Provincia de Marga Marga

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.

Women1st of 56 · Chile 51.5%52.4%

Men per 100 women56th of 56 · Chile 94.390.7

People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 56 · Chile 99.9%100.0%

People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 56 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 56 · Chile 99.7%100.0%

People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 56 · Chile 96.2%100.0%

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 3,955 surveyed

Lives in the commune where they were born

43.3%

46th of 54

Came from another commune of the same region

34.8%

5th of 54

Came from another region

18.3%

25th of 54

Net internal migration

+132,702

+33.7 per 100 residents

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII

The ten branches that employ most of Marga Marga

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change

01Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics15,18220.3%+165%02ConstructionIndustry and construction10,95214.6%+9%03ManufacturingIndustry and construction10,09513.5%+78%04EducationState and social services8,31911.1%+51%05Other servicesOther services4,8056.4%+100%06Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics4,7346.3%+237%07TransportTrade and logistics4,4205.9%+116%08Administrative servicesAdvanced services4,1005.5%+110%09Agriculture and fishingNatural resources3,2034.3%−32%10HealthState and social services2,2633.0%+203%

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.9% a year observed · 3.1% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.3% a year observed · 3.0% projected

What Marga Marga is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Marga Marga employs more people in 132 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

132

activities it is specialised in

74,730

formal workers

12/53

by the complexity of what it is specialised in

Each dot is one activity. Filled, Marga Marga is already specialised in it; hollow, it is not. Size is how many people work in it here.

Across: how much of what tends to sit beside that activity this place already does. Up: how few and how diversified the places that do it are. Two activities are counted as close when the places good at one tend also to be good at the other — that co-occurrence is the whole of it.

The corners are not labelled on purpose. Which one is worth being in depends on what a place wants and can afford, and neither is in the tax register. The dashed lines are this place's own medians; the axes are the same on every commune's page, so two of them can be laid side by side. The named ones are those whose name fits without covering another dot; the rest are a hover away.

Most over-represented in Marga Marga

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

Activity	Division	Workers here	Times the national share
Fabricación de maletas, bolsos y artículos similares, artículos de talabartería y guarnicionería	Curtido y adobo de cueros; fabricación productos de cuero; adobo y teñido de pieles	1,471	50.0×
Tratamiento y revestimiento de metales, maquinado	Fabricación de otros productos elaborados de metal; actividades de servicios de trabajo de metales	666	20.6×
Fabricación de artículos de cuchillería, herramientas de mano y artículos de ferretería	Fabricación de otros productos elaborados de metal; actividades de servicios de trabajo de metales	101	16.3×
Cultivo de hortalizas y melones	Cultivo de plantas no perennes	987	15.4×
Cría de aves de corral para la producción de huevos	Ganadería	472	13.4×
Cultivo de semillas de hortalizas	Cultivo de plantas no perennes	223	10.6×
Venta al por menor por comisionistas (no dependientes de comercios)	Venta al por menor no realizada en comercios, puestos de venta o mercados	115	10.3×
Venta al por menor de productos farmacéuticos y medicinales en comercios especializados	Venta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados	5,753	9.2×
Actividades de moteles	Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas	85	7.9×
Actividades de parques de atracciones y parques temáticos	Otras actividades de esparcimiento y recreativas	310	7.8×
Apicultura	Ganadería	53	7.8×
Fabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructural	Fabricación de productos metálicos para uso estructural, tanques, depósitos, recipientes de metal	3,301	6.9×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021

50,780

hectares in holdings

85.6%

of them under a named use

92.7%

of the crop land is irrigated

Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

The agricultural census measured 50,780 hectares of holdings in Marga Marga in the 2020/2021 agricultural year, and this is how it divided them.

Fourteen of the fifteen tiles are categories the census publishes. The fifteenth is not: it is the censused surface less the other fourteen, and what it holds is scrub, barren ground, roads and buildings. Across Chile it is half of everything, because most of the censused surface is Patagonian scrub and northern desert inside very large holdings.

Irrigation is asked of eleven of the uses and not of forest, native woodland, natural pasture or untilled ground — so the 92.7% above is a share of the 1,747 hectares the question applies to, not of the whole.

The census counts holdings by comuna and by region only, and one holding can have land in several comunas — so there is no count for this level and PuroChile does not make one by adding.

VIII Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 2021, INE

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

Marga MargaChile% of each territory's own population · 378,053 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Census population	378,053	1,896,053	18,480,432	13th of 56
Average age	39.7 yrs	39.5 yrs	38.1 yrs	11th of 56
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.	99.3	98.6	79.0	8th of 56
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.	326.5/km²	116.8/km²	24.7/km²	5th of 56

See the other 13 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Households	136,632	701,072	6,596,527	13th of 56
Dwellings	156,453	914,075	7,642,716	12th of 56
People per household	2.77	2.70	2.80	28th of 56
Women	52.4%	51.8%	51.5%	1st of 56
Men per 100 women	90.7	93.0	94.3	56th of 56
Under 15	16.8%	16.8%	17.7%	50th of 56
65 and over	16.7%	16.6%	14.0%	12th of 56
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.	50.4	50.1	46.5	22nd of 56
One-person households	20.0%	23.0%	21.8%	48th of 56
Households with children	31.8%	30.9%	33.2%	41st of 56
Indigenous peoples	4.9%	5.5%	11.4%	47th of 56
Female-headed households	52.4%	51.5%	49.9%	4th of 56
Land area	1,158 km²	16,234 km²	748,041 km²	52nd of 56

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born share	4.0%	5.3%	8.7%	33rd of 56
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.	43.3%	54.7%	50.5%	46th of 54
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.	34.8%	19.5%	23.9%	5th of 54
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.	18.3%	20.6%	17.2%	25th of 54

See the other 9 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born population	14,956	100,655	1,608,650	19th of 56
Average age, foreign-born	33.9 yrs	33.1 yrs	33.5 yrs	21st of 56
Women among foreign-born	51.8%	50.6%	51.7%	19th of 56
Foreign-born of working age	81.3%	81.3%	83.1%	36th of 56
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.	30.1%	37.1%	34.4%	49th of 56
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.	4.8%	6.5%	10.6%	33rd of 56
Average schooling, foreign-born	13.5 yrs	13.0 yrs	12.9 yrs	5th of 56
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.	132,702	125,016	0	3rd of 54
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.	33.7	6.2	0.0	3rd of 54

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Average years of schooling	10.9 yrs	10.6 yrs	10.4 yrs	3rd of 56
Reached higher education	36.8%	33.0%	31.1%	4th of 56
School attendance, ages 6-17	98.6%	98.6%	98.6%	38th of 54
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.	61.3%	59.7%	55.6%	9th of 56

See the other 17 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.	98.3%	99.6%	99.8%	52nd of 56
Literacy rate	98.8%	98.3%	97.8%	6th of 56
Reached secondary education	37.0%	37.9%	36.7%	29th of 56
Primary education only	19.1%	21.7%	24.1%	55th of 56
Never attended school	2.33%	2.56%	3.01%	51st of 56
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.	12.9 yrs	12.4 yrs	12.1 yrs	4th of 56
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.	12.6 yrs	12.3 yrs	12.1 yrs	5th of 56
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.	1.18%	1.67%	2.18%	50th of 56
Households lacking schooling	9.1%	12.4%	15.1%	53rd of 54
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.	4,287	21,739	217,565	15th of 56
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.	14.7%	27.7%	33.9%	54th of 56
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.	0.5%	0.5%	3.1%	37th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	75.8%	71.0%	67.2%	4th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	17.5%	20.5%	19.7%	28th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	6.7%	8.5%	13.1%	49th of 56
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.	2.4%	10.1%	13.0%	52nd of 56
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.	51.0%	50.6%	49.7%	23rd of 56

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

4,287left secondary school in 2024

2,627enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025

61.3%continued immediately

76%of those, to a university

2%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

Marga MargaChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

Marga MargaChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Marga Marga's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

Health

See all →

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Marga Marga against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Disability prevalence	10.5%	11.1%	10.6%	32nd of 56
Public health insurance	85.8%	85.5%	82.6%	43rd of 54
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.	78.8	81.6	82.5	23rd of 52
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	89	97	100	34th of 52

See the other 21 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
People with a disability	39,789	210,218	1,950,388	14th of 56
Average age, people with a disability	57.7 yrs	57.7 yrs	56.4 yrs	18th of 56
Disability among 65+	47.0%	46.2%	43.0%	9th of 56
Difficulty walking	5.06%	5.35%	4.92%	30th of 56
Difficulty seeing	4.15%	4.56%	4.58%	46th of 56
Difficulty hearing	2.10%	2.24%	2.16%	38th of 56
Difficulty concentrating	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	17th of 56
Private health insurance	7.0%	8.6%	13.2%	21st of 54
No health coverage	2.32%	2.16%	1.98%	22nd of 54
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.	92.2%	91.2%	92.1%	30th of 54
Households lacking health access	7.3%	6.3%	6.0%	16th of 54
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.	29,792	154,624	1,523,716	13th of 52
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.	771	4,163	36,698	13th of 52
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.	2.59%	2.69%	2.41%	23rd of 52
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.	6.3 days	6.8 days	6.1 days	26th of 52
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.	20.4	22.0	19.9	20th of 52
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	92	96	100	27th of 52
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.	2,207	10,687	89,723	9th of 54
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.	7.4%	6.9%	5.9%	3rd of 54
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.	58.4	56.4	48.6	6th of 54
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.	111	108	100	9th of 54

What people are hospitalised for

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaGenitales femeninosVías urinariasGenitales masculinoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.	18.2%	17.8%	17.3%	33rd of 54
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.	20.9 UF	26.6 UF	32.0 UF	45th of 54
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.	94.3%	85.9%	78.9%	26th of 54
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.	61.7	81.0	85.6	54th of 56

See the other 16 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.	51.6%	52.2%	54.4%	35th of 56
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.	8.8%	8.7%	8.6%	29th of 56
Self-employed	36.0%	36.0%	33.8%	21st of 56
Extreme poverty	7.5%	6.8%	6.9%	27th of 54
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.	10.7%	15.9%	17.7%	48th of 54
Unemployment rate	9.3%	9.4%	8.8%	21st of 54
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.	CLP 613,573	CLP 676,485	CLP 783,124	26th of 54
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.	0.448	0.465	0.488	28th of 53
Registered firms	23,342	153,561	1,582,390	20th of 56
Annual sales	64,821,684 UF	1,504,507,848 UF	34,347,683,688 UF	32nd of 54
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.	74,971	675,886	9,699,164	21st of 56
Sales per firm	2,777 UF	9,797 UF	21,706 UF	43rd of 54
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.	2.1	3.0	3.9	36th of 56
Women among employees	42.9%	39.4%	40.6%	17th of 56
Independent contractors	27,148	241,072	3,958,269	19th of 56
Contractors as share of workers	26.6%	26.3%	29.0%	24th of 56

Employment by industry

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Overcrowded dwellings	4.1%	4.6%	5.7%	54th of 56
Internet access	95.0%	94.0%	93.2%	10th of 56
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	1.6	1.8	2.3	50th of 56
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	0.9	1.3	1.6	54th of 56

See the other 35 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Occupied dwellings with residents	134,420	685,235	6,408,172	13th of 56
Critically overcrowded	0.45%	0.46%	0.57%	14th of 56
Irrecoverable dwellings	1.37%	1.36%	1.13%	27th of 56
Public water network	93.3%	92.8%	92.3%	16th of 56
Electricity access	99.5%	99.6%	99.6%	27th of 56
Detached houses	81.1%	78.1%	78.7%	50th of 56
Apartments	17.9%	20.8%	19.9%	7th of 56
Precarious wall materials	0.32%	0.30%	0.23%	21st of 56
Unoccupied private dwellings	8.9%	20.2%	11.9%	43rd of 56
Quantitative housing deficit	6,939	42,497	491,904	16th of 56
Housing deficit as share of households	5.1%	6.1%	7.5%	39th of 56
Renting households	22.0%	24.5%	26.2%	23rd of 56
Owner-occupiers	65.7%	60.9%	61.1%	28th of 56
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.	13.3%	15.0%	24.4%	35th of 56
Commute by public transport	48.6%	41.8%	42.1%	4th of 56
Walks to work	7.0%	10.1%	10.2%	54th of 56
Households with a computer	59.4%	54.6%	54.9%	7th of 56
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	1.0	1.0	1.1	46th of 56
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	98.5%	97.7%	97.0%	10th of 56
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	100.0%	99.9%	1st of 56
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 56
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	96.4%	93.2%	89.4%	8th of 56
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	99.8%	99.5%	98.1%	8th of 56
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	100.0%	99.7%	1st of 56
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	2.3	12.2	5.9	50th of 56
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	91.6%	81.0%	80.3%	10th of 56
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	99.1%	91.2%	90.0%	8th of 56
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	99.2%	96.2%	1st of 56
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	0.5	0.6	0.6	52nd of 56
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	99.7%	99.1%	99.0%	7th of 56
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	100.0%	99.9%	1st of 56
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 56
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	97.8%	94.4%	91.6%	7th of 56
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	99.9%	99.4%	98.5%	8th of 56
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	99.9%	99.8%	1st of 56

How people commute

Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result

87.4%

of the registered voted in the first round

87.3%

voted in the runoff

316,222

registered voters on the roll

8.0%

of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman44.8%41.7%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist55.2%58.3%

Marga MargaChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez17.6%19.8%

Jeannette Jara Roman28.9%26.7%

Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.3%1.2%

Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen17.5%13.9%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist20.0%24.0%

Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.7%0.7%

Evelyn Matthei Fornet12.4%12.4%

Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.6%1.3%

Marga MargaChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile31.1%30.6%

KCambio por Chile28.7%23.0%

JChile Grande y Unido18.0%21.1%

IPartido de la Gente13.3%12.0%

BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas9.0%6.9%

DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%

APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%

EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%

GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%

FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%

HPopular—0.2%

Independents outside a pact—0.7%

Marga MargaChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile34.7%

KCambio por Chile22.5%

JChile Grande y Unido29.4%

IPartido de la Gente10.2%

BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.2%

Marga Margashare of the valid vote

Congress is compared by list, not by candidate: the candidates change at every district line, and the list — the pact — is the same across the country.

8 deputies, by list

C. Unidad por Chile4
K. Cambio por Chile2
J. Chile Grande y Unido1
I. Partido de la Gente1

Elected in district 6, some of which also cover other places.

Every name

District 6 · also covers other communes

Chiara Barchiesi Chavez Partido Republicano de Chile · list K · 63,230 votes
Luis Pardo Sainz Renovacion Nacional · list J · 43,785 votes
Nelson Venegas Salazar Partido Socialista de Chile · list C · 38,396 votes
Sofia Gonzalez Cortes Partido Comunista de Chile · list C · 33,528 votes
Javier Olivares Avendaño Partido de la Gente · list I · 32,334 votes
Cristian Mella Andaur Partido Democrata Cristiano · list C · 31,178 votes
Francisca Bello Campos Frente Amplio · list C · 30,663 votes
Benjamin Lorca Inzunza Partido Republicano de Chile · list K · 19,768 votes

5 senators

Karol Cariola Oliva Partido Comunista de Chile · list C · 171,730 votes
Andres Longton Herrera Renovacion Nacional · list J · 168,679 votes
Arturo Squella Ovalle Partido Republicano de Chile · list K · 115,727 votes
Diego Ibañez Cotroneo Frente Amplio · list C · 112,886 votes
Camila Flores Oporto Renovacion Nacional · list J · 87,994 votes

Territories within

4

Commune	Census population	Foreign-born share	Average years of schooling	Income poverty
Quilpué	162,559	4.7%	11.2 yrs	18.0%
Limache	56,145	3.5%	10.3 yrs	24.5%
Olmué	19,778	3.2%	10.0 yrs	21.4%
Villa Alemana	139,571	3.4%	11.0 yrs	15.6%
Marga Marga	378,053	4.0%	10.9 yrs	18.2%

Where it stands out

Average monthly pay

Where the people here are from

Formal employment, 2005–2024

The ten branches that employ most of Marga Marga

Dependent workers, projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

What Marga Marga is specialised in

Most over-represented in Marga Marga

The land and who works it

Population and territory

Population pyramid

Migration

When the migrant population arrived

Education

How far schooling went

The class of 2024

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

By field of study

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

Health

Which health system

What people are hospitalised for

By tumour site

Economy and poverty

Employment by industry

Employment by occupation

Housing and services

House or flat

How people commute

Housing tenure

Home heating fuel

How it voted in 2025

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

Senate · 16 November

Territories within