Commune · 06101

RancaguaRancagua

Compare Rancagua with another place
Census population
257,744
13th of 346
Population density
984.6/km²
44th of 346
Average years of schooling
10.5 yrs
50th of 346
Foreign-born share
8.0%
59th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 98.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 90.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 96.2%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF26.4 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF26.4 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 3,600 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
61.3%
166th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
12.2%
255th of 335
Came from another region
20.3%
85th of 335
Net internal migration
-20,625
-7.5 per 100 residents
Rancaguathis commune · 277,579another region55,523 peopleelsewhere in the region33,494 peopleabroad17,167 peopleanother region70,682 peopleelsewhere in the region38,960 peopleRancaguathis commune · 274,121
Rancaguathis commune · 277,579another region55,523 peopleelsewhere in th…33,494 peopleabroad17,167 peopleanother region70,682 peopleelsewhere in th…38,960 peopleRancaguathis commune · 274,121

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing4Administrative services2Administrative services▲22Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▼16Transport4Transport▲27Education5Education▲28Health6Health▲23Construction7Construction▼45Manufacturing8Manufacturing▼39Professional services9Professional services11Accommodation and food10Accommodation and food▲114Water and waste11Water and waste▲313Mining12Mining▲110Other services13Other services▼312Arts and entertainment16Arts and entertainment▼4
2005202411Agriculture and fishing42Administrative services▲223Retail and wholesale▼164Transport▲275Education▲286Health▲237Construction▼458Manufacturing▼399Professional services1110Accommodation and food▲11411Water and waste▲31312Mining▲11013Other services▼31216Arts and entertainment▼4

The ten branches that employ most of Rancagua

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

70 k90 k110 k130 k150 kprojection →138 k2029 · central2005201520242029
70 k90 k110 k130 k150 kprojection →138 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.1% a year observed · 1.5% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

0200 M400 M600 Mprojection →373 M2029 · central2005201520242029
0200 M400 M600 Mprojection →373 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.0% a year observed · -0.2% projected

What Rancagua is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Rancagua employs more people in 97 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

97
activities it is specialised in
127,599
formal workers
55/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.53.7Explotación de frigoríficos para …Actividades de hospitales y clíni…Servicios de seguridad privada pr…Explotación de mataderos de bovin…Cultivo y crianza de peces marinosRecogida de desechos no peligrososMantenimiento y reparación de veh…Actividades de consultoría de ges…Enseñanza superior en universidad…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.53.7Cultivo de otras plantas perennesCultivo de uva para mesaActividades de ISAPRECría de otros animales n.c.p.How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Rancagua

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cría de cerdosGanadería2,01040.8×
Explotación de frigoríficos para almacenamiento y depósitoAlmacenamiento y depósito6,63229.5×
Venta al por mayor de carne y productos cárnicosVenta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco3,34227.1×
Explotación de mataderos de bovinos, ovinos, equinos, caprinos, porcinos y camélidosElaboración y conservación de carne2,83820.4×
Actividades de hospitales y clínicas públicasActividades de hospitales públicos y privados5,08910.9×
Actividades combinadas de apoyo a instalacionesActividades combinadas de apoyo a instalaciones1128.3×
Cultivo y crianza de peces marinosAcuicultura2,6297.4×
Cría de otros animales n.c.p.Ganadería756.8×
Explotación de mataderos de aves y de otros tipos de animales n.c.p.Elaboración y conservación de carne5515.6×
Recogida de desechos no peligrososRecogida de desechos2,5125.5×
Actividades de clubes de futbol amateur y profesionalActividades deportivas1455.1×
Otros servicios de almacenamiento y depósito n.c.p.Almacenamiento y depósito2,3314.8×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
16,622
hectares in holdings
95.5%
of them under a named use
97.7%
of the crop land is irrigated
257
holdings with land here
Not farmed 54%Orchards and vineyards 25%Annual crops 12%Woodland 9.9%Untilled land49%Scr…bar…gro…Fruit trees22%VinesFodder crops3.3%Cereals3.0%Vegetables2.5%Seed crops1.4%Industr…cropsNative woodland9.9%
Not farmed 54%Orchards and vineyards 25%Annual crops 12%Woodland 9.9%Untilled land49%Scr…bar…gro…Fruit trees22%Foddercrops3.3%Cerea…3.0%Veg…SeedcropsInd…cro…Native woodland9.9%
WoodlandPasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
RancaguaChile% of each territory's own population · 257,744 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
257,744
693,30818,480,43213th of 346
Average age
37.9 yrs
38.3 yrs38.1 yrs259th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
78.3
78.579.0230th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
984.6/km²
92.4/km²24.7/km²44th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
92,398
243,2256,596,52713th of 346
Dwellings
100,428
270,9457,642,71616th of 346
People per household
2.79
2.852.80140th of 345
Women
51.4%
51.0%51.5%98th of 346
Men per 100 women
94.4
95.994.3249th of 346
Under 15
17.8%
18.3%17.7%177th of 346
65 and over
13.9%
14.4%14.0%255th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
46.4
48.546.5280th of 346
One-person households
20.9%
19.6%21.8%214th of 345
Households with children
33.7%
35.2%33.2%156th of 345
Indigenous peoples
5.8%
5.5%11.4%234th of 346
Female-headed households
50.3%
48.2%49.9%105th of 345
Land area
262 km²
7,501 km²748,041 km²259th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Rancagua40%Arrived since 202060%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Rancagua40%Arrived since 202060%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
8.0%
5.4%8.7%59th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
61.3%
58.8%50.5%166th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
12.2%
17.4%23.9%255th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
20.3%
18.9%17.2%85th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
20,640
37,5241,608,65020th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
32.3 yrs
32.1 yrs33.5 yrs233rd of 345
Women among foreign-born
51.3%
50.6%51.7%157th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
81.6%
81.5%83.1%153rd of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
39.6%
42.2%34.4%149th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
9.6%
6.5%10.6%59th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
13.2 yrs
12.8 yrs12.9 yrs59th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-20,625
14,7210311th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-7.5
2.00.0182nd of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Rancagua32%Higher38%Secondary22%Primary only4.9%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Rancagua32%Higher38%Secondary22%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.5 yrs
9.9 yrs10.4 yrs50th of 346
Reached higher education
31.7%
26.9%31.1%50th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
98.3%
98.6%98.6%250th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
52.7%
52.0%55.6%196th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
99.2%
100.9%99.8%275th of 346
Literacy rate
98.1%
97.2%97.8%77th of 346
Reached secondary education
38.1%
37.3%36.7%139th of 346
Primary education only
22.4%
27.5%24.1%296th of 346
Never attended school
2.93%
3.34%3.01%257th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
12.3 yrs
11.5 yrs12.1 yrs49th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
12.2 yrs
11.6 yrs12.1 yrs61st of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
1.92%
2.83%2.18%266th of 345
Households lacking schooling
13.8%
19.7%15.1%268th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
3,587
8,325217,56510th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
44.8%
35.1%33.9%116th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
3.9%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
61.4%
61.9%67.2%178th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
22.3%
20.9%19.7%118th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
16.3%
17.2%13.1%161st of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
35.5%
38.2%13.0%78th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
47.9%
48.6%49.7%246th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

3,587left secondary school in 2024
1,892enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
52.7%continued immediately
61%of those, to a university
35%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria Civil Con EspecialidadDerechoIngenieria ComercialPsicologiaTecnico en EnfermeriaKinesiologiaEnfermeriaMedicina VeterinariaIngenieria en InformaticaMedicina
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria Civil Con EspecialidadDerechoIngenieria ComercialPsicologiaTecnico en EnfermeriaKinesiologiaEnfermeriaMedicina VeterinariaIngenieria en InformaticaMedicina
RancaguaChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationInformation technologyServicesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinaryNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationInformation technologyServicesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesAgriculture and veterinaryNatural sciences
RancaguaChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

01,0002,0003,0004,0002006201520243,5871,892
01,0002,0003,0004,0002006201520243,5871,892
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Rancagua's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Rancagua against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Rancagua85%Fonasa12%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Rancagua85%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
11.4%
11.5%10.6%204th of 346
Public health insurance
84.9%
86.4%82.6%281st of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
86.0
73.682.572nd of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
118
10110071st of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
29,378
79,4081,950,38810th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
55.0 yrs
56.3 yrs56.4 yrs288th of 346
Disability among 65+
40.1%
42.6%43.0%297th of 346
Difficulty walking
5.24%
5.49%4.92%220th of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.91%
4.90%4.58%214th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.36%
2.33%2.16%211th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.96%
2.82%2.70%147th of 346
Private health insurance
12.2%
10.2%13.2%47th of 335
No health coverage
1.17%
1.75%1.98%193rd of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
94.5%
94.1%92.1%143rd of 332
Households lacking health access
7.9%
6.1%6.0%76th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
22,155
51,0161,523,71615th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
589
1,40336,69810th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.66%
2.75%2.41%187th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.8 days
5.7 days6.1 days244th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
22.9
20.219.9101st of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
105
8910068th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
1,103
2,47489,72321st of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.0%
4.8%5.9%227th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
42.8
35.748.6140th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
89
72100113th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 23%Heart and lungs 20%Injuries, bones an… 18%Pregnancy, bi… 15%Tumours, blood an… 13%Infections an… 6.4%Mind, nerves … 5.1%Digestive system14%Genitouri…system8.9%Circulatorysystem11%Respiratorysystem9.4%Injuries andpoisoning11%Musculoskeletal5.5%SkinPregnancy andchildbirth12%Perinatal…Congeni…malform…Cancers andtumours7.7%Endocr…andmetabo…4.4%Contactwithhealth…2.6%Infec…andparas…2.3%Ill…sym…NervoussystemMentaland…
Digestive and urinary … 23%Heart and lungs 20%Injuries,… 18%Pregnancy, birth an… 15%Tumours, blood and … 13%Digestivesystem14%Genitour…system8.9%Circulato…system11%Respirat…system9.4%Injuriesandpoisoning11%Musculoskel…5.5%Pregnancy andchildbirth12%Cancers andtumours7.7%Endocri…andmetabol…Contactwith…Infe…andpara…Nervous…Mentaland…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos22%Sangre y sistemalinfático21%Mama12%Genitalesmasculinos7.4%Víasurinarias7.3%Genitalesfemeninos6.8%Sitios maldefinidos6.5%Víasrespirato…5.0%Tiroidesyendocrin…4.4%Piel ymelanoma2.4%Encéfa…ysistem…2.2%TejidosblandosHuesosBoca y…
Órganos digestivos22%Sangre y sistemalinfático21%Mama12%Genitalesmasculinos7.4%Víasurinarias7.3%Genitalesfemeninos6.8%Sitiosmaldefinidos6.5%Víasrespir…5.0%Tiroid…yendocr…4.4%Piel ymelano…2.4%Encéf…ysiste…2.2%TejidosblandosHuesosBoca …
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaGenitales masculinosVías urinariasGenitales femeninoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
18.8%
17.5%17.3%200th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
26.4 UF
23.7 UF32.0 UF84th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
84.5%
87.1%78.9%288th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
71.9
76.185.6211th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
53.3%
52.7%54.4%125th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
9.8%
8.6%8.6%104th of 345
Self-employed
29.8%
30.2%33.8%285th of 345
Extreme poverty
6.6%
6.8%6.9%207th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
18.8%
17.4%17.7%150th of 335
Unemployment rate
10.9%
9.4%8.8%97th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 695,512
CLP 647,045CLP 783,12458th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.432
0.4560.488169th of 321
Registered firms
18,539
52,7451,582,39018th of 346
Annual sales
375,760,987 UF
674,035,977 UF34,347,683,688 UF12th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
127,655
318,7739,699,16414th of 346
Sales per firm
20,269 UF
12,779 UF21,706 UF24th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
4.1
3.33.932nd of 346
Women among employees
39.1%
40.6%40.6%211th of 345
Independent contractors
26,512
63,3093,958,26924th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
17.2%
16.6%29.0%315th of 346

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 30%State and social services 22%Industry and construction 17%Natural resources 14%Advanced services 11%Retail andwholesale19%Transport6.0%Accommodat…and food5.1%Health9.2%Education8.2%Publicadmin…4.2%Manufacturing8.3%Construction7.0%Ele…andgasWat…andwas…Mining9.8%Agricu…andfishing4.1%Administr…services4.5%Profe…servi…2.9%Informa…and…Finan…andinsur…Otherservi…2.9%Domes…work2.3%Artsandenter…
Trade and logistics 30%State and socia… 22%Industry an… 17%Natural … 14%Advanced se… 11%Other serv… 6.5%Retail andwholesale19%Transport6.0%Accommod…and food5.1%Health9.2%Education8.2%Publicadmin…4.2%Manufacturing8.3%Constructi…7.0%Mining9.8%Agriculture andfishingAdmin…servi…4.5%Professio…servicesInf…andcom…Fina…and…Otherservic…Domes…work
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 53%Managers and professionals 32%Elementary occupations 15%Service and sales21%Craft andtrades14%Plant and machineoperators9.7%Clericalsupport6.3%Professionals17%Technicians11%Managers3.5%Elementary occupations15%
Skilled occupations 53%Managers and professionals 32%Elementar… 15%Service andsales21%Craft andtrades14%Plant andmachineoperators9.7%Clericalsupport6.3%Professionals17%Technicians11%ManagersElementaryoccupations15%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Rancagua77%House22%FlatChile79%House20%Flat
Rancagua77%House22%Chile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
4.6%
5.1%5.7%256th of 345
Internet access
94.4%
92.2%93.2%64th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.3
2.52.3300th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.9
2.01.6295th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
90,497
237,8036,408,17213th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.29%
0.32%0.57%221st of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.60%
0.85%1.13%292nd of 345
Public water network
98.4%
96.4%92.3%39th of 345
Electricity access
99.9%
99.7%99.6%24th of 345
Detached houses
76.8%
90.0%78.7%317th of 345
Apartments
22.3%
9.2%19.9%28th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.17%0.23%243rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
6.4%
8.5%11.9%291st of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
5,259
14,281491,90427th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
5.7%
5.9%7.5%154th of 345
Renting households
29.2%
21.5%26.2%34th of 345
Owner-occupiers
61.4%
65.5%61.1%272nd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
7.9%
29.2%24.4%275th of 345
Commute by public transport
33.3%
25.0%42.1%89th of 345
Walks to work
8.7%
8.3%10.2%274th of 345
Households with a computer
55.5%
51.4%54.9%55th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.9
1.31.1288th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.1%
98.1%97.0%81st of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.2%
85.3%89.4%47th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
98.8%98.1%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.5
4.35.9302nd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.2%
65.9%80.3%42nd of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
97.9%90.0%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.4
0.70.6304th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.9%
99.8%99.0%85th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.5%
88.9%91.6%60th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
98.9%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 37%Public transport 33%Other means 15%On foot or by bicy… 15%Car35%Public transport33%Other15%Walking8.7%Bicycle6.1%
Private vehicle 37%Public transport 33%Other means 15%On foot or by bicycle 15%Car35%Public transport33%Other15%Walking8.7%Bicycle6.1%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 61%Rented 29%Provided rent… 6.3%Owned outright43%Owned, still paying18%Rented, with contract21%Rented, no contract8.0%Provided byfamily5.6%Otherarrang…3.0%
Owned 61%Rented 29%Prov… 6.3%Owned outright43%Owned, stillpaying18%Rented, with contract21%Rented,nocontract8.0%Providedby family5.6%Otherarrangement
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Fossil fuels 56%Electricity 26%Wood and biomass 10%No heating 7.7%Paraffin29%Gas27%Electricity26%Firewood7.9%Pelle…2.4%No heating7.7%
Fossil fuels 56%Electricity 26%Wood and biomass 10%No heating 7.7%Paraffin29%Gas27%Electricity26%Firewood7.9%Pel…No heating
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
89.5%
of the registered voted in the first round
89.2%
voted in the runoff
203,495
registered voters on the roll
8.2%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman43.7%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist56.3%58.3%
RancaguaChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez22.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman26.5%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.3%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.1%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist21.5%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet11.9%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.4%1.3%
RancaguaChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile35.1%30.6%
KCambio por Chile18.6%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido23.0%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente11.2%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas8.2%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile2.3%0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.7%0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
RancaguaChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Rancagua across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading