Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 98.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 96.2%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF20.5 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF20.5 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 329 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
61.2%
168th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
25.3%
95th of 335
Came from another region
11.3%
271st of 335
Net internal migration
+1,498
+5.5 per 100 residents
Llaillaythis commune · 25,073elsewhere in the region6,876 peopleanother region3,063 peopleabroad600 peopleelsewhere in the region4,342 peopleanother region4,099 peopleLlaillaythis commune · 27,171
Llaillaythis commune · 25,073elsewhere in th…6,876 peopleanother region3,063 peopleabroad600 peopleelsewhere in th…4,342 peopleanother region4,099 peopleLlaillaythis commune · 27,171

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing3Construction2Construction▲12Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▼15Education4Education▲16Manufacturing5Manufacturing▲18Accommodation and food6Accommodation and food▲29Transport7Transport▲214Administrative services8Administrative services▲613Professional services9Professional services▲410Mining10Mining11Other services11Other services15Health12Health▲37Water and waste13Water and waste▼612Real estate14Real estate▼24Arts and entertainment15Arts and entertainment▼11
2005202411Agriculture and fishing32Construction▲123Retail and wholesale▼154Education▲165Manufacturing▲186Accommodation and food▲297Transport▲2148Administrative services▲6139Professional services▲41010Mining1111Other services1512Health▲3713Water and waste▼61214Real estate▼2415Arts and entertainment▼11

The ten branches that employ most of Llaillay

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

4 k6 k8 k10 kprojection →8 k2029 · central2005201520242029
4 k6 k8 k10 kprojection →8 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.0% a year observed · 0.5% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

02.0 M4.0 M6.0 M8.0 Mprojection →7.2 M2029 · central2005201520242029
02.0 M4.0 M6.0 M8.0 Mprojection →7.2 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval5.3% a year observed · 0.6% projected

What Llaillay is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Llaillay employs more people in 51 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

51
activities it is specialised in
7,870
formal workers
174/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.03.7Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de …Actividades de la administración …Otras instalaciones para obras de…Venta al por menor de combustible…Otros servicios de ensayos y anál…Actividades de otras asociaciones…Extracción y procesamiento de cob…Cría de aves de corral para la pr…Terminación y acabado de edificiosHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.03.7Enseñanza primaria, secundaria ci…Otros servicios de ensayos y anál…Fabricación de productos metálico…Actividades poscosechaHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Llaillay

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Reparación de otros equipos electrónicos y ópticos n.c.p.Reparación de productos elaborados de metal, maquinaria y equipo6046.3×
Otras actividades de alojamiento n.c.p.Otras actividades de alojamiento21939.3×
Construcción de edificios para uso no residencialConstrucción de edificios40916.7×
Otros servicios de ensayos y análisis técnicos (excepto actividades de plantas de revisión técnica)Ensayos y análisis técnicos8614.9×
Cultivo de uva para mesaCultivo de plantas perennes21012.6×
Suministro de vapor y de aire acondicionadoSuministro de vapor y de aire acondicionado119.7×
Cría de aves de corral para la producción de huevosGanadería349.2×
Venta de motocicletasVenta, mantenimiento y reparación de motocicletas y sus partes, piezas y accesorios108.2×
Actividades de servicios vinculadas al transporte terrestre n.c.p.Actividades de apoyo al transporte1418.0×
Construcción de otras obras de ingeniería civilConstrucción de otras obras de ingeniería civil1,0537.8×
Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de huesoCultivo de plantas perennes9507.2×
Cultivos forrajeros en praderas mejoradas o sembradas; cultivos suplementarios forrajerosCultivo de plantas no perennes206.5×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
20,535
hectares in holdings
27.9%
of them under a named use
96.1%
of the crop land is irrigated
139
holdings with land here
Not farmed 76%Orchards and vineyards 18%Annual c… 3.4%Wood… 1.7%Scrub, barren ground and buildings72%Fruit trees18%Veget…1.8%Foddercrops1.4%NativewoodlandPasture
Not farmed 76%Orchards and vineyards 18%Annu… 3.4%Scrub, barren ground and buildings72%Fruit trees18%Veget…Fodd…Nativewoodla…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
LlaillayChile% of each territory's own population · 25,484 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
25,484
159,39618,480,432144th of 346
Average age
38.4 yrs
38.4 yrs38.1 yrs227th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
77.7
81.479.0234th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
73.0/km²
60.5/km²24.7/km²106th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
8,913
57,2046,596,527147th of 346
Dwellings
10,439
63,3767,642,716162nd of 346
People per household
2.86
2.792.8090th of 345
Women
50.8%
51.3%51.5%187th of 346
Men per 100 women
96.8
94.994.3160th of 346
Under 15
19.5%
18.5%17.7%59th of 346
65 and over
15.2%
15.1%14.0%208th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
53.2
50.546.597th of 346
One-person households
20.1%
21.9%21.8%239th of 345
Households with children
36.8%
34.6%33.2%56th of 345
Indigenous peoples
5.2%
5.2%11.4%253rd of 346
Female-headed households
49.8%
50.0%49.9%121st of 345
Land area
349 km²
2,635 km²748,041 km²234th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Llaillay52%Arrived since 202048%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Llaillay52%Arrived since 202048%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
4.0%
6.5%8.7%130th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
61.2%
63.4%50.5%168th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
25.3%
19.2%23.9%95th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
11.3%
12.7%17.2%271st of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
1,015
10,3631,608,650122nd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
29.2 yrs
31.7 yrs33.5 yrs335th of 345
Women among foreign-born
49.4%
46.3%51.7%244th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
80.6%
84.1%83.1%192nd of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
52.3%
45.3%34.4%26th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
4.9%
8.2%10.6%129th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
11.0 yrs
11.3 yrs12.9 yrs317th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
1,498
-13,2820108th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
5.5
-7.70.0128th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Llaillay22%Higher39%Secondary30%Primary only5.7%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Llaillay22%39%Secondary30%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.4 yrs
9.8 yrs10.4 yrs153rd of 346
Reached higher education
21.9%
24.3%31.1%153rd of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
96.9%
98.5%98.6%290th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
58.7%
53.9%55.6%100th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
103.7%
102.3%99.8%87th of 346
Literacy rate
96.7%
97.3%97.8%161st of 346
Reached secondary education
39.3%
39.9%36.7%92nd of 346
Primary education only
30.0%
27.4%24.1%203rd of 346
Never attended school
3.16%
2.98%3.01%226th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.8 yrs
11.3 yrs12.1 yrs157th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
11.2 yrs
11.5 yrs12.1 yrs139th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.26%
2.69%2.18%189th of 345
Households lacking schooling
25.9%
20.2%15.1%133rd of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
293
2,019217,565143rd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
41.6%
52.5%33.9%143rd of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
66.3%
63.7%67.2%129th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
28.5%
31.9%19.7%65th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
5.2%
4.4%13.1%303rd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
14.5%
18.8%13.0%153rd of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
55.8%
49.8%49.7%77th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

293left secondary school in 2024
172enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
58.7%continued immediately
66%of those, to a university
15%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Ingenieria Civil IndustrialPsicologiaIngenieria ComercialDerechoIngenieria Civil en InformaticaIngenieria en Mecanica Automotriz y AutotronicaIngenieria en Negocios InternacionalesObstetricia y PuericulturaPrevencion de RiesgosTecnico en Mineria
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Ingenieria Civil IndustrialPsicologiaIngenieria ComercialDerechoIngenieria Civil en InformaticaIngenieria en Mecanica Automotriz y AutotronicaIngenieria en Negocios InternacionalesObstetricia y PuericulturaPrevencion de RiesgosTecnico en Mineria
LlaillayChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawServicesInformation technologyEducationSocial sciencesAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareBusiness and lawServicesInformation technologyEducationSocial sciencesAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
LlaillayChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0100200300400200620152024293172
0100200300400200620152024293172
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Llaillay's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Llaillay against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Llaillay90%Fonasa5.8%Chile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Llaillay90%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo cover% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
12.0%
11.7%10.6%180th of 346
Public health insurance
90.0%
90.8%82.6%214th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
90.0
85.282.555th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
152
13610013th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
3,060
18,5951,950,388149th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
57.0 yrs
57.0 yrs56.4 yrs220th of 346
Disability among 65+
44.8%
44.6%43.0%198th of 346
Difficulty walking
5.98%
5.67%4.92%171st of 346
Difficulty seeing
5.00%
4.88%4.58%210th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.44%
2.30%2.16%192nd of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.97%
2.92%2.70%140th of 346
Private health insurance
3.8%
3.3%13.2%144th of 335
No health coverage
5.72%
4.48%1.98%18th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
94.0%
88.5%92.1%155th of 332
Households lacking health access
6.3%
4.9%6.0%128th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
2,294
13,5881,523,716128th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
82
45836,698112th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
3.57%
3.37%2.41%84th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.8 days
10.6 days6.1 days242nd of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
32.2
28.719.922nd of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
108
10210060th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
132
84489,723124th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.8%
6.2%5.9%155th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
51.8
52.948.666th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
102
10510066th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 26%Injuries, bones and skin 21%Heart and lungs 20%Tumours, blood and metab… 13%Pregnancy, birth and new… 11%Mind… 5.1%Infe… 4.5%Digestive system15%Genitourina…system11%Injuries andpoisoning11%Musculoskele…6.3%SkinRespiratory system12%Circulatorysystem8.5%Cancers andtumours8.2%Endocrineandmetabolic3.9%Pregnancy and childbirth11%Mental andbehaviour…NervoussystemInfe…andpara…Cont…withheal…
Digestive and urinary t… 26%Injuries, bones … 21%Heart and lu… 20%Tumours, blood an… 13%Pregnancy, birth … 11%Digestivesystem15%Genitour…system11%Injuriesandpoisoning11%Musculo…6.3%Skin2.9%Respiratorysystem12%Circulatorysystem8.5%Cancers andtumours8.2%Endoc…andmetab…Pregnancy andchildbirth11%Mentaland…Nervo…systemInfecti…Cont…with…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos32%Sangre y sistema linfático14%Mama13%Genitalesfemeninos9.1%Víasrespiratorias8.3%Sitios reservados6.8%Genitalesmasculinos6.1%Tiroides yendocrinas6.1%Boca yfaringe4.5%
Órganos digestivos32%Sangre ysistemalinfático14%Mama13%Genitalesfemeninos9.1%Víasrespirator…8.3%Sitiosreservados6.8%Genitalesmasculinos6.1%Tiroides yendocrinas6.1%Boca y faringe4.5%
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaGenitales femeninosVías respiratoriasSitios reservadoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
17.4%
18.1%17.3%232nd of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
20.5 UF
22.8 UF32.0 UF258th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
100.6%
102.4%78.9%164th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
65.6
78.785.6256th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
52.3%
52.9%54.4%148th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
9.9%
9.1%8.6%98th of 345
Self-employed
29.4%
28.6%33.8%293rd of 345
Extreme poverty
4.8%
6.0%6.9%265th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
27.1%
17.2%17.7%45th of 335
Unemployment rate
12.9%
10.0%8.8%54th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 520,285
CLP 527,654CLP 783,124185th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.416
0.4010.488219th of 321
Registered firms
1,671
12,5391,582,390166th of 346
Annual sales
6,983,623 UF
57,210,672 UF34,347,683,688 UF163rd of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
7,870
55,8229,699,164137th of 346
Sales per firm
4,179 UF
4,563 UF21,706 UF148th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.8
2.73.996th of 346
Women among employees
34.9%
43.3%40.6%271st of 345
Independent contractors
1,558
13,8223,958,269177th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
16.5%
19.8%29.0%323rd of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 28%Trade and logistics 24%Industry and construction 19%State and social s… 19%Advan… 5.6%Other… 4.7%Agriculture andfishing21%Mining6.6%Retail andwholesale14%Transport6.4%Accommodationand foodManufacturing9.6%Construction7.2%Water and…Electr…and gasEducation9.7%Health5.4%Publicadmini…3.4%Administrat…servicesProfe…servi…1.8%Info…OtherservicesDomesticwork
Natural resources 28%Trade and logistics 24%Industry and c… 19%State and soc… 19%Agriculture andfishing21%Mining6.6%Retail and wholesale14%Transport6.4%Accomm…andfood3.8%Manufacturing9.6%Construction7.2%Wat…andwas…Ele…Education9.7%Health5.4%Publicadmin…3.4%Admin…servi…2.5%Pro…ser…Oth…ser…Dome…work
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professionals 23%Elementary occupations 20%Service and sales18%Craft andtrades14%Plant andmachineoperators12%Skilledagricultural7.9%Clerical support4.0%Professiona…10%Technicians10%ManagersElementary occupations20%
Skilled occupations 57%Managers and professi… 23%Elementary occupat… 20%Service andsales18%Craft and trades14%Plant and machineoperators12%Skilledagricult…7.9%Clericalsupport4.0%Professio…10%Technicians10%Elementaryoccupations20%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Llaillay93%House5.8%Chile79%House20%Flat
Llaillay93%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.7%
5.3%5.7%126th of 345
Internet access
90.3%
90.9%93.2%146th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.0
2.42.3264th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.7
1.71.6252nd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
8,721
55,8596,408,172148th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.60%
0.37%0.57%47th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
0.89%
1.69%1.13%229th of 345
Public water network
94.7%
94.0%92.3%76th of 345
Electricity access
99.5%
99.3%99.6%140th of 345
Detached houses
93.1%
90.4%78.7%249th of 345
Apartments
5.8%
7.8%19.9%85th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.30%
0.40%0.23%86th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
10.4%
7.8%11.9%232nd of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
541
4,038491,904136th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
6.1%
7.1%7.5%125th of 345
Renting households
17.2%
21.5%26.2%138th of 345
Owner-occupiers
69.3%
64.9%61.1%164th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
22.3%
25.4%24.4%238th of 345
Commute by public transport
20.5%
23.9%42.1%234th of 345
Walks to work
12.7%
11.8%10.2%196th of 345
Households with a computer
43.9%
45.7%54.9%155th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.0
1.41.1138th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.5%
95.9%97.0%181st of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
93.3%
86.4%89.4%88th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%98.1%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
21.3
7.65.9116th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
56.6%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
1.8%
73.9%90.0%239th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.7
0.60.6254th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
97.6%
99.4%99.0%203rd of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
93.8%
90.8%91.6%96th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 38%On foot or by bicycle 26%Public transport 20%Other means 16%Car35%MotorcycleBicycle13%Walking13%Public transport20%Other16%
Private vehicle 38%On foot or by … 26%Public transport 20%Other means 16%Car35%Bicycle13%Walking13%Public transport20%Other16%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 69%Rented 17%Provided rent-free 11%Owned outright64%Owned, still payingRented, no contract8.8%Rented, withcontract8.4%Provided byfamily9.1%Other arrangement
Owned 69%Rented 17%Provided re… 11%Owned outright64%Rented, nocontract8.8%Rented,withcontract8.4%Provided byfamily9.1%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Fossil fuels 42%Wood and biomass 23%No heating 20%Electricity 14%Gas36%Paraffin6.3%Firewood22%No heating20%Electricity14%
Fossil fuels 42%Wood and bi… 23%No heating 20%Electricity 14%Gas36%Par…Firewood22%No heating20%Electricity14%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
90.6%
of the registered voted in the first round
90.6%
voted in the runoff
21,764
registered voters on the roll
8.3%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman48.6%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist51.4%58.3%
LlaillayChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez27.3%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman30.6%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.3%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen12.6%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist19.0%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.6%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.0%1.3%
LlaillayChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile39.9%30.6%
KCambio por Chile22.8%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido13.1%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente17.6%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas6.5%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
LlaillayChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile41.2%
KCambio por Chile16.8%
JChile Grande y Unido21.9%
IPartido de la Gente15.6%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas4.5%
Llaillayshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Llaillay across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading