Lago Ranco — PuroChile

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.

School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%

People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%

People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%

Precarious wall materials3rd of 345 · Chile 0.23%2.70%

Employment rate331st of 345 · Chile 54.4%39.2%

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 208 surveyed

Lives in the commune where they were born

67.4%

100th of 335

Came from another commune of the same region

17.3%

190th of 335

Came from another region

14.3%

200th of 335

Net internal migration

-1,756

-17.3 per 100 residents

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII

The ten branches that employ most of Lago Ranco

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

BranchWorkersShare of total2005–2024Change

01Public administrationState and social services78746.1%+203%02Agriculture and fishingNatural resources23413.7%−46%03Retail and wholesaleTrade and logistics20512.0%+607%04ConstructionIndustry and construction975.7%+471%05EducationState and social services784.6%+239%06Accommodation and foodTrade and logistics714.2%+3,450%07ManufacturingIndustry and construction603.5%+650%08TransportTrade and logistics533.1%+1,667%09Other servicesOther services331.9%+1,550%10Electricity and gasIndustry and construction201.2%+400%

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval4.1% a year observed · 0.6% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval4.3% a year observed · -6.0% projected

What Lago Ranco is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Lago Ranco employs more people in 40 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

40

activities it is specialised in

1,706

formal workers

219/296

by the complexity of what it is specialised in

Each dot is one activity. Filled, Lago Ranco is already specialised in it; hollow, it is not. Size is how many people work in it here.

Across: how much of what tends to sit beside that activity this place already does. Up: how few and how diversified the places that do it are. Two activities are counted as close when the places good at one tend also to be good at the other — that co-occurrence is the whole of it.

The corners are not labelled on purpose. Which one is worth being in depends on what a place wants and can afford, and neither is in the tax register. The dashed lines are this place's own medians; the axes are the same on every commune's page, so two of them can be laid side by side. The named ones are those whose name fits without covering another dot; the rest are a hover away.

Most over-represented in Lago Ranco

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

Activity	Division	Workers here	Times the national share
Elaboración de comidas y platos preparados envasados, rotulados y con información nutricional	Elaboración de otros productos alimenticios	27	36.7×
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción lechera	Ganadería	79	36.1×
Otras actividades de alojamiento para turistas n.c.p.	Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas	5	25.1×
Actividades de residenciales para turistas	Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas	3	24.1×
Generación de energía eléctrica en centrales hidroeléctricas	Generación, transmisión y distribución de energía eléctrica	20	23.3×
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción de carne o como ganado reproductor	Ganadería	40	21.8×
Servicios de transporte de escolares	Otras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre	9	20.5×
Venta al por menor de artículos de papelería y escritorio en comercios especializados	Venta al por menor de productos culturales y recreativos en comercios especializados	26	20.2×
Apicultura	Ganadería	3	19.3×
Construcción de edificios para uso no residencial	Construcción de edificios	62	11.7×
Otras actividades de alojamiento n.c.p.	Otras actividades de alojamiento	14	11.6×
Actividades de la administración pública en general	Administración del estado y aplicación de la política económica y social de la comunidad	787	7.1×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021

111,162

hectares in holdings

78.4%

of them under a named use

3.5%

of the crop land is irrigated

840

holdings with land here

PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

The agricultural census measured 111,162 hectares of holdings in Lago Ranco in the 2020/2021 agricultural year, and this is how it divided them.

Fourteen of the fifteen tiles are categories the census publishes. The fifteenth is not: it is the censused surface less the other fourteen, and what it holds is scrub, barren ground, roads and buildings. Across Chile it is half of everything, because most of the censused surface is Patagonian scrub and northern desert inside very large holdings.

Irrigation is asked of eleven of the uses and not of forest, native woodland, natural pasture or untilled ground — so the 3.5% above is a share of the 5,143 hectares the question applies to, not of the whole.

Of the 840 holdings with land here, 179 are self-consumption plots — under two hectares and with nothing sold in the year. These counts are the census's own for this territory and they are not added to anything: a holding with land in two comunas is counted in both.

VIII Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 2021, INE

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

Lago RancoChile% of each territory's own population · 10,527 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Census population	10,527	98,432	18,480,432	251st of 346
Average age	40.4 yrs	40.0 yrs	38.1 yrs	105th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.	96.0	94.6	79.0	136th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.	6.0/km²	12.1/km²	24.7/km²	288th of 346

See the other 13 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Households	4,090	37,365	6,596,527	242nd of 346
Dwellings	6,248	47,705	7,642,716	225th of 346
People per household	2.57	2.63	2.80	276th of 345
Women	50.8%	51.3%	51.5%	191st of 346
Men per 100 women	96.9	94.8	94.3	156th of 346
Under 15	18.1%	17.7%	17.7%	153rd of 346
65 and over	17.3%	16.7%	14.0%	104th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.	54.8	52.3	46.5	63rd of 346
One-person households	25.3%	23.7%	21.8%	78th of 345
Households with children	31.1%	31.6%	33.2%	234th of 345
Indigenous peoples	51.6%	30.5%	11.4%	26th of 346
Female-headed households	45.9%	48.1%	49.9%	237th of 345
Land area	1,744 km²	8,153 km²	748,041 km²	83rd of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born share	0.9%	1.0%	8.7%	297th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.	67.4%	68.4%	50.5%	100th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.	17.3%	13.2%	23.9%	190th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.	14.3%	17.6%	17.2%	200th of 335

See the other 9 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Foreign-born population	93	955	1,608,650	288th of 346
Average age, foreign-born	39.0 yrs	34.7 yrs	33.5 yrs	27th of 345
Women among foreign-born	53.8%	50.3%	51.7%	67th of 345
Foreign-born of working age	81.7%	81.5%	83.1%	144th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.	32.3%	31.7%	34.4%	236th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.	1.1%	1.2%	10.6%	297th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born	13.8 yrs	12.7 yrs	12.9 yrs	31st of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.	-1,756	-11,262	0	194th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.	-17.3	-11.6	0.0	213th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Average years of schooling	8.5 yrs	9.1 yrs	10.4 yrs	310th of 346
Reached higher education	16.4%	20.5%	31.1%	279th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17	100.0%	99.6%	98.6%	1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.	61.2%	57.3%	55.6%	63rd of 331

See the other 17 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.	102.1%	101.8%	99.8%	142nd of 346
Literacy rate	95.1%	95.9%	97.8%	250th of 346
Reached secondary education	33.9%	36.1%	36.7%	280th of 346
Primary education only	40.3%	35.1%	24.1%	43rd of 346
Never attended school	4.90%	3.75%	3.01%	46th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.	9.7 yrs	10.4 yrs	12.1 yrs	287th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.	9.9 yrs	10.6 yrs	12.1 yrs	299th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.	4.90%	4.06%	2.18%	98th of 345
Households lacking schooling	34.4%	22.3%	15.1%	49th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.	103	1,392	217,565	231st of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.	32.0%	45.0%	33.9%	202nd of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.	0.0%	26.7%	3.1%	114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	54.0%	62.2%	67.2%	255th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	22.2%	18.3%	19.7%	119th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.	23.8%	19.5%	13.1%	82nd of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.	55.6%	64.0%	13.0%	41st of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.	47.6%	50.4%	49.7%	255th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

103left secondary school in 2024

63enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025

61.2%continued immediately

54%of those, to a university

56%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

Lago RancoChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

Lago RancoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Lago Ranco's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

Health

See all →

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Lago Ranco against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Disability prevalence	12.5%	12.2%	10.6%	155th of 346
Public health insurance	97.4%	93.0%	82.6%	29th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.	61.4	94.4	82.5	209th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	79	108	100	208th of 331

See the other 21 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
People with a disability	1,311	11,970	1,950,388	255th of 346
Average age, people with a disability	62.0 yrs	60.1 yrs	56.4 yrs	30th of 346
Disability among 65+	52.4%	49.1%	43.0%	42nd of 346
Difficulty walking	6.31%	5.95%	4.92%	138th of 346
Difficulty seeing	5.33%	5.40%	4.58%	176th of 346
Difficulty hearing	3.00%	2.76%	2.16%	94th of 346
Difficulty concentrating	2.69%	2.73%	2.70%	203rd of 346
Private health insurance	0.4%	4.7%	13.2%	305th of 335
No health coverage	0.77%	1.07%	1.98%	230th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.	83.2%	92.8%	92.1%	301st of 332
Households lacking health access	6.5%	10.3%	6.0%	117th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.	646	9,291	1,523,716	246th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.	20	247	36,698	236th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.	3.10%	2.66%	2.41%	135th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.	5.9 days	6.1 days	6.1 days	227th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.	19.0	25.1	19.9	175th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.	71	110	100	217th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.	38	408	89,723	243rd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.	5.9%	4.4%	5.9%	139th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.	36.1	41.4	48.6	210th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.	65	77	100	224th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivosSitios reservadosHuesosMamahover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.	27.8%	24.3%	17.3%	71st of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.	23.5 UF	23.8 UF	32.0 UF	145th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.	104.0%	96.6%	78.9%	135th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.	85.0	90.8	85.6	132nd of 346

See the other 16 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.	39.2%	47.2%	54.4%	331st of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.	11.6%	9.0%	8.6%	40th of 345
Self-employed	39.6%	35.8%	33.8%	94th of 345
Extreme poverty	11.8%	8.9%	6.9%	64th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.	16.9%	16.3%	17.7%	180th of 335
Unemployment rate	2.8%	7.0%	8.8%	310th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.	CLP 462,885	CLP 526,826	CLP 783,124	262nd of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.	0.522	0.454	0.488	15th of 321
Registered firms	895	8,935	1,582,390	245th of 346
Annual sales	2,312,035 UF	73,988,520 UF	34,347,683,688 UF	255th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.	1,706	23,555	9,699,164	262nd of 346
Sales per firm	2,583 UF	8,281 UF	21,706 UF	234th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.	1.4	1.8	3.9	293rd of 346
Women among employees	54.8%	41.1%	40.6%	16th of 345
Independent contractors	1,029	8,635	3,958,269	237th of 346
Contractors as share of workers	37.6%	26.8%	29.0%	56th of 346

Employment by industry

hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

HouseOther dwelling type% of private dwellings

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Overcrowded dwellings	6.0%	5.2%	5.7%	91st of 345
Internet access	82.5%	86.2%	93.2%	291st of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	11.6	6.5	2.3	26th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	7.3	4.7	1.6	51st of 345

See the other 35 indicators

Indicator	Value	Province	Chile	Rank
Occupied dwellings with residents	4,065	37,086	6,408,172	241st of 346
Critically overcrowded	0.42%	0.28%	0.57%	93rd of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings	4.06%	1.29%	1.13%	36th of 345
Public water network	49.4%	75.7%	92.3%	327th of 345
Electricity access	97.8%	99.0%	99.6%	314th of 345
Detached houses	98.6%	98.3%	78.7%	150th of 345
Apartments	0.0%	0.9%	19.9%	281st of 345
Precarious wall materials	2.70%	0.53%	0.23%	3rd of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings	27.4%	17.3%	11.9%	70th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit	268	1,569	491,904	215th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households	6.6%	4.2%	7.5%	102nd of 345
Renting households	9.0%	13.4%	26.2%	309th of 345
Owner-occupiers	72.7%	67.5%	61.1%	77th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.	91.3%	87.6%	24.4%	43rd of 345
Commute by public transport	20.1%	23.5%	42.1%	242nd of 345
Walks to work	24.0%	20.5%	10.2%	72nd of 345
Households with a computer	33.3%	40.7%	54.9%	299th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	3.5	2.2	1.1	32nd of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	74.2%	84.6%	97.0%	316th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	99.7%	99.8%	99.9%	267th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	34.5%	60.2%	89.4%	310th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	66.7%	83.4%	98.1%	321st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	92.8%	98.6%	99.7%	315th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	47.1	18.3	5.9	44th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	0.0%	48.5%	80.3%	194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	0.0%	55.6%	90.0%	249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.	7.2%	70.5%	96.2%	289th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.	2.0	1.5	0.6	46th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	96.9%	94.9%	99.0%	224th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	99.9%	99.9%	1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	52.8%	67.1%	91.6%	285th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	87.4%	92.8%	98.5%	287th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.	98.2%	99.6%	99.8%	295th of 345

How people commute

Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result

85.4%

of the registered voted in the first round

85.0%

voted in the runoff

10,815

registered voters on the roll

6.5%

of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman28.4%41.7%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist71.6%58.3%

Lago RancoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez17.2%19.8%

Jeannette Jara Roman19.0%26.7%

Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.3%1.2%

Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen17.0%13.9%

Jose Antonio Kast Rist34.5%24.0%

Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%

Evelyn Matthei Fornet9.7%12.4%

Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.8%1.3%

Lago RancoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile26.2%30.6%

KCambio por Chile18.1%23.0%

JChile Grande y Unido26.8%21.1%

IPartido de la Gente9.8%12.0%

BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.9%6.9%

DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%

APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%

EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%

GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%

FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%

HPopular—0.2%

Independents outside a pact15.3%0.7%

Lago RancoChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Lago Ranco across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

Freire0.62Araucanía · 26,164 peopleAlike in Education; apart in Economy.Río Negro0.68Los Lagos · 13,874 peopleAlike in Scale; apart in Economy.Purén0.70Araucanía · 12,184 peopleAlike in Economy; apart in Population structure.Teodoro Schmidt0.75Araucanía · 15,639 peopleAlike in Migration; apart in Housing and services.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts

Loading

Where it stands out

Average monthly pay

Where the people here are from

Formal employment, 2005–2024

The ten branches that employ most of Lago Ranco

Dependent workers, projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

What Lago Ranco is specialised in

Most over-represented in Lago Ranco

The land and who works it

Population and territory

Population pyramid

Migration

When the migrant population arrived

Education

How far schooling went

The class of 2024

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

By field of study

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

Health

Which health system

What people are hospitalised for

By tumour site

Economy and poverty

Employment by industry

Employment by occupation

Housing and services

House or flat

How people commute

Housing tenure

Home heating fuel

How it voted in 2025

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

Sister communes

Inside the commune