Province · 104

Provincia de PalenaProvincia de Palena

Compare Palena with another place
Census population
18,470
50th of 56
Population density
1.2/km²
47th of 56
Average years of schooling
9.0 yrs
49th of 56
Foreign-born share
3.7%
37th of 56

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Self-employed1st of 56 · Chile 33.8%47.8%
Households heating with wood1st of 56 · Chile 24.4%94.0%
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer1st of 54 · Chile 5.9%10.4%
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service1st of 56 · Chile 2.332.8
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service56th of 56 · Chile 89.4%20.6%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service56th of 56 · Chile 98.1%23.6%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.8 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF24.8 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 0 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
—
Came from another commune of the same region
—
Came from another region
—
Net internal migration
—
Palenathis province · 9,039elsewhere in the region5,584 peopleanother region3,455 people
Palenathis province · 9,039elsewhere in th…5,584 peopleanother region3,455 people

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Public administration1Public administration5Accommodation and food2Accommodation and food▲32Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▼13Agriculture and fishing4Agriculture and fishing▼14Construction5Construction▼19Transport6Transport▲36Manufacturing7Manufacturing▼17Administrative services8Administrative services▼110Professional services9Professional services▲18Other services10Other services▼211Water and waste11Water and waste12Information and communications12Information and communications
2005202411Public administration52Accommodation and food▲323Retail and wholesale▼134Agriculture and fishing▼145Construction▼196Transport▲367Manufacturing▼178Administrative services▼1109Professional services▲1810Other services▼21111Water and waste1212Information and communications

The ten branches that employ most of Palena

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

01 k2 k3 k4 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
01 k2 k3 k4 kprojection →4 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval8.3% a year observed · 5.3% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

01.0 M2.0 M3.0 M4.0 Mprojection →3.4 M2029 · central2005201520242029
01.0 M2.0 M3.0 M4.0 Mprojection →3.4 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval10.5% a year observed · 5.1% projected

What Palena is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Palena employs more people in 62 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

62
activities it is specialised in
2,866
formal workers
41/53
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Actividades de la administración …Servicios relacionados con la acu…Terminación y acabado de edificiosVenta al por menor de artículos d…Venta al por menor de prendas y a…Cría de ganado bovino para la pro…Transporte de carga por vías de n…Otras actividades de limpieza de …Transporte de pasajeros marítimo …How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Transporte de carga por vías de n…Actividades de casas de cambio y …Cultivo de trigoCría de ovejas (ovinos)How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Palena

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Transporte de pasajeros por vías de navegación interioresTransporte por vías de navegación interiores1455.8×
Otras actividades de alojamiento para turistas n.c.p.Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas1853.8×
ApiculturaGanadería1349.9×
Transporte de carga por vías de navegación interioresTransporte por vías de navegación interiores1335.4×
Venta al por menor de carbón, leña y otros combustibles de uso doméstico en comercios especializadosVenta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados1533.5×
Generación de energía eléctrica en otras centrales n.c.p.Generación, transmisión y distribución de energía eléctrica6832.0×
Servicios de transporte de escolaresOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre2027.1×
Otras actividades de alojamiento n.c.p.Otras actividades de alojamiento3215.8×
Actividades de residenciales para estudiantes y trabajadoresOtras actividades de alojamiento1213.7×
Otras actividades de servicio de bebidas n.c.p.Actividades de servicio de bebidas213.0×
Servicios relacionados con la acuicultura marinaAcuicultura11911.7×
Conservador de bienes raícesActividades jurídicas811.7×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
1,037,483
hectares in holdings
65.7%
of them under a named use
4.9%
of the crop land is irrigated
Woodland 64%Not farmed 34%Native woodland64%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings34%
Woodland 64%Not farmed 34%Native woodland64%Scrub, barren ground and buildings34%
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
PalenaChile% of each territory's own population · 18,470 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Census population
18,470
890,28418,480,43250th of 56
Average age
39.4 yrs
38.2 yrs38.1 yrs17th of 56
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
82.7
75.879.026th of 56
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
1.2/km²
18.4/km²24.7/km²47th of 56
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Households
7,586
332,3956,596,52750th of 56
Dwellings
10,883
404,1427,642,71650th of 56
People per household
2.43
2.682.8052nd of 56
Women
48.7%
50.9%51.5%52nd of 56
Men per 100 women
105.5
96.594.35th of 56
Under 15
17.6%
17.7%17.7%39th of 56
65 and over
14.6%
13.4%14.0%29th of 56
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
47.5
45.346.534th of 56
One-person households
28.2%
22.7%21.8%6th of 56
Households with children
29.8%
32.9%33.2%51st of 56
Indigenous peoples
28.9%
26.6%11.4%12th of 56
Female-headed households
46.5%
49.3%49.9%47th of 56
Land area
15,044 km²
48,307 km²748,041 km²16th of 56

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Palena32%Arrived since 202068%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Palena32%Arrived since 202068%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Foreign-born share
3.7%
4.0%8.7%37th of 56
See the other 7 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Foreign-born population
677
35,2851,608,65049th of 56
Average age, foreign-born
34.7 yrs
33.0 yrs33.5 yrs10th of 56
Women among foreign-born
52.9%
50.0%51.7%13th of 56
Foreign-born of working age
77.8%
81.6%83.1%55th of 56
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
32.2%
40.3%34.4%42nd of 56
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
4.2%
4.7%10.6%39th of 56
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.2 yrs
13.1 yrs12.9 yrs40th of 56

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Palena20%Higher34%Secondary37%Primary only4.8%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Palena20%34%Secondary37%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.0 yrs
9.8 yrs10.4 yrs49th of 56
Reached higher education
19.8%
25.3%31.1%47th of 56
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
65.3%
56.6%55.6%2nd of 56
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
105.1%
100.5%99.8%5th of 56
Literacy rate
95.9%
97.0%97.8%46th of 56
Reached secondary education
34.1%
35.9%36.7%50th of 56
Primary education only
37.3%
30.6%24.1%2nd of 56
Never attended school
3.98%
3.10%3.01%12th of 56
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.2 yrs
11.3 yrs12.1 yrs52nd of 56
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.7 yrs
11.4 yrs12.1 yrs48th of 56
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
4.13%
2.97%2.18%11th of 56
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
213
11,158217,56550th of 56
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
23.0%
39.5%33.9%49th of 56
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
89.7%
7.5%3.1%5th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
64.0%
67.4%67.2%34th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
18.7%
18.2%19.7%21st of 56
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
17.3%
14.4%13.1%30th of 56
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
28.8%
24.6%13.0%21st of 56
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
48.9%
51.3%49.7%43rd of 56

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

213left secondary school in 2024
139enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
65.3%continued immediately
64%of those, to a university
29%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%KinesiologiaTecnico en Produccion AcuicolaAdministracion PublicaEnfermeriaTecnico en EnfermeriaTecnologia MedicaTerapia OcupacionalDerechoIngenieria en InformaticaOdontologia
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%KinesiologiaTecnico en Produccion AcuicolaAdministracion PublicaEnfermeriaTecnico en EnfermeriaTecnologia MedicaTerapia OcupacionalDerechoIngenieria en InformaticaOdontologia
PalenaChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawServicesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesNatural sciences
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawServicesInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesSocial sciencesNatural sciences
PalenaChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0100200300200620152024213139
0100200300200620152024213139
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Palena's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Palena against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.5%
10.5%10.6%46th of 56
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
44.3
86.082.549th of 52
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
58
9510049th of 52
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
People with a disability
1,749
93,4411,950,38850th of 56
Average age, people with a disability
57.4 yrs
56.7 yrs56.4 yrs25th of 56
Disability among 65+
43.9%
43.0%43.0%30th of 56
Difficulty walking
3.93%
4.76%4.92%47th of 56
Difficulty seeing
4.24%
4.78%4.58%44th of 56
Difficulty hearing
2.14%
2.26%2.16%35th of 56
Difficulty concentrating
1.97%
2.46%2.70%50th of 56
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
819
76,5211,523,71648th of 52
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
23
1,66436,69847th of 52
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.81%
2.17%2.41%17th of 52
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
8.6 days
6.2 days6.1 days3rd of 52
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
12.5
18.719.948th of 52
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
53
10510050th of 52
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
85
5,39689,72347th of 54
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
10.4%
7.1%5.9%1st of 54
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
46.0
60.648.620th of 54
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
90
12510022nd of 54

What people are hospitalised for

Heart and lungs 23%Injuries, bones and skin 21%Digestive and uri… 18%Tumours, blood… 16%Infecti… 7.3%Pregnan… 7.3%Mind, … 7.2%Circulatorysystem13%Respiratorysystem9.6%Injuries andpoisoning16%Muscu…3.7%Skin1.3%Digestive system12%Genitourinarysystem6.3%Cancers andtumours12%Endocrine andmetabolicBlo…andimm…Ill-definedsymptomsContactwithhealth…2.4%Infec…andparas…2.0%Pregnancyandchildbirth7.3%Mental andbehavioural4.3%Nervoussystem
Heart and lungs 23%Injuries, bones an… 21%Digestive … 18%Tumours,… 16%Infections a… 7.3%Pregnancy, b… 7.3%Mind, nerves… 7.2%Circulatorysystem13%Respirat…system9.6%Injuries andpoisoning16%Musc…SkinDigestivesystem12%Genitourinarysystem6.3%Cancers andtumours12%Endocrineand…Ill-de…sympto…Conta…withhealt…Infe…andpara…Pregnancy andchildbirthMental andbehaviouralNervoussystem
Pregnancy, birth and newbornshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos45%Sitios reservados22%Genitales femeninos11%Vías respiratorias9.4%Sitios maldefinidos7.1%Tejidosblandos5.9%
Órganos digestivos45%Sitiosreservados22%Genitalesfemeninos11%Víasrespiratori…9.4%Sitiosmaldefinidos7.1%Tejidosblandos5.9%
Órganos digestivosSitios reservadosGenitales femeninosVías respiratoriasSitios mal definidosTejidos blandoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
24.8 UF
25.3 UF32.0 UF21st of 54
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
101.2%
88.1%78.9%14th of 54
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
125.2
93.985.67th of 56
See the other 11 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
55.6%
54.6%54.4%21st of 56
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
5.1%
7.9%8.6%50th of 56
Self-employed
47.8%
36.1%33.8%1st of 56
Registered firms
2,313
83,5901,582,39047th of 56
Annual sales
2,627,692 UF
1,090,755,799 UF34,347,683,688 UF52nd of 54
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
2,866
368,4769,699,16451st of 56
Sales per firm
1,136 UF
13,049 UF21,706 UF52nd of 54
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
0.9
2.93.953rd of 56
Women among employees
50.8%
38.3%40.6%2nd of 56
Independent contractors
2,366
118,1903,958,26948th of 56
Contractors as share of workers
45.2%
24.3%29.0%5th of 56

Employment by industry

State and social services 26%Trade and logistics 23%Natural resources 23%Industry and constru… 18%Advan… 5.2%Other… 4.3%Education11%Publicadministration9.2%Health6.2%Retail andwholesale12%Accommodationand food6.4%Transport5.5%Agriculture and fishing23%Construction9.9%Manufacturing5.9%WaterandwasteElect…and…Administrati…servicesProfess…servicesDomes…work2.1%Artsand…Other…
State and social serv… 26%Trade and logistics 23%Natural resources 23%Industry an… 18%Education11%Publicadministration9.2%Health6.2%Retailandwholesale12%Accommoda…and food6.4%Transport5.5%Agriculture andfishing23%Construction9.9%Manufacturi…5.9%Wat…and…Ele…and…Adminis…Profe…servi…Domestic…Artsand…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 61%Managers and professionals 24%Elementary occupations 15%Service and sales20%Craft and trades17%Skilled agricultural13%Plant andmachineoperators6.5%Clericalsupport4.8%Professionals12%Technicians9.3%Manage…3.2%Elementary occupations15%
Skilled occupations 61%Managers and professionals 24%Elementary oc… 15%Service andsales20%Craft and trades17%Skilled agricultural13%Plantandmachine…6.5%Clericalsupport4.8%Professiona…12%Technicians9.3%ManagersElementaryoccupations15%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Palena96%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Palena96%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
4.0%
4.7%5.7%55th of 56
Internet access
87.3%
90.8%93.2%47th of 56
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
32.8
4.52.31st of 56
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
7.1
3.21.67th of 56
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersRegionChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
7,544
328,7476,408,17250th of 56
Critically overcrowded
0.29%
0.29%0.57%41st of 56
Irrecoverable dwellings
3.66%
1.55%1.13%7th of 56
Public water network
67.0%
81.1%92.3%53rd of 56
Electricity access
98.1%
99.3%99.6%54th of 56
Detached houses
96.4%
94.1%78.7%20th of 56
Apartments
0.0%
4.7%19.9%54th of 56
Precarious wall materials
0.20%
0.40%0.23%36th of 56
Unoccupied private dwellings
25.2%
13.7%11.9%11th of 56
Quantitative housing deficit
428
16,302491,90450th of 56
Housing deficit as share of households
5.6%
4.9%7.5%29th of 56
Renting households
17.5%
21.1%26.2%40th of 56
Owner-occupiers
69.9%
66.4%61.1%12th of 56
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
94.0%
72.5%24.4%1st of 56
Commute by public transport
11.8%
31.4%42.1%51st of 56
Walks to work
29.7%
13.4%10.2%5th of 56
Households with a computer
40.1%
47.3%54.9%48th of 56
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.1
1.61.14th of 56
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
79.8%
92.1%97.0%55th of 56
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.2%
99.9%99.9%46th of 56
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.8%
100.0%100.0%43rd of 56
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
20.6%
76.4%89.4%56th of 56
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
23.6%
92.0%98.1%56th of 56
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
32.5%
98.1%99.7%56th of 56
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
80.1
9.65.94th of 56
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
66.4%80.3%51st of 56
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
78.5%90.0%52nd of 56
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
7.5%
89.3%96.2%52nd of 56
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.2
1.00.66th of 56
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
88.9%
97.3%99.0%52nd of 56
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.2%
99.9%99.9%45th of 56
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 56
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
59.4%
80.0%91.6%53rd of 56
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
82.3%
95.0%98.5%51st of 56
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
96.9%
99.7%99.8%47th of 56

How people commute

Private vehicle 43%On foot or by bicycle 32%Other means 13%Public transport 12%Car43%Walking30%Other6.6%Boat6.0%Public transport12%
Private vehicle 43%On foot or by bi… 32%Other means 13%Public transport 12%Car43%Walking30%Other6.6%Boat6.0%Public transport12%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 70%Rented 18%Provided rent-fr… 8.8%Other 3.8%Owned outright69%Rented, nocontract11%Rented, withcontract6.5%Provided byfamily6.4%Provi…byemplo…2.4%
Owned 70%Rented 18%Provide… 8.8%Owned outright69%Rented, nocontract11%Rented,withcontract6.5%Providedby family6.4%Otherarra…
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 96%Firewood94%
Wood and biomass 96%Firewood94%
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
73.7%
of the registered voted in the first round
73.6%
voted in the runoff
20,382
registered voters on the roll
5.8%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman31.9%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist68.1%58.3%
PalenaChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez16.7%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman21.8%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.0%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen22.3%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist27.6%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.0%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.0%1.3%
PalenaChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile25.6%30.6%
KCambio por Chile23.0%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido30.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente13.9%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas6.9%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
PalenaChileshare of the valid vote

Territories within

4
CommuneCensus populationForeign-born shareAverage years of schoolingIncome poverty
Chaitén4,0252.7%9.1 yrs—
Futaleufú3,06210.6%9.8 yrs—
Hualaihué9,4801.6%8.7 yrs—
Palena1,9034.6%9.3 yrs—
Palena18,4703.7%9.0 yrs—