166
8,220491,904271st of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
5.1%
5.1%7.5%186th of 345
Renting households
7.0%
19.5%26.2%335th of 345
Owner-occupiers
73.1%
69.0%61.1%70th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
72.1%
35.9%24.4%126th of 345
Commute by public transport
19.5%
27.0%42.1%252nd of 345
Walks to work
10.2%
10.3%10.2%242nd of 345
Households with a computer
38.2%
51.0%54.9%248th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.2
1.11.1103rd of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.0%
97.5%97.0%192nd of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
59.1%
86.6%89.4%241st of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.8%
98.6%98.1%173rd of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
13.9
5.15.9153rd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
78.4%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
76.6%
88.9%90.0%180th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
95.7%96.2%180th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.6
0.80.676th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.8%
98.8%99.0%159th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
59.1%
88.0%91.6%256th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.3%
98.0%98.5%185th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 50%Public transport 20%On foot or by b… 17%Other means 13%Car48%Public transport20%Walking10%Bicycle6.5%Other13%
Private vehicle 50%Public transpo… 20%On foot or… 17%Other m… 13%Car48%Publictransport20%Walking10%Bicycle6.5%Other13%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 73%Provided rent-… 15%Rented 7.0%Other 4.4%Owned outright71%Provided byfamily11%Provided byemployerRented,nocontract3.8%Rented,withcontract3.2%Other arrangement
Owned 73%Provided rent-free 15%Rented 7.0%Owned outright71%Provided by family11%Provi…byemplo…4.3%Rented,nocontra…3.8%Rent…withcont…Otherarrang…4.4%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 74%Fossil fuels 17%Electricity 6.3%Firewood72%Gas11%Paraffin5.9%Electricity6.3%Noheati…2.4%
Wood and biomass 74%Fossil fuels 17%Elec… 6.3%Firewood72%Gas11%Paraffin5.9%Electricity6.3%Nohea…
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
91.9%
of the registered voted in the first round
92.1%
voted in the runoff
9,740
registered voters on the roll
6.1%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman27.0%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist73.0%58.3%
PelarcoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez24.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman16.4%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio0.9%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen13.4%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist34.0%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.5%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.8%1.3%
PelarcoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile12.8%30.6%
KCambio por Chile67.7%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido9.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente7.0%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.0%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
PelarcoChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile18.9%
KCambio por Chile39.4%
JChile Grande y Unido16.6%
IPartido de la Gente9.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas4.0%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.4%
Independents outside a pact10.6%
Pelarcoshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Pelarco across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading