Provincia de Ranco — PuroChile

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.

People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 56 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 56 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

Foreign-born share of working-age population54th of 56 · Chile 10.6%1.2%

Renting households53rd of 56 · Chile 26.2%13.4%

Households lacking health access4th of 54 · Chile 6.0%10.3%

People within 5 km of any health facility52nd of 56 · Chile 97.0%84.6%

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 2,316 surveyed

Lives in the commune where they were born

68.4%

8th of 54

Came from another commune of the same region

13.2%

34th of 54

Came from another region

17.6%

27th of 54

Net internal migration

-11,262

-11.6 per 100 residents

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII

The ten branches that employ most of Ranco

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change

01Agriculture and fishingNatural resources5,21422.1%+10%02Public administrationState and social services4,68119.9%+328%03ManufacturingIndustry and construction2,90612.3%+116%04ConstructionIndustry and construction2,52610.7%+128%05Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics2,51010.7%+88%06TransportTrade and logistics1,2735.4%+231%07EducationState and social services1,1154.7%+303%08Administrative servicesAdvanced services9584.1%+604%09Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics8453.6%+571%10Professional servicesAdvanced services2841.2%+141%

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.5% a year observed · 3.7% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval8.7% a year observed · -1.1% projected

What Ranco is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Ranco employs more people in 103 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

103

activities it is specialised in

23,550

formal workers

43/53

by the complexity of what it is specialised in

Most over-represented in Ranco

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

Activity	Division	Workers here	Times the national share
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción lechera	Ganadería	1,548	51.2×
Elaboración de productos lácteos	Elaboración de productos lácteos	1,696	33.1×
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción de carne o como ganado reproductor	Ganadería	763	30.1×
Cultivo de flores	Cultivo de plantas no perennes	56	16.8×
Extracción de piedra, arena y arcilla	Extracción de piedra, arena y arcilla	246	14.2×
Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales (explotación mixta)	Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales	633	11.6×
Cría de caballos y otros equinos	Ganadería	18	10.9×
Cría de otros animales n.c.p.	Ganadería	21	10.4×
Venta al por menor de recuerdos, artesanías y artículos religiosos en comercios especializados	Venta al por menor de otros productos en comercios especializados	32	10.1×
Servicios de transporte de escolares	Otras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre	58	9.6×
Alquiler y arrendamiento de equipo recreativo y deportivo	Alquiler y arrendamiento de efectos personales y enseres domésticos	12	9.6×
Distribución de energía eléctrica	Generación, transmisión y distribución de energía eléctrica	121	8.9×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021

515,876

hectares in holdings

88.9%

of them under a named use

9.9%

of the crop land is irrigated

Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

The agricultural census measured 515,876 hectares of holdings in Ranco in the 2020/2021 agricultural year, and this is how it divided them.

Fourteen of the fifteen tiles are categories the census publishes. The fifteenth is not: it is the censused surface less the other fourteen, and what it holds is scrub, barren ground, roads and buildings. Across Chile it is half of everything, because most of the censused surface is Patagonian scrub and northern desert inside very large holdings.

Irrigation is asked of eleven of the uses and not of forest, native woodland, natural pasture or untilled ground — so the 9.9% above is a share of the 101,970 hectares the question applies to, not of the whole.

The census counts holdings by comuna and by region only, and one holding can have land in several comunas — so there is no count for this level and PuroChile does not make one by adding.

VIII Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 2021, INE

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

RancoChile% of each territory's own population · 98,432 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Census population	98,432	398,230	18,480,432	37th of 56
Average age	40.0 yrs	39.0 yrs	38.1 yrs	7th of 56
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.	94.6	89.2	79.0	11th of 56
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.	12.1/km²	21.8/km²	24.7/km²	38th of 56

See the other 13 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Households	37,365	148,643	6,596,527	37th of 56
Dwellings	47,705	183,479	7,642,716	37th of 56
People per household	2.63	2.68	2.80	42nd of 56
Women	51.3%	51.6%	51.5%	21st of 56
Men per 100 women	94.8	93.8	94.3	36th of 56
Under 15	17.7%	17.3%	17.7%	38th of 56
65 and over	16.7%	15.4%	14.0%	11th of 56
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.	52.3	48.5	46.5	12th of 56
One-person households	23.7%	23.3%	21.8%	19th of 56
Households with children	31.6%	31.4%	33.2%	43rd of 56
Indigenous peoples	30.5%	24.2%	11.4%	10th of 56
Female-headed households	48.1%	49.7%	49.9%	36th of 56
Land area	8,153 km²	18,233 km²	748,041 km²	30th of 56

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born share	1.0%	1.9%	8.7%	54th of 56
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.	68.4%	64.1%	50.5%	8th of 54
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.	13.2%	11.4%	23.9%	34th of 54
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.	17.6%	22.4%	17.2%	27th of 54

See the other 9 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born population	955	7,508	1,608,650	47th of 56
Average age, foreign-born	34.7 yrs	35.0 yrs	33.5 yrs	12th of 56
Women among foreign-born	50.3%	50.0%	51.7%	40th of 56
Foreign-born of working age	81.5%	82.8%	83.1%	30th of 56
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.	31.7%	28.0%	34.4%	44th of 56
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.	1.2%	2.3%	10.6%	54th of 56
Average schooling, foreign-born	12.7 yrs	13.7 yrs	12.9 yrs	22nd of 56
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.	-11,262	-61,961	0	30th of 54
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.	-11.6	-15.1	0.0	35th of 54

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Average years of schooling	9.1 yrs	9.9 yrs	10.4 yrs	47th of 56
Reached higher education	20.5%	26.4%	31.1%	43rd of 56
School attendance, ages 6-17	99.6%	99.3%	98.6%	13th of 54
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.	57.3%	57.0%	55.6%	22nd of 56

See the other 17 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.	101.8%	100.8%	99.8%	21st of 56
Literacy rate	95.9%	96.9%	97.8%	45th of 56
Reached secondary education	36.1%	36.7%	36.7%	42nd of 56
Primary education only	35.1%	28.8%	24.1%	7th of 56
Never attended school	3.75%	3.16%	3.01%	18th of 56
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.	10.4 yrs	11.4 yrs	12.1 yrs	48th of 56
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.	10.6 yrs	11.5 yrs	12.1 yrs	51st of 56
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.	4.06%	3.11%	2.18%	12th of 56
Households lacking schooling	22.3%	17.9%	15.1%	19th of 54
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.	1,392	5,195	217,565	36th of 56
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.	45.0%	36.6%	33.9%	12th of 56
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.	26.7%	12.3%	3.1%	6th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	62.2%	67.4%	67.2%	39th of 56
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	18.3%	14.3%	19.7%	23rd of 56
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	19.5%	18.3%	13.1%	16th of 56
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.	64.0%	29.1%	13.0%	8th of 56
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.	50.4%	51.5%	49.7%	29th of 56

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

1,392left secondary school in 2024

798enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025

57.3%continued immediately

62%of those, to a university

64%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

RancoChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

RancoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Ranco's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

Health

See all →

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Ranco against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Disability prevalence	12.2%	11.6%	10.6%	15th of 56
Public health insurance	93.0%	89.7%	82.6%	13th of 54
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.	94.4	93.8	82.5	9th of 52
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	108	105	100	16th of 52

See the other 21 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
People with a disability	11,970	46,185	1,950,388	35th of 56
Average age, people with a disability	60.1 yrs	58.2 yrs	56.4 yrs	6th of 56
Disability among 65+	49.1%	45.5%	43.0%	6th of 56
Difficulty walking	5.95%	5.51%	4.92%	13th of 56
Difficulty seeing	5.40%	5.10%	4.58%	19th of 56
Difficulty hearing	2.76%	2.51%	2.16%	12th of 56
Difficulty concentrating	2.73%	2.79%	2.70%	25th of 56
Private health insurance	4.7%	7.2%	13.2%	31st of 54
No health coverage	1.07%	1.09%	1.98%	44th of 54
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.	92.8%	91.5%	92.1%	27th of 54
Households lacking health access	10.3%	7.0%	6.0%	4th of 54
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.	9,291	37,368	1,523,716	35th of 52
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.	247	901	36,698	36th of 52
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.	2.66%	2.41%	2.41%	21st of 52
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.	6.1 days	6.1 days	6.1 days	28th of 52
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.	25.1	22.6	19.9	7th of 52
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	110	112	100	11th of 52
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.	408	2,416	89,723	36th of 54
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.	4.4%	6.5%	5.9%	43rd of 54
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.	41.4	60.7	48.6	27th of 54
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.	77	119	100	35th of 54

What people are hospitalised for

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoMamaSitios mal definidosVías urinariasGenitales femeninoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.	24.3%	22.3%	17.3%	11th of 54
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.	23.8 UF	25.4 UF	32.0 UF	23rd of 54
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.	96.6%	97.3%	78.9%	22nd of 54
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.	90.8	85.1	85.6	19th of 56

See the other 16 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.	47.2%	49.9%	54.4%	49th of 56
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.	9.0%	9.2%	8.6%	19th of 56
Self-employed	35.8%	34.9%	33.8%	23rd of 56
Extreme poverty	8.9%	8.5%	6.9%	18th of 54
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.	16.3%	14.4%	17.7%	33rd of 54
Unemployment rate	7.0%	9.2%	8.8%	43rd of 54
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.	CLP 526,826	CLP 626,303	CLP 783,124	44th of 54
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.	0.454	0.475	0.488	24th of 53
Registered firms	8,935	33,908	1,582,390	37th of 56
Annual sales	73,988,520 UF	169,832,212 UF	34,347,683,688 UF	31st of 54
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.	23,555	107,237	9,699,164	38th of 56
Sales per firm	8,281 UF	5,009 UF	21,706 UF	17th of 54
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.	1.8	2.2	3.9	42nd of 56
Women among employees	41.1%	43.2%	40.6%	21st of 56
Independent contractors	8,635	55,025	3,958,269	40th of 56
Contractors as share of workers	26.8%	33.9%	29.0%	23rd of 56

Employment by industry

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Overcrowded dwellings	5.2%	4.8%	5.7%	28th of 56
Internet access	86.2%	89.9%	93.2%	51st of 56
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	6.5	3.9	2.3	8th of 56
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	4.7	3.2	1.6	11th of 56

See the other 35 indicators

Indicator	Value	Region	Chile	Rank
Occupied dwellings with residents	37,086	146,392	6,408,172	37th of 56
Critically overcrowded	0.28%	0.31%	0.57%	45th of 56
Irrecoverable dwellings	1.29%	1.17%	1.13%	29th of 56
Public water network	75.7%	80.1%	92.3%	50th of 56
Electricity access	99.0%	99.2%	99.6%	45th of 56
Detached houses	98.3%	95.4%	78.7%	13th of 56
Apartments	0.9%	3.7%	19.9%	38th of 56
Precarious wall materials	0.53%	0.38%	0.23%	11th of 56
Unoccupied private dwellings	17.3%	15.4%	11.9%	23rd of 56
Quantitative housing deficit	1,569	7,099	491,904	41st of 56
Housing deficit as share of households	4.2%	4.8%	7.5%	50th of 56
Renting households	13.4%	19.7%	26.2%	53rd of 56
Owner-occupiers	67.5%	64.5%	61.1%	22nd of 56
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.	87.6%	76.2%	24.4%	6th of 56
Commute by public transport	23.5%	30.2%	42.1%	40th of 56
Walks to work	20.5%	16.1%	10.2%	15th of 56
Households with a computer	40.7%	48.7%	54.9%	46th of 56
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	2.2	1.7	1.1	12th of 56
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	84.6%	89.5%	97.0%	52nd of 56
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	99.8%	99.8%	99.9%	34th of 56
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 56
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	60.2%	75.3%	89.4%	49th of 56
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	83.4%	94.2%	98.1%	50th of 56
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	98.6%	99.7%	99.7%	40th of 56
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	18.3	9.1	5.9	12th of 56
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	48.5%	64.2%	80.3%	42nd of 56
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	55.6%	77.6%	90.0%	45th of 56
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	70.5%	90.5%	96.2%	46th of 56
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	1.5	1.0	0.6	12th of 56
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	94.9%	97.3%	99.0%	47th of 56
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	99.9%	99.9%	99.9%	31st of 56
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 56
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	67.1%	77.5%	91.6%	49th of 56
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	92.8%	96.3%	98.5%	43rd of 56
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	99.6%	99.9%	99.8%	33rd of 56

How people commute

Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result

86.1%

of the registered voted in the first round

85.8%

voted in the runoff

93,468

registered voters on the roll

6.2%

of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman30.0%41.7%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist70.0%58.3%

RancoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez21.1%19.8%

Jeannette Jara Roman19.2%26.7%

Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.0%1.2%

Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen17.3%13.9%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist30.5%24.0%

Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%

Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.4%12.4%

Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.9%1.3%

RancoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile30.7%30.6%

KCambio por Chile17.3%23.0%

JChile Grande y Unido22.0%21.1%

IPartido de la Gente9.8%12.0%

BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.5%6.9%

DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%

APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%

EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%

GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%

FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%

HPopular—0.2%

Independents outside a pact16.7%0.7%

RancoChileshare of the valid vote

Congress is compared by list, not by candidate: the candidates change at every district line, and the list — the pact — is the same across the country.

Región de Los Ríos renewed its senators in 2021, not in 2025, so Ranco has no Senate result in this election.

5 deputies, by list

J. Chile Grande y Unido2
C. Unidad por Chile2
K. Cambio por Chile1

Elected in district 24, some of which also cover other places.

Every name

District 24 · also covers other communes

Marcos Ilabaca Cerda Partido Socialista de Chile · list C · 33,972 votes
Omar Sabat Guzman Independiente Union Democrata Independiente · list J · 26,742 votes
Matias Fernandez Hartwig Frente Amplio · list C · 26,415 votes
Leandro Kunstmann Collado Partido Republicano de Chile · list K · 23,578 votes
Daniel Valenzuela Salazar Independiente Renovacion Nacional · list J · 15,056 votes

Territories within

4

Commune	Census population	Foreign-born share	Average years of schooling	Income poverty
La Unión	38,907	0.8%	9.5 yrs	22.9%
Futrono	15,635	1.4%	8.7 yrs	19.1%
Lago Ranco	10,527	0.9%	8.5 yrs	27.8%
Río Bueno	33,363	1.0%	9.1 yrs	26.8%
Ranco	98,432	1.0%	9.1 yrs	24.3%

Where it stands out

Average monthly pay

Where the people here are from

Formal employment, 2005–2024

The ten branches that employ most of Ranco

Dependent workers, projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

What Ranco is specialised in

Most over-represented in Ranco

The land and who works it

Population and territory

Population pyramid

Migration

When the migrant population arrived

Education

How far schooling went

The class of 2024

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

By field of study

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

Health

Which health system

What people are hospitalised for

By tumour site

Economy and poverty

Employment by industry

Employment by occupation

Housing and services

House or flat

How people commute

Housing tenure

Home heating fuel

How it voted in 2025

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

Territories within