Commune · 04201

IllapelIllapel

Compare Illapel with another place
Census population
32,009
123rd of 346
Population density
12.2/km²
243rd of 346
Average years of schooling
9.4 yrs
153rd of 346
Foreign-born share
3.1%
161st of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre14th of 331 · Chile 13.1%39.9%
Households lacking health access16th of 335 · Chile 6.0%13.0%
Of those continuing, enters a university309th of 331 · Chile 67.2%44.5%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF23.0 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF23.0 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 355 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
72.2%
58th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
8.3%
311th of 335
Came from another region
15.5%
154th of 335
Net internal migration
-11,311
-34.4 per 100 residents
Illapelthis commune · 42,863another region5,093 peopleelsewhere in the region2,733 peopleabroad1,315 peopleanother region13,594 peopleelsewhere in the region5,543 peopleIllapelthis commune · 32,867
Illapelthis commune · 42,863another region5,093 peopleelsewhere in th…2,733 peopleabroad1,315 peopleanother region13,594 peopleelsewhere in th…5,543 peopleIllapelthis commune · 32,867

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Retail and wholesale1Retail and wholesale▲15Health2Health▲34Education3Education▲111Administrative services4Administrative services▲73Mining5Mining▼26Construction6Construction7Transport7Transport10Accommodation and food8Accommodation and food▲28Professional services9Professional services▼19Manufacturing10Manufacturing▼11Agriculture and fishing11Agriculture and fishing▼1013Water and waste12Water and waste▲112Other services13Other services▼1
2005202421Retail and wholesale▲152Health▲343Education▲1114Administrative services▲735Mining▼266Construction77Transport108Accommodation and food▲289Professional services▼1910Manufacturing▼1111Agriculture and fishing▼101312Water and waste▲11213Other services▼1

The ten branches that employ most of Illapel

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

2 k4 k6 k8 kprojection →7 k2029 · central2005201520242029
2 k4 k6 k8 kprojection →7 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.0% a year observed · 3.1% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

2.0 M3.0 M4.0 M5.0 M6.0 Mprojection →5.3 M2029 · central2005201520242029
2.0 M3.0 M4.0 M5.0 M6.0 Mprojection →5.3 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.8% a year observed · 1.6% projected

What Illapel is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Illapel employs more people in 83 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

83
activities it is specialised in
6,034
formal workers
88/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.73.7Actividades de la administración …Servicios de seguridad privada pr…Venta al por menor de combustible…Elaboración de productos de panad…Venta al por mayor de otros tipos…Recuperación y reciclamiento de o…Explotación de viveros forestalesMantenimiento y reparación de veh…Extracción de otros minerales met…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.73.7Servicios de seguridad privada pr…Servicio notarialFabricación de motores, generador…Cultivo de floresHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Illapel

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Explotación de viveros forestalesSilvicultura y otras actividades forestales3641.7×
Extracción de piedra, arena y arcillaExtracción de piedra, arena y arcilla8218.5×
Cultivo de uva destinada a la producción de pisco y aguardienteCultivo de plantas perennes515.8×
Producción de aguas minerales y otras aguas embotelladasElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas1914.3×
Otras actividades de servicio de bebidas n.c.p.Actividades de servicio de bebidas412.4×
Alquiler de vehículos automotores sin choferAlquiler y arrendamiento de vehículos automotores949.9×
Venta al por menor de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas en comercios especializados (botillerías)Venta al por menor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco en comercios especializados428.7×
Cultivo de frutas tropicales y subtropicales (incluye el cultivo de paltas)Cultivo de plantas perennes138.6×
Otras actividades creativas, artísticas y de entretenimiento n.c.p.Actividades creativas, artísticas y de entretenimiento58.1×
Extracción de otros minerales metalíferos no ferrosos n.c.p. (excepto zinc, plomo y manganeso)Extracción de minerales metalíferos no ferrosos, excepto cobre277.3×
Recuperación y reciclamiento de otros desperdicios y desechos n.c.p.Recuperación de materiales466.9×
Servicio notarialActividades jurídicas236.7×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
182,396
hectares in holdings
23.8%
of them under a named use
91.9%
of the crop land is irrigated
689
holdings with land here
Not farmed 78%Pasture 20%Scrub, barren ground and buildings76%Pasture20%Native…Fruit…
Not farmed 78%Pasture 20%Scrub, barren ground and buildings76%Pasture20%Nat…woo…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
IllapelChile% of each territory's own population · 32,009 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
32,009
92,35018,480,432123rd of 346
Average age
39.9 yrs
40.0 yrs38.1 yrs132nd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
94.3
94.579.0144th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
12.2/km²
9.1/km²24.7/km²243rd of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
11,573
33,9006,596,527123rd of 346
Dwellings
14,203
46,3357,642,716129th of 346
People per household
2.77
2.722.80162nd of 345
Women
51.4%
50.8%51.5%99th of 346
Men per 100 women
94.5
97.094.3248th of 346
Under 15
18.1%
18.2%17.7%151st of 346
65 and over
17.0%
17.2%14.0%115th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
54.2
54.646.577th of 346
One-person households
23.0%
23.9%21.8%152nd of 345
Households with children
33.4%
33.0%33.2%167th of 345
Indigenous peoples
8.4%
9.5%11.4%170th of 346
Female-headed households
49.2%
48.4%49.9%138th of 345
Land area
2,628 km²
10,128 km²748,041 km²60th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Illapel43%Arrived since 202057%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Illapel43%Arrived since 202057%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
3.1%
4.0%8.7%161st of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
72.2%
72.3%50.5%58th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
8.3%
7.7%23.9%311th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
15.5%
16.6%17.2%154th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
988
3,7291,608,650124th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
31.4 yrs
31.2 yrs33.5 yrs275th of 345
Women among foreign-born
55.8%
54.3%51.7%34th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
78.7%
78.9%83.1%255th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
43.0%
48.9%34.4%112th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
3.7%
4.9%10.6%158th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
13.2 yrs
12.4 yrs12.9 yrs59th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-11,311
-25,1530295th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-34.4
-26.00.0266th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Illapel21%Higher39%Secondary31%Primary only5.0%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Illapel21%39%Secondary31%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.4 yrs
9.2 yrs10.4 yrs153rd of 346
Reached higher education
21.0%
19.9%31.1%166th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
100.0%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
56.0%
60.2%55.6%141st of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.9%
101.7%99.8%205th of 346
Literacy rate
96.7%
96.3%97.8%161st of 346
Reached secondary education
39.1%
37.7%36.7%101st of 346
Primary education only
31.2%
33.4%24.1%180th of 346
Never attended school
3.55%
3.98%3.01%180th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.8 yrs
10.5 yrs12.1 yrs157th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.9 yrs
10.7 yrs12.1 yrs173rd of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.28%
3.72%2.18%185th of 345
Households lacking schooling
23.3%
25.6%15.1%173rd of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
425
1,192217,565107th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
42.6%
25.3%33.9%132nd of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
44.5%
50.3%67.2%309th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
15.5%
15.9%19.7%210th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
39.9%
33.8%13.1%14th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
52.9%
57.9%13.0%45th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
51.3%
50.1%49.7%158th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

425left secondary school in 2024
238enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
56.0%continued immediately
45%of those, to a university
53%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%5.0%10.0%Maquinaria PesadaTecnico de Nivel Superior en EnfermeriaTecnico de Nivel Superior en AdministracionTecnico en EnfermeriaElectricidad y Eficiencia EnergeticaIngenieria ComercialMantenimiento Industrial y MecatronicaMecanica de Equipo PesadoPsicologiaTecnologia Medica
0.0%5.0%10.0%Maquinaria PesadaTecnico de Nivel Superior en EnfermeriaTecnico de Nivel Superior en AdministracionTecnico en EnfermeriaElectricidad y Eficiencia EnergeticaIngenieria ComercialMantenimiento Industrial y MecatronicaMecanica de Equipo PesadoPsicologiaTecnologia Medica
IllapelChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawServicesEducationInformation technologySocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinaryNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawServicesEducationInformation technologySocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinaryNatural sciences
IllapelChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0200400600200620152024425238
0200400600200620152024425238
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Illapel's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Illapel against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Illapel97%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Illapel97%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo cover% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
11.1%
11.4%10.6%218th of 346
Public health insurance
96.9%
93.8%82.6%42nd of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
83.3
72.182.581st of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
85
80100185th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
3,542
10,5011,950,388135th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
60.0 yrs
59.9 yrs56.4 yrs96th of 346
Disability among 65+
50.5%
50.6%43.0%70th of 346
Difficulty walking
5.39%
5.40%4.92%210th of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.71%
4.84%4.58%230th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.45%
2.60%2.16%191st of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.66%
2.64%2.70%210th of 346
Private health insurance
1.8%
3.3%13.2%234th of 335
No health coverage
0.88%
2.21%1.98%217th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
83.2%
83.3%92.1%300th of 332
Households lacking health access
13.0%
12.1%6.0%16th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
2,665
6,6581,523,716112th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
64
17836,698129th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.40%
2.67%2.41%227th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.1 days
5.7 days6.1 days307th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
20.0
19.319.9157th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
97
8410097th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
119
27689,723132nd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
4.5%
4.1%5.9%267th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
37.2
29.948.6199th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
69
55100201st of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 29%Heart and lungs 22%Pregnancy, bi… 13%Injuries, bo… 12%Tumours,… 9.9%Infections and… 7.8%Mind, nerves a… 5.4%Digestive system20%Genitouri…system9.2%Circulatorysystem11%Respiratorysystem11%Pregnancy andchildbirth12%Injuries andpoisoning8.0%Musculoskele…3.8%Cancers andtumours7.2%Endocrine andmetabolicContactwithhealth…3.8%Infectiousand…Ill-definedsymptomsNervoussystemMentalandbehav…
Digestive and urinary tr… 29%Heart and lungs 22%Pregnan… 13%Injuri… 12%Tumou… 9.9%Digestivesystem20%Genito…system9.2%Circulatory system11%Respiratory system11%Pregnancyandchildbirth12%Injuriesandpoisoning8.0%Musculos…3.8%Cancersandtumours7.2%Endocrine…Contactwithhealth…Inf…andpar…Ill…sym…Nervous systemMentaland…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos33%Genitales femeninos20%Vías urinarias7.6%Sitiosreservados7.6%Mama6.7%Tiroides yendocrinas5.9%Víasrespiratorias5.0%Genitalesmasculinos5.0%Sangre ysistemalinfático5.0%Sitios maldefinidos4.2%
Órganos digestivos33%Genitalesfemeninos20%Víasurinarias7.6%Sitiosreservados7.6%Mama6.7%Tiroides yendocrinas5.9%Víasrespirat…5.0%Genitalesmasculin…5.0%Sangre ysistemalinfático5.0%Sitiosmaldefinid…4.2%
Órganos digestivosGenitales femeninosVías urinariasSitios reservadosMamaTiroides y endocrinashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
17.5%
20.6%17.3%229th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
23.0 UF
23.6 UF32.0 UF156th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
108.2%
94.7%78.9%101st of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
82.8
92.285.6145th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
50.5%
50.3%54.4%176th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
9.7%
9.5%8.6%113th of 345
Self-employed
30.9%
36.4%33.8%262nd of 345
Extreme poverty
6.2%
9.3%6.9%221st of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
12.4%
11.6%17.7%263rd of 335
Unemployment rate
8.3%
8.9%8.8%196th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 551,156
CLP 523,094CLP 783,124153rd of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.430
0.4420.488179th of 321
Registered firms
2,649
8,5151,582,390120th of 346
Annual sales
4,886,310 UF
19,094,911 UF34,347,683,688 UF199th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
6,036
21,8879,699,164157th of 346
Sales per firm
1,845 UF
2,243 UF21,706 UF281st of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.7
1.73.9240th of 346
Women among employees
48.8%
40.4%40.6%53rd of 345
Independent contractors
2,988
10,9293,958,269126th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
33.1%
33.3%29.0%91st of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 25%State and social services 24%Trade and logistics 24%Industry and con… 15%Advanced … 6.2%Other ser… 5.1%Mining20%Agric…andfishi…5.3%Education9.8%Health8.2%Publicadministration6.5%Retail andwholesale14%Transport5.5%Accommodationand food4.6%Construction8.2%Manufactur…4.5%WaterandwasteElectr…and gasAdministrat…servicesProfessionalservicesInf…and…Fin…and…Domes…work2.4%Otherservic…
Natural resources 25%State and social se… 24%Trade and logistics 24%Industry and construc… 15%Advanc… 6.2%Othe… 5.1%Mining20%Agri…andfish…Education9.8%Health8.2%Publicadmin…6.5%Retail and wholesale14%Transport5.5%Accommoda…and food4.6%Construction8.2%Manufactur…4.5%Water…Ele…Admi…serv…Pro…ser…Dom…workOtherservi…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 60%Managers and professionals 27%Elementary occupations 13%Service and sales19%Plant and machineoperators17%Craft and trades15%Clericalsupport5.0%Skilledagricultural4.3%Professionals13%Technicians10%Manag…3.3%Elementary occupations13%
Skilled occupations 60%Managers and professionals 27%Elementary… 13%Service andsales19%Plant and machineoperators17%Craft and trades15%Cleri…suppo…5.0%Skill…agric…4.3%Professiona…13%Technicians10%ManagersElementaryoccupations13%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Illapel98%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Illapel98%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
4.6%
4.7%5.7%259th of 345
Internet access
87.5%
86.5%93.2%200th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.7
7.02.3129th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.2
7.41.6133rd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
11,337
33,1926,408,172123rd of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.24%
0.28%0.57%264th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.47%
1.76%1.13%115th of 345
Public water network
86.4%
83.2%92.3%157th of 345
Electricity access
99.5%
99.0%99.6%140th of 345
Detached houses
98.1%
98.6%78.7%181st of 345
Apartments
1.1%
0.7%19.9%123rd of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.19%0.23%243rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
14.7%
23.0%11.9%179th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
656
2,075491,904117th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
5.7%
6.1%7.5%155th of 345
Renting households
17.2%
15.5%26.2%139th of 345
Owner-occupiers
68.9%
70.2%61.1%172nd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
18.5%
20.2%24.4%246th of 345
Commute by public transport
32.7%
25.4%42.1%95th of 345
Walks to work
18.1%
21.8%10.2%138th of 345
Households with a computer
46.2%
42.3%54.9%127th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.4
1.81.1221st of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
92.2%
90.1%97.0%204th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.8%
99.7%99.9%257th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
72.0%
59.6%89.4%187th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
91.4%
82.9%98.1%259th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.2%
97.4%99.7%280th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.7
10.05.9227th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
71.6%
58.7%80.3%121st of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
91.4%
72.4%90.0%143rd of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.2%
88.2%96.2%191st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.9
1.10.6216th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.4%
96.2%99.0%208th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.8%
99.8%99.9%281st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
73.6%
63.3%91.6%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
91.4%
78.7%98.5%272nd of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.2%
97.4%99.8%280th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 36%Public transport 33%On foot or by bicy… 19%Other means 12%Car36%Public transport33%Walking18%Other12%
Private vehicle 36%Public transport 33%On foot or by bicycle 19%Other means 12%Car36%Public transport33%Walking18%Other12%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 69%Rented 17%Provided rent-free 9.9%Other 4.0%Owned outright66%Rented, withcontract10%Rented, no contract6.7%Provided by family8.9%
Owned 69%Rented 17%Provided… 9.9%Owned outright66%Rented, withcontract10%Rented,nocontract6.7%Provided byfamily8.9%Otherarra…
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heating 41%Fossil fuels 24%Wood and biomass 20%Electricity 14%No heating41%Gas22%Par…Firewood18%Electricity14%
No heating 41%Fossil fuels 24%Wood and biomass 20%Electricity 14%No heating41%Gas22%Firewood18%Electricity14%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
86.5%
of the registered voted in the first round
86.2%
voted in the runoff
28,376
registered voters on the roll
8.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman50.8%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist49.2%58.3%
IllapelChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez29.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman31.0%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen10.5%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist18.4%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.9%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.0%1.3%
IllapelChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile30.8%30.6%
KCambio por Chile10.9%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido7.2%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente43.6%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.1%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista2.9%2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile1.5%0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
IllapelChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Illapel across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading