Cochamó — PuroChile

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.

Leaves from a rural school1st of 331 · Chile 3.1%100.0%

People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer2nd of 330 · Chile 5.9%16.9%

Overcrowded dwellings337th of 345 · Chile 5.7%2.8%

In-hospital case fatality9th of 331 · Chile 2.41%5.93%

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 0 surveyed

Lives in the commune where they were born

—

Came from another commune of the same region

—

Came from another region

—

Net internal migration

—

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII

The ten branches that employ most of Cochamó

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change

01Public administrationState and social services31852.0%+468%02Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics18029.5%+800%03Agriculture and fishingNatural resources406.5%+48%04Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics376.1%+825%05Administrative servicesAdvanced services81.3%—06Water and wasteIndustry and construction71.1%+600%07Finance and insuranceAdvanced services50.8%—08TransportTrade and logistics50.8%+0%09Real estateAdvanced services40.7%—10ManufacturingIndustry and construction30.5%—

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval8.2% a year observed · -0.1% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval-7.2% a year observed

What Cochamó is specialised in

2024 · SII

PuroChile does not compute this for Cochamó. A specialisation is a share of this place's formal employment divided by the country's share, and with 611 formal workers here that division is a statement about a handful of people: one worker would move it further than a whole industry moves it in Santiago. The floor is 1,000 workers, and it is a floor rather than a caveat because a spectacular number nobody should read is worse than no number.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021

72,651

hectares in holdings

93.2%

of them under a named use

5.9%

of the crop land is irrigated

358

holdings with land here

Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

The agricultural census measured 72,651 hectares of holdings in Cochamó in the 2020/2021 agricultural year, and this is how it divided them.

Fourteen of the fifteen tiles are categories the census publishes. The fifteenth is not: it is the censused surface less the other fourteen, and what it holds is scrub, barren ground, roads and buildings. Across Chile it is half of everything, because most of the censused surface is Patagonian scrub and northern desert inside very large holdings.

Irrigation is asked of eleven of the uses and not of forest, native woodland, natural pasture or untilled ground — so the 5.9% above is a share of the 759 hectares the question applies to, not of the whole.

Of the 358 holdings with land here, 27 are self-consumption plots — under two hectares and with nothing sold in the year. These counts are the census's own for this territory and they are not added to anything: a holding with land in two comunas is counted in both.

VIII Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 2021, INE

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

CochamóChile% of each territory's own population · 4,199 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Census population	4,199	455,842	18,480,432	316th of 346
Average age	43.3 yrs	37.2 yrs	38.1 yrs	19th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.	141.1	65.7	79.0	19th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.	1.1/km²	30.9/km²	24.7/km²	311th of 346

See the other 13 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Households	1,887	166,403	6,596,527	308th of 346
Dwellings	3,063	200,092	7,642,716	305th of 346
People per household	2.23	2.74	2.80	333rd of 345
Women	47.3%	50.6%	51.5%	333rd of 346
Men per 100 women	111.4	97.6	94.3	14th of 346
Under 15	14.0%	18.4%	17.7%	331st of 346
65 and over	19.7%	12.1%	14.0%	34th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.	50.8	43.8	46.5	174th of 346
One-person households	33.8%	21.8%	21.8%	18th of 345
Households with children	22.5%	34.3%	33.2%	334th of 345
Indigenous peoples	18.2%	21.2%	11.4%	112th of 346
Female-headed households	42.0%	49.0%	49.9%	308th of 345
Land area	3,929 km²	14,768 km²	748,041 km²	47th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population

Indicator	Value	Against its peers	Province	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born share	2.6%		5.3%	8.7%	176th of 346

See the other 7 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born population	111	24,245	1,608,650	274th of 346
Average age, foreign-born	40.1 yrs	32.4 yrs	33.5 yrs	19th of 345
Women among foreign-born	49.5%	49.8%	51.7%	232nd of 345
Foreign-born of working age	80.2%	81.4%	83.1%	213th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.	36.0%	42.6%	34.4%	191st of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.	3.2%	6.2%	10.6%	177th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born	12.5 yrs	13.2 yrs	12.9 yrs	153rd of 345

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Average years of schooling	8.8 yrs	10.0 yrs	10.4 yrs	264th of 346
Reached higher education	17.1%	27.6%	31.1%	260th of 346
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.	57.6%	56.9%	55.6%	121st of 331

See the other 16 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.	105.2%	100.4%	99.8%	39th of 346
Literacy rate	95.9%	97.3%	97.8%	208th of 346
Reached secondary education	34.1%	35.3%	36.7%	277th of 346
Primary education only	41.0%	28.6%	24.1%	36th of 346
Never attended school	4.32%	3.05%	3.01%	93rd of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.	9.6 yrs	11.6 yrs	12.1 yrs	294th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.	10.1 yrs	11.7 yrs	12.1 yrs	279th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.	4.07%	2.70%	2.18%	137th of 345
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.	33	5,483	217,565	309th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.	9.1%	36.7%	33.9%	293rd of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.	100.0%	6.4%	3.1%	1st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	73.7%	65.9%	67.2%	61st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	10.5%	22.4%	19.7%	272nd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	15.8%	11.7%	13.1%	165th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.	5.3%	19.6%	13.0%	233rd of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.	57.9%	51.1%	49.7%	48th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

33left secondary school in 2024

19enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025

57.6%continued immediately

74%of those, to a university

5%of those, outside their region

By field of study

CochamóChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country. The list of individual programmes is withheld here: fewer than 30 of this territory's leavers continued, and a ranking built on that few names people.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Cochamó's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

Health

See all →

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Cochamó against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Disability prevalence	11.1%	9.6%	10.6%	221st of 346
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.	28.1	83.3	82.5	311th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	62	98	100	267th of 331

See the other 17 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
People with a disability	464	43,709	1,950,388	315th of 346
Average age, people with a disability	61.1 yrs	55.0 yrs	56.4 yrs	58th of 346
Disability among 65+	49.6%	40.2%	43.0%	89th of 346
Difficulty walking	4.62%	4.12%	4.92%	257th of 346
Difficulty seeing	5.93%	4.41%	4.58%	116th of 346
Difficulty hearing	2.43%	2.04%	2.16%	194th of 346
Difficulty concentrating	2.69%	2.28%	2.70%	202nd of 346
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.	118	37,971	1,523,716	312th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.	7	800	36,698	295th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.	5.93%	2.11%	2.41%	9th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.	9.7 days	6.5 days	6.1 days	17th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.	16.7	17.5	19.9	212th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	31	103	100	312th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.	20	2,803	89,723	284th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.	16.9%	7.4%	5.9%	2nd of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.	47.6	61.5	48.6	95th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.	79	133	100	158th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Pregnancy, birth and newbornshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivosSitios reservadoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.	28.0 UF	26.3 UF	32.0 UF	58th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.	91.8%	84.8%	78.9%	233rd of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.	113.1	96.8	85.6	46th of 346

See the other 11 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.	41.1%	56.5%	54.4%	318th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.	2.9%	7.6%	8.6%	330th of 345
Self-employed	44.3%	36.6%	33.8%	39th of 345
Registered firms	475	44,110	1,582,390	299th of 346
Annual sales	604,953 UF	741,811,673 UF	34,347,683,688 UF	314th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.	611	215,208	9,699,164	319th of 346
Sales per firm	1,274 UF	16,817 UF	21,706 UF	321st of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.	0.9	3.1	3.9	331st of 346
Women among employees	50.9%	37.3%	40.6%	36th of 345
Independent contractors	542	66,206	3,958,269	300th of 346
Contractors as share of workers	47.0%	23.5%	29.0%	25th of 346

Employment by industry

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

HouseOther dwelling type% of private dwellings

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Overcrowded dwellings	2.8%	4.8%	5.7%	337th of 345
Internet access	82.8%	92.7%	93.2%	287th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	17.9	3.7	2.3	20th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	11.8	2.6	1.6	23rd of 345

See the other 35 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Occupied dwellings with residents	1,881	164,378	6,408,172	307th of 346
Critically overcrowded	0.37%	0.30%	0.57%	124th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings	3.19%	1.38%	1.13%	45th of 345
Public water network	36.9%	84.6%	92.3%	336th of 345
Electricity access	96.3%	99.4%	99.6%	331st of 345
Detached houses	96.9%	93.4%	78.7%	210th of 345
Apartments	0.0%	5.5%	19.9%	281st of 345
Precarious wall materials	0.20%	0.36%	0.23%	205th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings	37.6%	12.9%	11.9%	42nd of 345
Quantitative housing deficit	75	8,338	491,904	321st of 345
Housing deficit as share of households	4.0%	5.0%	7.5%	283rd of 345
Renting households	11.6%	22.7%	26.2%	257th of 345
Owner-occupiers	74.3%	66.2%	61.1%	50th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.	94.5%	67.0%	24.4%	16th of 345
Commute by public transport	10.8%	31.7%	42.1%	322nd of 345
Walks to work	31.5%	11.1%	10.2%	30th of 345
Households with a computer	31.8%	51.4%	54.9%	311th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	4.3	1.4	1.1	19th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	61.1%	93.8%	97.0%	333rd of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	95.6%	99.9%	99.9%	324th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	23.3%	79.3%	89.4%	325th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	43.1%	94.1%	98.1%	328th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	83.1%	99.3%	99.7%	323rd of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	60.3	6.9	5.9	33rd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	0.0%	74.3%	80.3%	194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	0.0%	84.4%	90.0%	249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	0.0%	90.9%	96.2%	306th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	3.8	0.8	0.6	17th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	76.1%	98.4%	99.0%	331st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	97.3%	100.0%	99.9%	318th of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	49.2%	83.7%	91.6%	294th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	73.1%	97.3%	98.5%	317th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	83.1%	99.8%	99.8%	325th of 345

How people commute

Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result

78.9%

of the registered voted in the first round

78.2%

voted in the runoff

4,654

registered voters on the roll

6.0%

of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman24.2%41.7%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist75.8%58.3%

CochamóChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez15.2%19.8%

Jeannette Jara Roman16.9%26.7%

Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.5%1.2%

Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen20.9%13.9%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist34.9%24.0%

Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.9%0.7%

Evelyn Matthei Fornet8.5%12.4%

Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.2%1.3%

CochamóChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile21.2%30.6%

KCambio por Chile28.5%23.0%

JChile Grande y Unido28.3%21.1%

IPartido de la Gente11.4%12.0%

BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas10.5%6.9%

DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%

APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%

EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%

GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%

FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%

HPopular—0.2%

Independents outside a pact—0.7%

CochamóChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Cochamó across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

Chaitén0.77Los Lagos · 4,025 peopleAlike in Migration; apart in Population structure.Palena0.91Los Lagos · 1,903 peopleAlike in Scale; apart in Economy.Antuco0.95Biobío · 4,373 peopleAlike in Scale; apart in Health.La Estrella0.96O'Higgins · 4,609 peopleAlike in Education; apart in Economy.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts

Loading

Where it stands out

Average monthly pay

Where the people here are from

Formal employment, 2005–2024

The ten branches that employ most of Cochamó

Dependent workers, projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

What Cochamó is specialised in

The land and who works it

Population and territory

Population pyramid

Migration

When the migrant population arrived

Education

How far schooling went

The class of 2024

By field of study

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

Health

What people are hospitalised for

By tumour site

Economy and poverty

Employment by industry

Employment by occupation

Housing and services

House or flat

How people commute

Housing tenure

Home heating fuel

How it voted in 2025

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

Sister communes

Inside the commune