Commune · 13501

MelipillaMelipilla

Compare Melipilla with another place
Census population
136,325
44th of 346
Population density
100.8/km²
91st of 346
Average years of schooling
9.6 yrs
135th of 346
Foreign-born share
8.1%
58th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 96.2%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF21.8 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF21.8 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 650 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
66.3%
111th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
18.5%
166th of 335
Came from another region
11.4%
267th of 335
Net internal migration
+1,022
+0.7 per 100 residents
Melipillathis commune · 142,729elsewhere in the region27,643 peopleanother region16,990 peopleabroad5,756 peopleelsewhere in the region31,222 peopleanother region12,389 peopleMelipillathis commune · 149,507
Melipillathis commune · 142,729elsewhere in th…27,643 peopleanother region16,990 peopleabroad5,756 peopleelsewhere in th…31,222 peopleanother region12,389 peopleMelipillathis commune · 149,507

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing4Manufacturing2Manufacturing▲23Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale10Other services4Other services▲65Construction5Construction9Administrative services6Administrative services▲36Transport7Transport▼17Health8Health▼12Education9Education▼78Accommodation and food10Accommodation and food▼214Professional services11Professional services▲312Public administration12Public administration11Mining18Mining▼7
2005202411Agriculture and fishing42Manufacturing▲233Retail and wholesale104Other services▲655Construction96Administrative services▲367Transport▼178Health▼129Education▼7810Accommodation and food▼21411Professional services▲31212Public administration1118Mining▼7

The ten branches that employ most of Melipilla

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

10 k30 k50 k70 kprojection →64 k2029 · central2005201520242029
10 k30 k50 k70 kprojection →64 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.5% a year observed · 4.4% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

050 M100 M150 Mprojection →120 M2029 · central2005201520242029
050 M100 M150 Mprojection →120 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.1% a year observed · 2.2% projected

What Melipilla is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Melipilla employs more people in 93 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

93
activities it is specialised in
51,503
formal workers
179/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Cría de aves de corral para la pr…Venta al por menor de alimentos e…Otras actividades de limpieza de …Cultivo de frutos oleaginosos (in…Generación de energía eléctrica e…Instalaciones de gasfitería, cale…Venta al por mayor de productos q…Fabricación de instrumentos y mat…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Venta al por mayor de carne y pro…Cultivo de frutos oleaginosos (in…Cultivo de trigoVenta al por mayor de productos q…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Melipilla

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cría de aves de corral para la producción de carneGanadería1,67078.1×
Explotación de mataderos de aves y de otros tipos de animales n.c.p.Elaboración y conservación de carne2,41160.5×
Venta al por mayor de carne y productos cárnicosVenta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco1,02420.6×
Cultivo de papasCultivo de plantas no perennes18520.2×
Cría de cerdosGanadería37318.8×
Cultivo de cítricosCultivo de plantas perennes8618.4×
Fundaciones y corporaciones; asociaciones que promueven actividades culturales o recreativasActividades de otras asociaciones3,58716.1×
Venta al por mayor de maquinaria, equipo y materiales agropecuariosVenta al por mayor de maquinaria, equipo y materiales17711.5×
Actividades de apoyo a la agriculturaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha14,0028.9×
Elaboración y conservación de carne y productos cárnicosElaboración y conservación de carne6968.8×
Actividades poscosechaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha1318.7×
Fabricación de tanques, depósitos y recipientes de metal n.c.p.Fabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructural, tanques, depósitos, recipientes de metal356.2×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
73,926
hectares in holdings
76.6%
of them under a named use
97.4%
of the crop land is irrigated
1,730
holdings with land here
Not farmed 29%Orchards and vineyards 19%Woodland 18%Pasture 17%Annual crops 17%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings23%Untilled land5.9%Fruit trees18%Native woodland17%Pasture17%Cereals5.6%Fodder crops4.5%Vegetables3.5%Pulsesandtubers1.6%Seedcrops1.4%
Not farmed 29%Orchards and v… 19%Woodland 18%Pasture 17%Annual cro… 17%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings23%Until…land5.9%Fruit trees18%Nativewoodland17%Pasture17%Cereals5.6%Foddercrops4.5%Veget…3.5%Pulses…Seed…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MelipillaChile% of each territory's own population · 136,325 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
136,325
205,71818,480,43244th of 346
Average age
37.5 yrs
37.9 yrs38.1 yrs272nd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
73.1
75.679.0258th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
100.8/km²
50.5/km²24.7/km²91st of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
46,457
70,4486,596,52743rd of 346
Dwellings
52,240
81,0237,642,71641st of 346
People per household
2.93
2.922.8056th of 345
Women
51.0%
50.9%51.5%158th of 346
Men per 100 women
96.0
96.694.3189th of 346
Under 15
19.4%
19.2%17.7%65th of 346
65 and over
14.2%
14.5%14.0%247th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
50.5
50.946.5187th of 346
One-person households
18.7%
18.9%21.8%290th of 345
Households with children
37.1%
36.7%33.2%53rd of 345
Indigenous peoples
6.0%
6.1%11.4%224th of 346
Female-headed households
48.9%
47.9%49.9%147th of 345
Land area
1,352 km²
4,072 km²748,041 km²105th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Melipilla47%Arrived since 202053%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Melipilla47%Arrived since 202053%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
8.1%
7.3%8.7%58th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
66.3%
62.8%50.5%111th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
18.5%
21.4%23.9%166th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
11.4%
12.0%17.2%267th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
11,069
15,0631,608,65043rd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
30.7 yrs
31.0 yrs33.5 yrs301st of 345
Women among foreign-born
48.5%
48.7%51.7%272nd of 345
Foreign-born of working age
83.0%
82.3%83.1%89th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
46.9%
46.5%34.4%70th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
10.1%
9.1%10.6%52nd of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.3 yrs
11.4 yrs12.9 yrs302nd of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
1,022
17,9770122nd of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
0.7
8.00.0150th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Melipilla23%Higher39%Secondary28%Primary only5.2%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Melipilla23%39%Secondary28%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.6 yrs
9.6 yrs10.4 yrs135th of 346
Reached higher education
23.1%
23.1%31.1%137th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
96.9%
97.9%98.6%292nd of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
53.1%
53.2%55.6%190th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
102.7%
102.6%99.8%129th of 346
Literacy rate
97.1%
97.0%97.8%134th of 346
Reached secondary education
39.2%
38.8%36.7%100th of 346
Primary education only
28.4%
28.9%24.1%221st of 346
Never attended school
4.10%
4.02%3.01%114th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
11.1 yrs
11.1 yrs12.1 yrs138th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.4 yrs
11.4 yrs12.1 yrs119th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
2.86%
2.95%2.18%212th of 345
Households lacking schooling
22.6%
22.4%15.1%182nd of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
1,626
2,331217,56542nd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
34.9%
33.1%33.9%189th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
5.0%
6.8%3.1%91st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
60.8%
60.3%67.2%186th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
35.3%
33.7%19.7%24th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
3.8%
6.0%13.1%314th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
4.2%
4.7%13.0%245th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
49.4%
48.7%49.7%209th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

1,626left secondary school in 2024
863enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
53.1%continued immediately
61%of those, to a university
4%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Ingenieria en InformaticaDerechoPsicologiaIngenieria ComercialIngenieria en ConstruccionEnfermeriaMedicina VeterinariaKinesiologiaTecnico en Mecanica Automotriz y AutotronicaIngenieria Civil Industrial
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Ingenieria en InformaticaDerechoPsicologiaIngenieria ComercialIngenieria en ConstruccionEnfermeriaMedicina VeterinariaKinesiologiaTecnico en Mecanica Automotriz y AutotronicaIngenieria Civil Industrial
MelipillaChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryBusiness and lawHealth and welfareInformation technologyEducationAgriculture and veterinaryServicesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryBusiness and lawHealth and welfareInformation technologyEducationAgriculture and veterinaryServicesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
MelipillaChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

05001,0001,5002,0002006201520241,626863
05001,0001,5002,0002006201520241,626863
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Melipilla's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Melipilla against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Melipilla95%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Melipilla95%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
10.3%
10.3%10.6%252nd of 346
Public health insurance
94.5%
92.7%82.6%114th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
81.0
73.182.597th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
92
83100157th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
14,103
21,2201,950,38839th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
56.4 yrs
56.9 yrs56.4 yrs252nd of 346
Disability among 65+
43.8%
44.6%43.0%232nd of 346
Difficulty walking
4.69%
4.73%4.92%249th of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.58%
4.54%4.58%247th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.21%
2.19%2.16%240th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.61%
2.57%2.70%222nd of 346
Private health insurance
3.5%
5.4%13.2%157th of 335
No health coverage
1.00%
1.28%1.98%203rd of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
95.2%
95.4%92.1%130th of 332
Households lacking health access
5.1%
7.0%6.0%178th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
11,036
15,0441,523,71645th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
248
34736,69846th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.25%
2.31%2.41%248th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.8 days
6.0 days6.1 days248th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
18.2
16.919.9186th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
98
8810090th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
631
90289,72345th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.7%
6.0%5.9%158th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
46.3
43.848.6100th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
96
8910085th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 22%Pregnancy, birth and newborns 21%Injuries, bones … 17%Heart and lungs 16%Tumours, blood and met… 14%Infection… 4.4%Mind, ner… 4.3%Digestive system14%Genitour…system8.0%Pregnancy andchildbirth17%Perin…condi…2.4%Conge…malfo…1.5%Injuries andpoisoning10%Musculoskeletal5.6%Respiratorysystem8.5%Circulatory system7.8%Cancers andtumours9.4%Endocri…andmetabol…4.6%Infec…andparas…Contactwith…Ill-d…Mentalandbehav…Nervoussystem
Digestive and urinar… 22%Pregnancy, birth an… 21%Injuries… 17%Heart and lungs 16%Tumours, blood and met… 14%Digestivesystem14%Genitou…system8.0%Pregnancy andchildbirth17%Per…con…Con…mal…Injuries andpoisoning10%Musculoske…5.6%Respiratorysystem8.5%Circulato…system7.8%Cancers andtumours9.4%Endocri…andmetabol…Infec…andparas…Contactwith…Mentalandbehav…Ner…sys…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos28%Sangre y sistema linfático22%Genitalesmasculinos8.1%Genitalesfemeninos7.0%Vías urinarias6.8%Tiroides yendocrinas6.7%Mama5.5%Víasrespiratorias4.9%Encéfaloy sistemanervioso3.3%Sitiosmaldefinid…3.2%Sitiosreservados2.9%Tejidosblandos1.7%
Órganos digestivos28%Sangre y sistemalinfático22%Genitalesmasculinos8.1%Genitalesfemeninos7.0%Víasurinarias6.8%Tiroides yendocrinas6.7%Mama5.5%Víasrespirat…4.9%Encéfalo ysistema…Sitios maldefinidosSitiosreserva…2.9%Tejidos…
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoGenitales masculinosGenitales femeninosVías urinariasTiroides y endocrinashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
20.2%
19.5%17.3%168th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
21.8 UF
23.3 UF32.0 UF207th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
100.4%
90.3%78.9%167th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
79.2
82.085.6165th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
52.6%
52.8%54.4%141st of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
8.8%
8.5%8.6%161st of 345
Self-employed
33.7%
35.5%33.8%198th of 345
Extreme poverty
7.7%
7.5%6.9%171st of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
22.6%
24.2%17.7%90th of 335
Unemployment rate
13.7%
11.5%8.8%40th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 527,637
CLP 638,375CLP 783,124176th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.424
0.4980.488200th of 321
Registered firms
10,793
16,8631,582,39036th of 346
Annual sales
107,095,324 UF
147,179,218 UF34,347,683,688 UF37th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
51,540
70,2879,699,16441st of 346
Sales per firm
9,923 UF
8,728 UF21,706 UF55th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.8
2.53.997th of 346
Women among employees
38.0%
39.0%40.6%226th of 345
Independent contractors
11,043
19,6843,958,26953rd of 346
Contractors as share of workers
17.6%
21.9%29.0%305th of 346

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 28%Natural resources 21%State and social services 18%Industry and con… 18%Advanced s… 8.6%Other serv… 5.7%Retail andwholesale18%Transport6.3%Accommodat…and food3.8%Agriculture and fishing20%Education7.8%Health7.1%Publicadmin…3.5%Manufacturing9.3%Construction7.2%Ele…andgasWat…and…Adminis…services3.1%Profes…servic…2.5%Informa…andcommuni…Finan…andinsur…Domes…work2.7%Otherservic…2.3%
Trade and logistics 28%Natural resourc… 21%State and so… 18%Industry and… 18%Advanc… 8.6%Other … 5.7%Retail andwholesale18%Transport6.3%Accommod…and food3.8%Agriculture andfishing20%Education7.8%Health7.1%Publ…admi…Manufacturing9.3%Construction7.2%Admini…servic…Profess…servicesInf…and…Fin…and…Domes…work2.7%Otherservic…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 55%Managers and professionals 25%Elementary occupations 20%Service and sales20%Craft andtrades13%Plant andmachineoperators8.6%Skilledagricultural7.6%Clericalsupport4.8%Professionals13%Technicians9.0%Managers3.2%Elementary occupations20%
Skilled occupations 55%Managers and profession… 25%Elementary occupa… 20%Service andsales20%Craft and trades13%Plant and machineoperators8.6%Skilledagricult…7.6%Clericalsupport4.8%Profession…13%Technicians9.0%ManagersElementaryoccupations20%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Melipilla92%House6.6%Chile79%House20%Flat
Melipilla92%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.8%
5.8%5.7%99th of 345
Internet access
91.8%
91.4%93.2%119th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.5
4.92.3136th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.4
3.21.6217th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
45,253
68,7806,408,17243rd of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.38%
0.39%0.57%115th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.05%
1.10%1.13%183rd of 345
Public water network
91.9%
86.9%92.3%111th of 345
Electricity access
99.8%
99.7%99.6%73rd of 345
Detached houses
92.3%
94.4%78.7%257th of 345
Apartments
6.6%
4.5%19.9%80th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.20%
0.19%0.23%140th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
8.8%
10.3%11.9%258th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
3,215
4,590491,90452nd of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
6.9%
6.5%7.5%85th of 345
Renting households
21.0%
18.6%26.2%93rd of 345
Owner-occupiers
66.4%
67.8%61.1%222nd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
17.0%
20.2%24.4%254th of 345
Commute by public transport
31.2%
29.2%42.1%109th of 345
Walks to work
10.9%
11.0%10.2%232nd of 345
Households with a computer
47.1%
47.0%54.9%120th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.1
2.21.1122nd of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
85.7%
85.7%97.0%260th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
61.3%
58.5%89.4%234th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.9%
97.8%98.1%172nd of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.9
11.55.9224th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
62.0%
40.8%80.3%139th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
94.5%
63.7%90.0%134th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
95.5%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.2
1.30.6156th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.1%
96.3%99.0%193rd of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
81.5%
72.6%91.6%159th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.4%98.5%129th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 38%Public transport 31%On foot or by bicycle 17%Other means 13%Car37%Public transport31%Walking11%Bicycle6.4%Other13%
Private vehicle 38%Public transport 31%On foot or by bicycle 17%Other means 13%Car37%Publictransport31%Walking11%Bicycle6.4%Other13%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 66%Rented 21%Provided rent… 9.8%Owned outright59%Owned, still payingRented, withcontract12%Rented, no contract8.9%Provided byfamily7.9%Oth…arr…
Owned 66%Rented 21%Provide… 9.8%Owned outright59%Owne…stillpayi…Rented, withcontract12%Rented, nocontract8.9%Provided byfamily7.9%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Fossil fuels 42%No heating 23%Wood and biomass 18%Electricity 17%Gas33%Paraffin9.6%No heating23%Firewood17%Electricity17%
Fossil fuels 42%No heating 23%Wood and biomass 18%Electricity 17%Gas33%Paraf…9.6%No heating23%Firewood17%Electricity17%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
90.8%
of the registered voted in the first round
90.6%
voted in the runoff
106,366
registered voters on the roll
6.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman39.2%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist60.8%58.3%
MelipillaChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez19.8%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman24.8%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.5%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist26.4%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet11.6%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.2%1.3%
MelipillaChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile27.4%30.6%
KCambio por Chile18.7%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido24.4%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente12.7%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas11.9%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista3.6%2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.4%0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
MelipillaChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Melipilla across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading