Commune · 16104

El CarmenEl Carmen

Compare El Carmen with another place
Census population
13,186
222nd of 346
Population density
19.8/km²
207th of 346
Average years of schooling
8.6 yrs
300th of 346
Foreign-born share
0.8%
309th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Detached houses4th of 345 · Chile 78.7%99.8%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF22.6 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF22.6 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 177 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
79.2%
17th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
12.0%
259th of 335
Came from another region
8.8%
308th of 335
Net internal migration
-4,957
-41.0 per 100 residents
El Carmenthis commune · 17,057elsewhere in the region1,451 peopleanother region1,067 peopleelsewhere in the region4,610 peopleanother region2,865 peopleEl Carmenthis commune · 12,100
El Carmenthis commune · 17,057elsewhere in th…1,451 peopleanother region1,067 peopleelsewhere in th…4,610 peopleanother region2,865 peopleEl Carmenthis commune · 12,100

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520242Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing▲14Retail and wholesale2Retail and wholesale▲25Transport3Transport▲27Construction4Construction▲31Education5Education▼46Manufacturing6Manufacturing3Other services7Other services▼4
2005202421Agriculture and fishing▲142Retail and wholesale▲253Transport▲274Construction▲315Education▼466Manufacturing37Other services▼4

The ten branches that employ most of El Carmen

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

02 k4 k6 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
02 k4 k6 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval7.7% a year observed · 6.9% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

01.0 M2.0 M3.0 M4.0 Mprojection →2.8 M2029 · central2005201520242029
01.0 M2.0 M3.0 M4.0 Mprojection →2.8 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.5% a year observed · 3.3% projected

What El Carmen is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, El Carmen employs more people in 29 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

29
activities it is specialised in
3,171
formal workers
241/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de la administración …Cultivo de productos agrícolas en…Cultivo de trigoConstrucción de otras obras de in…Venta al por menor de artículos d…Fabricación de prendas de vestir …Venta al por menor de artículos o…Terminación y acabado de edificiosCultivo de papasHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de la administración …Cultivo de trigoTransporte de carga por carreteraVenta al por mayor de huevos, lác…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in El Carmen

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cultivo de trigoCultivo de plantas no perennes516114.6×
Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales (explotación mixta)Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales62084.3×
Servicios de forestación a cambio de una retribución o por contrataServicios de apoyo a la silvicultura3310.6×
Cultivos forrajeros en praderas mejoradas o sembradas; cultivos suplementarios forrajerosCultivo de plantas no perennes1310.6×
Venta al por mayor de combustibles sólidos, líquidos y gaseosos y productos conexosOtras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada2710.3×
Televisión de pago satelitalActividades de telecomunicaciones por satélite29.3×
Actividades de la administración pública en generalAdministración del estado y aplicación de la política económica y social de la comunidad9314.5×
Actividades de hospitales y clínicas privadasActividades de hospitales públicos y privados2603.9×
ApiculturaGanadería13.5×
Elaboración de otros productos de molinería n.c.p.Elaboración de productos de molinería, almidones y productos derivados del almidón12.5×
Otras actividades de transporte de pasajeros por vía terrestre n.c.p.Otras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre212.4×
Venta al por menor en comercios de alimentos, bebidas o tabaco (supermercados e hipermercados)Venta al por menor en comercios no especializados882.3×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
63,517
hectares in holdings
94.2%
of them under a named use
23.4%
of the crop land is irrigated
1,381
holdings with land here
Woodland 34%Annual crops 30%Pasture 24%Not farmed 8.7%Native woodland23%Forest plantations11%Cereals23%Industri…crops2.5%Foddercrops2.4%Pulsesandtubers1.0%SeedcropsVegetablesPasture24%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings5.8%Untilledland2.9%Fruittrees2.1%
Woodland 34%Annual crops 30%Pasture 24%Not farm… 8.7%Native woodland23%Forest plantations11%Cereals23%Indus…cropsFoddercrops2.4%Pulse…Seed…Pasture24%Scrub,barrenground…5.8%Unt…land
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
El CarmenChile% of each territory's own population · 13,186 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
13,186
336,80118,480,432222nd of 346
Average age
40.9 yrs
39.6 yrs38.1 yrs73rd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
104.5
92.879.094th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
19.8/km²
66.2/km²24.7/km²207th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
5,008
124,9896,596,527216th of 346
Dwellings
6,212
154,5017,642,716226th of 346
People per household
2.63
2.692.80244th of 345
Women
50.3%
52.3%51.5%240th of 346
Men per 100 women
98.6
91.294.3107th of 346
Under 15
16.6%
17.2%17.7%253rd of 346
65 and over
17.4%
15.9%14.0%101st of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
51.6
49.546.5152nd of 346
One-person households
23.5%
22.3%21.8%131st of 345
Households with children
30.4%
31.8%33.2%252nd of 345
Indigenous peoples
2.7%
4.0%11.4%340th of 346
Female-headed households
44.4%
50.2%49.9%276th of 345
Land area
666 km²
5,088 km²748,041 km²167th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

El Carmen58%Arrived since 202042%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
El Carmen58%Arrived since 202042%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
0.8%
2.7%8.7%309th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
79.2%
61.1%50.5%17th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
12.0%
14.5%23.9%259th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
8.8%
21.0%17.2%308th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
103
9,0401,608,650282nd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
30.9 yrs
33.5 yrs33.5 yrs293rd of 345
Women among foreign-born
52.4%
51.1%51.7%119th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
69.9%
80.4%83.1%338th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
58.3%
38.1%34.4%10th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
0.8%
3.2%10.6%318th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.3 yrs
13.5 yrs12.9 yrs180th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-4,957
-47,7620249th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-41.0
-13.70.0279th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

El Carmen15%Higher34%Secondary42%Primary only4.8%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
El Carmen15%34%Secondary42%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
8.6 yrs
10.0 yrs10.4 yrs300th of 346
Reached higher education
15.1%
27.1%31.1%303rd of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
98.9%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
66.7%
55.0%55.6%22nd of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
105.3%
101.4%99.8%35th of 346
Literacy rate
94.7%
96.6%97.8%271st of 346
Reached secondary education
34.0%
36.7%36.7%279th of 346
Primary education only
42.0%
28.0%24.1%24th of 346
Never attended school
4.77%
3.17%3.01%54th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.4 yrs
11.4 yrs12.1 yrs314th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
9.9 yrs
11.6 yrs12.1 yrs299th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
5.30%
3.39%2.18%73rd of 345
Households lacking schooling
35.1%
18.8%15.1%44th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
159
4,294217,565193rd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
20.8%
28.6%33.9%257th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
6.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
52.8%
64.2%67.2%260th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
19.8%
17.6%19.7%146th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
27.4%
18.2%13.1%59th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
17.0%
28.3%13.0%141st of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
53.8%
51.1%49.7%104th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

159left secondary school in 2024
106enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
66.7%continued immediately
53%of those, to a university
17%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%5.0%10.0%Tecnico en EnfermeriaTecnico AgricolaTecnico en Electricidad IndustrialTecnico en Educacion de ParvulosEnfermeriaAgronomiaContador Publico y AuditorIngenieria ComercialIngenieria ElectricaIngenieria en Mecanica y Electromovilidad Automotriz
0.0%5.0%10.0%Tecnico en EnfermeriaTecnico AgricolaTecnico en Electricidad IndustrialTecnico en Educacion de ParvulosEnfermeriaAgronomiaContador Publico y AuditorIngenieria ComercialIngenieria ElectricaIngenieria en Mecanica y Electromovilidad Automotriz
El CarmenChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationAgriculture and veterinaryServicesNatural sciencesArts and humanitiesInformation technologySocial sciences
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawEducationAgriculture and veterinaryServicesNatural sciencesArts and humanitiesInformation technologySocial sciences
El CarmenChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

050100150200200620152024159106
050100150200200620152024159106
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort El Carmen's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold El Carmen against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

El Carmen95%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
El Carmen95%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
15.9%
14.0%10.6%26th of 346
Public health insurance
94.7%
90.0%82.6%105th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
75.3
82.882.5132nd of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
140
11310027th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
2,098
47,2781,950,388195th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
60.6 yrs
57.4 yrs56.4 yrs74th of 346
Disability among 65+
48.9%
43.9%43.0%95th of 346
Difficulty walking
7.88%
6.84%4.92%27th of 346
Difficulty seeing
7.23%
6.43%4.58%40th of 346
Difficulty hearing
3.50%
2.82%2.16%42nd of 346
Difficulty concentrating
3.60%
3.62%2.70%37th of 346
Private health insurance
1.5%
5.0%13.2%248th of 335
No health coverage
2.05%
2.51%1.98%131st of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
96.5%
93.8%92.1%100th of 332
Households lacking health access
4.1%
6.2%6.0%217th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
993
27,8781,523,716207th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
47
84236,698165th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
4.73%
3.02%2.41%26th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.4 days
6.3 days6.1 days184th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
35.6
25.019.915th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
86
98100150th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
50
1,55289,723216th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.0%
5.6%5.9%220th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
37.9
46.148.6193rd of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
68
88100214th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Heart and lungs 28%Digestive and urinary tract 18%Injuries, bones … 16%Pregnancy, bi… 14%Tumours, blo… 11%Mind, nerves and… 7.9%Infections and o… 5.3%Respiratorysystem15%Circulatorysystem13%Digestivesystem10%Genitourin…system8.1%Injuries andpoisoning9.6%Skin4.0%Muscu…2.4%Pregnancy andchildbirth13%Cancers andtumours5.4%EndocrineandmetabolicBlo…andimm…Mental andbehavioural5.8%Nerv…syst…Ill-definedsymptomsInfec…Conta…
Heart and lungs 28%Digestive and … 18%Injuries… 16%Pregnancy, birth … 14%Tumours, blood an… 11%Mind… 7.9%Infe… 5.3%Respiratorysystem15%Circulatorysystem13%Digestive system10%Genitourinarysystem8.1%Injuriesandpoisoning9.6%Skin4.0%Musc…Pregnancy andchildbirth13%CancersandtumoursEndoc…andmetab…Mental andbehavioural5.8%Nervous…Ill-de…sympto…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos28%Sangre y sistema linfático26%Sitios reservados26%Genitalesmasculinos10%Víasurinarias10%
Órganos digestivos28%Sangre y sistemalinfático26%Sitios reservados26%Genitalesmasculinos10%Vías urinarias10%
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoSitios reservadosGenitales masculinosVías urinariashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
30.2%
23.2%17.3%45th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
22.6 UF
21.9 UF32.0 UF174th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
108.8%
101.8%78.9%93rd of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
87.4
78.785.6124th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
39.2%
47.5%54.4%332nd of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
6.5%
10.5%8.6%276th of 345
Self-employed
43.7%
34.5%33.8%47th of 345
Extreme poverty
11.9%
9.7%6.9%61st of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
15.9%
16.1%17.7%199th of 335
Unemployment rate
1.6%
10.3%8.8%319th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 383,034
CLP 556,977CLP 783,124325th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.466
0.4780.48880th of 321
Registered firms
1,152
26,5201,582,390217th of 346
Annual sales
2,402,650 UF
105,460,046 UF34,347,683,688 UF253rd of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
3,171
104,5929,699,164226th of 346
Sales per firm
2,086 UF
3,977 UF21,706 UF265th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.6
2.53.9265th of 346
Women among employees
52.7%
43.6%40.6%24th of 345
Independent contractors
936
34,2113,958,269248th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
22.8%
24.6%29.0%247th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 29%State and social services 24%Trade and logistics 20%Industry and const… 18%Othe… 5.1%Adva… 4.0%Agriculture and fishing27%Education10%Health6.9%Publicadminist…6.7%Retail andwholesale12%Transport6.0%Accommodationand foodConstruction11%Manufacturing5.2%Waterand…Elect…and…Domesticwork3.2%Otherservic…Profes…servic…Admini…
Natural resources 29%State and social … 24%Trade and logis… 20%Industry and … 18%Agriculture andfishing27%Education10%Health6.9%Public administrationRetail andwholesale12%Transport6.0%Accom…andfood2.7%Construction11%Manufacturing5.2%Wat…Ele…DomesticworkOther…Profe…Admin…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 60%Elementary occupations 21%Managers and professionals 19%Service and sales17%Craft and trades15%Skilledagricultural13%Plant and machineoperators12%Clerical support4.2%Elementary occupations21%Professiona…10%Technicians7.3%Managers
Skilled occupations 60%Elementary occupations 21%Managers and profe… 19%Service and sales17%Craft and trades15%Skilled agricultural13%Plant andmachineoperators12%Cleri…suppo…4.2%Elementaryoccupations21%Professio…10%Technici…7.3%Managers
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

El Carmen100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
El Carmen100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
3.3%
4.3%5.7%329th of 345
Internet access
79.9%
89.3%93.2%308th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
7.8
3.12.357th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
7.4
2.51.647th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
4,966
122,9036,408,172216th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.18%
0.27%0.57%305th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.81%
0.79%1.13%248th of 345
Public water network
54.7%
84.0%92.3%321st of 345
Electricity access
99.2%
99.6%99.6%207th of 345
Detached houses
99.8%
94.6%78.7%4th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
4.9%19.9%259th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.30%
0.20%0.23%100th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
17.9%
16.5%11.9%133rd of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
145
5,628491,904286th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
2.9%
4.5%7.5%333rd of 345
Renting households
10.0%
18.8%26.2%291st of 345
Owner-occupiers
70.4%
67.8%61.1%133rd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
84.3%
51.8%24.4%100th of 345
Commute by public transport
16.8%
30.0%42.1%282nd of 345
Walks to work
23.0%
11.7%10.2%77th of 345
Households with a computer
32.9%
47.4%54.9%303rd of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.8
1.51.158th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
81.1%
93.4%97.0%290th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
54.7%
81.6%89.4%258th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
77.0%
97.1%98.1%310th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.9%
99.7%99.7%285th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
31.1
10.65.982nd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
60.9%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
67.2%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
61.7%
89.0%96.2%254th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.8
0.90.659th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
95.6%
99.0%99.0%254th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
57.1%
84.9%91.6%265th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
77.0%
97.3%98.5%311th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
98.9%
99.7%99.8%291st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 46%On foot or by bicycle 29%Public transport 17%Other… 8.2%Car45%Walking23%Bicyc…5.6%Public transport17%Other8.1%
Private vehicle 46%On foot or by bicycle 29%Public transport 17%Other means 8.2%Car45%Walking23%Bic…Public transport17%Other
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 70%Provided rent-free 14%Rented 10%Other 5.6%Owned outright70%Provided byfamily11%Provided by employerRented, nocontract5.9%Rented,withcontract4.2%Other arrangement5.6%
Owned 70%Provided rent-free 14%Rented 10%Owned outright70%Provided byfamily11%Pro…byemp…Rented,nocontract5.9%Rente…withcontr…4.2%Otherarrang…5.6%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 86%Fossil fu… 6.9%Electrici… 4.5%No heat… 2.8%Firewood84%Gas5.2%ParaffinElectricity4.5%No heating2.8%
Wood and biomass 86%Fossil fuels 6.9%Electric… 4.5%Firewood84%GasPara…ElectricityNo…
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
89.3%
of the registered voted in the first round
88.5%
voted in the runoff
12,666
registered voters on the roll
4.4%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman21.9%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist78.1%58.3%
El CarmenChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez19.5%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman15.2%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.0%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen16.4%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist37.7%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.2%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.6%1.3%
El CarmenChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile31.4%30.6%
KCambio por Chile11.3%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido39.0%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente5.0%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.7%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista4.7%2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde2.8%0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile2.2%0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.0%0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
El CarmenChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble El Carmen across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading