Commune · 09205

LonquimayLonquimay

Compare Lonquimay with another place
Census population
10,247
252nd of 346
Population density
2.6/km²
304th of 346
Average years of schooling
8.2 yrs
332nd of 346
Foreign-born share
1.0%
282nd of 346

Where it stands out

Indicators with the most extreme rank among territories at its level.
Households heating with wood1st of 345 · Chile 24.4%97.8%
Unemployment rate1st of 335 · Chile 8.8%38.4%
School attendance, ages 6-171st of 333 · Chile 98.6%100.0%
People within 30 km of any health facility1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
People within 30 km of a school in operation1st of 345 · Chile 100.0%100.0%
Employment rate340th of 345 · Chile 54.4%36.5%
Loading
Population density by commune
Trend 2005–2024

Average monthly pay

01020304020052015202432.0 UF25.7 UF
01020304020052015202432.0 UF25.7 UF
In UF, Chile's inflation-indexed unit, so the twenty years are comparable without deflating. Grey is the country.

Where the people here are from

Casen 2024 · 218 surveyed
Lives in the commune where they were born
83.1%
9th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region
12.1%
256th of 335
Came from another region
4.5%
329th of 335
Net internal migration
-3,969
-35.8 per 100 residents
Lonquimaythis commune · 15,033elsewhere in the region1,345 peopleanother region498 peopleabroad26 peopleanother region3,628 peopleelsewhere in the region2,184 peopleLonquimaythis commune · 11,090
Lonquimaythis commune · 15,033elsewhere in th…1,345 peopleanother region498 peopleabroad26 peopleanother region3,628 peopleelsewhere in th…2,184 peopleLonquimaythis commune · 11,090

Formal employment, 2005–2024

2005–2024 · Source SII
200520241Public administration1Public administration4Retail and wholesale2Retail and wholesale▲22Agriculture and fishing3Agriculture and fishing▼17Accommodation and food4Accommodation and food▲33Construction5Construction▼25Manufacturing6Manufacturing▼18Information and communications7Information and communications▲16Water and waste8Water and waste▼29Professional services9Professional services10Other services10Other services
2005202411Public administration42Retail and wholesale▲223Agriculture and fishing▼174Accommodation and food▲335Construction▼256Manufacturing▼187Information and communications▲168Water and waste▼299Professional services1010Other services

The ten branches that employ most of Lonquimay

Ranked by headcount in the latest year; the line is each branch's own twenty-year shape, on its own scale.

Dependent workers, projected

Prophet, fitted on the twenty observed years. A projection is not a figure of PuroChile.

05001 k2 k2 kprojection →2 k2029 · central2005201520242029
05001 k2 k2 kprojection →2 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.6% a year observed · 5.9% projected

Annual sales in UF, projected

UF is indexed to inflation, so this is a projection in real terms.

0500 k1.0 M1.5 Mprojection →915 k2029 · central2005201520242029
0500 k1.0 M1.5 Mprojection →915 k2029 · central2005201520242029
observed 2005–2024central projection80% interval6.6% a year observed · 4.6% projected

What Lonquimay is specialised in

2024 · SII

Of the 672 activities the tax register files firms under, Lonquimay employs more people in 37 of them than Chile does, proportionally. That comparison is Balassa's revealed comparative advantage: this place's share of an activity, over the country's share of it. Above one, the activity is over-represented here.

37
activities it is specialised in
1,193
formal workers
185/296
by the complexity of what it is specialised in
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.93.7Actividades de la administración …Actividades de restaurantes y de …Venta al por menor de artículos d…Elaboración de productos de panad…Venta de partes, piezas y accesor…Actividades de servicios vinculad…Elaboración de bebidas malteadas …Extracción de maderaGestión de salas de pool; gestión…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity
0%20%40%60%-2.5-0.93.7Actividades de la administración …Actividades de restaurantes y de …Elaboración de productos de panad…Otras actividades de telecomunica…How much of what surrounds the activity is already hereComplexity of the activity

Most over-represented in Lonquimay

Ranked by how many times the national share this place reaches. The division each activity belongs to is a page of its own.

ActivityDivisionWorkers hereTimes the national share
Actividades de residenciales para turistasActividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas9103.3×
Cría de ganado bovino para la producción de carne o como ganado reproductorGanadería3426.4×
Otras actividades de alojamiento para turistas n.c.p.Actividades de alojamiento para estancias cortas214.4×
Elaboración de bebidas malteadas y de maltaElaboración de bebidas alcohólicas y no alcohólicas412.6×
Actividades de la administración pública en generalAdministración del estado y aplicación de la política económica y social de la comunidad7639.9×
Gestión de salas de pool; gestión (explotación) de juegos electrónicosOtras actividades de esparcimiento y recreativas39.8×
Venta al por menor de aparatos eléctricos, textiles para el hogar y otros enseres domésticos n.c.p.Venta al por menor de otros enseres domésticos en comercios especializados189.6×
Actividades de residenciales para estudiantes y trabajadoresOtras actividades de alojamiento38.2×
Fabricación de gas; distribución de combustibles gaseosos por tubería, excepto regasificación de GNLFabricación de gas; distribución de combustibles gaseosos por tuberías35.4×
Venta al por menor en comercios de alimentos, bebidas o tabaco (supermercados e hipermercados)Venta al por menor en comercios no especializados745.2×
Servicio notarialActividades jurídicas34.4×
Venta al por menor en comercios especializados de frutas y verduras (verdulerías)Venta al por menor de alimentos, bebidas y tabaco en comercios especializados34.4×

The register files a firm at its tax address, so an activity can be over-represented here because the work happens here or because the head office does. Both are real facts about a place and they are not the same fact, and nothing in the register tells them apart: the communes where large firms keep their registered office carry activities that are physically elsewhere in Chile.

Revealed comparative advantage (Balassa, 1965) and the space of activities (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási and Hausmann, 2007), computed on formal employment because that is what a Chilean commune has. Built from the 500-worker activities and the communes above 1,000 formal workers; the floors are on /datos with everything else.

The land and who works it

Agricultural census · INE · 2020/2021
189,937
hectares in holdings
68.1%
of them under a named use
84.0%
of the crop land is irrigated
1,111
holdings with land here
Woodland 51%Not farmed 34%Pasture 15%Native woodland50%Scrub, barren ground and buildings32%Pasture15%
Woodland 51%Not farmed 34%Pasture 15%Native woodland50%Scrub, barren ground andbuildings32%Pasture15%
PastureOrchards and vineyardshover a tile for its count; click a group to open itFive families of land use, grouped by PuroChile from the fourteen categories the census publishes. The fifteenth tile is not a category: it is the censused surface less the fourteen.

Population and territory

See all →

Population pyramid

MenWomen001122334455%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
MenWomen00224466%0 to 45 to 910 to 1415 to 1920 to 2425 to 2930 to 3435 to 3940 to 4445 to 4950 to 5455 to 5960 to 6465 to 6970 to 7475 to 7980 to 8485 and over
LonquimayChile% of each territory's own population · 10,247 people counted herehover a cohort for its countsCenso de Población y Vivienda 2024, INE (cuadro D1)
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Census population
10,247
206,64618,480,432252nd of 346
Average age
38.3 yrs
39.4 yrs38.1 yrs233rd of 346
Ageing index · People aged 65 or over per 100 under 15.
76.5
89.979.0239th of 345
Population density · Inhabitants per square kilometre, over the area of the census cartography.
2.6/km²
15.4/km²24.7/km²304th of 346
See the other 13 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Households
3,763
75,5936,596,527256th of 346
Dwellings
5,662
92,1817,642,716238th of 346
People per household
2.72
2.732.80188th of 345
Women
50.0%
51.8%51.5%278th of 346
Men per 100 women
100.1
92.994.369th of 346
Under 15
20.2%
18.5%17.7%35th of 346
65 and over
15.5%
16.6%14.0%190th of 346
Dependency ratio · Population outside working age per 100 of working age.
55.6
54.046.555th of 346
One-person households
24.6%
21.8%21.8%97th of 345
Households with children
34.8%
34.1%33.2%111th of 345
Indigenous peoples
56.9%
26.1%11.4%21st of 346
Female-headed households
44.6%
50.9%49.9%268th of 345
Land area
3,929 km²
13,432 km²748,041 km²46th of 346

Migration

See all →

When the migrant population arrived

Lonquimay19%Arrived since 202081%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Lonquimay19%81%Arrived before 2020Chile34%Arrived since 202066%Arrived before 2020
Arrived since 2020Arrived before 2020% of the foreign-born population
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born share
1.0%
1.0%8.7%282nd of 346
Lives in the commune where they were born · Casen 2024 asks in which comuna each person's mother lived when they were born. It is lifetime migration, not last year's, and it measures origin, not moves: someone born here who left and came back counts as living where they were born.
83.1%
72.8%50.5%9th of 335
Came from another commune of the same region · Of those who live here, the ones born in another comuna of this same region. It is the short move: within the metropolitan area, the valley or the neighbouring province.
12.1%
12.8%23.9%256th of 335
Came from another region · Of those who live here, the ones born in a comuna of another region.
4.5%
13.8%17.2%329th of 335
See the other 9 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Foreign-born population
103
2,1471,608,650282nd of 346
Average age, foreign-born
37.1 yrs
34.3 yrs33.5 yrs55th of 345
Women among foreign-born
48.5%
51.4%51.7%271st of 345
Foreign-born of working age
84.5%
82.1%83.1%45th of 345
Arrived since 2020 · Share of the migrant population that arrived in the country in 2020 or later.
19.4%
29.4%34.4%321st of 345
Foreign-born share of working-age population · Foreign-born people aged 15 to 64, over everyone aged 15 to 64 in the comuna.
1.3%
1.3%10.6%278th of 346
Average schooling, foreign-born
12.2 yrs
13.1 yrs12.9 yrs191st of 345
Net internal migration · People who arrived from another comuna minus people born here who live in another comuna. It is a lifetime balance, not a year's. Chile adds to zero by construction: nobody leaves the country in this count.
-3,969
-88,1470237th of 335
Net internal migration per 100 residents · The balance above, over the population living in the territory.
-35.8
-41.00.0269th of 335

Education

See all →

How far schooling went

Lonquimay14%Higher33%Secondary41%Primary only6.4%5.0%Chile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only5.0%
Lonquimay33%Secondary41%Primary onlyChile31%Higher37%Secondary24%Primary only
HigherSecondaryPrimary onlyNever attendedOther or unclassified% of people aged 25 and over
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Average years of schooling
8.2 yrs
9.0 yrs10.4 yrs332nd of 346
Reached higher education
14.4%
18.7%31.1%312th of 346
School attendance, ages 6-17
100.0%
99.3%98.6%1st of 333
Continues to higher education · Of young secondary-school graduates, those enrolled in first-year undergraduate studies the following March. By the comuna of the school where they finished secondary school, which is the approximation to origin that Mineduc publishes.
55.3%
47.3%55.6%152nd of 331
See the other 17 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Women's schooling as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women in the territory completed fewer years than men. The census does not publish educational attainment split by sex at comuna level, so the higher-education gap is not in PuroChile: only the gap in years of schooling.
100.0%
102.5%99.8%231st of 346
Literacy rate
93.8%
94.8%97.8%307th of 346
Reached secondary education
33.0%
37.2%36.7%299th of 346
Primary education only
41.1%
34.4%24.1%35th of 346
Never attended school
6.43%
4.35%3.01%16th of 346
Average years of schooling, men · The census publishes this average over the population aged 18 or over and crosses age with sex only in five-year bands, so it is weighted by the population aged 15 or over of each sex. Rebuilt from the 346 comunas it gives 12.1 years, the same figure INE published for the country.
9.6 yrs
10.3 yrs12.1 yrs294th of 346
Average years of schooling, women · Same weight and same caveat as the figure for men.
9.6 yrs
10.5 yrs12.1 yrs325th of 346
Illiteracy · People aged 15 or over who say they cannot read or write.
6.17%
5.20%2.18%40th of 345
Households lacking schooling
38.8%
27.2%15.1%29th of 335
Secondary school leavers · Secondary education for children and young people, by the comuna of the school where they took it. Adults are counted apart.
103
2,825217,565231st of 331
Leaves from technical-vocational school · Commercial, industrial, technical, agricultural and maritime tracks.
25.2%
46.8%33.9%236th of 331
Leaves from a rural school · By the school's own rural classification. A zero here is a measured zero —the comuna had a graduating class and none of its graduates came from a rural school—, not a cell without data: two in three comunas are in that situation. There is no continuation rate split by rural and urban because the median comuna's rural divisor does not reach thirty graduates.
0.0%
2.8%3.1%114th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a university · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
64.9%
66.0%67.2%142nd of 331
Of those continuing, enters a professional institute · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
8.8%
16.8%19.7%290th of 331
Of those continuing, enters a technical training centre · The three destinations split the same total and add up to 100.
26.3%
17.3%13.1%65th of 331
Of those continuing, studies outside their region · Compares the region of the school they graduated from with the region of the campus where they enrol. A campus is not necessarily where the student lives.
21.1%
34.6%13.0%121st of 331
Of those continuing, women · The graduates module does not publish sex, so there is no continuation rate by sex: only the make-up of those who do continue.
49.1%
55.1%49.7%211th of 331

The class of 2024

Mineduc (SIES), by the comuna they went to school in

Approximation: the comuna is the one this cohort was enrolled in for secondary school, which is what Mineduc publishes — not a home address, which it does not.

103left secondary school in 2024
57enrolled in a first-year programme in 2025
55.3%continued immediately
65%of those, to a university
21%of those, outside their region

The ten programmes they enrolled in most

0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria Civil IndustrialKinesiologiaObstetricia y PuericulturaPsicologiaTecnico Agricola y GanaderoTerapia Ocupacional
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%Ingenieria Civil IndustrialKinesiologiaObstetricia y PuericulturaPsicologiaTecnico Agricola y GanaderoTerapia Ocupacional
LonquimayChile

Each bar is that programme's share of everyone who continued, here and in the country — not a headcount, so a commune of a few hundred can be read beside a country of 121,050. Programme names as the register writes them: in capitals and without accents, and unmerged, since SIES publishes 1,481 distinct names in a single year and two spellings of one degree stay two rows. Only the capitals are undone here.

By field of study

0.0%20.0%40.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryAgriculture and veterinaryBusiness and lawSocial sciencesNatural sciencesEducationServices
0.0%20.0%40.0%Health and welfareEngineering and industryAgriculture and veterinaryBusiness and lawSocial sciencesNatural sciencesEducationServices
LonquimayChile

The ten broad fields of ISCED-F 2013, as SIES classifies each programme, as a share of everyone who continued, here and in the country.

Nineteen cohorts, 2006–2024

05010015020062015202410357
05010015020062015202410357
left secondary schoolenrolled the following year

Only enrolment the following March counts — someone who works for a year and starts after that is not here, so the rate is a floor under how many ever study, not an estimate of it. Adult secondary education is counted separately and is not in these figures. What the approximation above does not settle is catchment: this is the cohort Lonquimay's schools taught, and where schools draw pupils from next door that is not the same set of children as the ones the territory raised.

The hospital figures come from DEIS's discharge register: one row per completed stay, in any establishment in the country, counted in the commune where the patient lives rather than where the hospital is. It counts stays, not people — someone admitted three times is three of them.

The deaths it records are the ones that happened during a stay. Deaths at home or in the street are in the vital statistics register, which is a different DEIS release and is not in PuroChile — so nothing here is this place's mortality, and every label says «hospitalaria» for that reason.

The two standardised ratios are the ones meant for comparing places: they hold Lonquimay against what its own age and sex structure would produce at the country's rates, with Chile fixed at 100. A commune of older people buries more people than a commune of young families, and that is demography, not health.

In 2024, 7.5% of the country's discharges arrive with every identifying field replaced by an asterisk and cannot be attached to any commune; what is counted here is the 91.4% that carries one.

Which health system

Lonquimay98%FonasaChile83%Fonasa13%Isapre
Lonquimay98%FonasaChile83%Fonasa
FonasaIsapreOther system or undeclared% of the population counted
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Disability prevalence
9.7%
14.0%10.6%276th of 346
Public health insurance
98.3%
94.7%82.6%11th of 335
Hospital discharges per 1,000 residents · Not age-adjusted. It mixes how much illness there is with how much hospital there is nearby.
108.0
99.982.520th of 331
In-hospital mortality, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
84
131100191st of 331
See the other 21 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
People with a disability
997
28,9781,950,388283rd of 346
Average age, people with a disability
61.2 yrs
58.8 yrs56.4 yrs55th of 346
Disability among 65+
51.4%
46.7%43.0%55th of 346
Difficulty walking
4.18%
6.72%4.92%283rd of 346
Difficulty seeing
4.43%
6.86%4.58%258th of 346
Difficulty hearing
2.60%
3.23%2.16%163rd of 346
Difficulty concentrating
1.91%
3.18%2.70%318th of 346
Private health insurance
0.5%
2.4%13.2%301st of 335
No health coverage
0.00%
0.09%1.98%279th of 335
Sought care when ill · Of those who had an illness or accident in the last three months.
88.6%
90.9%92.1%256th of 332
Households lacking health access
3.5%
3.6%6.0%227th of 335
Hospital discharges · Episodes, not people: someone hospitalised three times counts three times.
1,107
20,6531,523,716192nd of 331
Deaths during a hospital stay · Only those that happen in hospital; the rest do not go through this register.
19
62936,698242nd of 331
In-hospital case fatality · Of every 100 hospital stays, how many end in death.
1.72%
3.05%2.41%298th of 331
Average length of stay · Bed-days over discharges, averaged after adding up.
5.9 days
6.6 days6.1 days229th of 331
In-hospital deaths per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted, and therefore high where the population is older.
18.5
30.419.9179th of 331
Hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex.
129
11710020th of 331
Cancer hospitalisations · Discharges with a malignant tumour (C00-C97) as the main diagnosis. Episodes, not people.
64
1,04989,723196th of 330
Share of hospitalisations that are for cancer · Of every 100 discharges in the comuna, how many are for a malignant tumour.
5.8%
5.1%5.9%152nd of 330
Cancer hospitalisations per 10,000 residents · Not age-adjusted: above all it compares how old the comuna is.
62.5
50.848.621st of 330
Cancer hospitalisation, standardised ratio · Chile = 100, adjusting for this comuna's age and sex. It is the only one of the four made for comparing places.
123
9610024th of 330

What people are hospitalised for

Heart and lungs 26%Digestive and urinary tract 22%Injuries, bones and skin 18%Tumours, blood and… 10%Infections and ot… 9.7%Mind, ner… 8.0%Pregnancy… 6.0%Respiratorysystem16%Circulatorysystem9.4%Digestive system14%Genitourin…system8.1%Injuries and poisoning12%Musculoskel…3.3%Skin2.8%Cancers andtumours6.7%Endoc…andmetab…2.5%Blood…Ill-de…sympto…3.4%Conta…withhealt…3.3%Infec…andparas…2.9%Mental andbehavioural5.6%NervoussystemPregnancyandchildbirth5.5%
Heart and lungs 26%Digestive and urin… 22%Injuries, b… 18%Tumours, bloo… 10%Infections a… 9.7%Mind,… 8.0%Pregn… 6.0%Respiratorysystem16%Circula…system9.4%Digestivesystem14%Genito…system8.1%Injuries andpoisoning12%Musculo…3.3%Skin2.8%CancersandtumoursEndoc…andmetab…Blood…Ill-d…sympt…3.4%Conta…withhealt…3.3%Infe…andpara…Mentalandbehavi…5.6%Pregnancyandchildbirth
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSeven families of cause, grouped by PuroChile from the 22 ICD-10 chapters. The chapter is still the tile; the family is nothing but the sum of its chapters.

By tumour site

Órganos digestivos38%Sitios reservados31%Sangre y sistemalinfático22%Genitalesmasculinos9.4%
Órganos digestivos38%Sitiosreservados31%Sangre y sistema linfático22%Genitalesmasculinos9.4%
Órganos digestivosSitios reservadosSangre y sistema linfáticoGenitales masculinoshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile

Economy and poverty

See all →
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Income poverty · People in households whose income does not cover the poverty line.
45.7%
31.7%17.3%6th of 335
Average monthly pay · Reported net pay in UF divided by workers weighted by months worked.
25.7 UF
23.0 UF32.0 UF95th of 342
Women's pay as share of men's · 100 means parity; below 100, women earn less per full-time-equivalent job.
96.6%
110.5%78.9%190th of 342
Firms per 1,000 residents · Firms with their registered address or head office in the territory; in comunas where large firms are registered the figure reflects the head office, not the activity.
67.2
74.485.6242nd of 346
See the other 16 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Employment rate · Employed people over the population aged 15 or over.
36.5%
43.9%54.4%340th of 345
Census unemployment · Measured by the Census, not by Casen: the two ask differently.
13.3%
11.2%8.6%10th of 345
Self-employed
38.6%
32.1%33.8%103rd of 345
Extreme poverty
16.4%
15.5%6.9%22nd of 335
Multidimensional poverty · Households with deprivations in education, health, work, housing or networks.
23.3%
14.1%17.7%77th of 335
Unemployment rate
38.4%
12.2%8.8%1st of 335
Household income per capita · Chilean pesos per month, corrected total income.
CLP 407,838
CLP 456,768CLP 783,124308th of 335
Gini coefficient · 0 is a perfectly equal split and 1 a perfectly unequal one. On household per-capita income (ypchtotcor). A survey estimate: in comunas with a small sample the interval is wide.
0.498
0.4800.48835th of 321
Registered firms
689
15,3821,582,390271st of 346
Annual sales
729,815 UF
40,427,136 UF34,347,683,688 UF307th of 342
Employees reported · People reported at some point in the tax year, not average employment: the national total exceeds the employed because someone who worked two months counts the same as someone who worked twelve.
1,193
50,2679,699,164288th of 346
Sales per firm
1,059 UF
2,628 UF21,706 UF332nd of 342
Employees per firm · Workers weighted by months worked, so two half-year jobs are not counted as two positions.
1.3
2.13.9299th of 346
Women among employees
55.0%
44.4%40.6%14th of 345
Independent contractors
968
16,0623,958,269245th of 346
Contractors as share of workers
44.8%
24.2%29.0%29th of 346

Employment by industry

State and social services 38%Trade and logistics 19%Industry and cons… 17%Natural resources 17%Other se… 4.4%Advanced… 4.1%Education16%Public administration14%Health7.7%Retail and wholesale11%Accommodat…and food4.5%Transport3.8%Construction11%Manufacturi…4.2%WaterandwasteElectri…Agriculture and fishing16%Domest…work2.4%Otherservic…Arts…Admin…servi…1.9%Pro…ser…
State and social services 38%Trade and … 19%Industry and c… 17%Natural resour… 17%Education16%Publicadministration14%Health7.7%Retail andwholesale11%Accomm…andfood4.5%Transp…3.8%Construct…11%Manuf…4.2%Wat…andwas…Agriculture andfishing16%Dome…workOth…ser…Art…Adm…ser…Pro…ser…
hover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itSix activity families, grouped by PuroChile from CAENES.

Employment by occupation

Skilled occupations 52%Managers and professionals 24%Elementary occupations 21%Service and sales21%Craft andtrades13%Plant and machineoperators6.4%Skilledagricultu…6.0%Clericalsupport5.1%Professionals13%Technicians8.5%ManagersElementary occupations21%Arm…for…
Skilled occupations 52%Managers and profes… 24%Elementary occupatio… 21%Service andsales21%Craft andtrades13%Plant andmachineoperatorsSkilledagricul…6.0%Cleri…suppo…5.1%Profession…13%Technici…8.5%ManagersElementaryoccupations21%
Elementary occupationsArmed forceshover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itCIUO-08 (ISCO) skill levels.

Housing and services

See all →

House or flat

Lonquimay99%HouseChile79%House20%Flat
Lonquimay99%HouseChile79%House20%
HouseFlatOther dwelling type% of private dwellings
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Overcrowded dwellings
8.9%
5.8%5.7%23rd of 345
Internet access
79.7%
84.3%93.2%309th of 345
Average distance to a facility with an emergency service · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
9.0
4.02.337th of 345
Average distance to a school teaching upper secondary · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
13.8
4.01.619th of 345
See the other 35 indicators
IndicatorValueAgainst its peersProvinceChileRank
Occupied dwellings with residents
3,739
74,8356,408,172254th of 346
Critically overcrowded
0.16%
0.29%0.57%316th of 345
Irrecoverable dwellings
1.15%
1.30%1.13%164th of 345
Public water network
50.4%
78.7%92.3%326th of 345
Electricity access
96.8%
98.3%99.6%328th of 345
Detached houses
99.1%
98.2%78.7%105th of 345
Apartments
0.0%
0.8%19.9%247th of 345
Precarious wall materials
0.30%
0.29%0.23%100th of 345
Unoccupied private dwellings
29.4%
12.9%11.9%64th of 345
Quantitative housing deficit
158
3,658491,904278th of 345
Housing deficit as share of households
4.2%
4.8%7.5%270th of 345
Renting households
10.2%
14.2%26.2%288th of 345
Owner-occupiers
79.8%
72.0%61.1%10th of 345
Households heating with wood · Firewood is the main source of urban air pollution in the south.
97.8%
88.0%24.4%1st of 345
Commute by public transport
15.6%
22.7%42.1%296th of 345
Walks to work
35.9%
21.3%10.2%22nd of 345
Households with a computer
28.9%
37.5%54.9%328th of 345
Average distance to any health facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
4.1
1.71.122nd of 345
People within 5 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
64.6%
90.7%97.0%331st of 345
People within 15 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
99.4%
99.9%99.9%287th of 345
People within 30 km of any health facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
46.0%
74.3%89.4%285th of 345
People within 15 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
78.1%
93.3%98.1%306th of 345
People within 30 km of a facility with an emergency service · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
95.3%
99.7%99.7%311th of 345
Average distance to a second- or third-level facility · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in September 2026. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
79.6
18.55.921st of 345
People within 5 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
43.2%80.3%194th of 345
People within 15 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
50.9%90.0%249th of 345
People within 30 km of a second- or third-level facility · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in September 2026.
0.0%
78.0%96.2%306th of 345
Average distance to a school in operation · Population-weighted average of the straight-line distance from each of the 244,754 blocks and rural entities of the 2024 census to the nearest facility standing in 2025. It is a floor: nobody travels in a straight line.
3.2
1.20.622nd of 345
People within 5 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
77.2%
95.2%99.0%328th of 345
People within 15 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
99.1%
99.9%99.9%301st of 345
People within 30 km of a school in operation · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
100.0%
100.0%100.0%1st of 345
People within 5 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 5 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
37.3%
73.4%91.6%318th of 345
People within 15 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 15 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
62.9%
93.0%98.5%324th of 345
People within 30 km of a school teaching upper secondary · Lives in a census block or rural entity within 30 km of the nearest facility, as the crow flies. Population from the 2024 census; facilities as they stood in 2025.
78.9%
98.9%99.8%330th of 345

How people commute

On foot or by bicycle 40%Private vehicle 38%Public transport 16%Othe… 5.7%Walking36%BicycleCar38%Public transport16%Other4.2%Boat
On foot or by bicycle 40%Private vehicle 38%Public transport 16%Other… 5.7%Walking36%BicycleCar38%Public transport16%Other4.2%
Public transporthover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour modes, grouped by PuroChile.

Housing tenure

Owned 80%Rented 10%Provided… 7.6%Owned outright79%Rented, withcontract5.3%Rented, nocontract4.9%Provided byfamily5.2%Provided by…Other…
Owned 80%Rented 10%Provided ren… 7.6%Owned outright79%Rented, withcontractRented, nocontractProvided byfamilyProv…byempl…Otherarra…
Otherhover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour tenure types, grouped by PuroChile.

Home heating fuel

Wood and biomass 99%Firewood98%
Wood and biomass 99%Firewood98%
ElectricityNo heatingOther sourcehover a tile for its count and its distance from Chile; click a group to open itFour fuel types, grouped by PuroChile.

How it voted in 2025

TRICEL · qualified result
71.8%
of the registered voted in the first round
71.0%
voted in the runoff
12,033
registered voters on the roll
6.0%
of runoff ballots were null or blank

Presidential runoff · 14 December

Jeannette Jara Roman26.3%41.7%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist73.7%58.3%
LonquimayChileshare of the valid vote

Presidential, first round · 16 November

Franco Parisi Fernandez21.0%19.8%
Jeannette Jara Roman17.4%26.7%
Marco Antonio Enriquez-Ominami Gumucio0.8%1.2%
Johannes Kaiser Barents-Von Hohenhagen17.8%13.9%
Jose Antonio Kast Rist36.3%24.0%
Eduardo Antonio Artes Brichetti0.5%0.7%
Evelyn Matthei Fornet5.6%12.4%
Harold Mayne-Nicholls Secul0.6%1.3%
LonquimayChileshare of the valid vote

Chamber of Deputies · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile22.5%30.6%
KCambio por Chile16.8%23.0%
JChile Grande y Unido44.6%21.1%
IPartido de la Gente6.3%12.0%
BVerdes, Regionalistas y Humanistas3.8%6.9%
DIzquierda Ecologista Popular Animalista y Humanista—2.6%
APartido Ecologista Verde3.6%0.8%
EMovimiento Amarillos por Chile2.5%0.8%
GPartido Alianza Verde Popular—0.6%
FPartido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios—0.6%
HPopular—0.2%
Independents outside a pact—0.7%
LonquimayChileshare of the valid vote

Senate · 16 November

CUnidad por Chile26.4%
KCambio por Chile31.2%
JChile Grande y Unido20.6%
IPartido de la Gente8.0%
APartido Ecologista Verde8.6%
Independents outside a pact5.2%
Lonquimayshare of the valid vote

Sister communes

How this is computed

The four communes that most resemble Lonquimay across the 28 figures PuroChile publishes for the 345 communes with complete data, grouped into seven dimensions of equal weight. This is not proximity: nothing in the computation knows where any commune is.

ScalePopulation structureMigrationEducationHealthEconomyHousing and services

The figure beside each name is the distance between the two communes: 0 would be identical, and 1.48 is what separates any two communes in the country. Each bar is one of the seven dimensions, and reaches the end when the two differ on it by twice what two communes picked at random do. Location is not part of the computation: 52% of these pairings cross into another region.

Inside the commune

Census districts
Loading