Commune · 11301

CochraneCochrane

Compare Cochrane with another place
Census population
3,458
322nd of 346
Population density
0.4/km²
327th of 346
Average years of schooling
9.5 yrs
136th of 346
Foreign-born share
2.6%
180th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Sought care when ill1st of 332 · Chile 92.1%100.0%
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
Leaves from a rural school1st of 331 · Chile 3.1%100.0%
Employees per firm343rd of 346 · Chile 3.90.5
Average monthly pay338th of 342 · Chile 32.0 UF15.7 UF
Commute by public transport338th of 345 · Chile 42.1%4.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF15.7 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF15.7 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 94 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
60.1%
182nd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
17.6%
182nd of 335
Came from another region
20.5%
79th of 335
Net internal migration
+127
+3.4 per 100 residents
Cochranethis commune · 3,568another region773 peopleelsewhere in the region662 peopleabroad67 peopleelsewhere in the region1,075 peopleanother region233 peopleCochranethis commune · 3,762
Cochranethis commune · 3,568another region773 peopleelsewhere in th…662 peopleabroad67 peopleelsewhere in th…1,075 peopleanother region233 peopleCochranethis commune · 3,762

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Retail and wholesale1Retail and wholesale▲11Public administration2Public administration▼14Construction3Construction▲15Accommodation and food4Accommodation and food▲13Agriculture and fishing5Agriculture and fishing▼26Transport6Transport7Professional services7Professional services
2005202421Retail and wholesale▲112Public administration▼143Construction▲154Accommodation and food▲135Agriculture and fishing▼266Transport77Professional services

The ten branches that employ most of Cochrane

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

0200400600800projection →6752029 · central2005201520242029
0200400600800projection →6752029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.4% a year observed · 7.3% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

0250 k500 k750 k1.0 Mprojection →782 k2029 · central2005201520242029
0250 k500 k750 k1.0 Mprojection →782 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.5% a year observed · 3.4% projected

What Cochrane is specialised in

2024 · SII

PuroChile does not compute this for Cochrane. A specialisation is a share of this place's formal employment divided by the country's share, and with 475 formal workers here that division is a statement about a handful of people: one worker would move it further than a whole industry moves it in Santiago. The floor is 1,000 workers, and it is a floor rather than a caveat because a spectacular number nobody should read is worse than no number.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
113,282
hectares in holdings
55.0%
of them under a named use
13.8%
of the crop land is irrigated
128
holdings with land here
Not farmed 46%Woodland 30%Pasture 23%Scrub, barren ground and buildings45%Native woodland30%Pasture23%
Not farmed 46%Woodland 30%Pasture 23%Scrub, barren groundand buildings45%Native woodland30%Pasture23%
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
CochraneChile% of each territory's own population · 3,458 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
3,458
4,61018,480,432322nd of 346
Average age
37.0 yrs
36.4 yrs38.1 yrs292nd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
65.0
57.779.0291st of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
0.4/km²
0.1/km²24.7/km²327th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
1,462
1,9856,596,527320th of 346
Dwellings
2,126
2,9247,642,716319th of 346
People per household
2.37
2.322.80325th of 345
Women
48.6%
48.4%51.5%327th of 346
Men per 100 women
106.0
106.694.320th of 346
Under 15
19.7%
19.9%17.7%54th of 346
65 and over
12.8%
11.5%14.0%290th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
48.0
45.846.5247th of 346
One-person households
32.4%
33.7%21.8%24th of 345
Households with children
32.7%
32.6%33.2%186th of 345
Indigenous peoples
24.5%
26.8%11.4%96th of 346
Female-headed households
53.2%
52.3%49.9%21st of 345
Land area
8,640 km²
36,179 km²748,041 km²21st of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Cochrane22%Arrived since 202078%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Cochrane22%78%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
2.6%
2.6%8.7%180th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
60.1%
58.5%50.5%182nd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
17.6%
18.4%23.9%182nd of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
20.5%
21.4%17.2%79th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
89
1191,608,650293rd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
38.2 yrs
38.5 yrs33.5 yrs39th of 345
Women among foreign-born
52.8%
52.9%51.7%106th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
78.7%
79.0%83.1%259th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
22.5%
31.1%34.4%305th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
3.0%
3.0%10.6%187th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.8 yrs
11.9 yrs12.9 yrs255th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
127
-5640149th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
3.4
-11.30.0138th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Cochrane28%Higher31%Secondary30%Primary only4.6%6.7%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Cochrane28%Higher31%Secondary30%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.5 yrs
9.5 yrs10.4 yrs136th of 346
Reached higher education
27.5%
27.4%31.1%84th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
100.0%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
47.6%
51.9%55.6%271st of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
104.5%
105.7%99.8%57th of 346
Literacy rate
96.5%
96.7%97.8%170th of 346
Reached secondary education
31.1%
31.2%36.7%319th of 346
Primary education only
30.1%
30.1%24.1%200th of 346
Never attended school
4.61%
4.69%3.01%72nd of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
11.0 yrs
11.0 yrs12.1 yrs139th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.5 yrs
11.6 yrs12.1 yrs113th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.53%
3.31%2.18%172nd of 345
Households lacking schooling
25.4%
24.8%15.1%137th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
42
54217,565301st of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
0.0%
0.0%33.9%301st of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
100.0%
100.0%3.1%1st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
80.0%
75.0%67.2%23rd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
0.0%
7.1%19.7%323rd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
20.0%
17.9%13.1%118th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
80.0%
78.6%13.0%10th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
60.0%
57.1%49.7%31st of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

42left secondary school in 2024
20enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
47.6%continued immediately
80%of those, to a university
80%of those, outside their region

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareSocial sciencesAgriculture and veterinaryServicesArts and humanitiesBusiness and law
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareSocial sciencesAgriculture and veterinaryServicesArts and humanitiesBusiness and law
CochraneChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country. The list of individual programmes is withheld here: fewer than 30 of this territory's leavers continued, and a ranking built on that few names people.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

02040602006201520244220
02040602006201520244220
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Cochrane's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Cochrane against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Cochrane93%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Cochrane93%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
10.1%
9.6%10.6%264th of 346
Public health insurance
93.5%
93.1%82.6%145th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
46.8
44.382.5275th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
30
37100313th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
350
4411,950,388320th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
56.4 yrs
56.1 yrs56.4 yrs252nd of 346
Disability among 65+
44.3%
42.4%43.0%211th of 346
Difficulty walking
2.89%
2.86%4.92%327th of 346
Difficulty seeing
5.90%
5.55%4.58%118th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.40%
2.23%2.16%204th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
1.59%
1.45%2.70%329th of 346
Private health insurance
1.8%
1.6%13.2%233rd of 335
No health coverage
0.58%
0.72%1.98%245th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
100.0%
100.0%92.1%1st of 332
Households lacking health access
2.5%
2.3%6.0%265th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
162
2041,523,716302nd of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
2
336,698316th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.23%
1.47%2.41%315th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.6 days
6.4 days6.1 days159th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
5.8
6.519.9316th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
57
55100270th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
10
1189,723302nd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
6.2%
5.4%5.9%120th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
28.9
23.948.6260th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
62
53100233rd of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 19%Injuries, bones and skin 19%Heart and lungs 16%Infections and other reasons 14%Mind, nerves and senses 12%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 10%Tumours, blood and metabolism 9.9%Digestive system12%Genitourina…system7.4%Injuries and poisoning14%Musculos…3.7%Skin1.2%Circulatorysystem11%Respirat…system4.9%Ill-definedsymptoms9.9%Infectio…andparasitic2.5%Contactwithhealth…1.9%Mental and behavioural9.9%Nerv…syst…EarPregnancy and childbirth10%Cancers and tumours8.0%Endocr…andmetabo…1.2%Bloodand…
Digestive and urinar… 19%Injuries, bones and… 19%Heart and lungs 16%Infections and othe… 14%Mind, n… 12%Pregn… 10%Tumours, blood and … 9.9%Digestivesystem12%Genitou…system7.4%Injuries andpoisoning14%Muscu…3.7%SkinCirculatorysystem11%Respi…system4.9%Ill-definedsymptoms9.9%Infec…andparas…Contactwith…Mental andbehavioural9.9%EarPregnancyandchildbir…10%Cancers and tumoursEnd…and…
Pregnancy, birth and newbornshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
11.7%
11.4%17.3%295th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
15.7 UF
17.4 UF32.0 UF338th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
71.6%
75.7%78.9%326th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
150.1
167.785.621st of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
67.4%
69.5%54.4%18th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
2.8%
2.5%8.6%334th of 345
Self-employed
36.1%
35.1%33.8%149th of 345
Extreme poverty
1.8%
1.6%6.9%316th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
6.6%
6.0%17.7%309th of 335
Unemployment rate
5.6%
5.1%8.8%281st of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 930,213
CLP 948,504CLP 783,12425th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.438
0.4310.488162nd of 321
Registered firms
519
7731,582,390291st of 346
Annual sales
661,744 UF
843,135 UF34,347,683,688 UF311th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
475
7059,699,164326th of 346
Sales per firm
1,275 UF
1,091 UF21,706 UF320th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
0.5
0.53.9343rd of 346
Women among employees
42.1%
40.3%40.6%144th of 345
Independent contractors
507
9183,958,269305th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
51.6%
56.6%29.0%13th of 346

Employment by industry

State and social services 41%Trade and logistics 22%Industry and… 15%Natural resourc… 10%Advanc… 6.8%Oth… 5.5%Public administration22%Education10%Health8.4%Retail and wholesale10%Accommodat…and food6.7%Transport4.5%Construction9.4%Manufactu…3.9%Elect…andgasWater…Agriculture andfishing10%Administrat…servicesProfe…servi…2.6%Inf…and…Fin…and…DomesticworkArtsandente…Oth…ser…
State and social services 41%Trade and l… 22%Industry and c… 15%Natural… 10%Advanced … 6.8%Other ser… 5.5%Publicadministrati…22%Education10%Health8.4%Retail andwholesale10%Accommod…and food6.7%Transp…4.5%Construct…9.4%Manufa…3.9%Ele…and…Agricultureand fishing10%Admin…servi…2.6%Profe…servi…2.6%Domest…workArtsand…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 54%Managers and professionals 28%Elementary occupatio… 13%Service and sales19%Craft andtrades13%Skilledagricultural7.6%Clericalsupport7.0%Plant andmachineoperators6.3%Professionals14%Technicians9.3%Managers4.6%Elementaryoccupations13%Armedforces5.1%
Skilled occupations 54%Managers and professionals 28%Elementary occ… 13%Service andsales19%Craft andtrades13%Skilledagricult…7.6%Clericalsupport7.0%Plant and machineoperatorsProfessiona…14%Technicians9.3%ManagersElementaryoccupations13%Armed forces
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Cochrane95%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Cochrane95%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.6%
5.4%5.7%133rd of 345
Internet access
85.2%
87.1%93.2%245th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.4
31.62.3196th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.3
13.51.6170th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
1,449
1,9716,408,172320th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.41%
0.41%0.57%95th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
4.28%
3.75%1.13%33rd of 345
Public water network
80.9%
81.7%92.3%197th of 345
Electricity access
98.3%
98.5%99.6%298th of 345
Detached houses
95.5%
96.0%78.7%227th of 345
Apartments
0.4%
0.4%19.9%151st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.12%0.23%243rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
28.2%
29.3%11.9%67th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
118
137491,904300th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
8.1%
6.9%7.5%69th of 345
Renting households
27.4%
28.4%26.2%44th of 345
Owner-occupiers
58.8%
56.2%61.1%284th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
91.5%
92.2%24.4%39th of 345
Commute by public transport
4.0%
3.6%42.1%338th of 345
Walks to work
37.7%
46.1%10.2%19th of 345
Households with a computer
50.4%
51.3%54.9%93rd of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.2
3.61.141st of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
87.8%
88.0%97.0%248th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.0%
91.9%99.9%329th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.5%
96.1%100.0%330th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
87.8%
66.0%89.4%109th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.0%
69.9%98.1%243rd of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.5%
73.4%99.7%300th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
102.8
129.75.912th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
0.0%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
0.0%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
0.0%96.2%306th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.0
3.50.625th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
87.8%
88.0%99.0%315th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
93.0%
91.9%99.9%333rd of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.5%
96.1%100.0%333rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
87.8%
78.3%91.6%126th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
93.0%
82.2%98.5%253rd of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.5%
86.0%99.8%307th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 46%On foot or by bicycle 46%Other means 4.8%Public trans… 4.0%Car45%Walking38%Bicycle7.9%OtherBoatPublic transport
Private vehicle 46%On foot or by bicycle 46%Car45%Walking38%Bicycle7.9%Boat
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 59%Rented 27%Provided rent-free 11%Owned outright55%Rented, no contract14%Rented, with contract14%Provided byfamily5.8%Providedbyemployer5.0%Otherarran…2.9%
Owned 59%Rented 27%Provided r… 11%Owned outright55%Rented, nocontract14%Rented, withcontract14%Provid…byfamily5.8%Provid…byemploy…5.0%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 96%Firewood92%Pel…Par…GasEle…Nohea…
Wood and biomass 96%Firewood92%
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
69.4%
of the registered voted in the first round
70.8%
voted in the runoff
3,461
registered voters on the roll
6.1%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman38.2%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist61.8%58.3%
CochraneChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez11.4%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman28.3%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.1%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen22.9%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist24.6%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet10.2%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.9%1.3%
CochraneChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile39.2%30.6%
KCambio por Chile15.2%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido30.0%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente2.4%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas13.2%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
CochraneChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile21.0%
KCambio por Chile25.2%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas53.8%
Cochraneshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Cochrane across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading