Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Average monthly pay339th of 342 · Chile 32.0 UF15.3 UF
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer327th of 330 · Chile 5.9%2.1%
Multidimensional poverty321st of 335 · Chile 17.7%3.3%
Never attended school331st of 346 · Chile 3.01%2.10%
People within 30 km of a school in operation323rd of 345 · Chile 100.0%99.4%
Electricity access24th of 345 · Chile 99.6%99.9%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF15.3 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF15.3 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 877 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
49.7%
254th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
11.6%
263rd of 335
Came from another region
29.2%
27th of 335
Net internal migration
+5,487
+22.2 per 100 residents
Natalesthis commune · 16,863another region7,203 peopleelsewhere in the region2,865 peopleabroad2,352 peopleelsewhere in the region2,736 peopleanother region1,845 peopleNatalesthis commune · 24,702
Natalesthis commune · 16,863another region7,203 peopleelsewhere in th…2,865 peopleabroad2,352 peopleelsewhere in th…2,736 peopleanother region1,845 peopleNatalesthis commune · 24,702

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520243Accommodation and food1Accommodation and food▲22Agriculture and fishing2Agriculture and fishing1Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▼25Transport4Transport▲18Administrative services5Administrative services▲37Manufacturing6Manufacturing▲19Construction7Construction▲215Health8Health▲74Other services9Other services▼56Public administration10Public administration▼416Arts and entertainment11Arts and entertainment▲510Education12Education▼211Professional services13Professional services▼212Information and communications15Information and communications▼3
2005202431Accommodation and food▲222Agriculture and fishing13Retail and wholesale▼254Transport▲185Administrative services▲376Manufacturing▲197Construction▲2158Health▲749Other services▼5610Public administration▼41611Arts and entertainment▲51012Education▼21113Professional services▼21215Information and communications▼3

The ten branches that employ most of Natales

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

05 k10 k15 kprojection →13 k2029 · central2005201520242029
05 k10 k15 kprojection →13 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.2% a year observed · 4.8% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

010 M20 M30 Mprojection →23 M2029 · central2005201520242029
010 M20 M30 Mprojection →23 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval11.7% a year observed · 2.9% projected

What Natales is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Natales employs more people in 73 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

73
activities it is specialised in
9,917
formal workers
78/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Servicios relacionados con la acu…Venta al por mayor de materiales …Centros médicos privados (estable…Transporte de pasajeros marítimo …Actividades de agencias de empleoElaboración de otros productos al…Cría de ovejas (ovinos)Otras actividades de alojamiento …Actividades de servicios vinculad…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.63.7Actividades de agencias de empleoCría de ovejas (ovinos)Agencias de navesExtracción de maderaHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Natales

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Elaboración y conservación de crustáceos, moluscos y otros productos acuáticos, en plantas en tierraElaboración y conservación de pescado, crustáceos y moluscos16782.5×
Transporte de pasajeros marítimo y de cabotajeTransporte marítimo y de cabotaje13475.9×
Pesca marítima artesanalPesca13258.8×
Servicios de transporte a turistasOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre10457.2×
Cría de ovejas (ovinos)Ganadería6247.7×
Transporte de pasajeros por vías de navegación interioresTransporte por vías de navegación interiores3641.4×
Servicios relacionados con la acuicultura marinaAcuicultura1,21834.7×
Servicios relacionados con la pesca marítimaPesca2932.3×
Otras actividades de alojamiento para turistas n.c.p.Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas3731.9×
Actividades de agencias de viajesActividades de agencias de viajes y operadores turísticos18329.6×
Actividades de hotelesActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas1,93127.6×
Venta al por menor de recuerdos, artesanías y artículos religiosos en comercios especializadosVenta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados3324.8×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
6,024,668
hectares in holdings
71.9%
of them under a named use
16.6%
of the crop land is irrigated
178
holdings with land here
Pasture 37%Woodland 35%Not farmed 28%Pasture37%Native woodland35%Scrub, barren groundand buildings28%
Pasture 37%Woodland 35%Not farmed 28%Pasture37%Native woodland35%Scrub, barren ground and buildings28%
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
NatalesChile% of each territory's own population · 24,152 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
24,152
24,35518,480,432152nd of 346
Average age
38.4 yrs
38.4 yrs38.1 yrs227th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
84.1
84.279.0202nd of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
0.5/km²
0.5/km²24.7/km²323rd of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
9,490
9,5906,596,527140th of 346
Dwellings
11,223
11,5277,642,716152nd of 346
People per household
2.54
2.542.80289th of 345
Women
50.0%
50.0%51.5%274th of 346
Men per 100 women
99.8
100.194.373rd of 346
Under 15
17.1%
17.0%17.7%227th of 346
65 and over
14.4%
14.3%14.0%239th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
45.8
45.746.5292nd of 346
One-person households
25.0%
25.2%21.8%86th of 345
Households with children
30.8%
30.7%33.2%240th of 345
Indigenous peoples
28.0%
27.9%11.4%79th of 346
Female-headed households
52.5%
52.2%49.9%35th of 345
Land area
47,023 km²
53,540 km²748,041 km²1st of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Natales34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Natales34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
9.7%
9.7%8.7%48th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
49.7%
49.0%50.5%254th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
11.6%
12.5%23.9%263rd of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
29.2%
29.1%17.2%27th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
2,338
2,3551,608,65090th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
32.7 yrs
32.7 yrs33.5 yrs208th of 345
Women among foreign-born
51.9%
52.0%51.7%136th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
83.1%
83.1%83.1%86th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
33.9%
34.0%34.4%216th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
11.7%
11.7%10.6%48th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.5 yrs
12.5 yrs12.9 yrs153rd of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
5,487
6,351064th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
22.2
24.60.064th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Natales28%Higher38%Secondary26%Primary only5.4%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Natales28%Higher38%Secondary26%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.1 yrs
10.1 yrs10.4 yrs72nd of 346
Reached higher education
27.9%
28.0%31.1%77th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
99.3%
99.4%98.6%205th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
52.5%
52.5%55.6%199th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
102.6%
102.7%99.8%134th of 346
Literacy rate
98.2%
98.2%97.8%65th of 346
Reached secondary education
38.5%
38.5%36.7%125th of 346
Primary education only
26.1%
26.1%24.1%252nd of 346
Never attended school
2.10%
2.11%3.01%331st of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
11.6 yrs
11.6 yrs12.1 yrs89th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.9 yrs
11.9 yrs12.1 yrs77th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.75%
1.76%2.18%281st of 345
Households lacking schooling
13.2%
13.5%15.1%277th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
316
316217,565133rd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
25.0%
25.0%33.9%238th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
76.5%
76.5%67.2%43rd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
11.4%
11.4%19.7%260th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
12.0%
12.0%13.1%216th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
41.0%
41.0%13.0%64th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
53.6%
53.6%49.7%108th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

316left secondary school in 2024
166enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
52.5%continued immediately
77%of those, to a university
41%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Nutricion y DieteticaTecnico de Nivel Superior en EnfermeriaTecnico de Nivel Superior en AdministracionDerechoIngenieria ComercialTecnico de Nivel Superior en Educacion ParvulariaEnfermeriaIngenieria Civil Plan ComunIngenieria en Prevencion de RiesgosKinesiologia
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Nutricion y DieteticaTecnico de Nivel Superior en EnfermeriaTecnico de Nivel Superior en AdministracionDerechoIngenieria ComercialTecnico de Nivel Superior en Educacion ParvulariaEnfermeriaIngenieria Civil Plan ComunIngenieria en Prevencion de RiesgosKinesiologia
NatalesChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryBusiness and lawEducationServicesNatural sciencesAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesInformation technology
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryBusiness and lawEducationServicesNatural sciencesAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesInformation technology
NatalesChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0100200300400200620152024316166
0100200300400200620152024316166
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Natales's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Natales against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

This region's own series says it stopped reporting in 2019, 2024 and 2025: 21,838 discharges in 2019 against a median of 14,183 in its other years, 54%; 7,768 discharges in 2024 against a median of 14,958 in its other years, -48%; 9,770 discharges in 2025 against a median of 14,958 in its other years, -35%. The rule withholds any year that departs more than 25% from that median, and no other region crosses it in any year. A register that loses records is not a place whose health changed, so those years are not published here. The counts are still in the published data, and /datos carries the check.

Which health system

Natales90%Fonasa7.3%Chile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Natales90%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.9%
9.9%10.6%271st of 346
Public health insurance
90.4%
90.2%82.6%205th of 335
See the other 15 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
2,393
2,4121,950,388182nd of 346
Average age, people with a disability
56.8 yrs
56.8 yrs56.4 yrs233rd of 346
Disability among 65+
45.9%
45.9%43.0%161st of 346
Difficulty walking
4.36%
4.34%4.92%276th of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.60%
4.61%4.58%244th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.07%
2.07%2.16%269th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.02%
2.00%2.70%307th of 346
Private health insurance
7.3%
7.6%13.2%84th of 335
No health coverage
1.25%
1.20%1.98%188th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
98.7%
98.7%92.1%53rd of 332
Households lacking health access
5.8%
5.6%6.0%148th of 335
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
38
3989,723243rd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
2.1%
2.1%5.9%327th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
15.7
16.048.6305th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
32
33100302nd of 330

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
13.3%
13.1%17.3%283rd of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
15.3 UF
15.5 UF32.0 UF339th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
79.8%
81.2%78.9%306th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
137.3
137.885.628th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
63.1%
63.3%54.4%26th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
5.3%
5.3%8.6%303rd of 345
Self-employed
31.2%
31.1%33.8%255th of 345
Extreme poverty
3.3%
3.3%6.9%298th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
3.3%
3.8%17.7%321st of 335
Unemployment rate
6.5%
6.3%8.8%261st of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 860,109
CLP 873,299CLP 783,12432nd of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.447
0.4430.488128th of 321
Registered firms
3,316
3,3571,582,390108th of 346
Annual sales
20,138,107 UF
20,314,726 UF34,347,683,688 UF99th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
9,917
10,1899,699,164120th of 346
Sales per firm
6,073 UF
6,051 UF21,706 UF99th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.7
1.73.9252nd of 346
Women among employees
42.9%
42.9%40.6%131st of 345
Independent contractors
4,943
5,0433,958,26986th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
33.3%
33.1%29.0%90th of 346

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 33%State and social services 24%Industry and construction 17%Natural resources 13%Advanced servi… 8.6%Othe… 4.9%Retail andwholesale12%Accommodation and food12%Transport8.5%Health8.4%Publicadministra…8.0%Education7.8%Construction8.4%Manufacturi…7.1%Water…Agriculture and fishing12%Administra…services5.4%Profe…servi…1.9%Otherservi…1.9%Artsandente…Domestic…
Trade and logistics 33%State and socia… 24%Industry and … 17%Natural … 13%Advanced… 8.6%Other se… 4.9%Retail andwholesale12%Accommodation andfood12%Transp…8.5%Health8.4%Publicadminist…8.0%Education7.8%Construction8.4%Manufacturing7.1%Agricultureand fishing12%Adminis…services5.4%Prof…serv…Otherserv…Artsand…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 27%Elementary occupations 14%Service and sales20%Craft andtrades15%Clericalsupport9.4%Plant andmachineoperators9.1%Skilledagricu…4.4%Professiona…11%Technicians11%ManagersElementary occupations14%
Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 27%Elementary o… 14%Service andsales20%Craft and trades15%Clerical support9.4%Plant andmachineoperators9.1%Skilledagricultur…4.4%Profession…11%Technicians11%ManagersElementaryoccupations14%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Natales100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Natales100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
4.8%
4.7%5.7%237th of 345
Internet access
93.9%
93.9%93.2%71st of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.0
3.62.3214th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.3
2.81.6225th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
9,352
9,4506,408,172140th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.35%
0.35%0.57%141st of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.62%
0.67%1.13%287th of 345
Public water network
93.6%
93.0%92.3%86th of 345
Electricity access
99.9%
99.9%99.6%24th of 345
Detached houses
99.4%
99.3%78.7%68th of 345
Apartments
0.1%
0.1%19.9%185th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.20%
0.20%0.23%140th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
10.1%
11.6%11.9%241st of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
433
442491,904157th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.6%
4.6%7.5%235th of 345
Renting households
25.9%
25.9%26.2%55th of 345
Owner-occupiers
64.5%
64.1%61.1%246th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
4.8%
5.7%24.4%286th of 345
Commute by public transport
17.5%
17.4%42.1%277th of 345
Walks to work
17.8%
17.9%10.2%141st of 345
Households with a computer
54.8%
54.8%54.9%60th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.4
1.61.1235th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.9%
96.3%97.0%119th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.9%
98.4%99.9%293rd of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.1%
98.6%100.0%320th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.4%
95.6%89.4%67th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.4%
97.6%98.1%161st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.1%
98.3%99.7%283rd of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.9
3.55.9263rd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
96.4%
95.6%80.3%54th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.4%
97.6%90.0%95th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.1%
98.3%96.2%193rd of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.2
1.30.6153rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.9%
96.5%99.0%222nd of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.1%
98.7%99.9%303rd of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.4%
99.2%100.0%323rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.4%
95.6%91.6%77th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.4%
97.6%98.5%178th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.1%
98.3%99.8%286th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 48%On foot or by bicycle 21%Public transport 18%Other means 13%Car48%Walking18%Bicyc…3.4%Publictransport18%Other11%Boat
Private vehicle 48%On foot or by … 21%Public tra… 18%Other … 13%Car48%Walking18%Publictransport18%Other11%Boat
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 64%Rented 26%Provided rent-… 7.4%Owned outright58%Owned, still payingRented, withcontract15%Rented, no contract11%Provided byfamily5.3%Prov…byempl…Otherarra…
Owned 64%Rented 26%Provid… 7.4%Owned outright58%Own…sti…pay…Rented, withcontract15%Rented, nocontract11%Providedbyfamily5.3%Other…
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Fossil fuels 93%Gas93%Firew…4.8%Elect…1.0%Other0.9%
Fossil fuels 93%Gas93%Electr…Other
ElectricityOther sourceNo heatinghover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
71.4%
of the registered voted in the first round
71.5%
voted in the runoff
24,339
registered voters on the roll
8.1%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman46.9%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist53.1%58.3%
NatalesChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez16.4%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman30.2%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio2.1%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen15.1%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist25.1%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.7%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.0%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.4%1.3%
NatalesChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile22.0%30.6%
KCambio por Chile20.5%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido6.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente5.4%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas10.8%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact34.6%0.7%
NatalesChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Natales across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading