Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 96.2%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF27.4 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF27.4 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 184 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
73.3%
48th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
8.8%
303rd of 335
Came from another region
14.3%
198th of 335
Net internal migration
-3,741
-23.7 per 100 residents
Catemuthis commune · 18,942another region2,258 peopleelsewhere in the region1,390 peopleabroad566 peopleelsewhere in the region4,728 peopleanother region2,661 peopleCatemuthis commune · 15,767
Catemuthis commune · 18,942another region2,258 peopleelsewhere in th…1,390 peopleabroad566 peopleelsewhere in th…4,728 peopleanother region2,661 peopleCatemuthis commune · 15,767

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing10Mining2Mining▲82Public administration3Public administration▼13Retail and wholesale4Retail and wholesale▼16Construction5Construction▲15Transport6Transport▼115Administrative services7Administrative services▲84Education8Education▼48Other services9Other services▼19Water and waste10Water and waste▼17Manufacturing11Manufacturing▼412Real estate12Real estate11Accommodation and food13Accommodation and food▼2
2005202411Agriculture and fishing102Mining▲823Public administration▼134Retail and wholesale▼165Construction▲156Transport▼1157Administrative services▲848Education▼489Other services▼1910Water and waste▼1711Manufacturing▼41212Real estate1113Accommodation and food▼2

The ten branches that employ most of Catemu

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

02 k4 k6 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
02 k4 k6 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval4.8% a year observed · 0.8% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

02.0 M4.0 M6.0 M8.0 Mprojection →6.5 M2029 · central2005201520242029
02.0 M4.0 M6.0 M8.0 Mprojection →6.5 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval13.3% a year observed · -2.6% projected

What Catemu is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Catemu employs more people in 42 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

42
activities it is specialised in
3,955
formal workers
234/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Actividades de la administración …Extracción y procesamiento de cob…Actividades poscosechaActividades combinadas de apoyo a…Fabricación de prendas de vestir …Corretaje al por mayor de ganadoElaboración de productos de panad…Mantenimiento y reparación de veh…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.23.7Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Actividades de la administración …Actividades combinadas de apoyo a…Fabricación de prendas de vestir …How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Catemu

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Actividades poscosechaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha120103.8×
Extracción y procesamiento de cobreExtracción y procesamiento de cobre63231.8×
Cultivos forrajeros en praderas mejoradas o sembradas; cultivos suplementarios forrajerosCultivo de plantas no perennes4831.3×
Actividades combinadas de apoyo a instalacionesActividades combinadas de apoyo a instalaciones1126.2×
Venta al por menor de carbón, leña y otros combustibles de uso doméstico en comercios especializadosVenta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados1524.3×
Venta al por menor en comercios especializados de frutas y verduras (verdulerías)Venta al por menor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco en comercios especializados2611.4×
ApiculturaGanadería411.1×
Actividades de apoyo a la agriculturaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha1,1559.5×
Explotación de otras minas y canteras n.c.p.Explotación de minas y canteras n.c.p.968.9×
Otros servicios de telecomunicaciones inalámbricas n.c.p.Actividades de telecomunicaciones inalámbricas48.1×
Cultivo de uva para mesaCultivo de plantas perennes506.0×
Servicios de transporte de escolaresOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre54.9×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
13,112
hectares in holdings
93.1%
of them under a named use
99.6%
of the crop land is irrigated
194
holdings with land here
Pasture 57%Woodland 13%Orchards and viney… 11%Not farmed 9.6%Annual crops 9.5%Pasture57%Native woodland12%Fruit trees11%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings6.9%Untill…land2.7%Fodder crops4.4%Vegetables3.2%Cer…Pul…andtub…
Pasture 57%Woodland 13%Orchar… 11%Not farmed 9.6%Annual crops 9.5%Pasture57%Nativewoodland12%Fruittrees11%Scrub, barrenground and…Until…land2.7%FoddercropsVeget…3.2%Cer…Pul…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
CatemuChile% of each territory's own population · 13,760 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
13,760
159,39618,480,432220th of 346
Average age
39.7 yrs
38.4 yrs38.1 yrs148th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
93.7
81.479.0151st of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
38.1/km²
60.5/km²24.7/km²151st of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
4,923
57,2046,596,527220th of 346
Dwellings
5,604
63,3767,642,716240th of 346
People per household
2.80
2.792.80135th of 345
Women
51.1%
51.3%51.5%143rd of 346
Men per 100 women
95.7
94.994.3204th of 346
Under 15
17.8%
18.5%17.7%176th of 346
65 and over
16.7%
15.1%14.0%135th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
52.5
50.546.5115th of 346
One-person households
21.0%
21.9%21.8%210th of 345
Households with children
34.2%
34.6%33.2%129th of 345
Indigenous peoples
4.7%
5.2%11.4%278th of 346
Female-headed households
49.8%
50.0%49.9%120th of 345
Land area
361 km²
2,635 km²748,041 km²233rd of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Catemu37%Arrived since 202063%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Catemu37%Arrived since 202063%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
2.1%
6.5%8.7%208th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
73.3%
63.4%50.5%48th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
8.8%
19.2%23.9%303rd of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
14.3%
12.7%17.2%198th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
284
10,3631,608,650203rd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
32.5 yrs
31.7 yrs33.5 yrs219th of 345
Women among foreign-born
47.9%
46.3%51.7%280th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
85.6%
84.1%83.1%27th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
37.0%
45.3%34.4%182nd of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
2.7%
8.2%10.6%200th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
10.9 yrs
11.3 yrs12.9 yrs324th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-3,741
-13,2820234th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-23.7
-7.70.0240th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Catemu17%Higher42%Secondary33%Primary only4.9%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Catemu17%42%Secondary33%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.1 yrs
9.8 yrs10.4 yrs211th of 346
Reached higher education
16.7%
24.3%31.1%265th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
98.5%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
58.9%
53.9%55.6%98th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
103.9%
102.3%99.8%80th of 346
Literacy rate
96.3%
97.3%97.8%181st of 346
Reached secondary education
42.2%
39.9%36.7%34th of 346
Primary education only
32.8%
27.4%24.1%154th of 346
Never attended school
3.30%
2.98%3.01%209th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.2 yrs
11.3 yrs12.1 yrs227th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.6 yrs
11.5 yrs12.1 yrs207th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.72%
2.69%2.18%164th of 345
Households lacking schooling
26.6%
20.2%15.1%127th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
163
2,019217,565190th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
93.3%
52.5%33.9%18th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
38.5%
63.7%67.2%321st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
53.1%
31.9%19.7%2nd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
8.3%
4.4%13.1%264th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
7.3%
18.8%13.0%209th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
47.9%
49.8%49.7%247th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

163left secondary school in 2024
96enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
58.9%continued immediately
39%of those, to a university
7%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria en InformaticaTecnico en Electricidad y Automatizacion IndustrialMedicina VeterinariaTecnico en ConstruccionTecnico en EnfermeriaIngenieria en Electricidad y Energias RenovablesTecnico en Educacion Parvularia 1 y 2 BasicoTecnico en MineriaTecnico Universitario en BiotecnologiaTrabajo Social
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria en InformaticaTecnico en Electricidad y Automatizacion IndustrialMedicina VeterinariaTecnico en ConstruccionTecnico en EnfermeriaIngenieria en Electricidad y Energias RenovablesTecnico en Educacion Parvularia 1 y 2 BasicoTecnico en MineriaTecnico Universitario en BiotecnologiaTrabajo Social
CatemuChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareAgriculture and veterinaryBusiness and lawInformation technologyEducationServicesArts and humanities
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryHealth and welfareAgriculture and veterinaryBusiness and lawInformation technologyEducationServicesArts and humanities
CatemuChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

05010015020020062015202416396
05010015020020062015202416396
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Catemu's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Catemu against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Catemu96%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Catemu96%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapre% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
12.3%
11.7%10.6%166th of 346
Public health insurance
96.4%
90.8%82.6%59th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
79.1
85.282.5111th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
125
13610051st of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
1,687
18,5951,950,388228th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
59.2 yrs
57.0 yrs56.4 yrs116th of 346
Disability among 65+
48.4%
44.6%43.0%108th of 346
Difficulty walking
5.65%
5.67%4.92%191st of 346
Difficulty seeing
5.76%
4.88%4.58%139th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.62%
2.30%2.16%159th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.48%
2.92%2.70%247th of 346
Private health insurance
3.6%
3.3%13.2%154th of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
4.48%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
79.3%
88.5%92.1%313th of 332
Households lacking health access
5.0%
4.9%6.0%179th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
1,089
13,5881,523,716194th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
40
45836,698182nd of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
3.67%
3.37%2.41%77th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.3 days
10.6 days6.1 days202nd of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
29.1
28.719.939th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
93
102100119th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
74
84489,723173rd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
6.8%
6.2%5.9%83rd of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
53.8
52.948.657th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
101
10510074th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 26%Heart and lungs 21%Injuries, bones and skin 20%Tumours, blood and meta… 13%Pregnancy, birth and ne… 10%Infe… 5.2%Mind… 4.7%Digestive system16%Genitourin…system10%Respiratorysystem11%Circulatorysystem9.6%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculoskele…5.6%SkinCancers andtumours9.3%Endoc…andmetab…2.8%Blood…Pregnancy and childbirth10%Infectiousand…Con…withhea…Ill-d…Specia…Mental andbehaviour…3.4%Nervous…
Digestive and urinary t… 26%Heart and lungs 21%Injuries, bon… 20%Tumours, blood a… 13%Pregnancy, birth… 10%Digestivesystem16%Genitour…system10%Respirat…system11%Circulat…system9.6%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculoskel…5.6%SkinCancers andtumours9.3%Endoc…andmetab…2.8%Blood…Pregnancy andchildbirth10%Infecti…and…Ill-…Spec…Mentaland…Nervou…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Mama19%Sangre y sistemalinfático19%Sitios reservados19%Órganosdigestivos18%Víasrespiratorias12%Genitalesfemeninos6.8%Genitalesmasculinos6.8%
Mama19%Sangre y sistemalinfático19%Sitios reservados19%Órganos digestivos18%Víasrespiratorias12%Genitalesfemeninos6.8%Genitalesmasculin…6.8%
MamaSangre y sistema linfáticoSitios reservadosÓrganos digestivosVías respiratoriasGenitales femeninoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
16.2%
18.1%17.3%250th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
27.4 UF
22.8 UF32.0 UF67th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
87.9%
102.4%78.9%266th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
75.8
78.785.6180th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
46.0%
52.9%54.4%251st of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
12.4%
9.1%8.6%19th of 345
Self-employed
27.5%
28.6%33.8%313th of 345
Extreme poverty
4.1%
6.0%6.9%287th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
20.9%
17.2%17.7%119th of 335
Unemployment rate
12.4%
10.0%8.8%64th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 480,215
CLP 527,654CLP 783,124235th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.397
0.4010.488259th of 321
Registered firms
1,043
12,5391,582,390229th of 346
Annual sales
7,436,631 UF
57,210,672 UF34,347,683,688 UF158th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
3,955
55,8229,699,164204th of 346
Sales per firm
7,130 UF
4,563 UF21,706 UF83rd of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.2
2.73.9142nd of 346
Women among employees
34.2%
43.3%40.6%285th of 345
Independent contractors
781
13,8223,958,269264th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
16.5%
19.8%29.0%324th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 38%Trade and logistics 19%State and social… 17%Industry and construction 16%Other servi… 5.2%Advanced se… 4.8%Agriculture andfishing24%Mining14%Retail and wholesale11%Transport5.5%Accomm…andfood3.1%Education9.0%Health4.6%Publicadminis…3.5%Constructi…7.2%Manufacturi…6.1%Electr…and gasWaterand…Domest…work2.5%Otherservi…1.8%Administ…servicesProfess…
Natural resources 38%Trade and … 19%State and soci… 17%Industry and… 16%Oth… 5.2%Adv… 4.8%Agriculture andfishing24%Mining14%Retail andwholesale11%Transport5.5%Acco…andfoodEducation9.0%Health4.6%Publicadminis…3.5%Construction7.2%Manufacturi…6.1%Ele…and…Wat…and…Dome…workOtherserv…Arts…Admin…servi…2.7%Pro…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 61%Managers and professionals 20%Elementary occupations 19%Service and sales16%Plant andmachineoperators16%Craft and trades14%Skilledagricultural11%Clerical support4.0%Technicians9.4%Profession…8.1%ManagersElementaryoccupations19%
Skilled occupations 61%Managers and profess… 20%Elementary occupati… 19%Service and sales16%Plant and machineoperators16%Craft and trades14%Skilledagricultural11%Cleri…suppo…4.0%Technicia…9.4%Profession…8.1%ManagersElementaryoccupations19%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Catemu100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Catemu100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.3%
5.3%5.7%164th of 345
Internet access
86.2%
90.9%93.2%228th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.1
2.42.3206th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.3
1.71.6222nd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
4,860
55,8596,408,172220th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.29%
0.37%0.57%222nd of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.01%
1.69%1.13%193rd of 345
Public water network
93.7%
94.0%92.3%85th of 345
Electricity access
99.4%
99.3%99.6%175th of 345
Detached houses
99.3%
90.4%78.7%79th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
7.8%19.9%219th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.30%
0.40%0.23%100th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
9.7%
7.8%11.9%248th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
233
4,038491,904238th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.7%
7.1%7.5%218th of 345
Renting households
13.0%
21.5%26.2%219th of 345
Owner-occupiers
73.7%
64.9%61.1%61st of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
34.5%
25.4%24.4%213th of 345
Commute by public transport
28.7%
23.9%42.1%134th of 345
Walks to work
11.1%
11.8%10.2%228th of 345
Households with a computer
34.1%
45.7%54.9%290th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.9
1.41.1152nd of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
92.0%
95.9%97.0%208th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
75.4%
86.4%89.4%163rd of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.9%
99.9%98.1%112th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
19.7
7.65.9123rd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
56.6%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
1.6%
73.9%90.0%241st of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.9
0.60.6221st of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.5%
99.4%99.0%125th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
82.5%
90.8%91.6%153rd of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 39%Public transport 29%On foot or by bicycle 18%Other means 14%Car37%Public transport29%Walking11%Bicycle6.7%Other14%
Private vehicle 39%Public transport 29%On foot or by bicycle 18%Other means 14%Car37%Public transport29%Walking11%Bicycle6.7%Other14%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 74%Rented 13%Provided rent-… 11%Owned outright72%Rented, nocontract6.8%Rented, withcontract6.2%Provided byfamily9.1%
Owned 74%Rented 13%Provided rent-f… 11%Owned outright72%Rented, nocontract6.8%Rented,withcontractProvided byfamily9.1%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 35%Fossil fuels 33%No heating 22%Electricity 10%Firewood34%Gas26%Paraffin6.5%No heating22%Electricity10%
Wood and biomass 35%Fossil fuels 33%No heating 22%Electricity 10%Firewood34%Gas26%ParaffinNo heating22%Electricity10%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
92.3%
of the registered voted in the first round
92.1%
voted in the runoff
12,551
registered voters on the roll
9.9%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman38.8%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist61.2%58.3%
CatemuChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez33.7%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman22.7%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.1%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen12.8%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist21.8%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet6.7%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.7%1.3%
CatemuChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile34.7%30.6%
KCambio por Chile21.9%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido15.7%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente19.9%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas7.8%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
CatemuChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile32.9%
KCambio por Chile18.4%
JChile Grande y Unido24.5%
IPartido de la Gente18.4%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas5.9%
Catemushare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Catemu across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading