Commune · 05504

La CruzLa Cruz

Compare La Cruz with another place
Census population
24,939
149th of 346
Population density
318.9/km²
62nd of 346
Average years of schooling
10.8 yrs
32nd of 346
Foreign-born share
5.8%
88th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 98.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 90.0%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF21.2 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF21.2 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 341 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
39.4%
289th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
43.4%
12th of 335
Came from another region
12.4%
242nd of 335
Net internal migration
+11,588
+41.6 per 100 residents
La Cruzthis commune · 14,935elsewhere in the region12,087 peopleanother region3,450 peopleabroad1,340 peopleelsewhere in the region3,250 peopleanother region699 peopleLa Cruzthis commune · 27,863
La Cruzthis commune · 14,935elsewhere in th…12,087 peopleanother region3,450 peopleabroad1,340 peopleelsewhere in th…3,250 peopleanother region699 peopleLa Cruzthis commune · 27,863

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing2Retail and wholesale2Retail and wholesale7Construction3Construction▲45Manufacturing4Manufacturing▲14Administrative services5Administrative services▼110Accommodation and food6Accommodation and food▲46Transport7Transport▼13Education8Education▼511Professional services9Professional services▲212Real estate10Real estate▲28Other services11Other services▼313Health12Health▲19Finance and insurance13Finance and insurance▼4
2005202411Agriculture and fishing22Retail and wholesale73Construction▲454Manufacturing▲145Administrative services▼1106Accommodation and food▲467Transport▼138Education▼5119Professional services▲21210Real estate▲2811Other services▼31312Health▲1913Finance and insurance▼4

The ten branches that employ most of La Cruz

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

2 k4 k6 k8 kprojection →7 k2029 · central2005201520242029
2 k4 k6 k8 kprojection →7 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.6% a year observed · 4.7% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

05.0 M10 M15 Mprojection →9.2 M2029 · central2005201520242029
05.0 M10 M15 Mprojection →9.2 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval7.6% a year observed · 4.5% projected

What La Cruz is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, La Cruz employs more people in 57 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

57
activities it is specialised in
5,180
formal workers
134/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.93.7Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Actividades de la administración …Construcción de edificios para us…Cultivo de floresServicios de extinción y prevenci…Fabricación de ropa de trabajoVenta al por menor de artículos d…Peluquería y otros tratamientos d…Fabricación de prendas de vestir …How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.93.7Actividades de la administración …Cultivo de plantas vivas incluida…Transporte de carga por carreteraActividades de restaurantes y de …How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in La Cruz

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cultivo de plantas vivas incluida la producción en viveros (excepto viveros forestales)Propagación de plantas439101.3×
ApiculturaGanadería4187.1×
Cultivo de frutas tropicales y subtropicales (incluye el cultivo de paltas)Cultivo de plantas perennes9976.1×
Cultivo de floresCultivo de plantas no perennes3851.8×
Cultivo de hortalizas y melonesCultivo de plantas no perennes21849.1×
Reparación de productos elaborados de metalReparación de productos elaborados de metal, maquinaria y equipo5326.8×
Cultivo de porotosCultivo de plantas no perennes925.7×
Alquiler de maquinaria y equipo agropecuario, forestal, de construcción e ing. civil, sin operariosAlquiler y arrendamiento de otros tipos de maquinaria, equipo y bienes tangibles15017.6×
Venta al por mayor de carne y productos cárnicosVenta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco7314.6×
Fabricación de ropa de trabajoFabricación de prendas de vestir, excepto prendas de piel109.9×
Servicios de extinción y prevención de incendios forestalesServicios de apoyo a la silvicultura129.2×
Actividades combinadas de servicios administrativos de oficinaActividades administrativas y de apoyo de oficina188.2×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
3,024
hectares in holdings
79.7%
of them under a named use
98.9%
of the crop land is irrigated
258
holdings with land here
Orchards and vineyards 47%Not farmed 29%Woodland 19%Annual crops 4.9%Fruit trees47%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings20%Untilled land9.1%Native woodland18%Vegetables2.9%Nurse…andturf
Orchards and vineyards 47%Not farmed 29%Woodland 19%Fruit trees47%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings20%Untill…land9.1%Native woodland18%VegetablesNurse…and…
Orchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
La CruzChile% of each territory's own population · 24,939 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
24,939
213,74518,480,432149th of 346
Average age
36.7 yrs
38.6 yrs38.1 yrs302nd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
60.7
85.679.0310th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
318.9/km²
192.1/km²24.7/km²62nd of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
8,580
73,9446,596,527154th of 346
Dwellings
9,860
82,5027,642,716172nd of 346
People per household
2.91
2.892.8071st of 345
Women
51.9%
51.6%51.5%49th of 346
Men per 100 women
92.6
93.994.3298th of 346
Under 15
20.2%
18.1%17.7%36th of 346
65 and over
12.3%
15.5%14.0%300th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
48.0
50.546.5246th of 346
One-person households
16.5%
19.0%21.8%324th of 345
Households with children
40.5%
35.4%33.2%16th of 345
Indigenous peoples
4.8%
4.8%11.4%268th of 346
Female-headed households
47.4%
50.2%49.9%194th of 345
Land area
78 km²
1,113 km²748,041 km²309th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

La Cruz32%Arrived since 202068%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
La Cruz32%Arrived since 202068%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
5.8%
6.4%8.7%88th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
39.4%
60.0%50.5%289th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
43.4%
20.2%23.9%12th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
12.4%
14.1%17.2%242nd of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
1,454
13,7561,608,650106th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
32.5 yrs
31.5 yrs33.5 yrs219th of 345
Women among foreign-born
51.8%
49.7%51.7%139th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
81.5%
80.6%83.1%159th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
32.3%
41.1%34.4%238th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
7.0%
7.8%10.6%88th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
13.5 yrs
12.6 yrs12.9 yrs44th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
11,588
1,000041st of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
41.6
0.40.022nd of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

La Cruz37%Higher33%Secondary21%Primary only5.3%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
La Cruz37%Higher33%Secondary21%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.8 yrs
10.0 yrs10.4 yrs32nd of 346
Reached higher education
37.4%
27.7%31.1%28th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.7%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
46.9%
65.1%55.6%283rd of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.8%
100.8%99.8%229th of 346
Literacy rate
98.7%
97.8%97.8%34th of 346
Reached secondary education
33.2%
39.0%36.7%295th of 346
Primary education only
21.4%
25.2%24.1%307th of 346
Never attended school
2.73%
2.85%3.01%292nd of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
12.8 yrs
11.7 yrs12.1 yrs30th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
12.9 yrs
11.8 yrs12.1 yrs21st of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.33%
2.22%2.18%308th of 345
Households lacking schooling
15.4%
17.4%15.1%255th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
96
2,655217,565243rd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
36.5%
21.0%33.9%172nd of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
57.8%
68.9%67.2%216th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
22.2%
15.2%19.7%119th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
20.0%
15.8%13.1%118th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
2.2%
4.6%13.0%263rd of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
64.4%
51.4%49.7%19th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

96left secondary school in 2024
45enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
46.9%continued immediately
58%of those, to a university
2%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%AgronomiaIngenieria Civil IndustrialMedicina VeterinariaTecnico de Nivel Superior en Estetica, Cosmetologia y Terapias ComplementariasTecnico Veterinario y Pecuario
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%AgronomiaIngenieria Civil IndustrialMedicina VeterinariaTecnico de Nivel Superior en Estetica, Cosmetologia y Terapias ComplementariasTecnico Veterinario y Pecuario
La CruzChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Agriculture and veterinaryBusiness and lawEngineering and industryEducationServicesHealth and welfareArts and humanitiesInformation technologySocial sciences
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Agriculture and veterinaryBusiness and lawEngineering and industryEducationServicesHealth and welfareArts and humanitiesInformation technologySocial sciences
La CruzChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

02550751002006201520249645
02550751002006201520249645
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort La Cruz's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold La Cruz against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

La Cruz76%Fonasa18%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
La Cruz76%Fonasa18%Chile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
8.9%
11.2%10.6%305th of 346
Public health insurance
76.4%
86.5%82.6%314th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
56.1
67.082.5243rd of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
45
83100300th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
2,208
23,9751,950,388188th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
55.4 yrs
57.4 yrs56.4 yrs284th of 346
Disability among 65+
43.3%
46.1%43.0%244th of 346
Difficulty walking
4.21%
5.46%4.92%282nd of 346
Difficulty seeing
3.22%
4.64%4.58%323rd of 346
Difficulty hearing
1.72%
2.27%2.16%308th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.63%
2.87%2.70%217th of 346
Private health insurance
18.3%
6.7%13.2%23rd of 335
No health coverage
3.51%
4.12%1.98%60th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
84.1%
89.4%92.1%293rd of 332
Households lacking health access
3.0%
4.8%6.0%249th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
1,398
14,3131,523,716168th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
20
38136,698236th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.43%
2.66%2.41%312th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.5 days
6.4 days6.1 days277th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
8.0
17.819.9311th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
69
80100222nd of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
103
94289,723140th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
7.4%
6.6%5.9%58th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
41.3
44.148.6151st of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
90
87100107th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 22%Injuries, bones and skin 21%Pregnancy, birth an… 19%Tumours, bloo… 15%Heart and lungs 12%Infections and… 7.0%Mind, nerves a… 4.6%Digestive system14%Genitour…system7.7%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculoske…6.7%SkinPregnancy andchildbirth16%Perinata…Cancers andtumours9.9%Endocrine andmetabolic4.4%Circulatorysystem7.4%Respir…system4.6%Contactwith healthservicesInfect…and…Ill-de…NervoussystemMent…and…
Digestive and urinar… 22%Injuries, bones and… 21%Pregnancy,… 19%Tumours, blood and… 15%Heart and lungs 12%Digestivesystem14%Genito…system7.7%Injuriesandpoisoning12%Musculo…6.7%SkinPregnancyandchildbirth16%Perin…Cancers andtumours9.9%Endocr…andmetabo…4.4%Circulatorysystem7.4%Respir…system4.6%Contactwithhealth…Infe…and…Ner…sys…Men…and…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Encéfalo y sistemanervioso25%Órganos digestivos20%Sangre ysistemalinfático18%Sitiosreservados17%Genitales femeninos12%Genitalesmasculinos6.8%
Encéfalo y sistemanervioso25%Órganosdigestivos20%Sangre ysistemalinfático18%Sitiosreservados17%Genitalesfemeninos12%Genitalesmasculinos6.8%
Encéfalo y sistema nerviosoÓrganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoSitios reservadosGenitales femeninosGenitales masculinoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
16.3%
18.0%17.3%249th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
21.2 UF
22.1 UF32.0 UF225th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
97.6%
90.1%78.9%186th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
77.2
78.385.6171st of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
57.9%
51.7%54.4%55th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
6.7%
9.0%8.6%267th of 345
Self-employed
29.3%
33.7%33.8%295th of 345
Extreme poverty
6.8%
5.8%6.9%203rd of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
3.3%
14.5%17.7%320th of 335
Unemployment rate
9.0%
11.1%8.8%171st of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 705,214
CLP 567,477CLP 783,12454th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.410
0.4160.488231st of 321
Registered firms
1,926
16,7411,582,390147th of 346
Annual sales
7,392,129 UF
88,030,506 UF34,347,683,688 UF160th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
5,180
64,2439,699,164173rd of 346
Sales per firm
3,838 UF
5,258 UF21,706 UF172nd of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.7
2.43.9250th of 346
Women among employees
34.5%
37.4%40.6%280th of 345
Independent contractors
1,929
18,9783,958,269158th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
27.1%
22.8%29.0%173rd of 346

Employment by industry

State and social services 24%Trade and logistics 23%Natural resources 22%Industry and c… 15%Advanced serv… 9.2%Other services 6.4%Education10%Health8.8%Publicadministration4.9%Retail andwholesale15%Transport4.9%Accommodati…and food3.3%Agriculture andfishing12%Mining9.9%Manufacturing6.4%Constructi…6.3%Elec…andgasWaterandwasteProfession…services3.4%Administrat…servicesFinanceand…Inform…and…Real…Domesticwork2.9%Otherservic…2.4%
State and social ser… 24%Trade and logistics 23%Natural resourc… 22%Industr… 15%Advance… 9.2%Other s… 6.4%Education10%Health8.8%Pub…adm…Retail andwholesale15%Transp…4.9%Accomm…andfoodAgriculture andfishing12%Mining9.9%Manufacturing6.4%Construction6.3%Electri…Water…Profes…servic…Adminis…Fina…and…Info…and…Real…Domes…work2.9%Otherservic…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 49%Managers and professionals 40%Elementary occupations 11%Service and sales17%Craft and trades12%Plant and machineoperators8.0%Skilledagricultur…6.6%Clericalsupport5.5%Professionals21%Technicians13%Managers5.8%Elementary occupations11%
Skilled occupations 49%Managers and professionals 40%Elem… 11%Service andsales17%Craft andtrades12%Plant andmachineoperators8.0%Skilledagricul…6.6%Clerical supportProfessionals21%Technicians13%Managers5.8%Elementa…occupati…11%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

La Cruz95%House5.0%Chile79%House20%Flat
La Cruz95%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
3.9%
4.6%5.7%307th of 345
Internet access
95.4%
92.8%93.2%41st of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.8
2.02.3274th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.0
1.31.6287th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
8,443
72,2396,408,172155th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.17%
0.27%0.57%315th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.72%
0.75%1.13%268th of 345
Public water network
93.5%
94.1%92.3%88th of 345
Electricity access
99.9%
99.7%99.6%24th of 345
Detached houses
94.6%
88.1%78.7%240th of 345
Apartments
4.9%
11.3%19.9%91st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.19%0.23%298th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
9.4%
6.6%11.9%250th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
368
4,238491,904181st of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.3%
5.7%7.5%261st of 345
Renting households
19.3%
20.2%26.2%108th of 345
Owner-occupiers
68.1%
65.0%61.1%187th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
17.7%
15.7%24.4%253rd of 345
Commute by public transport
28.9%
34.1%42.1%129th of 345
Walks to work
5.1%
10.3%10.2%343rd of 345
Households with a computer
64.7%
49.9%54.9%19th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.3
0.91.1244th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.5%
99.2%97.0%66th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.8%
90.3%89.4%42nd of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%98.1%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.3
3.05.9231st of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
74.1%
81.5%80.3%113th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.4%90.0%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.6
0.60.6266th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.5%99.0%1st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.5%
94.2%91.6%47th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 47%Public transport 29%Other means 15%On foot o… 9.9%Car45%Public transport29%Other15%Walking5.1%Bicycle4.8%
Private vehicle 47%Public transport 29%Other means 15%On foot or by bi… 9.9%Car45%Public transport29%Other15%Walking5.1%Bicycle4.8%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 68%Rented 19%Provided re… 10.0%Owned outright35%Owned, still paying33%Rented, withcontract15%Rented, no contract4.5%Provided byfamily7.7%Provided by employer
Owned 68%Rented 19%Provide… 10.0%Owned outright35%Owned, stillpaying33%Rented, withcontract15%Rente…nocontr…4.5%Providedby family7.7%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Fossil fuels 40%No heating 21%Electricity 20%Wood and biomass 18%Gas33%Paraffin7.0%No heating21%Electricity20%Firewood18%
Fossil fuels 40%No heating 21%Electricity 20%Wood and biomass 18%Gas33%Para…No heating21%Electricity20%Firewood18%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
91.0%
of the registered voted in the first round
90.8%
voted in the runoff
18,775
registered voters on the roll
7.2%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman39.5%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist60.5%58.3%
La CruzChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez21.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman24.4%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen15.6%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist24.5%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet10.5%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.4%1.3%
La CruzChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile38.1%30.6%
KCambio por Chile23.8%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido19.8%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente13.7%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas4.5%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
La CruzChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile32.7%
KCambio por Chile19.6%
JChile Grande y Unido32.1%
IPartido de la Gente12.4%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.2%
La Cruzshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble La Cruz across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading