Commune · 13203

San José de MaipoSan José de Maipo

Compare San José de Maipo with another place
Census population
17,441
189th of 346
Population density
3.5/km²
298th of 346
Average years of schooling
10.6 yrs
43rd of 346
Foreign-born share
4.7%
109th of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
School attendance, ages 6-17326th of 333 · Chile 98.6%92.2%
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio10th of 331 · Chile 100156
Gini coefficient12th of 321 · Chile 0.4880.527
Continues to higher education318th of 331 · Chile 55.6%38.5%
Unemployment rate317th of 335 · Chile 8.8%2.2%
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents20th of 331 · Chile 19.934.4
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF26.2 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF26.2 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 180 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
70.8%
68th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
16.6%
196th of 335
Came from another region
11.6%
260th of 335
Net internal migration
+244
+1.2 per 100 residents
San José de Maipothis commune · 19,139elsewhere in the region3,253 peopleanother region2,263 peopleabroad208 peopleelsewhere in the region4,180 peopleanother region1,092 peopleSan José de Maipothis commune · 19,591
San José de Mai…this commune · 19,139elsewhere in th…3,253 peopleanother region2,263 peopleabroad208 peopleelsewhere in th…4,180 peopleanother region1,092 peopleSan José de Mai…this commune · 19,591

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
2005202416Health1Health▲153Accommodation and food2Accommodation and food▲12Retail and wholesale3Retail and wholesale▼110Construction4Construction▲69Education5Education▲46Public administration6Public administration4Transport7Transport▼31Other services8Other services▼78Manufacturing9Manufacturing▼112Administrative services10Administrative services▲27Agriculture and fishing11Agriculture and fishing▼411Professional services12Professional services▼15Mining13Mining▼8
20052024161Health▲1532Accommodation and food▲123Retail and wholesale▼1104Construction▲695Education▲466Public administration47Transport▼318Other services▼789Manufacturing▼11210Administrative services▲2711Agriculture and fishing▼41112Professional services▼1513Mining▼8

The ten branches that employ most of San José de Maipo

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

02 k4 k6 k8 kprojection →6 k2029 · central2005201520242029
02 k4 k6 k8 kprojection →6 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.0% a year observed · 7.5% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

05.0 M10 M15 M20 Mprojection →13 M2029 · central2005201520242029
05.0 M10 M15 M20 Mprojection →13 M2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval14.0% a year observed · 5.5% projected

What San José de Maipo is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, San José de Maipo employs more people in 56 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

56
activities it is specialised in
3,918
formal workers
104/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Actividades de hospitales y clíni…Actividades de restaurantes y de …Actividades de centros de salud m…Venta al por menor en comercios d…Terminación y acabado de edificiosServicios de publicidad prestados…Actividades de paisajismo, servic…Otros tipos de enseñanza n.c.p.Actividades de agencias de viajesHow much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.83.7Actividades de hospitales y clíni…Actividades de restaurantes y de …Enseñanza primaria, secundaria ci…Servicios de publicidad prestados…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in San José de Maipo

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Cultivo de plantas con las que se preparan bebidas (incluye el cultivo de café, té y mate)Cultivo de plantas perennes2578.1×
Actividades de hospitales y clínicas públicasActividades de hospitales públicos y privados80255.8×
Otras actividades de alojamiento para turistas n.c.p.Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas1839.3×
Actividades de centros de salud municipalizados (servicios de salud pública)Actividades de médicos y odontólogos49129.0×
Otras actividades de alojamiento n.c.p.Otras actividades de alojamiento7527.1×
Actividades de residenciales para turistasActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas621.0×
Extracción de piedra, arena y arcillaExtracción de piedra, arena y arcilla4114.2×
Elaboración de té, café, mate e infusiones de hierbasElaboración de otros productos alimenticios2712.1×
Servicios de transporte a turistasOtras actividades de transporte por vía terrestre79.7×
Actividades de hotelesActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas2659.6×
Asesoría y gestión en la compra o venta de pequeñas y medianas empresasOtras actividades profesionales, científicas y técnicas n.c.p.27.5×
Suministro de comidas por encargo (servicios de banquetería)Suministro de comidas por encargo y otras actividades de servicio de comidas177.1×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
430,878
hectares in holdings
16.5%
of them under a named use
96.8%
of the crop land is irrigated
171
holdings with land here
Not farmed 85%Pasture 12%Woodland 2.9%Scrub, barren ground and buildings84%Pasture12%Native woodland2.9%
Not farmed 85%Pasture 12%Scrub, barren ground and buildings84%PastureNative…
Pasturehover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
San José de MaipoChile% of each territory's own population · 17,441 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
17,441
614,58718,480,432189th of 346
Average age
39.6 yrs
37.1 yrs38.1 yrs152nd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
94.2
65.179.0146th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
3.5/km²
111.4/km²24.7/km²298th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
6,368
198,4066,596,527193rd of 346
Dwellings
8,027
208,5907,642,716190th of 346
People per household
2.74
3.102.80181st of 345
Women
50.3%
51.7%51.5%250th of 346
Men per 100 women
98.9
93.594.397th of 346
Under 15
16.8%
18.3%17.7%248th of 346
65 and over
15.8%
11.9%14.0%174th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
48.5
43.446.5236th of 346
One-person households
24.3%
15.2%21.8%103rd of 345
Households with children
31.5%
37.5%33.2%225th of 345
Indigenous peoples
6.3%
8.9%11.4%213th of 346
Female-headed households
48.1%
51.3%49.9%170th of 345
Land area
4,985 km²
5,519 km²748,041 km²36th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

San José de Maipo40%Arrived since 202060%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
San José de Maipo40%Arrived since 202060%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
4.7%
5.1%8.7%109th of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
70.8%
42.5%50.5%68th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
16.6%
39.5%23.9%196th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
11.6%
13.9%17.2%260th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
823
31,2201,608,650136th of 346
Average age, foreign-born
35.5 yrs
34.1 yrs33.5 yrs85th of 345
Women among foreign-born
50.4%
51.5%51.7%195th of 345
Foreign-born of working age
80.8%
83.2%83.1%186th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
39.6%
30.7%34.4%150th of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
5.7%
6.1%10.6%109th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.8 yrs
12.6 yrs12.9 yrs120th of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
244
233,3690142nd of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
1.2
32.60.0149th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

San José de Maipo34%Higher37%Secondary22%Primary only5.1%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
San José de Maipo34%Higher37%Secondary22%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
10.6 yrs
10.4 yrs10.4 yrs43rd of 346
Reached higher education
34.0%
31.3%31.1%40th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
92.2%
98.8%98.6%326th of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
38.5%
52.7%55.6%318th of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
101.6%
99.4%99.8%184th of 346
Literacy rate
98.0%
98.5%97.8%84th of 346
Reached secondary education
36.5%
38.9%36.7%197th of 346
Primary education only
22.0%
22.2%24.1%300th of 346
Never attended school
2.35%
2.62%3.01%321st of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
12.3 yrs
12.3 yrs12.1 yrs47th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
12.5 yrs
12.2 yrs12.1 yrs41st of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
2.00%
1.47%2.18%257th of 345
Households lacking schooling
13.3%
15.2%15.1%275th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
122
6,733217,565218th of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
27.9%
29.8%33.9%220th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
7.1%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
66.0%
61.6%67.2%132nd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
21.3%
28.4%19.7%129th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
12.8%
9.9%13.1%204th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
2.1%
1.3%13.0%266th of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
57.4%
49.2%49.7%55th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

122left secondary school in 2024
47enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
38.5%continued immediately
66%of those, to a university
2%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Analista ProgramadorDerechoEnfermeriaIngenieria Civil en Computacion Mencion InformaticaTrabajo Social
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Analista ProgramadorDerechoEnfermeriaIngenieria Civil en Computacion Mencion InformaticaTrabajo Social
San José de MaipoChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Health and welfareInformation technologyEngineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawSocial sciencesServicesArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
0.0%20.0%40.0%Health and welfareInformation technologyEngineering and industryEducationBusiness and lawSocial sciencesServicesArts and humanitiesNatural sciences
San José de MaipoChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

05010015020020062015202412247
05010015020020062015202412247
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort San José de Maipo's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold San José de Maipo against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

San José de Maipo78%Fonasa15%IsapreChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
San José de Maipo78%Fonasa15%Chile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreNo coverOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
10.3%
10.2%10.6%257th of 346
Public health insurance
78.4%
84.3%82.6%307th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
91.3
87.482.554th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
156
13310010th of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
1,792
62,7191,950,388219th of 346
Average age, people with a disability
58.1 yrs
53.1 yrs56.4 yrs164th of 346
Disability among 65+
45.4%
36.2%43.0%178th of 346
Difficulty walking
4.68%
4.47%4.92%252nd of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.54%
4.29%4.58%252nd of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.25%
1.91%2.16%231st of 346
Difficulty concentrating
2.44%
2.86%2.70%256th of 346
Private health insurance
14.6%
12.4%13.2%37th of 335
No health coverage
4.21%
1.48%1.98%38th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
96.3%
92.9%92.1%107th of 332
Households lacking health access
5.4%
6.9%6.0%167th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
1,592
53,7031,523,716160th of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
60
1,37136,698136th of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
3.77%
2.55%2.41%66th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
7.9 days
7.8 days6.1 days57th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
34.4
22.319.920th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
108
11010058th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
62
2,51489,723201st of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
3.9%
4.7%5.9%292nd of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
35.5
40.948.6213th of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
68
88100212th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Heart and lungs 30%Digestive and urinary tract 21%Injuries, bone… 13%Pregnancy,… 11%Infecti… 9.9%Tumours, blood … 9.6%Mind, nerves an… 5.1%Respiratory system19%Circulatorysystem11%Digestive system11%Genitourinarysystem10%Injuries andpoisoning7.7%Musculoskele…3.9%SkinPregnancyandchildbirth10%Contact withhealthservicesInfectiousand parasiticIll-definedsymptomsCancersandtumours5.6%Endocri…andmetabol…3.3%Mental andbehaviouralNervo…system
Heart and lungs 30%Digestive and u… 21%Injuri… 13%Pregnancy, birth… 11%Infections and … 9.9%Tumours… 9.6%Mind, n… 5.1%Respiratorysystem19%Circulat…system11%Digestive system11%Genitourinarysystem10%Injuriesandpoisoning7.7%Musculo…3.9%Pregnancy andchildbirth10%Conta…withhealt…Infec…andparas…Ill-d…sympt…2.5%Cancersandtumours5.6%Endoc…andmetab…3.3%Mentaland…Ner…sys…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos31%Sangre y sistema linfático16%Genitalesfemeninos15%Vías urinarias11%Sitiosreservados11%Mama8.1%Genitales masculinos8.1%
Órganos digestivos31%Sangre ysistemalinfático16%Genitales femeninos15%Vías urinarias11%Sitiosreservados11%Mama8.1%Genitales masculinos8.1%
Órganos digestivosSangre y sistema linfáticoGenitales femeninosVías urinariasSitios reservadosMamahover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
24.6%
14.2%17.3%103rd of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
26.2 UF
26.7 UF32.0 UF88th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
88.8%
103.9%78.9%260th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
81.0
54.385.6156th of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
56.7%
56.8%54.4%70th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
7.5%
9.0%8.6%228th of 345
Self-employed
40.0%
33.2%33.8%88th of 345
Extreme poverty
8.1%
6.3%6.9%162nd of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
18.0%
21.2%17.7%162nd of 335
Unemployment rate
2.2%
9.2%8.8%317th of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 798,888
CLP 728,662CLP 783,12440th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.527
0.4240.48812th of 321
Registered firms
1,412
33,3721,582,390190th of 346
Annual sales
10,168,428 UF
123,487,892 UF34,347,683,688 UF135th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
3,918
80,5959,699,164205th of 346
Sales per firm
7,201 UF
3,700 UF21,706 UF81st of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
2.1
1.73.9178th of 346
Women among employees
52.7%
45.4%40.6%22nd of 345
Independent contractors
3,012
41,1263,958,269124th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
43.5%
33.8%29.0%33rd of 346

Employment by industry

Trade and logistics 28%State and social services 25%Industry and construction 17%Advanced services 14%Natural resources 8.1%Accommodationand food12%Retail andwholesale11%Transport4.8%Health12%Education8.6%PublicadministrationConstruction9.2%Manufacturing5.5%Electric…and gasWaterand…Administ…services5.5%Professionalservices4.3%Infor…andcommu…Financeand…Real…Mining5.7%Agricu…andfishing2.4%Arts andenterta…2.9%Domesticwork2.9%Otherservices2.1%
Trade and logistics 28%State and social s… 25%Industry and… 17%Advanced… 14%Natural re… 8.1%Other serv… 8.0%Accommodation andfood12%Retail andwholesale11%Tra…Health12%Education8.6%Publicadmin…4.4%Construction9.2%Manufactur…5.5%Elect…and…Water…Administrati…services5.5%Profes…servic…4.3%Infor…andcommu…Mining5.7%Agr…andfis…Artsandenter…2.9%Dome…workOth…ser…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 52%Managers and professionals 35%Elementary occupations 13%Service and sales22%Craft andtrades13%Plant and machineoperators9.1%Clericalsupport5.2%Skilledagricul…3.4%Professionals17%Technicians11%Managers6.1%Elementary occupations13%
Skilled occupations 52%Managers and professionals 35%Element… 13%Service andsales22%Craft andtrades13%Plant andmachineoperators9.1%Clericalsupport5.2%Skilledagricu…3.4%Professionals17%Technicians11%Managers6.1%Elementaryoccupations13%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

San José de Maipo99%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
San José de Maipo99%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
5.3%
5.2%5.7%165th of 345
Internet access
94.5%
95.8%93.2%60th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
7.0
1.72.368th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
5.3
0.71.684th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
6,212
193,1376,408,172194th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.58%
0.34%0.57%53rd of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
2.00%
0.78%1.13%71st of 345
Public water network
74.0%
97.7%92.3%258th of 345
Electricity access
99.3%
99.9%99.6%187th of 345
Detached houses
98.7%
89.9%78.7%137th of 345
Apartments
0.2%
9.3%19.9%165th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.60%
0.21%0.23%31st of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
15.6%
3.0%11.9%161st of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
410
13,485491,904164th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
6.4%
6.8%7.5%107th of 345
Renting households
18.0%
18.5%26.2%126th of 345
Owner-occupiers
56.3%
72.4%61.1%294th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
43.1%
3.7%24.4%194th of 345
Commute by public transport
30.4%
56.3%42.1%113th of 345
Walks to work
18.3%
5.7%10.2%135th of 345
Households with a computer
56.6%
60.1%54.9%47th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.6
0.91.128th of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
67.6%
99.0%97.0%325th of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
98.8%
100.0%99.9%297th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.9%
100.0%100.0%304th of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
42.0%
95.2%89.4%294th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
90.1%
99.7%98.1%270th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
100.0%99.7%274th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
6.9
1.85.9194th of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
42.0%
95.8%80.3%161st of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
90.1%
99.7%90.0%148th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
100.0%96.2%181st of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
2.0
0.40.642nd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
84.2%
99.4%99.0%321st of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.5%
100.0%99.9%296th of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.9%
100.0%100.0%312th of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
56.4%
98.5%91.6%272nd of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
90.1%
99.7%98.5%280th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.4%
100.0%99.8%275th of 345

How people commute

Private vehicle 43%Public transport 30%On foot or by bicycle 19%Oth… 7.0%Car42%Public transport30%Walking18%Other6.8%
Private vehicle 43%Public transport 30%On foot or by bicycle 19%Other… 7.0%Car42%Public transport30%Walking18%Other6.8%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 56%Provided rent-free 19%Rented 18%Owned outright50%Owned, still payingProvided byfamily14%Providedbyemployer5.4%Rented, withcontract12%Rented, no contract6.4%Otherarran…6.2%
Owned 56%Provided rent-free 19%Rented 18%Owned outright50%Owne…stillpayi…Provided byfamily14%Provi…byemplo…5.4%Rented,withcontract12%Rente…nocontr…6.4%Otherarran…6.2%
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 44%Fossil fuels 41%Electricity 11%No heati… 3.5%Firewood43%Gas28%Paraffin13%Electricity11%No heating3.5%
Wood and biomass 44%Fossil fuels 41%Electricity 11%No h… 3.5%Firewood43%Gas28%Paraffin13%ElectricityNo heating
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
87.6%
of the registered voted in the first round
87.6%
voted in the runoff
16,197
registered voters on the roll
6.6%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman51.6%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist48.4%58.3%
San José de MaipoChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez14.7%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman36.2%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio1.5%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen13.5%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist19.1%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.7%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet12.7%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul1.6%1.3%
San José de MaipoChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile18.6%30.6%
KCambio por Chile20.5%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido12.8%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente20.4%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas21.5%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista4.5%2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde—0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile—0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular1.7%0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
San José de MaipoChileshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble San José de Maipo across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading