Province · 057
Provincia de San Felipe de Aconcagua
Compare San Felipe de Aconcagua with another placeCensus population
159,396
33rd of 56
Population density
60.5/km²
14th of 56
Average years of schooling
9.8 yrs
31st of 56
Foreign-born share
6.5%
14th of 56
Where it stands out
Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.Average length of stay1st of 52 · Chile 6.1 days10.6 days
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 56 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 56 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Women among foreign-born55th of 56 · Chile 51.7%46.3%
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute2nd of 56 · Chile 19.7%31.9%
Gini coefficient52nd of 53 · Chile 0.4880.401
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024
Average monthly pay
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.
Where the people here are from
Casen 2024 · 1,955 surveyedLives in the commune where they were born
63.4%
19th of 54
Came from another commune of the same region
19.2%
17th of 54
Came from another region
12.7%
49th of 54
Net internal migration
-13,282
-7.7 per 100 residents
Formal employment, 2005–2024
2005–2024 · Source SIIThe ten branches that employ most of San Felipe de Aconcagua
Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.
BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change
01Agriculture and fishingNatural resources18,996−32%02Public administrationState and social services5,920+115%03HealthState and social services5,721+2,274%04Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics4,944+18%05ManufacturingIndustry and construction4,248−11%06ConstructionIndustry and construction3,917+132%07EducationState and social services2,263+75%08Administrative servicesAdvanced services2,215+179%09Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics1,862+286%10TransportTrade and logistics1,855+126%Dependent workers, projected
Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.
Annual sales in UF, projected
UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.
What San Felipe de Aconcagua is specialised in
2024 · SIIOf the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, San Felipe de Aconcagua employs more people in 89 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.
89
activities it is specialised in
55,796
formal workers
36/53
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
Most over-represented in San Felipe de Aconcagua
Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.
| Activity | Division | Workers here | Times the national share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivo de frutas tropicales y subtropicales (incluye el cultivo de paltas) | Cultivo de plantas perennes | 1,054 | 75.2× |
| Actividades de mantenimiento del orden público y de seguridad | Prestación de servicios a la comunidad en general | 814 | 52.6× |
| Actividades de centros de salud municipalizados (servicios de salud pública) | Actividades de médicos y odontólogos | 5,287 | 21.9× |
| Cultivo de uva para mesa | Cultivo de plantas perennes | 2,579 | 21.8× |
| Fabricación de fibras de vidrio | Fabricación de vidrio y productos de vidrio | 44 | 15.1× |
| Reparación de equipo de comunicaciones (incluye la reparación teléfonos celulares) | Reparación de computadores y equipo de comunicaciones | 35 | 10.2× |
| Actividades poscosecha | Actividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha | 163 | 10.0× |
| Servicios de transporte a turistas | Otras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre | 81 | 7.9× |
| Apicultura | Ganadería | 39 | 7.7× |
| Actividades de clubes de futbol amateur y profesional | Actividades deportivas | 89 | 7.1× |
| Fabricación de maquinaria agropecuaria y forestal | Fabricación de maquinaria de uso especial | 55 | 6.8× |
| Reparación de otros equipos electrónicos y ópticos n.c.p. | Reparación de productos elaborados de metal, maquinaria y equipo | 61 | 6.6× |
The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.
Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.
The land and who works it
Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021118,195
hectares in holdings
70.4%
of them under a named use
98.8%
of the crop land is irrigated
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.
Population and territory
See all →Population pyramid
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Census population | 159,396 | 1,896,053 | 18,480,432 | 33rd of 56 | |
Average age | 38.4 yrs | 39.5 yrs | 38.1 yrs | 28th of 56 | |
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15. | 81.4 | 98.6 | 79.0 | 29th of 56 | |
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography. | 60.5/km² | 116.8/km² | 24.7/km² | 14th of 56 |
See the other 13 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Households | 57,204 | 701,072 | 6,596,527 | 33rd of 56 | |
Dwellings | 63,376 | 914,075 | 7,642,716 | 33rd of 56 | |
People per household | 2.79 | 2.70 | 2.80 | 24th of 56 | |
Women | 51.3% | 51.8% | 51.5% | 23rd of 56 | |
Men per 100 women | 94.9 | 93.0 | 94.3 | 34th of 56 | |
Under 15 | 18.5% | 16.8% | 17.7% | 23rd of 56 | |
65 and over | 15.1% | 16.6% | 14.0% | 22nd of 56 | |
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age. | 50.5 | 50.1 | 46.5 | 20th of 56 | |
One-person households | 21.9% | 23.0% | 21.8% | 30th of 56 | |
Households with children | 34.6% | 30.9% | 33.2% | 21st of 56 | |
Indigenous peoples | 5.2% | 5.5% | 11.4% | 45th of 56 | |
Female-headed households | 50.0% | 51.5% | 49.9% | 19th of 56 | |
Land area | 2,635 km² | 16,234 km² | 748,041 km² | 47th of 56 |
Migration
See all →When the migrant population arrived
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign-born share | 6.5% | 5.3% | 8.7% | 14th of 56 | |
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born. | 63.4% | 54.7% | 50.5% | 19th of 54 | |
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province. | 19.2% | 19.5% | 23.9% | 17th of 54 | |
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region. | 12.7% | 20.6% | 17.2% | 49th of 54 |
See the other 9 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign-born population | 10,363 | 100,655 | 1,608,650 | 22nd of 56 | |
Average age, foreign-born | 31.7 yrs | 33.1 yrs | 33.5 yrs | 46th of 56 | |
Women among foreign-born | 46.3% | 50.6% | 51.7% | 55th of 56 | |
Foreign-born of working age | 84.1% | 81.3% | 83.1% | 7th of 56 | |
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later. | 45.3% | 37.1% | 34.4% | 8th of 56 | |
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna. | 8.2% | 6.5% | 10.6% | 14th of 56 | |
Average schooling, foreign-born | 11.3 yrs | 13.0 yrs | 12.9 yrs | 52nd of 56 | |
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count. | -13,282 | 125,016 | 0 | 31st of 54 | |
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory. | -7.7 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 30th of 54 |
Education
See all →How far schooling went
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average years of schooling | 9.8 yrs | 10.6 yrs | 10.4 yrs | 31st of 56 | |
Reached higher education | 24.3% | 33.0% | 31.1% | 33rd of 56 | |
School attendance, ages 6-17 | 98.5% | 98.6% | 98.6% | 42nd of 54 | |
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes. | 53.9% | 59.7% | 55.6% | 34th of 56 |
See the other 17 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling. | 102.3% | 99.6% | 99.8% | 20th of 56 | |
Literacy rate | 97.3% | 98.3% | 97.8% | 27th of 56 | |
Reached secondary education | 39.9% | 37.9% | 36.7% | 10th of 56 | |
Primary education only | 27.4% | 21.7% | 24.1% | 30th of 56 | |
Never attended school | 2.98% | 2.56% | 3.01% | 37th of 56 | |
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country. | 11.3 yrs | 12.4 yrs | 12.1 yrs | 32nd of 56 | |
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men. | 11.5 yrs | 12.3 yrs | 12.1 yrs | 31st of 56 | |
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write. | 2.69% | 1.67% | 2.18% | 30th of 56 | |
Households lacking schooling | 20.2% | 12.4% | 15.1% | 25th of 54 | |
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart. | 2,019 | 21,739 | 217,565 | 33rd of 56 | |
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks. | 52.5% | 27.7% | 33.9% | 4th of 56 | |
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates. | 0.0% | 0.5% | 3.1% | 41st of 56 | |
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 63.7% | 71.0% | 67.2% | 35th of 56 | |
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 31.9% | 20.5% | 19.7% | 2nd of 56 | |
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100. | 4.4% | 8.5% | 13.1% | 54th of 56 | |
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives. | 18.8% | 10.1% | 13.0% | 36th of 56 | |
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue. | 49.8% | 50.6% | 49.7% | 37th of 56 |
The class of 2024
Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school inApproximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.
2,019left secondary school in 2024
1,089enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
53.9%continued immediately
64%of those, to a university
19%of those, outside their region
The ten programmes they enrolled in most
Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.
By field of study
The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.
Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year
Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort San Felipe de Aconcagua's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.
Health
See all →The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.
The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.
The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold San Felipe de Aconcagua against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.
In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.
Which health system
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disability prevalence | 11.7% | 11.1% | 10.6% | 19th of 56 | |
Public health insurance | 90.8% | 85.5% | 82.6% | 23rd of 54 | |
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby. | 85.2 | 81.6 | 82.5 | 17th of 52 | |
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. | 136 | 97 | 100 | 2nd of 52 |
See the other 21 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People with a disability | 18,595 | 210,218 | 1,950,388 | 31st of 56 | |
Average age, people with a disability | 57.0 yrs | 57.7 yrs | 56.4 yrs | 28th of 56 | |
Disability among 65+ | 44.6% | 46.2% | 43.0% | 25th of 56 | |
Difficulty walking | 5.67% | 5.35% | 4.92% | 17th of 56 | |
Difficulty seeing | 4.88% | 4.56% | 4.58% | 30th of 56 | |
Difficulty hearing | 2.30% | 2.24% | 2.16% | 28th of 56 | |
Difficulty concentrating | 2.92% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 15th of 56 | |
Private health insurance | 3.3% | 8.6% | 13.2% | 39th of 54 | |
No health coverage | 4.48% | 2.16% | 1.98% | 4th of 54 | |
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months. | 88.5% | 91.2% | 92.1% | 48th of 54 | |
Households lacking health access | 4.9% | 6.3% | 6.0% | 43rd of 54 | |
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times. | 13,588 | 154,624 | 1,523,716 | 30th of 52 | |
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register. | 458 | 4,163 | 36,698 | 21st of 52 | |
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death. | 3.37% | 2.69% | 2.41% | 9th of 52 | |
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up. | 10.6 days | 6.8 days | 6.1 days | 1st of 52 | |
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older. | 28.7 | 22.0 | 19.9 | 3rd of 52 | |
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. | 102 | 96 | 100 | 21st of 52 | |
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people. | 844 | 10,687 | 89,723 | 26th of 54 | |
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour. | 6.2% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 11th of 54 | |
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is. | 52.9 | 56.4 | 48.6 | 9th of 54 | |
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places. | 105 | 108 | 100 | 11th of 54 |
What people are hospitalised for
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.
By tumour site
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaGenitales femeninosVías respiratoriasTiroides y endocrinashover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile
Economy and poverty
See all →| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line. | 18.1% | 17.8% | 17.3% | 34th of 54 | |
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked. | 22.8 UF | 26.6 UF | 32.0 UF | 30th of 54 | |
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job. | 102.4% | 85.9% | 78.9% | 9th of 54 | |
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity. | 78.7 | 81.0 | 85.6 | 32nd of 56 |
See the other 16 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over. | 52.9% | 52.2% | 54.4% | 28th of 56 | |
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently. | 9.1% | 8.7% | 8.6% | 17th of 56 | |
Self-employed | 28.6% | 36.0% | 33.8% | 53rd of 56 | |
Extreme poverty | 6.0% | 6.8% | 6.9% | 41st of 54 | |
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks. | 17.2% | 15.9% | 17.7% | 28th of 54 | |
Unemployment rate | 10.0% | 9.4% | 8.8% | 16th of 54 | |
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income. | CLP 527,654 | CLP 676,485 | CLP 783,124 | 43rd of 54 | |
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide. | 0.401 | 0.465 | 0.488 | 52nd of 53 | |
Registered firms | 12,539 | 153,561 | 1,582,390 | 31st of 56 | |
Annual sales | 57,210,672 UF | 1,504,507,848 UF | 34,347,683,688 UF | 33rd of 54 | |
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve. | 55,822 | 675,886 | 9,699,164 | 28th of 56 | |
Sales per firm | 4,563 UF | 9,797 UF | 21,706 UF | 32nd of 54 | |
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions. | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 20th of 56 | |
Women among employees | 43.3% | 39.4% | 40.6% | 15th of 56 | |
Independent contractors | 13,822 | 241,072 | 3,958,269 | 33rd of 56 | |
Contractors as share of workers | 19.8% | 26.3% | 29.0% | 52nd of 56 |
Employment by industry
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.
Employment by occupation
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.
Housing and services
See all →House or flat
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overcrowded dwellings | 5.3% | 4.6% | 5.7% | 26th of 56 | |
Internet access | 90.9% | 94.0% | 93.2% | 32nd of 56 | |
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 2.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 40th of 56 | |
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 39th of 56 |
See the other 35 indicators
| Indicator | Value | Against its peers | Region | Chile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupied dwellings with residents | 55,859 | 685,235 | 6,408,172 | 33rd of 56 | |
Critically overcrowded | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 24th of 56 | |
Irrecoverable dwellings | 1.69% | 1.36% | 1.13% | 19th of 56 | |
Public water network | 94.0% | 92.8% | 92.3% | 13th of 56 | |
Electricity access | 99.3% | 99.6% | 99.6% | 37th of 56 | |
Detached houses | 90.4% | 78.1% | 78.7% | 39th of 56 | |
Apartments | 7.8% | 20.8% | 19.9% | 19th of 56 | |
Precarious wall materials | 0.40% | 0.30% | 0.23% | 16th of 56 | |
Unoccupied private dwellings | 7.8% | 20.2% | 11.9% | 48th of 56 | |
Quantitative housing deficit | 4,038 | 42,497 | 491,904 | 30th of 56 | |
Housing deficit as share of households | 7.1% | 6.1% | 7.5% | 13th of 56 | |
Renting households | 21.5% | 24.5% | 26.2% | 26th of 56 | |
Owner-occupiers | 64.9% | 60.9% | 61.1% | 34th of 56 | |
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south. | 25.4% | 15.0% | 24.4% | 29th of 56 | |
Commute by public transport | 23.9% | 41.8% | 42.1% | 38th of 56 | |
Walks to work | 11.8% | 10.1% | 10.2% | 32nd of 56 | |
Households with a computer | 45.7% | 54.6% | 54.9% | 37th of 56 | |
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 35th of 56 | |
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 95.9% | 97.7% | 97.0% | 23rd of 56 | |
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 99.9% | 100.0% | 99.9% | 28th of 56 | |
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 99.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 41st of 56 | |
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 86.4% | 93.2% | 89.4% | 25th of 56 | |
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 99.9% | 99.5% | 98.1% | 7th of 56 | |
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 99.9% | 100.0% | 99.7% | 24th of 56 | |
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 7.6 | 12.2 | 5.9 | 30th of 56 | |
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 56.6% | 81.0% | 80.3% | 35th of 56 | |
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 73.9% | 91.2% | 90.0% | 33rd of 56 | |
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026. | 99.9% | 99.2% | 96.2% | 10th of 56 | |
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line. | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 45th of 56 | |
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 99.4% | 99.1% | 99.0% | 11th of 56 | |
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.9% | 1st of 56 | |
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1st of 56 | |
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 90.8% | 94.4% | 91.6% | 23rd of 56 | |
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 99.9% | 99.4% | 98.5% | 9th of 56 | |
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025. | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.8% | 27th of 56 |
How people commute
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.
Housing tenure
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.
Home heating fuel
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.
How it voted in 2025
TRICEL · qualified result90.1%
of the registered voted in the first round
89.7%
voted in the runoff
130,707
registered voters on the roll
8.5%
of runoff ballots were null or blank
Presidential runoff · 14 December
Jeannette Jara Roman43.6%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist56.4%58.3%
Presidential, first round · 16 November
Franco Parisi Fernandez27.2%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman26.8%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.2%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen13.2%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist21.2%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet8.8%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.0%1.3%
Chamber of Deputies · 16 November
CUnidad por Chile40.3%30.6%
KCambio por Chile22.4%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido15.9%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente16.1%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas5.4%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
Senate · 16 November
CUnidad por Chile37.2%
KCambio por Chile17.7%
JChile Grande y Unido25.9%
IPartido de la Gente14.9%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas4.3%
Territories within
6| Commune | Census population | Foreign-born share | Average years of schooling | Income poverty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Felipe | 80,413 | 10.2% | 10.1 yrs | 20.1% |
| Catemu | 13,760 | 2.1% | 9.1 yrs | 16.2% |
| Llaillay | 25,484 | 4.0% | 9.4 yrs | 17.4% |
| Panquehue | 7,269 | 1.3% | 9.3 yrs | 17.6% |
| Putaendo | 17,336 | 2.0% | 9.7 yrs | 22.3% |
| Santa María | 15,134 | 2.6% | 9.4 yrs | 10.5% |
| San Felipe de Aconcagua | 159,396 | 6.5% | 9.8 yrs | 18.1% |