Commune · 12103

Río VerdeRío Verde

Compare Río Verde with another place
Census population
102
345th of 346
Population density
0.0/km²
346th of 346
Average years of schooling
9.4 yrs
153rd of 346
Foreign-born share
3.9%
133rd of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
People per household345th of 345 · Chile 2.801.62
Average age1st of 346 · Chile 38.1 yrs47.9 yrs
Ageing index1st of 345 · Chile 79.0283.3
One-person households1st of 345 · Chile 21.8%60.3%
Households with children345th of 345 · Chile 33.2%6.3%
Women's schooling as share of men's1st of 346 · Chile 99.8%121.5%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF34.1 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF34.1 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 21 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
23.8%
321st of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
9.5%
290th of 335
Came from another region
66.7%
4th of 335
Net internal migration
+160
+76.2 per 100 residents
Río Verdethis commune · 50another region140 peopleelsewhere in the region20 peopleRío Verdethis commune · 210
Río Verdethis commune · 50another region140 peopleelsewhere in th…20 peopleRío Verdethis commune · 210

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII

The ten branches that employ most of Río Verde

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

What Río Verde is specialised in

2024 · SII

PuroChile does not compute this for Río Verde. A specialisation is a share of this place's formal employment divided by the country's share, and with 87 formal workers here that division is a statement about a handful of people: one worker would move it further than a whole industry moves it in Santiago. The floor is 1,000 workers, and it is a floor rather than a caveat because a spectacular number nobody should read is worse than no number.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
263,110
hectares in holdings
84.6%
of them under a named use
49.2%
of the crop land is irrigated
35
holdings with land here
Pasture 45%Woodland 33%Not farmed 21%Pasture45%Native woodland33%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings15%Untilled land6.0%
Pasture 45%Woodland 33%Not farmed 21%Pasture45%Native woodland33%Scrub, barren ground and buildings15%Untilled land6.0%
PastureWoodlandhover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen005510101515%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen005510101515%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
Río VerdeChile% of each territory's own population · 102 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
102
132,97518,480,432345th of 346
Average age
47.9 yrs
39.2 yrs38.1 yrs1st of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
283.3
90.779.01st of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
0.0/km²
3.7/km²24.7/km²346th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
63
49,8426,596,527344th of 346
Dwellings
188
60,1177,642,716345th of 346
People per household
1.62
2.672.80345th of 345
Women
29.4%
50.8%51.5%345th of 346
Men per 100 women
240.0
96.994.32nd of 346
Under 15
5.9%
16.4%17.7%345th of 346
65 and over
16.7%
14.9%14.0%134th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
29.1
45.446.5343rd of 346
One-person households
60.3%
22.3%21.8%1st of 345
Households with children
6.3%
30.8%33.2%345th of 345
Indigenous peoples
18.6%
22.2%11.4%110th of 346
Female-headed households
14.3%
48.7%49.9%345th of 345
Land area
9,004 km²
36,148 km²748,041 km²19th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Río Verde25%Arrived since 202075%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Río Verde25%Arrived sinc…75%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
3.9%
6.0%8.7%133rd of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
23.8%
57.8%50.5%321st of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
9.5%
2.9%23.9%290th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
66.7%
33.3%17.2%4th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
4
8,0191,608,650344th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
47.5 yrs
33.7 yrs33.5 yrs2nd of 345
Women among foreign-born
50.0%
54.8%51.7%211th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
75.0%
82.6%83.1%314th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
25.0%
35.5%34.4%288th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
3.8%
7.2%10.6%155th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
9.3 yrs
12.8 yrs12.9 yrs342nd of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
160
5,9300148th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
76.2
4.00.04th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Río Verde24%Higher27%Secondary42%Primary only5.9%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Río Verde24%27%Secondary42%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.4 yrs
10.8 yrs10.4 yrs153rd of 346
Reached higher education
23.5%
34.0%31.1%130th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.0%98.6%1st of 333
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
121.5%
99.3%99.8%1st of 346
Literacy rate
90.6%
98.8%97.8%340th of 346
Reached secondary education
27.5%
37.9%36.7%335th of 346
Primary education only
42.2%
21.1%24.1%21st of 346
Never attended school
5.88%
1.66%3.01%22nd of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.3 yrs
12.6 yrs12.1 yrs320th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.3 yrs
12.5 yrs12.1 yrs133rd of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
9.38%
1.17%2.18%6th of 345
Households lacking schooling
25.0%
9.4%15.1%144th of 335

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Río Verde against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

This region's own series says it stopped reporting in 2019, 2024 and 2025: 21,838 discharges in 2019 against a median of 14,183 in its other years, 54%; 7,768 discharges in 2024 against a median of 14,958 in its other years, -48%; 9,770 discharges in 2025 against a median of 14,958 in its other years, -35%. The rule withholds any year that departs more than 25% from that median, and no other region crosses it in any year. A register that loses records is not a place whose health changed, so those years are not published here. The counts are still in the published data, and /datos carries the check.

Which health system

Río Verde71%Fonasa29%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Río Verde71%Fonasa29%IsapreChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapre% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
6.9%
8.7%10.6%332nd of 346
Public health insurance
71.4%
79.4%82.6%322nd of 335
See the other 11 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
7
11,6311,950,388344th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
64.6 yrs
56.8 yrs56.4 yrs6th of 346
Disability among 65+
57.1%
44.9%43.0%12th of 346
Difficulty walking
1.96%
4.15%4.92%340th of 346
Difficulty seeing
2.94%
3.37%4.58%329th of 346
Difficulty hearing
0.00%
1.84%2.16%345th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
1.96%
2.13%2.70%315th of 346
Private health insurance
28.6%
12.6%13.2%10th of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
0.94%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
100.0%
95.9%92.1%1st of 332
Households lacking health access
0.0%
6.0%6.0%310th of 335

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
0.0%
10.4%17.3%332nd of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
34.1 UF
21.1 UF32.0 UF18th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
123.9%
92.2%78.9%14th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
205.9
95.385.68th of 346
See the other 15 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
86.5%
59.4%54.4%2nd of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
1.2%
6.8%8.6%340th of 345
Self-employed
8.4%
27.9%33.8%345th of 345
Extreme poverty
0.0%
4.8%6.9%326th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
0.0%
6.4%17.7%328th of 335
Unemployment rate
0.0%
5.9%8.8%325th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 1,447,582
CLP 907,446CLP 783,1248th of 335
Registered firms
21
12,6691,582,390344th of 346
Annual sales
23,336 UF
93,747,642 UF34,347,683,688 UF342nd of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
87
63,4169,699,164343rd of 346
Sales per firm
1,111 UF
7,400 UF21,706 UF329th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
3.0
3.23.969th of 346
Women among employees
33.3%
40.8%40.6%292nd of 345
Independent contractors
46
22,7753,958,269345th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
34.6%
26.4%29.0%80th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 75%State and soc… 15%Tra… 3.7%Adva… 2.5%Agriculture and fishing75%Publicadministration9.9%Health3.7%Edu…Accommod…and foodRetail and…Manufa…1.2%Constr…1.2%RealestateProfe…servi…Dome…work
Natural resources 75%State and social services 15%Agriculture and fishing75%Publicadministration9.9%Health3.7%Accomm…andfoodRetail…Manu…Cons…Realesta…Prof…serv…
Natural resourcesOther serviceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 65%Elementary occupations 18%Managers and professio… 15%Skilled agricultural39%Service and sales14%Clericalsupport6.3%Craft andtrades5.0%Plant and…Elementaryoccupations18%Managers7.5%Professiona…3.8%Technicians3.8%
Skilled occupations 65%Elementary occupatio… 18%Managers and pro… 15%Skilled agricultural39%Service andsales14%Clericalsupport6.3%Craft andtrades5.0%Elementaryoccupations18%Managers7.5%Professi…3.8%Technici…3.8%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Río Verde97%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Río Verde97%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
0.0%
3.9%5.7%345th of 345
Internet access
90.5%
95.7%93.2%142nd of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
69.5
1.72.39th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
69.2
1.71.66th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
63
49,1006,408,172344th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.00%
0.27%0.57%337th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
7.94%
0.56%1.13%11th of 345
Public water network
4.8%
96.4%92.3%345th of 345
Electricity access
98.4%
99.8%99.6%286th of 345
Detached houses
96.8%
91.4%78.7%211th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
8.1%19.9%281st of 345
Precarious wall materials
6.30%
0.21%0.23%1st of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
66.0%
11.3%11.9%8th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
5
2,173491,904341st of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
7.9%
4.4%7.5%71st of 345
Renting households
1.6%
23.4%26.2%345th of 345
Owner-occupiers
7.9%
63.8%61.1%344th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
96.8%
2.8%24.4%4th of 345
Commute by public transport
60.0%
26.9%42.1%14th of 345
Walks to work
0.0%
7.3%10.2%345th of 345
Households with a computer
22.2%
61.2%54.9%340th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
22.0
0.91.15th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
11.8%
99.1%97.0%343rd of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
53.8%
99.6%99.9%338th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
80.6%
99.8%100.0%338th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
96.4%89.4%329th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
99.0%98.1%330th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
99.4%99.7%333rd of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
69.6
2.15.926th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
96.4%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
99.0%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
99.4%96.2%306th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
19.4
0.70.62nd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
11.8%
99.1%99.0%343rd of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
53.8%
99.4%99.9%342nd of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
80.6%
99.9%100.0%343rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
0.0%
96.4%91.6%335th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
0.0%
99.0%98.5%336th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
0.0%
99.4%99.8%338th of 345

How people commute

Public transport 60%Private vehicle 20%Other means 20%Public transport60%Car20%Other20%
Public transport 60%Private vehicle 20%Other means 20%Public transport60%Car20%Other20%
Public transportPrivate vehicleOther meanshover a tile for its count and its distance from ChileFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Provided rent-free 89%Provided by employer87%Ownedoutri…7.9%Rente…with…Otherarran…
Provided rent-free 89%Provided by employer87%Owned outrightRente…with…Otherarran…
OwnedRentedOtherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 97%Firewood97%
Wood and biomass 97%Firewood97%
Wood and biomassFossil fuelshover a tile for its count and its distance from ChileFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
69.8%
of the registered voted in the first round
68.0%
voted in the runoff
650
registered voters on the roll
5.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman27.6%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist72.4%58.3%
Río VerdeChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez11.7%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman17.9%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.4%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen24.1%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist34.2%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.4%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.9%1.3%
Río VerdeChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile14.2%30.6%
KCambio por Chile31.4%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido20.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente5.5%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.9%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact25.3%0.7%
Río VerdeChileshare of the valid vote

No sister communes

How this is computed

No commune in Chile resembles Río Verde closely enough: its best match sits further away than the best match of nine out of ten communes in the country. These four are the least unlike it, which is not the same thing as sisters. In fact, the commune that most resembles it is further from it than any two Chilean communes typically are.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading