Commune · 14103

LancoLanco

Compare Lanco with another place
Census population
16,876
195th of 346
Population density
31.7/km²
167th of 346
Average years of schooling
9.3 yrs
170th of 346
Foreign-born share
0.8%
303rd of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 98.1%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF21.2 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF21.2 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 378 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
62.5%
145th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
15.9%
208th of 335
Came from another region
21.5%
67th of 335
Net internal migration
-1,934
-10.8 per 100 residents
Lancothis commune · 19,808another region3,847 peopleelsewhere in the region2,848 peopleanother region6,164 peopleelsewhere in the region2,465 peopleLancothis commune · 17,874
Lancothis commune · 19,808another region3,847 peopleelsewhere in th…2,848 peopleanother region6,164 peopleelsewhere in th…2,465 peopleLancothis commune · 17,874

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Agriculture and fishing1Agriculture and fishing2Public administration2Public administration6Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▲34Manufacturing4Manufacturing3Construction5Construction▼29Education6Education▲37Transport7Transport8Accommodation and food8Accommodation and food5Other services9Other services▼416Health10Health▲613Information and communications11Information and communications▲211Administrative services12Administrative services▼110Professional services13Professional services▼312Water and waste14Water and waste▼2
2005202411Agriculture and fishing22Public administration63Retail and wholesale▲344Manufacturing35Construction▼296Education▲377Transport88Accommodation and food59Other services▼41610Health▲61311Information and communications▲21112Administrative services▼11013Professional services▼31214Water and waste▼2

The ten branches that employ most of Lanco

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

2 k3 k4 k5 k6 kprojection →5 k2029 · central2005201520242029
2 k3 k4 k5 k6 kprojection →5 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval1.5% a year observed · 6.4% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

02.0 M4.0 M6.0 Mprojection →5.4 M2029 · central2005201520242029
02.0 M4.0 M6.0 Mprojection →5.4 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.4% a year observed · 5.2% projected

What Lanco is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Lanco employs more people in 53 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

53
activities it is specialised in
3,738
formal workers
216/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.93.7Actividades de la administración …Elaboración y conservación de fru…Terminación y acabado de edificiosActividades de organizaciones rel…Actividades de atención en instit…Venta al por menor de artículos d…Extracción de maderaInstalaciones de gasfitería, cale…Venta al por mayor de productos t…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.93.7Extracción de maderaInstalaciones de gasfitería, cale…Venta al por mayor de productos t…Mantenimiento y reparación de veh…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Lanco

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Servicios de transporte de escolaresOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre6971.8×
Otras actividades de servicios de información n.c.p.Otras actividades de servicios de información3065.6×
Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales (explotación mixta)Cultivo de productos agrícolas en combinación con la cría de animales39946.0×
Elaboración y conservación de frutas, legumbres y hortalizasElaboración y conservación de frutas, legumbres y hortalizas20328.1×
Actividades de organizaciones religiosasActividades de otras asociaciones6025.0×
Venta al por mayor de madera en bruto y productos primarios de la elaboración de maderaOtras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada7823.6×
Actividades de atención en instituciones para personas de edad y personas con discapacidad físicaActividades de atención en instituciones para personas de edad y personas con discapacidad5015.4×
Venta al por mayor de combustibles sólidos, líquidos y gaseosos y productos conexosOtras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada4614.8×
Servicios de forestación a cambio de una retribución o por contrataServicios de apoyo a la silvicultura5314.4×
Venta al por menor en comercios especializados de frutas y verduras (verdulerías)Venta al por menor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco en comercios especializados2712.5×
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción de carne o como ganado reproductorGanadería4912.2×
Extracción de maderaExtracción de madera3811.4×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
34,041
hectares in holdings
94.7%
of them under a named use
26.4%
of the crop land is irrigated
527
holdings with land here
Woodland 66%Pasture 17%Annual crops 8.2%Not farmed 7.9%Native woodland34%Forest plantations32%Pasture17%Fodder crops5.3%Cereals2.4%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings5.3%Untilled land2.6%
Woodland 66%Pasture 17%Annu… 8.2%Not f… 7.9%Native woodland34%Forestplantations32%Pasture17%Foddercrops5.3%CerealsScrub,barrenground…5.3%Unt…land
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
LancoChile% of each territory's own population · 16,876 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
16,876
299,79818,480,432195th of 346
Average age
39.4 yrs
38.7 yrs38.1 yrs163rd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
89.0
87.479.0174th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
31.7/km²
29.7/km²24.7/km²167th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
6,432
111,2786,596,527191st of 346
Dwellings
7,784
135,7747,642,716197th of 346
People per household
2.62
2.692.80248th of 345
Women
51.8%
51.7%51.5%60th of 346
Men per 100 women
93.0
93.594.3287th of 346
Under 15
18.1%
17.1%17.7%144th of 346
65 and over
16.1%
15.0%14.0%158th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
52.1
47.246.5131st of 346
One-person households
23.9%
23.2%21.8%116th of 345
Households with children
32.8%
31.4%33.2%183rd of 345
Indigenous peoples
33.3%
22.1%11.4%53rd of 346
Female-headed households
53.5%
50.2%49.9%17th of 345
Land area
532 km²
10,079 km²748,041 km²197th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Lanco23%Arrived since 202077%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Lanco23%77%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
0.8%
2.2%8.7%303rd of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
62.5%
63.0%50.5%145th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
15.9%
11.0%23.9%208th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
21.5%
23.8%17.2%67th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
140
6,5531,608,650263rd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
36.3 yrs
35.0 yrs33.5 yrs67th of 345
Women among foreign-born
54.3%
50.0%51.7%58th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
87.1%
83.0%83.1%13th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
22.9%
27.5%34.4%301st of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
1.1%
2.7%10.6%300th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
13.0 yrs
13.8 yrs12.9 yrs92nd of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-1,934
-53,6710199th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-10.8
-17.10.0193rd of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Lanco20%Higher40%Secondary32%Primary only4.9%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Lanco20%40%Secondary32%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
9.3 yrs
10.1 yrs10.4 yrs170th of 346
Reached higher education
19.6%
28.4%31.1%199th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.2%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
48.6%
56.8%55.6%259th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.9%
100.5%99.8%204th of 346
Literacy rate
96.7%
97.2%97.8%157th of 346
Reached secondary education
40.1%
36.9%36.7%64th of 346
Primary education only
32.0%
26.7%24.1%168th of 346
Never attended school
3.42%
2.96%3.01%200th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
10.7 yrs
11.7 yrs12.1 yrs172nd of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.8 yrs
11.8 yrs12.1 yrs178th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
3.31%
2.80%2.18%184th of 345
Households lacking schooling
24.9%
18.4%15.1%145th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
259
3,803217,565158th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
63.7%
33.6%33.9%50th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
13.9%
7.0%3.1%71st of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
56.3%
69.3%67.2%229th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
19.0%
12.9%19.7%154th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
24.6%
17.9%13.1%77th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
46.0%
16.2%13.0%54th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
52.4%
51.9%49.7%132nd of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

259left secondary school in 2024
126enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
48.6%continued immediately
56%of those, to a university
46%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Tecnico en EnfermeriaEnfermeriaPsicologiaAdministracion GastronomicaDerechoKinesiologiaQuimica y FarmaciaTecnico en Mecanica y Electromovilidad AutomotrizIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria en Construccion
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%Tecnico en EnfermeriaEnfermeriaPsicologiaAdministracion GastronomicaDerechoKinesiologiaQuimica y FarmaciaTecnico en Mecanica y Electromovilidad AutomotrizIngenieria Civil IndustrialIngenieria en Construccion
LancoChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawServicesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesInformation technologyNatural sciencesAgriculture and veterinary
0.0%20.0%40.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawServicesSocial sciencesArts and humanitiesInformation technologyNatural sciencesAgriculture and veterinary
LancoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0100200300400200620152024259126
0100200300400200620152024259126
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Lanco's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Lanco against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Lanco98%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Lanco98%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
14.4%
11.4%10.6%71st of 346
Public health insurance
98.4%
89.8%82.6%10th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
71.5
93.782.5156th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
73
104100234th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
2,427
34,2151,950,388175th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
59.1 yrs
57.5 yrs56.4 yrs125th of 346
Disability among 65+
45.3%
44.3%43.0%179th of 346
Difficulty walking
6.90%
5.36%4.92%89th of 346
Difficulty seeing
7.09%
5.01%4.58%50th of 346
Difficulty hearing
3.20%
2.42%2.16%76th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.90%
2.81%2.70%157th of 346
Private health insurance
0.0%
7.0%13.2%311th of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
1.05%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
95.1%
90.9%92.1%134th of 332
Households lacking health access
5.7%
6.3%6.0%150th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
1,206
28,0771,523,716186th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
28
65436,698209th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
2.32%
2.33%2.41%237th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.7 days
6.1 days6.1 days262nd of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
16.6
21.819.9216th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
84
112100165th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
81
2,00889,723163rd of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
6.7%
7.2%5.9%89th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
48.0
67.048.692nd of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
91
133100100th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Digestive and urinary tract 24%Heart and lungs 24%Injuries, bones and skin 19%Tumours, blood and m… 11%Infections and othe… 9.5%Mind, … 6.9%Pregna… 4.7%Digestivesystem14%Genitourina…system10.0%Circulatorysystem13%Respiratorysystem11%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculoskel…4.7%SkinCancers andtumours8.6%Endo…andmeta…Blood…Ill-defi…symptoms4.5%Contact withhealth…Infectiousand parasiticMental andbehavioural3.5%Nervoussystem3.2%Pregnancyandchildbir…3.9%
Digestive and urinar… 24%Heart and lungs 24%Injuries, bo… 19%Tumours, blood… 11%Infections an… 9.5%Min… 6.9%Pre… 4.7%Digestivesystem14%Genitour…system10.0%Circulatorysystem13%Respirat…system11%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculosk…4.7%Skin2.7%Cancers andtumours8.6%End…andmet…Ill-def…symptoms4.5%Con…withhea…Infe…andpara…Mental andbehaviouralNervoussystemPregna…andchildb…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos33%Mama15%Vías urinarias15%Sitiosreservados15%Genitalesfemeninos8.6%Sangre ysistemalinfático7.4%Víasrespirat…6.2%
Órganos digestivos33%Mama15%Víasurinarias15%Sitiosreservados15%Genitalesfemeninos8.6%Sangre ysistemalinfático7.4%Vías respiratorias6.2%
Órganos digestivosMamaVías urinariasSitios reservadosGenitales femeninosSangre y sistema linfáticohover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
34.1%
23.4%17.3%26th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
21.2 UF
25.8 UF32.0 UF229th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
99.4%
97.1%78.9%172nd of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
80.8
83.385.6157th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
45.5%
50.8%54.4%260th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
11.7%
9.3%8.6%36th of 345
Self-employed
34.3%
34.6%33.8%192nd of 345
Extreme poverty
13.6%
9.3%6.9%45th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
13.7%
14.7%17.7%237th of 335
Unemployment rate
11.6%
10.1%8.8%81st of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 401,689
CLP 620,972CLP 783,124311th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.443
0.4930.488143rd of 321
Registered firms
1,364
24,9731,582,390195th of 346
Annual sales
4,212,835 UF
95,843,692 UF34,347,683,688 UF216th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
3,738
83,6829,699,164208th of 346
Sales per firm
3,089 UF
3,838 UF21,706 UF199th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.7
2.33.9245th of 346
Women among employees
44.2%
43.8%40.6%107th of 345
Independent contractors
1,431
46,3903,958,269190th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
27.7%
35.7%29.0%165th of 346

Employment by industry

Industry and construction 26%Trade and logistics 24%State and social services 24%Natural resources 16%Other … 5.1%Advanc… 4.6%Manufacturing14%Construction9.6%Electrici…Water…Retail andwholesale15%Transport5.5%Accommodationand food4.1%Education12%Health6.2%Publicadministration5.4%Agriculture andfishing15%Domes…work2.8%Otherservi…1.7%Arts…Admi…serv…Profes…servic…Inf…
Industry and construc… 26%Trade and logistics 24%State and social se… 24%Natural resources 16%Other … 5.1%Adva… 4.6%Manufactur…14%Construc…9.6%Electr…Wate…Retail andwholesale15%Transpo…5.5%Accommo…and food4.1%Education12%Health6.2%Publicadminist…5.4%Agriculture andfishing15%Domest…workOtherserv…Adm…ser…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 62%Managers and professiona… 23%Elementary occupations 15%Service and sales21%Craft and trades17%Plant and machineoperators13%Skilledagricultur…7.4%Cleric…support4.4%Professionals12%Technicians9.4%Manag…2.5%Elementary occupations15%
Skilled occupations 62%Managers and professionals 23%Elementary oc… 15%Service andsales21%Craft and trades17%Plant and machineoperators13%Skilledagricul…7.4%Clericalsupport4.4%Professiona…12%Technicians9.4%Elementaryoccupations15%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Lanco100%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Lanco100%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlat% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
4.2%
4.6%5.7%291st of 345
Internet access
85.1%
91.2%93.2%250th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.3
3.12.3251st of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.8
2.71.6249th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
6,364
109,3066,408,172190th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.33%
0.33%0.57%169th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.12%
1.13%1.13%171st of 345
Public water network
75.0%
81.6%92.3%249th of 345
Electricity access
98.9%
99.3%99.6%245th of 345
Detached houses
99.4%
94.4%78.7%65th of 345
Apartments
0.1%
4.7%19.9%191st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.60%
0.33%0.23%31st of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
9.5%
14.7%11.9%249th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
254
5,530491,904227th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
3.9%
5.0%7.5%285th of 345
Renting households
15.1%
21.9%26.2%170th of 345
Owner-occupiers
71.2%
63.5%61.1%108th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
90.3%
72.4%24.4%53rd of 345
Commute by public transport
25.0%
32.2%42.1%179th of 345
Walks to work
19.5%
14.8%10.2%117th of 345
Households with a computer
38.3%
51.4%54.9%246th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.8
1.51.1170th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
87.6%
91.2%97.0%249th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
99.9%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
81.6%
80.2%89.4%135th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
97.7%98.1%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
20.1
6.05.9122nd of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
69.4%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
1.4%
84.9%90.0%242nd of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.4%
97.1%96.2%200th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.1
0.90.6175th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.0%
98.1%99.0%153rd of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
99.9%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
87.0%
80.9%91.6%135th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
97.4%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 35%Public transport 25%On foot or by bicycle 25%Other means 15%Car35%Public transport25%Walking19%BicycleOther15%
Private vehicle 35%Public transport 25%On foot or by bicycle 25%Other means 15%Car35%Public transport25%Walking19%Bicycle5.5%Other15%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 71%Rented 15%Provided rent-f… 9.6%Other 4.1%Owned outright69%Rented, withcontract8.4%Rented, no contract6.7%Provided byfamily7.8%Other arrangement
Owned 71%Rented 15%Provided … 9.6%Owned outright69%Rented,withcontract8.4%Rented,nocontract6.7%Provided byfamily7.8%Otherarran…4.1%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 92%Firewood90%Gas2.4%Paraf…1.6%Elect…2.5%Noheati…
Wood and biomass 92%Firewood90%No…
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
83.5%
of the registered voted in the first round
83.3%
voted in the runoff
17,310
registered voters on the roll
6.8%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman35.7%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist64.3%58.3%
LancoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez22.9%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman23.9%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.0%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen16.0%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist27.6%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.6%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet7.2%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.7%1.3%
LancoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile38.2%30.6%
KCambio por Chile15.4%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido21.2%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente10.7%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.4%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact11.1%0.7%
LancoChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Lanco across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading