Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 98.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility1st of 345 · Chile 96.2%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF23.6 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF23.6 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 154 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
61.5%
163rd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
24.2%
111th of 335
Came from another region
13.3%
222nd of 335
Net internal migration
+1,301
+16.6 per 100 residents
Panquehuethis commune · 6,471elsewhere in the region1,899 peopleanother region1,045 peopleabroad74 peopleelsewhere in the region1,239 peopleanother region404 peoplePanquehuethis commune · 7,846
Panquehuethis commune · 6,471elsewhere in th…1,899 peopleanother region1,045 peopleabroad74 peopleelsewhere in th…1,239 peopleanother region404 peoplePanquehuethis commune · 7,846

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing2Manufacturing2Manufacturing5Construction3Construction▲24Education4Education3Retail and wholesale5Retail and wholesale▼27Administrative services6Administrative services▲16Transport7Transport▼19Arts and entertainment8Arts and entertainment▲18Accommodation and food9Accommodation and food▼110Other services10Other services11Finance and insurance11Finance and insurance
2005202411Agriculture and fishing22Manufacturing53Construction▲244Education35Retail and wholesale▼276Administrative services▲167Transport▼198Arts and entertainment▲189Accommodation and food▼11010Other services1111Finance and insurance

The ten branches that employ most of Panquehue

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

1 k3 k5 k7 k9 kprojection →7 k2029 · central2005201520242029
1 k3 k5 k7 k9 kprojection →7 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval2.7% a year observed · 6.7% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

05.0 M10 M15 Mprojection →10 M2029 · central2005201520242029
05.0 M10 M15 Mprojection →10 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval10.3% a year observed · 4.4% projected

What Panquehue is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Panquehue employs more people in 26 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

26
activities it is specialised in
5,251
formal workers
205/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.43.7Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Elaboración de otros productos al…Construcción de proyectos de serv…Cultivo de uva para mesaFabricación de plásticos y caucho…Cultivo de trigoTransporte de carga por carreteraCultivo de papasCultivo de floresHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.43.7Actividades de apoyo a la agricul…Elaboración de otros productos al…Construcción de proyectos de serv…Fabricación de plásticos y caucho…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Panquehue

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cultivo de frutas tropicales y subtropicales (incluye el cultivo de paltas)Cultivo de plantas perennes1,052797.9×
ApiculturaGanadería3164.9×
Elaboración de vinosElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas49556.6×
Elaboración de otros productos de molinería n.c.p.Elaboración de productos de molinería, almidones y productos derivados del almidón1218.2×
Fabricación de partes y piezas de carpintería para edificios y construccionesFabricación de productos de madera, corcho, paja y materiales trenzables4715.7×
Fabricación de plásticos y caucho sintético en formas primariasFabricación sustancias químicas básicas, abonos y compuestos de nitrógeno, plásticos y caucho sint.3415.4×
Cultivo de plantas vivas incluida la producción en viveros (excepto viveros forestales)Propagación de plantas5011.4×
Elaboración de otros productos alimenticios n.c.p.Elaboración de otros productos alimenticios34411.3×
Fabricación de otros artículos de papel y cartónFabricación de papel y de productos de papel287.5×
Cultivo de frutas de pepita y de huesoCultivo de plantas perennes6507.4×
Actividades de apoyo a la agriculturaActividades de apoyo a la agricultura y la ganadería y actividades poscosecha1,1207.0×
Otras actividades de esparcimiento y recreativas n.c.p.Otras actividades de esparcimiento y recreativas346.7×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
7,278
hectares in holdings
60.0%
of them under a named use
99.7%
of the crop land is irrigated
167
holdings with land here
Not farmed 47%Orchards and vineyards 37%Annual crops 13%Scrub, barren ground and buildings40%Untilled land7.3%Fruit trees35%Fodder crops6.4%Cereals5.3%Nativewoodl…Pastu…1.3%
Not farmed 47%Orchards and vineyards 37%Annual c… 13%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings40%Until…land7.3%Fruit trees35%Fodder crops6.4%Cereals5.3%Nativ…Pastu…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
PanquehueChile% of each territory's own population · 7,269 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
7,269
159,39618,480,432287th of 346
Average age
38.8 yrs
38.4 yrs38.1 yrs208th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
83.9
81.479.0205th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
60.0/km²
60.5/km²24.7/km²117th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
2,441
57,2046,596,527292nd of 346
Dwellings
2,863
63,3767,642,716311th of 346
People per household
2.98
2.792.8041st of 345
Women
50.7%
51.3%51.5%199th of 346
Men per 100 women
97.2
94.994.3148th of 346
Under 15
18.1%
18.5%17.7%155th of 346
65 and over
15.1%
15.1%14.0%210th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
49.7
50.546.5204th of 346
One-person households
18.0%
21.9%21.8%304th of 345
Households with children
35.7%
34.6%33.2%76th of 345
Indigenous peoples
3.7%
5.2%11.4%315th of 346
Female-headed households
53.1%
50.0%49.9%27th of 345
Land area
121 km²
2,635 km²748,041 km²289th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Panquehue30%Arrived since 202070%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Panquehue30%Arrived since 2…70%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
1.3%
6.5%8.7%261st of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
61.5%
63.4%50.5%163rd of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
24.2%
19.2%23.9%111th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
13.3%
12.7%17.2%222nd of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
91
10,3631,608,650291st of 346
Average age, foreign-born
38.4 yrs
31.7 yrs33.5 yrs34th of 345
Women among foreign-born
49.5%
46.3%51.7%241st of 345
Foreign-born of working age
79.1%
84.1%83.1%245th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
29.7%
45.3%34.4%260th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
1.5%
8.2%10.6%263rd of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.5 yrs
11.3 yrs12.9 yrs153rd of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
1,301
-13,2820115th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
16.6
-7.70.079th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Panquehue19%Higher40%Secondary32%Primary only4.7%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Panquehue19%40%Secondary32%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.3 yrs
9.8 yrs10.4 yrs170th of 346
Reached higher education
19.1%
24.3%31.1%217th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
98.5%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
58.9%
53.9%55.6%97th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
101.9%
102.3%99.8%163rd of 346
Literacy rate
96.7%
97.3%97.8%157th of 346
Reached secondary education
40.4%
39.9%36.7%60th of 346
Primary education only
32.5%
27.4%24.1%158th of 346
Never attended school
3.29%
2.98%3.01%213th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.6 yrs
11.3 yrs12.1 yrs182nd of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.8 yrs
11.5 yrs12.1 yrs178th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.26%
2.69%2.18%190th of 345
Households lacking schooling
17.0%
20.2%15.1%236th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
56
2,019217,565283rd of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
35.7%
52.5%33.9%178th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
0.0%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
57.6%
63.7%67.2%220th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
42.4%
31.9%19.7%4th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
0.0%
4.4%13.1%323rd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
9.1%
18.8%13.0%192nd of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
51.5%
49.8%49.7%152nd of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

56left secondary school in 2024
33enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
58.9%continued immediately
58%of those, to a university
9%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%Tecnico en Electricidad y Electronica
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%Tecnico en Electricidad y Electronica
PanquehueChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawHealth and welfareArts and humanitiesServicesSocial sciencesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Engineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawHealth and welfareArts and humanitiesServicesSocial sciencesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinary
PanquehueChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0204060802006201520245633
0204060802006201520245633
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Panquehue's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Panquehue against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Panquehue92%Fonasa5.4%Chile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Panquehue92%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.5%
11.7%10.6%285th of 346
Public health insurance
92.3%
90.8%82.6%178th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
57.5
85.282.5230th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
127
13610048th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
694
18,5951,950,388303rd of 346
Average age, people with a disability
57.2 yrs
57.0 yrs56.4 yrs212th of 346
Disability among 65+
44.5%
44.6%43.0%201st of 346
Difficulty walking
3.82%
5.67%4.92%298th of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.57%
4.88%4.58%249th of 346
Difficulty hearing
1.69%
2.30%2.16%310th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
1.97%
2.92%2.70%313th of 346
Private health insurance
5.4%
3.3%13.2%110th of 335
No health coverage
1.21%
4.48%1.98%190th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
69.0%
88.5%92.1%327th of 332
Households lacking health access
6.9%
4.9%6.0%102nd of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
418
13,5881,523,716272nd of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
19
45836,698242nd of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
4.55%
3.37%2.41%29th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
7.0 days
10.6 days6.1 days115th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
26.1
28.719.968th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
69
102100224th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
45
84489,723229th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
10.8%
6.2%5.9%8th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
61.9
52.948.625th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
120
10510032nd of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 27%Injuries, bones and skin 25%Heart and lungs 21%Tumours, blood an… 17%Mind, … 5.5%Infect… 2.6%Pregna… 2.6%Digestive system16%Genitourina…system11%Injuries andpoisoning16%Musculoske…6.7%SkinCirculatorysystem11%Respiratorysystem10%Cancers andtumours14%Endocrine andmetabolicBlo…and…Mentalandbehavio…3.8%Ner…sys…Infecti…and…Pregnancy an…
Digestive and urinary… 27%Injuries, bones an… 25%Heart and lungs 21%Tumours, bl… 17%Min… 5.5%Digestivesystem16%Genitou…system11%Injuries andpoisoning16%Musculoskeletal6.7%SkinCirculatory system11%Respiratory system10%Cancers andtumours14%Endocrine and…Mentalandbehav…3.8%Infe…and…Spe…Pregnancyand…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos27%Sitios reservados22%Vías respiratorias18%Genitales femeninos11%Genitales masculinos11%Sangre ysistemalinfático11%
Órganos digestivos27%Sitiosreservados22%Víasrespiratorias18%Genitales femeninos11%Genitalesmasculinos11%Sangre ysistemalinfático11%
Órganos digestivosSitios reservadosVías respiratoriasGenitales femeninosGenitales masculinosSangre y sistema linfáticohover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
17.6%
18.1%17.3%226th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
23.6 UF
22.8 UF32.0 UF139th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
101.0%
102.4%78.9%160th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
94.1
78.785.686th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
48.7%
52.9%54.4%213th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
8.5%
9.1%8.6%182nd of 345
Self-employed
29.9%
28.6%33.8%282nd of 345
Extreme poverty
3.5%
6.0%6.9%295th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
15.4%
17.2%17.7%211th of 335
Unemployment rate
15.9%
10.0%8.8%20th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 728,978
CLP 527,654CLP 783,12448th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.441
0.4010.488150th of 321
Registered firms
684
12,5391,582,390272nd of 346
Annual sales
8,111,080 UF
57,210,672 UF34,347,683,688 UF152nd of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
5,251
55,8229,699,164172nd of 346
Sales per firm
11,858 UF
4,563 UF21,706 UF47th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
4.7
2.73.921st of 346
Women among employees
30.5%
43.3%40.6%314th of 345
Independent contractors
1,043
13,8223,958,269233rd of 346
Contractors as share of workers
16.6%
19.8%29.0%320th of 346

Employment by industry

Natural resources 40%State and social … 18%Trade and logisti… 17%Industry and cons… 12%Advanced services 6.3%Other services 5.8%Agriculture andfishing36%MiningEducation7.7%Publicadministr…5.4%Health4.7%Retail andwholesale9.2%Transport5.2%Accom…andfood3.0%Constru…5.9%Manufactu…5.2%Water…Elec…Adminis…services2.7%Profes…servic…2.0%Finan…Inf…and…Domestic work3.7%Oth…ser…
Natural resources 40%State and… 18%Trade and logis… 17%Industry… 12%Advance… 6.3%Other s… 5.8%Agriculture andfishing36%Education7.7%Publicadministrati…Health4.7%Retailandwholesa…9.2%Transpo…5.2%Accommo…and foodConstruction5.9%Manufactu…5.2%Admin…servi…2.7%Profes…Domest…workOthe…Arts…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 54%Elementary occupations 24%Managers and professionals 22%Skilledagricultural16%Plant andmachineoperators12%Service andsales12%Craft and trades8.8%Clerical support5.1%Elementary occupations24%Professiona…9.4%Technicians8.2%Managers4.2%
Skilled occupations 54%Elementary occupations 24%Managers and profe… 22%Skilledagricultural16%Plant and machineoperators12%Service and sales12%Craft andtrades8.8%Clericalsupport5.1%Elementaryoccupations24%Professionals9.4%Technicians8.2%Man…
Elementary occupationshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Panquehue98%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Panquehue98%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.0%
5.3%5.7%199th of 345
Internet access
91.6%
90.9%93.2%122nd of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
8.6
2.42.342nd of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
5.8
1.71.673rd of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
2,401
55,8596,408,172292nd of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.21%
0.37%0.57%286th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
2.37%
1.69%1.13%64th of 345
Public water network
87.8%
94.0%92.3%140th of 345
Electricity access
99.8%
99.3%99.6%55th of 345
Detached houses
97.7%
90.4%78.7%194th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
7.8%19.9%281st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.10%
0.40%0.23%243rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
11.4%
7.8%11.9%218th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
149
4,038491,904282nd of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
6.1%
7.1%7.5%124th of 345
Renting households
11.6%
21.5%26.2%258th of 345
Owner-occupiers
69.6%
64.9%61.1%153rd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
39.3%
25.4%24.4%202nd of 345
Commute by public transport
30.2%
23.9%42.1%116th of 345
Walks to work
7.3%
11.8%10.2%297th of 345
Households with a computer
41.2%
45.7%54.9%194th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.5
1.41.131st of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
65.0%
95.9%97.0%330th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
4.0%
86.4%89.4%328th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%98.1%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
12.1
7.65.9163rd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
2.4%
56.6%80.3%183rd of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
69.5%
73.9%90.0%191st of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%96.2%1st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
0.8
0.60.6233rd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.4%99.0%1st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
21.2%
90.8%91.6%331st of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 51%Public transport 30%On foot or by bi… 11%Other me… 8.2%Car49%Public transport30%Walking7.3%Bicyc…3.6%Other8.2%
Private vehicle 51%Public transport 30%On foot or by… 11%Other means 8.2%Car49%Public transport30%Walking7.3%Bicyc…3.6%Other8.2%
Public transportOther meanshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 70%Provided rent-free 17%Rented 12%Owned outright66%Provided by family12%Provided by employer4.6%Rented,withcontract6.2%Rented,nocontract5.4%
Owned 70%Provided rent-free 17%Rented 12%Owned outright66%Provided byfamily12%Provid…byemploy…4.6%Rented,withcontract6.2%Rented,nocontra…5.4%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 40%Fossil fuels 37%No heating 11%Electricity 11%Firewood39%Gas32%Paraffin5.4%No heating11%Electricity11%
Wood and biomass 40%Fossil fuels 37%No heating 11%Electricity 11%Firewood39%Gas32%ParaffinNo heating11%Electricity11%
No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
92.8%
of the registered voted in the first round
92.5%
voted in the runoff
7,007
registered voters on the roll
8.8%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman38.4%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist61.6%58.3%
PanquehueChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez32.5%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman22.6%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.0%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen12.3%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist23.0%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.5%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.7%1.3%
PanquehueChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile37.1%30.6%
KCambio por Chile20.7%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido17.3%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente19.4%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas5.5%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
PanquehueChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile37.1%
KCambio por Chile16.6%
JChile Grande y Unido24.6%
IPartido de la Gente17.5%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas4.2%
Panquehueshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Panquehue across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading