Commune · 16206

RánquilRánquil

Compare Ránquil with another place
Census population
6,508
292nd of 346
Population density
26.2/km²
185th of 346
Average years of schooling
8.8 yrs
264th of 346
Foreign-born share
0.6%
320th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 15 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service1st of 345 · Chile 99.7%100.0%
People within 5 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.0%100.0%
People within 15 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 99.9%100.0%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF23.7 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF23.7 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 119 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
50.2%
251st of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
17.0%
194th of 335
Came from another region
32.8%
20th of 335
Net internal migration
-107
-1.7 per 100 residents
Ránquilthis commune · 6,355another region2,049 peopleelsewhere in the region1,060 peopleanother region1,941 peopleelsewhere in the region1,275 peopleRánquilthis commune · 6,248
Ránquilthis commune · 6,355another region2,049 peopleelsewhere in th…1,060 peopleanother region1,941 peopleelsewhere in th…1,275 peopleRánquilthis commune · 6,248

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520244Manufacturing1Manufacturing▲33Agriculture and fishing2Agriculture and fishing▲16Construction3Construction▲37Transport4Transport▲35Retail and wholesale5Retail and wholesale1Administrative services6Administrative services▼58Water and waste7Water and waste▲12Other services8Other services▼6
2005202441Manufacturing▲332Agriculture and fishing▲163Construction▲374Transport▲355Retail and wholesale16Administrative services▼587Water and waste▲128Other services▼6

The ten branches that employ most of Ránquil

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

5007501 k1 k2 kprojection →1 k2029 · central2005201520242029
5007501 k1 k2 kprojection →1 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval3.2% a year observed · -1.0% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

01.0 M2.0 M3.0 M4.0 Mprojection →3.1 M2029 · central2005201520242029
01.0 M2.0 M3.0 M4.0 Mprojection →3.1 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval9.1% a year observed · 4.1% projected

What Ránquil is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Ránquil employs more people in 26 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

26
activities it is specialised in
1,291
formal workers
264/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.13.7Actividades de la administración …Extracción de maderaTerminación y acabado de edificiosVenta al por mayor de carne y pro…Actividades de restaurantes y de …Cultivo de trigoVenta al por menor de artículos d…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-1.13.7Actividades de la administración …Transporte de carga por carreteraExtracción de maderaVenta al por mayor de carne y pro…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Ránquil

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Servicios de corta de madera a cambio de una retribución o por contrataServicios de apoyo a la silvicultura87149.3×
Aserrado y acepilladura de maderaAserrado y acepilladura de madera24997.0×
Extracción de maderaExtracción de madera2622.6×
Venta al por mayor de madera en bruto y productos primarios de la elaboración de maderaOtras actividades de venta al por mayor especializada2017.5×
Reparación de equipo eléctrico (excepto reparación de equipo y enseres domésticos)Reparación de productos elaborados de metal, maquinaria y equipo1212.3×
Actividades de residenciales para turistasActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas110.6×
Servicios de transporte de escolaresOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre39.0×
Venta al por mayor de carne y productos cárnicosVenta al por mayor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco118.8×
Construcción de carreteras y líneas de ferrocarrilConstrucción de carreteras y líneas de ferrocarril946.8×
Servicios de forestación a cambio de una retribución o por contrataServicios de apoyo a la silvicultura86.3×
Actividades de la administración pública en generalAdministración del estado y aplicación de la política económica y social de la comunidad4675.6×
Venta al por menor en comercios especializados de pescado, mariscos y productos conexosVenta al por menor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco en comercios especializados25.4×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
11,709
hectares in holdings
84.5%
of them under a named use
14.0%
of the crop land is irrigated
472
holdings with land here
Woodland 63%Not farmed 26%Orchards and vine… 6.4%Pas… 3.1%Forest plantations53%Nativewoodland9.5%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings15%Untilledland10%Vines5.4%Pasture3.1%Veget…0.7%Cerea…0.6%Fodd…crops
Woodland 63%Not farmed 26%Orchards… 6.4%Forest plantations53%Nativewoodla…9.5%Scrub, barrenground andbuildings15%Untilledland10%Vines5.4%PastureVege…Cere…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
RánquilChile% of each territory's own population · 6,508 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
6,508
56,73418,480,432292nd of 346
Average age
43.8 yrs
42.4 yrs38.1 yrs16th of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
141.5
128.679.018th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
26.2/km²
20.6/km²24.7/km²185th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
2,615
21,8896,596,527291st of 346
Dwellings
3,563
28,8367,642,716288th of 346
People per household
2.49
2.592.80314th of 345
Women
50.9%
51.0%51.5%180th of 346
Men per 100 women
96.6
96.294.3167th of 346
Under 15
16.1%
15.7%17.7%284th of 346
65 and over
22.8%
20.2%14.0%10th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
63.7
56.246.58th of 346
One-person households
27.7%
25.5%21.8%45th of 345
Households with children
27.5%
28.3%33.2%308th of 345
Indigenous peoples
5.1%
3.9%11.4%257th of 346
Female-headed households
45.4%
46.2%49.9%250th of 345
Land area
248 km²
2,756 km²748,041 km²261st of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Ránquil44%Arrived since 202056%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Ránquil44%Arrived since 202056%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
0.6%
0.7%8.7%320th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
50.2%
69.2%50.5%251st of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
17.0%
14.2%23.9%194th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
32.8%
15.9%17.2%20th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
41
4241,608,650317th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
39.0 yrs
34.6 yrs33.5 yrs27th of 345
Women among foreign-born
36.6%
47.4%51.7%343rd of 345
Foreign-born of working age
87.8%
84.9%83.1%10th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
43.9%
43.4%34.4%96th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
0.9%
1.0%10.6%312th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
14.1 yrs
12.8 yrs12.9 yrs16th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-107
-25,7960155th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-1.7
-45.80.0160th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Ránquil18%Higher35%Secondary40%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Ránquil18%35%Secondary40%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
8.8 yrs
8.8 yrs10.4 yrs264th of 346
Reached higher education
17.6%
18.8%31.1%245th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.3%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
54.8%
57.0%55.6%160th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
103.1%
105.7%99.8%99th of 346
Literacy rate
93.9%
93.2%97.8%302nd of 346
Reached secondary education
34.9%
33.2%36.7%260th of 346
Primary education only
39.6%
39.5%24.1%50th of 346
Never attended school
3.91%
4.24%3.01%129th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.8 yrs
9.7 yrs12.1 yrs277th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
10.1 yrs
10.2 yrs12.1 yrs279th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
6.12%
6.81%2.18%42nd of 345
Households lacking schooling
40.9%
34.8%15.1%22nd of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
73
679217,565268th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
46.6%
32.7%33.9%105th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
12.4%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
45.0%
64.3%67.2%307th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
25.0%
18.1%19.7%86th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
30.0%
17.6%13.1%45th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
50.0%
62.8%13.0%49th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
42.5%
52.2%49.7%301st of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

73left secondary school in 2024
40enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
54.8%continued immediately
45%of those, to a university
50%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%5.0%10.0%Ingenieria ComercialIngenieria en Administracion de EmpresasTecnico en Enfermeria
0.0%5.0%10.0%Ingenieria ComercialIngenieria en Administracion de EmpresasTecnico en Enfermeria
RánquilChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Business and lawEngineering and industryHealth and welfareEducationInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesNatural sciencesServices
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Business and lawEngineering and industryHealth and welfareEducationInformation technologyAgriculture and veterinaryArts and humanitiesNatural sciencesServices
RánquilChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

0204060802006201520247340
0204060802006201520247340
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Ránquil's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Ránquil against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Ránquil98%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Ránquil98%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
18.6%
17.5%10.6%5th of 346
Public health insurance
98.0%
94.4%82.6%17th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
57.6
67.582.5229th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
89
100100171st of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
1,213
9,9101,950,388262nd of 346
Average age, people with a disability
61.9 yrs
61.4 yrs56.4 yrs33rd of 346
Disability among 65+
52.3%
51.0%43.0%43rd of 346
Difficulty walking
10.17%
9.56%4.92%3rd of 346
Difficulty seeing
8.68%
7.83%4.58%7th of 346
Difficulty hearing
3.78%
3.72%2.16%17th of 346
Difficulty concentrating
3.96%
3.87%2.70%14th of 346
Private health insurance
1.0%
2.4%13.2%276th of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
2.18%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
94.2%
90.2%92.1%149th of 332
Households lacking health access
5.3%
6.1%6.0%170th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
375
3,8291,523,716276th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
17
15736,698250th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
4.53%
4.10%2.41%31st of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
6.8 days
7.8 days6.1 days139th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
26.1
27.719.969th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
63
75100255th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
29
22189,723264th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
7.7%
5.8%5.9%47th of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
44.6
39.048.6118th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
70
65100197th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Heart and lungs 26%Digestive and urinary tract 21%Injuries, bones and skin 19%Tumours, blood and m… 14%Pregnancy, birth an… 7.2%Mind, n… 6.4%Infecti… 5.6%Circulatorysystem16%Respiratorysystem10%Digestive system14%Genitouri…system7.2%Injuries and poisoning13%Musculoskel…3.5%Skin2.7%Cancers andtumours10%Bloodandimmuni…2.1%Endocr…andmetabo…1.6%Pregnancy and childbirth7.2%Mental andbehavioural3.7%NervoussystemInfectio…andparasiticIll-defin…symptoms
Heart and lungs 26%Digestive and ur… 21%Injuries, bo… 19%Tumour… 14%Pregnancy, … 7.2%Circulatorysystem16%Respirat…system10%Digestive system14%Genitourinary system7.2%Injuries andpoisoning13%Musculos…3.5%Skin2.7%Cancersandtumours10%Bloodandimmuni…Endo…andmeta…Pregnancy andchildbirthMentalandbehavio…NervoussystemInfec…and…Ill-de…Cont…with…
Pregnancy, birth and newbornshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Sangre y sistema linfático31%Órganos digestivos24%Sitios reservados24%Genitales femeninos21%
Sangre y sistemalinfático31%Órganosdigestivos24%Sitios reservados24%Genitalesfemeninos21%
Sangre y sistema linfáticoÓrganos digestivosSitios reservadosGenitales femeninoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
28.8%
26.4%17.3%60th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
23.7 UF
21.9 UF32.0 UF135th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
114.9%
115.0%78.9%51st of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
71.9
71.385.6212th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
41.6%
44.1%54.4%311th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
8.5%
6.9%8.6%180th of 345
Self-employed
36.1%
34.1%33.8%147th of 345
Extreme poverty
12.8%
11.7%6.9%49th of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
28.9%
21.6%17.7%33rd of 335
Unemployment rate
4.3%
8.1%8.8%297th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 496,540
CLP 507,910CLP 783,124212th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.451
0.4800.488117th of 321
Registered firms
468
4,0461,582,390301st of 346
Annual sales
2,543,659 UF
14,584,104 UF34,347,683,688 UF248th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
1,293
12,6769,699,164285th of 346
Sales per firm
5,435 UF
3,605 UF21,706 UF111th of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.2
2.33.9149th of 346
Women among employees
37.6%
39.3%40.6%231st of 345
Independent contractors
422
3,7533,958,269316th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
24.6%
22.8%29.0%215th of 346

Employment by industry

Industry and construction 27%State and social services 23%Trade and logistics 22%Natural resources 18%Other … 5.7%Advanc… 5.0%Manufacturing14%Construction9.8%Water…Electri…Education9.7%Health6.6%Publicadministration6.5%Retail andwholesale11%Transport6.1%Accommodation andfoodAgriculture andfishing17%Domestic work3.5%OtherservicesArtsand…Admini…servic…3.2%Pro…ser…
Industry and construct… 27%State and social … 23%Trade and logis… 22%Natural reso… 18%Manufacturi…14%Construct…9.8%Waterand…Elect…and…Education9.7%Health6.6%Public administrationRetail andwholesale11%Transport6.1%Accomm…andfood4.6%Agricultureand fishing17%DomesticworkOther…Admin…servi…3.2%
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 59%Managers and professionals 22%Elementary occupations 19%Service and sales17%Craft and trades15%Plant andmachineoperators14%Skilledagricultural8.3%Clerical support4.5%Profession…11%Technicians9.0%ManagersElementary occupations19%
Skilled occupations 59%Managers and professi… 22%Elementary occupat… 19%Service andsales17%Craft and trades15%Plant and machineoperators14%Skilledagricult…8.3%Clericalsupport4.5%Profession…11%Technicians9.0%Elementaryoccupations19%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Ránquil99%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Ránquil99%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
3.6%
4.2%5.7%318th of 345
Internet access
84.1%
80.7%93.2%268th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.3
4.02.3146th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.6
3.41.6159th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
2,586
21,6356,408,172291st of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.27%
0.25%0.57%241st of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.93%
1.28%1.13%75th of 345
Public water network
64.8%
64.3%92.3%288th of 345
Electricity access
99.2%
99.1%99.6%207th of 345
Detached houses
98.7%
99.1%78.7%141st of 345
Apartments
0.0%
0.2%19.9%281st of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.40%
0.21%0.23%76th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
21.7%
22.2%11.9%105th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
118
892491,904300th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.5%
4.1%7.5%241st of 345
Renting households
7.6%
11.8%26.2%331st of 345
Owner-occupiers
74.2%
72.3%61.1%53rd of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
78.5%
81.3%24.4%114th of 345
Commute by public transport
21.2%
19.4%42.1%225th of 345
Walks to work
21.2%
24.0%10.2%94th of 345
Households with a computer
32.4%
35.3%54.9%305th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.4
2.21.186th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
83.4%
86.4%97.0%276th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
62.2%
65.7%89.4%230th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
97.3%
97.3%98.1%181st of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%99.7%1st of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
34.0
32.75.970th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
0.0%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
0.0%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
9.7%
38.2%96.2%288th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
1.1
1.20.6176th of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
98.4%99.0%1st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.9%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
65.8%
71.6%91.6%231st of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
97.3%98.5%1st of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%99.8%1st of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 40%On foot or by bicyc… 24%Public transport 21%Other means 15%Car39%Walking21%BicyclePublic transport21%Other15%
Private vehicle 40%On foot or b… 24%Public transport 21%Other means 15%Car39%Walking21%Public transport21%Other15%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 74%Provided rent… 13%Rented 7.6%Other 5.4%Owned outright73%Provided byfamily11%Rented,withcontract3.9%Rented,nocontract3.7%Other arrangement5.4%
Owned 74%Provided rent-free 13%Rented 7.6%Owned outright73%Provided by family11%Rente…withcontr…3.9%Rente…nocontr…3.7%Otherarrange…5.4%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 80%Fossil fuels 11%Electricity 5.3%No heating 3.3%Firewood79%Gas8.9%ParaffinElectricity5.3%No heating3.3%
Wood and biomass 80%Fossil fuels 11%Elect… 5.3%Firewood79%Gas8.9%Para…Electricity5.3%Noheating
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
90.2%
of the registered voted in the first round
90.4%
voted in the runoff
6,042
registered voters on the roll
5.6%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman28.2%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist71.8%58.3%
RánquilChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez21.6%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman18.7%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.0%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen14.7%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist32.9%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.4%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet10.4%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.4%1.3%
RánquilChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile24.2%30.6%
KCambio por Chile22.5%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido31.4%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente7.7%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas1.4%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista6.3%2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde3.3%0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile2.0%0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.2%0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
RánquilChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Ránquil across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading