Provincia de Tierra del Fuego

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.

School attendance, ages 6-171st of 54 · Chile 98.6%100.0%

Of those continuing, enters a university56th of 56 · Chile 67.2%45.0%

Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents54th of 54 · Chile 48.68.1

Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio54th of 54 · Chile 10018

Women55th of 56 · Chile 51.5%47.0%

Men per 100 women2nd of 56 · Chile 94.3113.0

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 348 surveyed

Lives in the commune where they were born

27.0%

53rd of 54

Came from another commune of the same region

22.8%

10th of 54

Came from another region

44.7%

3rd of 54

Net internal migration

+2,117

+24.7 per 100 residents

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII

The ten branches that employ most of Tierra del Fuego

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change

01ManufacturingIndustry and construction1,99350.0%+120%02Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics50312.6%+27%03Agriculture and fishingNatural resources44611.2%−57%04Administrative servicesAdvanced services2616.5%+335%05TransportTrade and logistics2045.1%+10,100%06Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics1854.6%+429%07Public administrationState and social services1854.6%+302%08ConstructionIndustry and construction972.4%−88%09EducationState and social services300.8%—10Professional servicesAdvanced services290.7%+867%

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval0.7% a year observed · 4.6% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval9.0% a year observed · -3.6% projected

What Tierra del Fuego is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Tierra del Fuego employs more people in 46 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

46

activities it is specialised in

3,985

formal workers

24/53

by the complexity of what it is specialised in

Each dot is one activity. Filled, Tierra del Fuego is already specialised in it; hollow, it is not. Size is how many people work in it here.

Across: how much of what tends to sit beside that activity this place already does. Up: how few and how diversified the places that do it are. Two activities are counted as close when the places good at one tend also to be good at the other — that co-occurrence is the whole of it.

The corners are not labelled on purpose. Which one is worth being in depends on what a place wants and can afford, and neither is in the tax register. The dashed lines are this place's own medians; the axes are the same on every commune's page, so two of them can be laid side by side. The named ones are those whose name fits without covering another dot; the rest are a hover away.

Most over-represented in Tierra del Fuego

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

Activity	Division	Workers here	Times the national share
Cría de ovejas (ovinos)	Ganadería	212	406.2×
Elaboración y conservación de otros pescados, en plantas en tierra (excepto barcos factoría)	Elaboración y conservación de pescado, crustáceos y moluscos	953	318.8×
Elaboración y conservación de crustáceos, moluscos y otros productos acuáticos, en plantas en tierra	Elaboración y conservación de pescado, crustáceos y moluscos	143	175.7×
Tejedura de productos textiles	Hilatura, tejedura y acabado de productos textiles	43	138.3×
Explotación de mataderos de bovinos, ovinos, equinos, caprinos, porcinos y camélidos	Elaboración y conservación de carne	503	115.5×
Elaboración de aceites y grasas de origen vegetal y animal (excepto elaboración de mantequilla)	Elaboración de aceites y grasas de origen vegetal y animal	85	72.3×
Pesca marítima artesanal	Pesca	55	61.0×
Acuicultura de agua dulce	Acuicultura	72	54.2×
Venta al por mayor de productos del mar (pescados, mariscos y algas)	Venta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco	319	50.9×
Cultivo, reproducción y manejo de algas marinas	Acuicultura	49	46.3×
Otras actividades de alojamiento para turistas n.c.p.	Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas	13	27.9×
Servicios relacionados con la pesca marítima	Pesca	8	22.2×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021

1,622,462

hectares in holdings

80.7%

of them under a named use

2.3%

of the crop land is irrigated

PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

The agricultural census measured 1,622,462 hectares of holdings in Tierra del Fuego in the 2020/2021 agricultural year, and this is how it divided them.

Fourteen of the fifteen tiles are categories the census publishes. The fifteenth is not: it is the censused surface less the other fourteen, and what it holds is scrub, barren ground, roads and buildings. Across Chile it is half of everything, because most of the censused surface is Patagonian scrub and northern desert inside very large holdings.

Irrigation is asked of eleven of the uses and not of forest, native woodland, natural pasture or untilled ground — so the 2.3% above is a share of the 9,873 hectares the question applies to, not of the whole.

The census counts holdings by comuna and by region only, and one holding can have land in several comunas — so there is no count for this level and PuroChile does not make one by adding.

VIII Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 2021, INE

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

Tierra del FuegoChile% of each territory's own population · 7,397 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Census population	7,397	166,537	18,480,432	52nd of 56
Average age	36.7 yrs	38.9 yrs	38.1 yrs	44th of 56
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.	60.7	87.1	79.0	46th of 56
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.	0.3/km²	1.3/km²	24.7/km²	53rd of 56

See the other 13 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Households	3,013	63,062	6,596,527	52nd of 56
Dwellings	4,179	76,607	7,642,716	52nd of 56
People per household	2.46	2.64	2.80	51st of 56
Women	47.0%	50.5%	51.5%	55th of 56
Men per 100 women	113.0	98.1	94.3	2nd of 56
Under 15	19.1%	16.7%	17.7%	19th of 56
65 and over	11.6%	14.5%	14.0%	47th of 56
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.	44.2	45.4	46.5	49th of 56
One-person households	31.0%	23.1%	21.8%	5th of 56
Households with children	32.2%	31.0%	33.2%	38th of 56
Indigenous peoples	26.3%	23.2%	11.4%	17th of 56
Female-headed households	43.6%	48.9%	49.9%	55th of 56
Land area	22,582 km²	127,438 km²	748,041 km²	10th of 56

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born share	7.9%	6.6%	8.7%	12th of 56
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.	27.0%	55.4%	50.5%	53rd of 54
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.	22.8%	5.0%	23.9%	10th of 54
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.	44.7%	32.8%	17.2%	3rd of 54

See the other 9 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born population	581	10,997	1,608,650	50th of 56
Average age, foreign-born	31.8 yrs	33.4 yrs	33.5 yrs	44th of 56
Women among foreign-born	51.1%	54.0%	51.7%	29th of 56
Foreign-born of working age	84.0%	82.8%	83.1%	8th of 56
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.	44.1%	35.5%	34.4%	11th of 56
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.	9.5%	7.9%	10.6%	12th of 56
Average schooling, foreign-born	12.0 yrs	12.7 yrs	12.9 yrs	43rd of 56
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.	2,117	13,205	0	20th of 54
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.	24.7	7.2	0.0	7th of 54

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Average years of schooling	9.9 yrs	10.7 yrs	10.4 yrs	28th of 56
Reached higher education	25.9%	32.9%	31.1%	30th of 56
School attendance, ages 6-17	100.0%	99.1%	98.6%	1st of 54
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.	49.4%	61.5%	55.6%	48th of 56

See the other 17 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.	104.1%	100.0%	99.8%	8th of 56
Literacy rate	98.5%	98.7%	97.8%	13th of 56
Reached secondary education	38.0%	37.9%	36.7%	23rd of 56
Primary education only	28.4%	22.2%	24.1%	26th of 56
Never attended school	2.03%	1.74%	3.01%	54th of 56
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.	11.4 yrs	12.4 yrs	12.1 yrs	29th of 56
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.	11.9 yrs	12.4 yrs	12.1 yrs	20th of 56
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.	1.44%	1.26%	2.18%	45th of 56
Households lacking schooling	21.3%	10.4%	15.1%	22nd of 54
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.	81	1,989	217,565	52nd of 56
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.	17.3%	29.6%	33.9%	52nd of 56
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.	0.0%	0.0%	3.1%	41st of 56
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	45.0%	69.7%	67.2%	56th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	10.0%	9.3%	19.7%	48th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	45.0%	21.0%	13.1%	2nd of 56
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.	20.0%	23.4%	13.0%	33rd of 56
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.	50.0%	48.6%	49.7%	34th of 56

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

81left secondary school in 2024

40enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025

49.4%continued immediately

45%of those, to a university

20%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

Tierra del FuegoChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

Tierra del FuegoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Tierra del Fuego's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

Health

See all →

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Tierra del Fuego against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

This region's own series says it stopped reporting in 2019, 2024 and 2025: 21,838 discharges in 2019 against a median of 14,183 in its other years, 54%; 7,768 discharges in 2024 against a median of 14,958 in its other years, -48%; 9,770 discharges in 2025 against a median of 14,958 in its other years, -35%. The rule withholds any year that departs more than 25% from that median, and no other region crosses it in any year. A register that loses records is not a place whose health changed, so those years are not published here. The counts are still in the published data, and /datos carries the check.

Which health system

FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted

Indicator	Value	Against its peers	Region	Chile	Rank
Disability prevalence	8.0%		8.8%	10.6%	51st of 56
Public health insurance	88.9%		81.1%	82.6%	31st of 54

See the other 15 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
People with a disability	592	14,715	1,950,388	52nd of 56
Average age, people with a disability	52.0 yrs	56.6 yrs	56.4 yrs	50th of 56
Disability among 65+	36.1%	44.6%	43.0%	50th of 56
Difficulty walking	3.24%	4.11%	4.92%	50th of 56
Difficulty seeing	3.83%	3.55%	4.58%	50th of 56
Difficulty hearing	1.34%	1.84%	2.16%	54th of 56
Difficulty concentrating	1.55%	2.07%	2.70%	54th of 56
Private health insurance	5.9%	11.5%	13.2%	24th of 54
No health coverage	0.48%	0.99%	1.98%	52nd of 54
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.	99.4%	96.6%	92.1%	3rd of 54
Households lacking health access	1.9%	5.5%	6.0%	53rd of 54
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.	6	251	89,723	54th of 54
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.	2.5%	3.2%	5.9%	52nd of 54
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.	8.1	15.1	48.6	54th of 54
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.	18	30	100	54th of 54

Economy and poverty

See all →

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.	5.4%	9.9%	17.3%	53rd of 54
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.	20.8 UF	20.3 UF	32.0 UF	46th of 54
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.	68.1%	90.2%	78.9%	53rd of 54
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.	130.5	103.5	85.6	6th of 56

See the other 16 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.	68.7%	60.5%	54.4%	4th of 56
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.	4.0%	6.4%	8.6%	53rd of 56
Self-employed	25.1%	28.2%	33.8%	55th of 56
Extreme poverty	1.7%	4.2%	6.9%	52nd of 54
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.	9.0%	6.1%	17.7%	50th of 54
Unemployment rate	4.2%	5.6%	8.8%	52nd of 54
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.	CLP 1,157,237	CLP 938,187	CLP 783,124	2nd of 54
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.	0.478	0.437	0.488	12th of 53
Registered firms	965	17,232	1,582,390	52nd of 56
Annual sales	25,417,305 UF	139,479,673 UF	34,347,683,688 UF	38th of 54
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.	3,985	78,296	9,699,164	50th of 56
Sales per firm	26,339 UF	8,094 UF	21,706 UF	2nd of 54
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.	2.6	2.9	3.9	21st of 56
Women among employees	36.2%	40.8%	40.6%	47th of 56
Independent contractors	1,196	29,620	3,958,269	52nd of 56
Contractors as share of workers	23.1%	27.4%	29.0%	45th of 56

Employment by industry

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Overcrowded dwellings	4.8%	4.1%	5.7%	38th of 56
Internet access	93.7%	95.4%	93.2%	18th of 56
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	10.3	2.3	2.3	6th of 56
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	10.0	2.2	1.6	4th of 56

See the other 35 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Occupied dwellings with residents	2,966	62,127	6,408,172	52nd of 56
Critically overcrowded	0.34%	0.29%	0.57%	27th of 56
Irrecoverable dwellings	1.89%	0.65%	1.13%	15th of 56
Public water network	85.8%	95.4%	92.3%	33rd of 56
Electricity access	99.4%	99.8%	99.6%	30th of 56
Detached houses	98.3%	93.0%	78.7%	11th of 56
Apartments	0.3%	6.4%	19.9%	45th of 56
Precarious wall materials	0.47%	0.22%	0.23%	15th of 56
Unoccupied private dwellings	26.4%	12.2%	11.9%	10th of 56
Quantitative housing deficit	188	2,835	491,904	52nd of 56
Housing deficit as share of households	6.2%	4.5%	7.5%	22nd of 56
Renting households	30.2%	24.2%	26.2%	8th of 56
Owner-occupiers	52.6%	63.0%	61.1%	48th of 56
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.	12.1%	4.2%	24.4%	36th of 56
Commute by public transport	10.3%	24.6%	42.1%	52nd of 56
Walks to work	24.9%	10.0%	10.2%	8th of 56
Households with a computer	49.8%	59.8%	54.9%	27th of 56
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	6.3	1.2	1.1	2nd of 56
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	88.9%	98.2%	97.0%	44th of 56
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	90.5%	99.0%	99.9%	55th of 56
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	91.2%	99.2%	100.0%	55th of 56
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	87.8%	95.9%	89.4%	23rd of 56
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	89.6%	98.4%	98.1%	47th of 56
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	90.0%	98.8%	99.7%	51st of 56
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	10.2	2.6	5.9	25th of 56
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	87.8%	95.9%	80.3%	14th of 56
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	89.6%	98.4%	90.0%	22nd of 56
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	90.0%	98.8%	96.2%	36th of 56
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	2.4	0.9	0.6	5th of 56
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	92.2%	98.4%	99.0%	50th of 56
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	96.0%	99.1%	99.9%	53rd of 56
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	97.3%	99.6%	100.0%	55th of 56
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	88.0%	95.9%	91.6%	26th of 56
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	89.6%	98.4%	98.5%	49th of 56
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	90.0%	98.8%	99.8%	53rd of 56

How people commute

Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

No heatingElectricityOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result

61.9%

of the registered voted in the first round

60.9%

voted in the runoff

7,671

registered voters on the roll

6.4%

of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman44.9%41.7%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist55.1%58.3%

Tierra del FuegoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez18.4%19.8%

Jeannette Jara Roman30.2%26.7%

Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.6%1.2%

Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.7%13.9%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist26.3%24.0%

Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%

Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.5%12.4%

Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.9%1.3%

Tierra del FuegoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile21.1%30.6%

KCambio por Chile34.5%23.0%

JChile Grande y Unido6.4%21.1%

IPartido de la Gente5.5%12.0%

BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas2.3%6.9%

DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%

APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%

EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%

GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%

FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%

HPopular—0.2%

Independents outside a pact30.3%0.7%

Tierra del FuegoChileshare of the valid vote

Territories within

3

Commune	Census population	Foreign-born share	Average years of schooling	Income poverty
Porvenir	6,809	8.1%	9.9 yrs	6.1%
Primavera	431	5.1%	9.4 yrs	0.0%
Timaukel	157	3.8%	10.7 yrs	1.9%
Tierra del Fuego	7,397	7.9%	9.9 yrs	5.4%

Where it stands out

Average monthly pay

Where the people here are from

Formal employment, 2005–2024

The ten branches that employ most of Tierra del Fuego

Dependent workers, projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

What Tierra del Fuego is specialised in

Most over-represented in Tierra del Fuego

The land and who works it

Population and territory

Population pyramid

Migration

When the migrant population arrived

Education

How far schooling went

The class of 2024

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

By field of study

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

Health

Which health system

Economy and poverty

Employment by industry

Employment by occupation

Housing and services

House or flat

How people commute

Housing tenure

Home heating fuel

How it voted in 2025

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

Territories within